You seem to be ignoring the establishment's rights under the 14th Amendment. Also most intelligent people are aware of establishments that are not friendly to particular behaviors. And, perhaps service to those people go against the owner "better nature." Regarding public safety concerns, I only rolled with your comments. The Constitution was not written just to protect Negro, I******s, and Gays. It was written for the benefit of all CITIZENS of the US.

It is okay to discriminate against things that offend my sensibilities. We as humans do it all the time. I do not steal, k**l, I believe in one God, I did not c***t on my spouse even in thought (he passed away), I do not have idols of Gods in my home, I do not swear by the name of God, I loved, respected and prayed for both my parents that they should live long and happy lives, I will not go to court and lie for anyone, and finally there is nothing that my neighbor owns that I want for myself. Because someone else find it acceptable to do any of the above does not require me to. I will not obey any law that requires me to break or betray my ethics. So, if it offends my sensibilities as outlined, then yes I will be discriminatory and reject the actions or person.

The 14th Amended has been revisited many times and further the courts have interpreted the word "person" to include corporations. Therefore, they too are protected by "due process" along with being granted "equal protection."

AZ passes lots of laws that the liberal states call crazy and unconstitutional among other things. Right now they have a sheriff that has a monitor watching him everyday, it has not stopped him from picking up i******s or busting their safe houses or their drug houses. AZ dances to its own music. We will see if Brewer has what it takes to sign the bill. The other things you mentioned, I do not see how they are religiously connected. For example, it is already on the books that bars can refuse to sell drinks to someone intoxicated. On the books is a law that says, if a person appears unsanitary a food establishment can refuse service. So, unless a person came in shouting things about others that would make you to think they are a bigot, then how would you know? Unless a person came in with bible in hand and starts preaching how would you know they are Christian? Jewish people are different, we rarely go to establishments that are not kosher. If two men come in and they do not show outward signs of their sexual preference, then how would you know if they are gay?

Thank you. I could blame the computer, but I made the mistake and did not proffread my comment. Spelling was never a strong suite, I love math and science. An old computer engineer....it is not hard to spell 1 or 0. LOL

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Thank you for catching the mistake!

There are ample shops that only care about their profits that will service these individuals. The act of intercourse rarely takes place in public, however the displays of affection such as passionately kissing, inappropriate grouping of privates do occur.

I think that the laws that force employers to employment a ratio of minorities should be abolished. People should be hired due to capabilities and not the tone of their skin. Qualification, work ethic, and attendance, and so forth are few of the things that needs to be addressed. Skin tone, or lack thereof is unfair and unjust to those who are qualified. Do away with discrimination, allow store owners sell to those they want and allow hiring authorities hire the best candidate.

I do not judge people, it is not my job or any human's. I however, support the rights of establishments to have a belief system and they should not have to ignore their religion in support of laws or public opinion.

Turn the tables, sue the companies for age discrimination. You are over 50 and if you can prove they hired a less qualified person that is younger, you have a case. When you file, be sure to add in income you would have earned if you had been given equal consideration. Also, file for the anguish it has caused. Make a big deal of it, involve the news papers; even if you have to buy advertisement space, go to EOT of the company and show your evidence. Fair is fair.


http://www.ehow.com/how_2085775_file-age-discrimination-lawsuit.html

I guess I should have made my position clear. I hope that Brewer signs this into law and I further hope that it goes nationwide. No one, regardless of the business should have to cater to something that goes against their principals or their religious beliefs.

I am guilty of coping and pasting the article as it was written. Sorry if I mislead anyone.

I guess I should have made my position clear. I hope that Brewer signs this into law and I further hope that it goes nationwide. No one, regardless of the business should have to cater to something that goes against their principals or their religious beliefs.

I am guilty of coping and pasting the article as it was written. Sorry if I mislead anyone.

Hey, I guess you have not heard; all the people in jail are innocent. They were convicted because of corrupt juries, dishonest law enforcement, the law is wrong, or it was a r****t decision and they were just out to have some fun.

Ask any body that is serving time. Each one of them has an appeal going, at tax payer expense.

(CNN) -- Arizona's Legislature has passed a controversial bill that would allow business owners, as long as they assert their religious beliefs, to deny service to gay and lesbian customers.

http://www.cnn.com/2014/02/21/us/arizona-anti-gay-bill/index.html

It is on the governor's desk for signature.

I agree with you up to the point of having a gun under your pillow loaded and cocked. It could go off into the head of your significant other or it could go off and blow you away. Suggest that a bedside table would be safer for you and still in easy reach.

No worries. I think that the title to the topic caused many to believe that this was a white on black shooting. It would be odd to see such a title for a black on white shooting. I think the creator just wanted people to react badly and be horrified that another "cherished, youthful prankster, just out for a drive and not intending any harm was shot by a r****t bigot white because they had a loaded gun."

I do not think that Obama will claim this child, it was shot by a black man.

Detain them? More than likely these nice sweet Sunday School perfect children who were out for a cheerful drive searching for an elder to help across the street, or to rescue a family from their burning home probably was in the possession of their own weapon and had he try to detained them, he would be the one in the morgue.

Those geezers that paid into programs need to be left alone. Let us look at these programs, in particular the money being paid to i******s for disabilities which are f**ed to young people who are faking disabilities. Then look at the life time membership bums that never paid one cent in, but has taken advantage of the programs from birth. Once the i******s, f**ers, and the trash (include Negro and White),, are off the programs there will be more than enough funds to allow the retired (of all races), who WORKED and paid into the programs to live a fairly decent life.