One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Nickolai
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1339 1340 1341 1342
Apr 2, 2014 12:47:03   #
Do you understrand how a story told orally can change over time. working in a sizeable shop I've told a storyand three months later somebody else would tell me the same story with differant spins on it. Everybody that heard the story would hear it a little differantly and put their own spin on it. Immagine how stories can be told and legends grow over centuries or millinea.

For instance the story of moses was told and retold long before a written language was developed . The only writtren language of the time in that part of the world was Egyption hieroglyphcs. The history of anchient Egypt is written in this form on walls of their tombs, Temples, and Palaces, And there is no record of Jewish s***es in Egypt or of an Egytptian army being swallowed in the Red Sea. And not a shred of evidence of 600,000 Jews wandereing in the Sanai dessert fof 40 years
Go to
Apr 2, 2014 01:57:16   #
The ark is just one of a very great number of contradictions n the Bible. It is a collection of allegorical books crafted to convey a moral teaching. It is filled with discrepancy's, contradictions, and absurdities. Such as Bats are birds, and dead people can be resurrected. And a man can live in the belly if a whale.
Go to
Apr 1, 2014 23:39:02   #
The Dutchman wrote:
The C*******t States of America
Matt Barber Mar 31, 2014 Matt Barber

A preferred ploy of left-wing change agents is to ridicule critics when they point out the undeniable parallels between the goals of today’s “progressive” movement, to include the Democratic Party in general, and the goals of the early, and very much still alive, c*******t movement.

If, for instance, one mentions the historical fact that nearly every adult who, at any time, was in any position of influence over a young, soon-to-be-radicalized Barry Soetoro was an avowed c*******t, to include his own parents, then one is immediately mocked and dismissed as a neo-McCarthyite hack pining for the bygone days of the Red Scare. This is an evasive, ad hominem strategy employed by those who are caught, for lack of a better word, red-handed.

To all this I say, if the jackboot fits, wear it. If it quacks like a c****e and goose-steps like a c****e, then a c****e it is.

There are multiple layers within “progressivism’s” pseudo-utopian, truly dystopian Marxist philosophy. The left’s lust for redistributionist statism is well-known. Less understood, however, is the “progressive” rush toward cultural Marxism.

Cultural Marxism entails, among other things, that secularist aspect of left-wing statist ideology that seeks, within society, to supplant traditional values, norms and mores with postmodern moral relativism. Cultural Marxists endeavor to scrub America of her Judeo-Christian, constitutional-republican founding principles, and take, instead, a secular-statist Sharpie to our beloved U.S. Constitution.

Historian and U.S. military affairs expert William S. Lind describes cultural Marxism as “a branch of western Marxism, different from the Marxism-Leninism of the old Soviet Union. It is commonly known as ‘m**************m’ or, less formally, Political Correctness. From its beginning, the promoters of cultural Marxism have known they could be more effective if they concealed the Marxist nature of their work, hence the use of terms such as ‘m**************m.’”

Pastor, attorney and Massachusetts gubernatorial candidate Scott Lively is globally admired by liberty-loving traditionalists. Conversely, he’s universally reviled by cultural Marxists. He drills down a bit deeper: “Cultural Marxism is a variation of the Marxist strategy to build a utopian socialist order on the ashes of Christian civilization, but through subversion of the moral culture, especially the elimination of the natural family, rather than solely through destruction of capitalism.”
The C*******t States of America br Matt Barber Ma... (show quote)






When I was a young fellow I bought into the idea of conservative Libertarianism because it seemed to make the best sense at the time. But I was compleatly naive and limited understanding from an historical perspective. As it turns out Libertarianism is based on myth and fantasy theory.


Free market capitalism is the greatest engine of economic growth in human history is the most prevelent myth in Libertarian circles, and is easily disproved by a look at history.

The stunning growth of the 19 century had little to do with unregulated capitalism and more to the fact America was the most protectionest country in the world from 1830 up to WW ll. Every industrialized economy on the planate grew astronomically by strictly regulating markets.

As former head of the world bank Joseph Stiglitz points out, the countries that adopted free market reforms under IMF structural adjustment policies failed miserably and poverty acctually increased Chile being a prime example. Another myth I swallowed as a young fellow was "Private companies are more efficient because there is a profit " This is only true if profit is the only measurment of sucsess. Take health care as just one example. The US health care industry is extreamly good at delivering profit's but extreamly bad at delivering health care.


Another myth;
The rich need tax cuts to be encouraged to spend and creat economic growth in resessions; Trickle down is easily proved to have failed. miserbly.

The US has the highest standard of living in the world and every one wants to be American; Again provably false. The people who benifit from the highest living standard in the worfld is Norway, a highly socialistic country. America has one of the greatest levels of wealth ine******y in the west and have over 46 million people living in poverty.

America is a free market capitalist economy; The overall structure of the economy is anything but free, and the higher up the wealth ladder you get the more the government intervenes.
The t***h is that the middle class and poor live under the dictates of the market (if your small business fails, there’s no bailout), but the rich have a gigantic government structure designed to protect their wealth from competition. America has always first and foremost been about buisness. From the tobaco and cotten plantations of the south to the merchants of the north east
Go to
Apr 1, 2014 23:26:53   #
Under our existing system the cost of our health care eats up over 17 % of GDP, more than double any other civilized country, all of whom have some form of universal health care, yet near 50 million citizens have torely on hospital ER's the most costly and inefficient health care. The ACA is acctually a compromise between a single payer stystem with an overhead cost of around 3% and the now 20% overhead and profit of the market based ACA.
Go to
Apr 1, 2014 22:39:49   #
Tasine wrote:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Great beginning, Newbie :!: I always try to welcome newcomers here, but in the case where they come in on day one and smart mouthing people they don't know one teeny thing about strikes me as indescribably rude, crude, crass, and Progressive. It also leaves the impression with oldtimers that newbie is a plant. Are you a plant?


A plant? A plant for what. I'm a plant for no one just and old timer that is somewhat stunned by the h**emongers on the right on this site. Also a student of History. I'll be 8o years young in August and it seems that these young conservsatives have a lot to learn And thought I might be of help.
Go to
Apr 1, 2014 20:57:25   #
rumitoid wrote:
"Sheriff David A. Clarke has caused quite a stir in his home state of Wisconsin for suggesting that citizens take the prerogative to defend themselves, because the job of police is to investigate crime, not stop it."
The duty of police from its inception is, and as always advertized, to "protect and serve." This sheriff is promoting anarchy--vigilante consciousness--in prompting citizens to take matters into their own hands because he can't or won't do the job he is assigned. His attitude is utterly disgraceful. In effect he is saying die or get robbed and then I will help find the culprit. He is opting off the wall of providing safety for citizens in exchange for a desk after the fact of harm done. Vile!

That sheriff is the sociopath.
"Sheriff David A. Clarke has caused quite a ... (show quote)


I see the author is a graduate of Liberty University Jerry Falwell's school for ultra right wingnuts
Go to
Apr 1, 2014 17:53:52   #
MrEd wrote:
The reason the liberals have made it this far is simply because of the v****g blocks they keep under their control. The sooner these v****g blocks free themselves from the progressives the sooner they can stand on their own two feet. President Johnson said something to the effect that he would have the b****s v****g Democratic for the next 200 years. He h**ed b****s, but he was not above taking their v**es.

As for the police saying we need to defend ourselves, that has always been the case. They have stated on more then one occasion that they are not here to protect the individual, but society as a whole. That means they lock up the crooks when they catch them, but stopping crime is not what they are here for. They only catch the criminal after the fact. Which do you think is more effective, the gun in your hand, or the cop at the coffee shop????
The reason the liberals have made it this far is s... (show quote)


What LBJ actually said is that he thought he had just delivered the south to the Republican party for very long time. Bill Moyers page 167 of his 2004 book Moyers on America
Go to
Apr 1, 2014 16:36:01   #
I don't h**e any body. But in addition to company towns there were Hoovervilles when I was a kid and of course tennament houses. And lets not forget the Hobo jungles where teenage hookers risked disease, pregnacy, and death for as little as a dime. Ah-- the day's of laissez fair
Go to
Apr 1, 2014 16:28:26   #
The US is supposed to be above such medievil and primordial practices as torture. B ut I could be wrong.
Go to
Apr 1, 2014 16:24:20   #
I'm not offering solutions just making the point that the millions of cows on those feed lots fart a lot and that world meat consumpion increased from 47 million tons in1950 to 260 tons in 2005 and is expected to double by 2020 due to population growth. These trends will have major consequences on the global invironment. While meat production provides food and a livelyhood for our" i*****l A***ns " The growth in meat production mirriors the growth In world population which has trippled in my lifetime to 7. 222 billion and has added 20 million since Jan 1st 2014. and is having a severe impact on g****l w*****g as reported monday by the (IPCC)
Go to
Apr 1, 2014 14:49:46   #
We can be certain our conservative friends won't be happy until they can take the country back to the day's when working people lived in company towns and were paid in script that could only be spent at the company store with Charles and David Koch running the show.
Go to
Apr 1, 2014 14:34:40   #
I'm not suggesting any such nonsense just the fact that Cow flatulence contribute to Methane emissions. Another note! American Agribusiness grows enough grain to feed two billion people but half of that grain is used feed livestock. Cattle feed lots are huge where not a blade of grass grows and trucks laden with feed grain roar up and down the highway's
Go to
Apr 1, 2014 14:07:51   #
Methane is the second most important long-lived greenhouse gas. Approximately 40 % of methane is emitted into the atmosphere by natural sources (eg. termites wetlands ) and about 60 % comes from human activities such as cattle breeding, rice cultivation, f****l f**l exploitation, landfills and biomass burning. Atmospheric methane reached reached a new high of 1819 ppb in 2012 according to the "World Meteorological Organization." or 260 % of pre- industrial level, due to anthropogenic sources. Atmospheric methane is increasing again after a period of leveling off
Go to
Apr 1, 2014 13:38:06   #
An interesting book that references several University studies on the subject is "The Republican Brain" Why They Deny Science And Reality
Go to
Apr 1, 2014 13:26:51   #
Not all that were tortured were terrorist. Some were just caught in a net. The Spanish inquisition was about punishing people for heresy against the church and torturing them into naming others who were in it with them. Of course the torturee's would name anybody just to get them to stop this lasted from 1300 to 1800 until church authorities had to stop when they realized if they kept it up they would run out of people. That Information obtained by tourcher is unreliable should be obvious to anybody with rfeasonable inteligence.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1339 1340 1341 1342
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.