Posts for: EmilyD
Dec 23, 2023 12:36:21 #
(Main)
pescado rojo wrote:
Have you noticed this bloviating, self-righteous refugee from a fertilizer factory was careful to include ZERO sources or cites while posting his drivel as fact?
People with big egos think they are so perfect that no one would ever dare question them. This clown thinks he should not have to bother to post links to back up his statements when everyone should KNOW that he is the authority on everything ... everywhere. šš
.
Dec 23, 2023 12:07:01 #
(Main)
kemmer wrote:
I didnāt use Paulās thing to slam anyone, although I do find you two hellfire sisters amusing if not sadly pathetic.
Then what did you mean when you said this???
I'll answer that: You were trying to slam martsiva.....
Dec 23, 2023 11:59:55 #
(Main)
Ricktloml wrote:
I will have to disagree. Trump could have gone hom... (show quote)
Well said!!!
Trump is about AMERICA!!!!!
...
Dec 23, 2023 11:52:56 #
Dec 23, 2023 11:35:55 #
(Main)
martsiva wrote:
'Or words to that effect'? Oh please quote those words!! Paul was referring to women trying to preach which they had no authority to do so!
Kemmer thinks what Paul said in the Bible gives kemmer the right to tell women to shut up...he couldn't have given a clearer example of how cherry picks the Bible!!!
...
Dec 23, 2023 11:11:07 #
(Main)
kemmer wrote:
Hahaha.... No, you silly girl, PAUL said it.
KJV: "But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence." RSV: "I permit no woman to teach or to have authority over men; she is to keep silent."
KJV: "But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence." RSV: "I permit no woman to teach or to have authority over men; she is to keep silent."
Yes, Paul said it....and YOU quoted him. You used something Paul said to slam a woman who was annoying you with the t***h.
Do you have a problem understanding this??? Maybe have that judge friend of yours explain it to you in simple terms so you can get it???
...
Dec 23, 2023 10:28:30 #
(Main)
kemmer wrote:
I love it when you start mindlessly flailing. Why don't you tell the fans about the problem you have with women being ministers and rabbis? 
Well...you said women should "shut up" in church, so I would think it would be an awfully quiet service if there's a female pastor conducting it. I don't have the problem with women being pastors......
You're the one who pointed it out!
...
Dec 23, 2023 09:53:45 #
(Main)
permafrost wrote:
Old warning and did not happen...
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/05/15/texas-border-migrant-encounters-title-42-drop/
Border migrant encounters have dropped by half since Title 42 ended, federal official says
Federal officials had about 10,000 encounters with migrants per day at the U.S.-Mexico border before the emergency health order ended late Thursday. Since Friday they have had about 5,000 encounters per day.
https://www.texastribune.org/2023/05/15/texas-border-migrant-encounters-title-42-drop/
Border migrant encounters have dropped by half since Title 42 ended, federal official says
Federal officials had about 10,000 encounters with migrants per day at the U.S.-Mexico border before the emergency health order ended late Thursday. Since Friday they have had about 5,000 encounters per day.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12881409/More-12-600-cross-southern-border-day-highest-HISTORY-migrant-record-smashed-Biden-thousands-waiting-Eagle-Pass.html
More than '14,000' cross the border in a day in in the highest 24-hour total in HISTORY
"U.S. apprehensions of migrants at the border hit a new record Monday, with at least 12,600 encounters during a period of just 24 hours.
Published: 10:44 EST, 19 December 2023 | Updated: 12:33 EST, 20 December 2023
The stunning spike comes as US Customs and Border Protection announced it would suspend rail operations at a pair of international crossings.
The agency pledged to continue to prioritize its 'border security mission' amid a situation it called 'evolving.'
The latest figures include 11,000 border apprehensions and an additional 1,600 migrants encountered at official points of entry, Fox News reported, based on CBP sources, edging past the prior record of 12,000 two weeks ago.
Texas Republican Rep. Tony Gonzales put the figure even higher, posting about the 'historic' numbers on X and saying there were 26,000 border crossers already in custody.
'Tuesday morning in Eagle Pass. 14,000+ crossed ILLEGALLY yesterday & 26,000+ already in custody - the HIGHEST in US history. Christmas Day will be WORSE. President Biden has abandoned border communities like mine,' wrote the lawmaker, who represents Hidalgo County.
CBP suspended the freight crossings in Eagle Pass and El Paso, Texas, in order to shift staffing to deal with the surging number of migrants.
Vehicular and pedestrian crossings at ports in San Ysidro, Calif., Lukeville, Ariz., and Eagle Pass, Texas have also been shut down in recent weeks.
The closures come as i*****l m*****t apprehensions in December are already up 30 percent over November. Last month the U.S.-Mexico border saw 130,000 attempts to cross unlawfully in the first 17 days of the month and there have been 167,000 attempts so far in December, according to NewsNation.
'After observing a recent resurgence of smuggling organizations moving migrants through Mexico via freight trains, CBP is taking additional actions to surge personnel and address this concerning development, including in partnership with Mexican authorities,' CBP said in a statement.
Texas Governor Greg Abbott on Monday set himself on a collision course with Joe Biden as he enacted sweeping powers to deal with the migrant crisis.
The laws will enable cops to arrest i*****l m*****ts and allow judges to boot them back across the Mexico border. The Republican governor said it could slash the number of crossings by up to three quarters - but the Biden administration is bound to attack its constitutional legality.
It comes as 2,000 migrants are crossing the frontier everyday, with Texas bearing the brunt of the crisis. Biden has failed to confront the spiraling humanitarian disaster at the border and even received criticism from within Democratic ranks.
Opponents have called Abbott's measure the most dramatic attempt by a state to police immigration since a 2010 Arizona law - denounced by critics as the 'Show Me Your Papers' bill - that was largely struck down by the US Supreme Court.
The law will likely face a quick legal challenge by the White House, which has pushed back on the Governorās previous attempts to reduce the flow of migrants.
The law, known as SB4, takes effect in March and allows any Texas law enforcement officer to arrest people who are suspected of entering the country illegally. Those who re-enter face penalties ranging from 180 days in jail to 20 years in prison.
Abbott, who signed the law in front of a section of border fence in Brownsville, Texas, predicted the number of people crossing illegally into Texas would drop by 'well over 50 percent, maybe 75 percent.' He did not offer evidence for such an estimate.
Once in custody, i*****l m*****ts could either agree to a Texas judge's order to leave the US or be prosecuted on misdemeanor charges of illegal entry.
Migrants who don't leave could face arrest again under more serious felony charges.
Abbott accused the White House of doing 'nothing to halt i*****l i*********n.'
'Joe Biden's deliberate inaction has decimated America,' Abbott said.
'The consequences of [the new law] are so extreme that the people being smuggled by the cartels, they will not want to be coming into the state of Texas,' he said.
Abbott claimed 8million people have crossed the border illegally since Biden, a Democrat, took office in January 2021.
Abbott defended the new law as constitutional, saying Texas had been left to 'fend for itself.' Typically, immigration policy and enforcement have been the responsibility of the federal government. But several southern governors have taken the matter into their own hands saying Biden has dropped the ball.
Abbott said the bill passed by the Republican-majority Texas state legislature last month was needed to 'stop the tidal wave of illegal entry into Texas.'
Abbott said the bill makes it a 'criminal offense for illegal entry into Texas from a foreign nation.
'For repeat offenders it creates the offense of illegal reentry with a potential prison sentence term of up to 20 years,' he said.
The bill also 'provides a mechanism to order an i*****l i*******t to return to the foreign nation from which they entered,' he said.
Migrant crossings have remained at roughly 2,000 per day within the Del Rio Sector with most of those being encountered Venezuelans, Hondurans and Colombians."
(There's more to the article....)
Dec 23, 2023 06:01:28 #
(Main)
kemmer wrote:
The Bible didnāt even know what gay meant. In any case, no gay male partner would ever āplayā woman. Thatās the best part of gay partnerships: one can be both a āpitcherā AND a ācatcherā. š
Using Paul and the Bible as an excuse for lying is pretty despicable!
You are in real trouble.
Have you started hissing yet?
Dec 23, 2023 05:48:39 #
(Main)
tomhoff24 wrote:
And why did Trump change from a Democrat to a Republican?! Or just a trumper!
Because he wanted to run for president. It didnāt matter to him which party it took to do thatā¦as long as he could work on the problems that America was facing.
Thatās the difference between Trump, who loves our country, and the rest of them, who love money and power. Trump already had both money and power BEFORE running for president.
Dec 22, 2023 21:58:57 #
(Main)
kemmer wrote:
Hahahaā¦..Your hilarious and futile efforts at denial are what I come to expect from you.
Liar. You said what you said to slam a woman whose views you don't like.
If women are supposed to "shut up" in church....how do female Pastors do their jobs??? Hmmmm??
This is what I believe the Bible's intentions were when mentioning women being respectful to men in church:
In marriage, husbands and wives are to submit to one another, yet there are g****r specific expressions: husbands model themselves in their relationship with their wives after Jesusā sacrificial love for the church. And wives model themselves in relationship with their husbands after the churchās willingness to follow Jesus.
In the church, men and women serve as partners in the use of their gifts in ministry. Women can serve as ushers, pray, read Scripture, worship leaders, etc., while seeking to uphold New Testament norms which teach that the lead preacher's role in the gathered church and the elder's roles are for qualified men. The vision of the Bible is an equal partnership of men and women in creation, in marriage, in salvation, in the gifts of the Spirit and in the ministries of the church but exercised in ways that honor g****r as described in the Bible.
I sincerely believe that women should be restricted from being church pastors because of this belief.
And there is nothing in the bible about how one gay man should take the role of men and his gay sexmate should take the role of women in the church....because the Bible says that kind of relationship is an a*********n.
*****************
But telling a woman that she should "shut up" because you don't like the view she is expressing, and then trying to walk it back by saying it wasn't you, it was Paul who said it, is a low-down, cheap insult - to both the woman AND Paul!!
Dec 22, 2023 21:32:37 #
(Main)
Haski123 wrote:
Emily didnāt read the process and was corrected. S... (show quote)
You are lying about what you said!! You said that Trump was ranked 41 out of 45 TWICE, without saying the ranking was just from one term of office! You were trying to make it look worse by saying that Trump was "ranked 41 of 45 by historians" WITHOUT mentioning that it was only the one term they were ranking!!!
I was not "corrected" - I told you historians would not rank a president's HISTORY until after he was done making that history....after the president was dead and his history could then be told! You tried to walk back your two statements!! I stand by every syllable I wrote in response to you attempt to smear Trump like you have done umpteen times on this forum!
I even saved the information I looked up because I thought you wouldn't let it go, and sure enough, here you are lying about it what you said!
You said for me to "look it up" Well I did. I looked up exactly what you said to look up: "historians ranking of presidents" and these are the links I found regarding how historians rank presidents. Neither one of them mentions that they do it by each term the president serves - I couldn't FIND anything that said that HISTORIANS rank presidents that way. These are the things I found:
https://www.bostonglobe.com/2022/08/13/nation/chart-how-do-historians-rank-us-presidents/
"The rankings are based on survey responses from 141 p**********l scholars, historians, and political scientists who rated each president using a scale of 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent) on 20 different measures, from their background to their ability to avoid crucial mistakes, and more."
https://news.gallup.com/opinion/polling-matters/176426/science-ranking-presidents.aspx
"But we're interested here in views of presidents from the people's perspective. Rather than asking Americans to retrospectively choose the best and worst presidents, I think a method using contemporaneous polling has some significant advantages. We can examine the job approval ratings earned by each of the 12 presidents who have served since World War II while they were in office, and from that create a list of the best and the worst -- as evaluated by their constituents. This equalizes any recency bias, since all ratings were obtained while the president was in the White House -- giving us an excellent focus on what people thought about them at the time they were doing their job.
This method, too, has its issues, of course. Many argue that the "greatness" of a president may not be known for years or decades to come. Many presidents themselves like to think this is the case, since it provides them a convenient mental way out of the dissonance created by low ratings while in office. George W. Bush comes to mind here. He is able to sidestep questions about his administration by opining that only history will eventually judge how he did -- presumably after he dies. Similarly, there is a five-year waiting period before baseball players can be elected to the Hall of Fame, presumably to let the sports writers who v**e have more time to contemplate just how long-lasting their contributions and achievements were. Still, even in this process, the baseball Hall of Fame v**ers take mostly into account how well the players did while on the field -- batting averages, wins and losses, fielding percentages, ERAs, and so forth."
Here are the two times you wrote what you wrote verbatim....you cannot argue with YOUR OWN WORDS, liar.
Dec 22, 2023 18:58:42 #
(Main)
tomhoff24 wrote:
One thing you and I as conservatives have to believe and remember. Trump is about Trump.He is not about the Republican Party
Trump SHOULD be about Trump! No one should be all about a single party! And one thing Trump is NOT is all about Republicans.
You probably don't want to remember this, but Trump did not commit to the Republican party until they had nominated him to run in 2016! He told them he was not going to sign a pledge to run as Republican until they did that! He could have easily been a Democrat president. Wouldn't THAT have been interesting!!!
Trump is more a pragmatist than a politician. He wants to FIX America...not be a spokesperson for a poliltical party!
Dec 22, 2023 18:24:38 #
(Main)
kemmer wrote:
š. Some of my best friends are women; two were at my house for dinner last night.
You need to talk to someone about your irrational hatreds.
You need to talk to someone about your irrational hatreds.
YOU said it! Right here in black and white. And you didn't say it because Paul said it....you said it because you didn't like what a woman - martsiva - said to you here! You can't hide your lies, pal.
Do your women friends know what you just said about women needing to keep their mouths shut??
Dec 22, 2023 17:58:36 #
(Main)
kemmer wrote:
Among other things, he cautioned people not to marry unless they were super horny (or words to that effect) because Jesus was due back any minute.
He also told women to keep their mouths shut in church.
He also told women to keep their mouths shut in church.
Along with Jesus, you just slammed marriage and women - all in two sentences!
A good Christian man would not say something like that about women in general.
What is it that happened to you to h**e women so much?
..