what does Hilary Clinton have to hide by not releasing her server.
Mar 26, 2015 07:24:21 #
What would be the main talking point the republicans would want to establish by so adamantly pursuing it.What could they possibly want to uncover that could be revelant to the peoples interest,or business.possibly a negotiation of some sort without the consent of the administration.
Mar 26, 2015 07:50:06 #
dongreen76 wrote:
What would be the main talking point the republicans would want to establish by so adamantly pursuing it.What could they possibly want to uncover that could be revelant to the peoples interest,or business.possibly a negotiation of some sort without the consent of the administration.
She likely has nothing to hide but personal communication with her daughter and friends. By telling the republicans to pound sand she is effectively rattling the cages of ill tempered louts that she dosnt give a damn about. The folks with their panties in a bunch over the emails already h**e her and are working to harm her so she has no reason to appease them. They just don't matter to her.
Mar 26, 2015 08:05:39 #
dongreen76 wrote:
What would be the main talking point the republicans would want to establish by so adamantly pursuing it.What could they possibly want to uncover that could be revelant to the peoples interest,or business.possibly a negotiation of some sort without the consent of the administration.
She wants to hide the same thing she and Obama need hidden to protect themselves--the t***h.
Mar 26, 2015 12:59:05 #
Ah C'Mon you can do better than.What are they trying to be suggestive of, Kevyn ? Can I see your hand.
Mar 30, 2015 18:22:11 #
Whats this? Hilary Clinton can be suspected of violating the LOGAN ACT and the "REDS" have ,she's persecuted and they're not.
May 17, 2015 03:48:29 #
[quote=dongreen76]What would be the main talking point the republicans would want to establish by so adamantly pursuing it.What could they possibly want to uncover that could be revelant to the peoples interest,or business.possibly a negotiation of some sort without the consent of the administration.[/quoe] could they possibly be trying to find something s******nist, something mutinous, something in violation of the Logan act, as they did, and of course we're not prosecuted
May 17, 2015 07:39:49 #
dongreen76 wrote:
Whats this? Hilary Clinton can be suspected of violating the LOGAN ACT and the "REDS" have ,she's persecuted and they're not.
She did, they did not. that is why.
May 17, 2015 07:49:24 #
dongreen76 wrote:
What would be the main talking point the republicans would want to establish by so adamantly pursuing it.What could they possibly want to uncover that could be revelant to the peoples interest,or business.possibly a negotiation of some sort without the consent of the administration.
Quite simply she is protecting her privacy and that of her family and friends, why on earth should she make available to her enemy's her private communications between family and friends. She has archived all of her communications that were of an official nature made in her role as secretary of state, only a fool would cooperate with a witch hunt by their enemy's. Her response to the republicans whining demands should be a resounding "piss off!"
May 17, 2015 08:21:11 #
Kevyn wrote:
Quite simply she is protecting her privacy and that of her family and friends, why on earth should she make available to her enemy's her private communications between family and friends. She has archived all of her communications that were of an official nature made in her role as secretary of state, only a fool would cooperate with a witch hunt by their enemy's. Her response to the republicans whining demands should be a resounding "piss off!"
She is protecting nothing but herself and her political future. She, Obama, and Gruber count you as part of the stupid Americans who believe wh**ever they say and you never let them down.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.