One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: Boo_Boo
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 ... 1349 next>>
Feb 22, 2014 23:05:23   #
You seem to have a very personal interest in this, and you seem to know where they work. Just wondering, if you might want to confess something?

Brian Devon wrote:
If you eat in restaurants chances are you eat food made by gay people all the time. Not all gay people have obvious mannerisms that identify them as gay.

Do you usually go back into the kitchen and quiz the chefs on their sexual identity. If you did, do you think they would tell you. Sounds like you are a man struggling to deal with his own gay impulses....the J. Edgar Hoover-Vladimir Putin syndrome. You might consider psychotherapy...
Go to
Feb 22, 2014 18:03:32   #
Any e******n can be won if you are willing to bribe, lie, and issue bad checks....now those checks are beginning to bounce. What promises has he kept? None. How many lies has he told....every time he opens his mouth!

faithistheword wrote:
First thing--he will NEVER be MY president !
Everything he touches is garbage in my opinion. He is SO unqualified for president that it amazes me that he has even ONE defender. What kind of sick puppy would think he's doing a good job for the country ? He lies, he c***ts, he passes the buck, he's arrogant, he's ruined our reputation throughout the world, and he has brought us embarrassment in Moochelle. HOW DID WE SINK SO LOW ??
Go to
Feb 22, 2014 17:59:17   #
moose wrote:
Christy is a dumocrat in disguise. Obamacare has made clowns of the entire democratic socialist party

Right you are on him! He has taken up residence in Obama's .......... you can fill in the blank. The others you mentioned are solid performers!

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Feb 22, 2014 17:45:41   #
Ve'hoe wrote:
Really,,, so which way did you v**e?? Dem or repub.

Because the Govt took over student loans,, and they promised to simplify and "fair up" the process,,,, that hasn't happened huh?

Well,,, once (or twice) before the govt promised other things, (like to the Old Geezers whose money they took and gave to losers and welfare addicts for v**es) that they would take that money, and keep it safe, "Investing" it for them, so there would be a "safety net". Well that hasnt happened either.

I am sorry for your distress, but just imagine all the old "Geezers" whose money was taken,,, now being told it is gone!?! That is a pretty big FU!! I am on the tail end of the Baby Boomers, I doubt I will see a nickel of it,,,, but then I am Cheyenne Indian,,, I live on a reservation, and I learned NOT to trust the white mans govt,, cause they lie.


I may have indeed "been out of it awhile" but it doesnt sound as though you were ever really "in it" especially if this is the first realization that the govt is screwing you?? I think we old geezers have been telling you that for a while. Havent we?
Really,,, so which way did you v**e?? Dem or repu... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Go to
Feb 22, 2014 17:44:02   #
Dummy Boy wrote:
The sad thing is I make plenty of money I'm just tired of giving it to the whining geezers...I could bank 15K a year (which is what I pay to SSA, alone and 2300/yr to medicaid). Imagine investing 5K a piece (I have 3 kids) for just 15 years. NO Loans for college.
Oh, by the not everyone goes to Harvard and Harvard is an exception to the rule. It costs 25K annually to go to any of the big ten schools...been out of it for a while, eh???


And, just asking, but what would happen to the old geezers you are "paying?" Your mother, father, grandparents? Should we just allow them to become homeless? Should we turn our backs and allow them to starve? Should we just allow them to die because they do not have money for medical care? Does anyone remember that real old movie called Logan's Run? I think they are doing a remake, but in general, In a future where the masses are systematically put to death upon reaching a certain age, those who attempt to c***t death are dubbed “runners” and pursued by formidable operatives known as Sandmen. Logan is a Sandman who is fast approaching that fateful age, and when he decides to run, the stage is set for the ultimate chase. Good movie, dark under tones of solutions for dealing with the aging population. Perhaps this is your idea of how you can save money to put your kids through college. The thought of giving up your morning Latie with extra nonfat cream would after all be depriving you of a right.
Go to
Feb 22, 2014 17:20:37   #
cant beleve wrote:
Thats funny some ex boyfriends would take issue with that but I'm not going to defend my sinful nature it's something I'm no longer proud of for sure.


The really wonderful thing about the past, that it is the past. And a person can choose what they do right now and they can plan for tomorrow. It is what we do in the moment, the e******ns that you make this very second. The past teaches, the present sets the stage for tomorrow, and tomorrow is never assured. Do not feel shame for past offenses, wh**ever you did is behind you. For one, not to exclude others, but to me you are just fine the way you are. You can feel p***e for who you are ........ I could go on, but I hope you get my point.
Go to
Feb 22, 2014 16:17:32   #
Sorry for your inability to comprehend. I also understand that you want to press me into saying something unkind but it is not going to happen. If you do not have a real understanding, then you will need to look elsewhere for someone to tell you what you want to hear. I am not that person, however I wish you well.

V***l wrote:
I'm not one to just back away without having gained a real understanding.

You keep talking about living in a just society, but are then content to live in one that is not just. It doesn't compute. Why is this paradox acceptable?

I assume you mean that by defending my own kind, you are referring to Americans?
Go to
Feb 22, 2014 12:57:27   #
madshark wrote:
Let me help you, r****d. If two men come in together and order their wedding cake with little figures of two men on it, one could sarely assume they are homosexual. However, this is not a bill targeting homosexuals. It is a codification of a basic human right.

Our business or work product is a part of us. Inseperable as are our eyes, hands or feet. When a government orders us to surrender our work product, our humanity, to another, against our will, that government has dictates that we longer own ourselves. But rather, we are owned by that government. We are s***es to the government. This bill simply asserts that the citizens of the State of Arizona are free and sovereign to government.
Let me help you, r****d. If two men come in togeth... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

Well said!
Go to
Feb 22, 2014 12:46:59   #
Kevyn wrote:
I wonder what happens if this enlightened business person found B****s or Mexicans an "a*********n before his god" and refuses service if it will work out well for them. This law will be tossed by the federal courts in no time and the teabaggers who push this nonsense will go into full hissyfit mode. This brilliant legeslation will help push young v**ers further and further from the Republican party.


To fully appreciate the contents of the bill, you must read it first. It is on line, and to argue the contents without reading it is as foolhardy as being told that Obamacare is great, but the bill must be signed before you know what is in it. You can drive down the roads and see signs regarding i******s will not be served.... does that mean that they discriminate? It may interest you to know Arizona does not have a State law prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation in the areas accommodation, education, provision of goods and services and disposal of land, clubs and club members, sport and local government. Contained in the current law is protection for service providers. There already are laws that give some protection from government regulation to those who have sincerely held religious beliefs. This measure would extend those protections to those facing civil suits brought by individuals who say they’re the victims of discrimination. This law is directed and intended as a defense when someone files a law suite claiming discrimination due to sexual orientation. Historically, when someone filed a law suite claiming discrimination due to sexual orientation, the proprietor had no defense and it was an automatic win for the accuser. This law was written to correct or close that loop and restore a business' right to deny service to those participating in open homosexual activities that the proprietor finds offensive to their religious convictions.

Now, do I think that Brewer will sign it. No, it would send a message that AZ is hostile to homosexuals. This would hurt business, and with the up coming super bowl game being played in AZ....... Money will drive her to veto it.
Go to
Feb 22, 2014 11:44:00   #
Your comments are a lot to absorb. You will not accept it when a person offers you a soft way out of an unending dialogue and want to keep "fighting" until there is no soft way out of the situation. I am not of that nature. I still offer you an easy way out of agreeing that you and I will not agree.

However, I must address your concerns.

1. Do not feel badly because you were so caught up in your fever to defend your own kind that you failed to see the suttle hint that my belief system is different.
2. I fail to see how telling someone that service is not available is treating someone badly. Unless you think that the person may be starving and in immediate need of food. In that case, yes we are obligated to feed the stranger at no cost to them. However, AZ ranks in the top 20 of the state with the most obese people. That makes me think that there are not that many people starving to death in AZ. Also, in AZ cities, there is a eatery about every .10 mile. There are no lack of bakeries, bars, clothing outlets, and so on to sell to all people. Most will not concern themselves with those they service, their focus is on their income and profit.
3. Most Jewish people stay within their communities. We have never been treated well by non-Jewish, this has been going on from the time we left Egypt. Nothing has changed and nothing is likely to change. Therefore we have a tendency to stay within our own community and not try to tell others how to live their lives.
4. The death camps you speak of was a horrible spot on the world. The issue started in 1933 and the final solution was enacted in 1941. I could go into the history and point out that WWII was not a fight to free the people being murdered by the N**i, but that would be offensive to some. I can recommend several books, but due to your reaction to my last recommendation I will not encourage you to read or try to research.
5. Muslim have h**ed Jewish people from the 7th century. It is only recently that others have recognized that there may be a problem. And that problem only became of importance to most people on 9-11. They have had their laws regarding women from the origin of the religion. It is up to those people who believe as they do to change. It can not be done from outside.
6. We, speaking of Jewish people, do not convert others. We are raised to respect your beliefs and to understand as well as possible why your religion has evolved. I would not encourage any Christian, or for that matter any other religion, to convert. Historically, converting others has not worked out well for us. Let me give you a history lesson:

In the time of Abraham, Abraham did try to convert many people. He did this by having an open tent which allowed people from every direction to come and learn about Gd. Then, in the time of the Exodus from Egypt, the Jewish people again, accepted any converts who would come to the Jewish people and become part of the nation. In Jewish tradition these people were referred to as the "Eruv Rav" or the "Mixed multitudes of people" who did not come from the Israeli tribes, but who saw the miracles that happened in Egypt and wanted to attach themselves to Gd.

Traditionally, the Eruv Rav was the source of many bad things that the Jewish people did. Some explain, that this happened because while they were awed and inspired by Gd, they were not truly loyal to the Jewish people.

Jump forward a few hundred years, and before the time of Christianity, the leaders of the Jewish state, were fighting a war with the Idumeans. After winning the war, and being tired of the constant fighting over generations, the leaders decided to convince the Idumeans to all convert to Judaism. They did so, and centuries later, some Jews of Idumean decent (namely King Herod) attached themselves to Rome, became leaders of Israel and were very cruel to the Jewish people. Again, their loyalty to the Jewish people was questioned.

So Jews in general, do not like mass conversions of people who are joining the "winning team". There is a question of their loyalty to Judaism and the Jewish people. In other religions like Christianity and Islam, this is not such a big deal, because those are religions made up of many nations, while Judaism is a religion only made up of a single nation. You can't be Jewish and not be part of the Jewish People.

On another level, we are not concerned about losing many members, or not having enough Jews around. In the Torah, Gd says not to count the Jewish people directly, or else a plague will come about. We are also promised that we will be an eternal nation. We will never die out. Because of this promise, and a general statement that our numbers should not really be counted (except when absolutely needed, like to build community projects or help the poor) there is no concern that we are "too small", or that other groups of people are larger than us.

From the perspective of Judaism, we know what is correct and right for our people. We know the T***h, and we are not in competition with anybody else in the world. We share what we know about Gd and his unity, and about living in a Just society. The rest of the details of how other nations live is not our concern. As long as people act Justly and Peacefully and don't try to take away our home from us, we let other people live however they wish to live.

I hope now, with my response that you will see the sanity of letting the conversation between you and I, specifically about religion and beliefs, fade and become part of memory or history.


V***l wrote:
I should have picked up on that bit of obviousness when you mentioned kosher. Not sure why that escaped me, sorry about that.

I fail to see how allowing someone to be treated poorly falls in line with "not to wrong anyone in speech or in business", or with "acts of loving kindness". It allows others to wrong people, and is most certainly not an act (legal play on words) of loving kindness.

It is State sanctioned discrimination and having the revelation of your faith, it honestly surprises me about your support for it. Do not misunderstand that my stance to this is purely built on support for the L**T community, it is built on a mutual respect for my fellows. This Bill authorizes antisemitism in addition to others. This is perhaps the most perplexing thing from my point of view; you, being Jewish, are ok with State sanctioned discrimination for business, but I'm guessing you're not ok with it when it means rounding them up into camps? The only difference is the end game, both are discriminatory.




And now to play to the fears of some:

This law allows a Muslim to enact parts of Sharia law in their places of business. They can deny service to an unaccompanied woman. I'm sure there are others, which I'll have to look up later.


In regards to history, does this book touch on how Christianity absorbed the Pagan holidays (saturnalia, lupercalia to name a few) in an effort to convert more people?
I should have picked up on that bit of obviousness... (show quote)
Go to
Feb 22, 2014 02:05:47   #
Shirbojo wrote:
It was sarcasm


I am assuming that you are replying to me. I am not certain because you failed to use the quote reply button; it does help. Anyway, I am not good with humor.....unless you give me a indication, like using the smilies or LOL or something of that nature. Although I am working hard in obtaining a sense of humor, it is still a work in progress. Yes, I am being sincere. I was a bookworm as a kid, was in the armed service, and a computer engineer. No people sk**ls. Sorry to have misunderstood your intent.
Go to
Feb 22, 2014 01:54:33   #
I disagree. And I see that you and I will not see eye to eye. Therefore, I suggest that you and I agree to disagree.

I am not a Christian. I am Jewish. Roman Emperor Constantine or Emperor Theodosius were unable to command us to accept their concept of religion. Now I know that this will raise the hair on your neck. I suggest that you not just read your bible, but research history and in particular religious history. I can suggest an excellent book: A History of Christian Thought, Vol. 1: From the Beginnings to the Council of Chalcedon. It will help you understand.

As for love my neighbor. A large part of Jewish law is about treating people with kindness. The same body of Jewish law that commands us to eat only kosher food and not to turn on lights on Shabbat, also commands us to love both Jews and strangers, to give tzedakah (charity) to the poor and needy, and not to wrong anyone in speech or in business. In fact, acts of kindness are so much a part of Jewish law that the word "mitzvah" (literally, "commandment") is informally used to mean any good deed.

Pirkei Avot, a book of the Mishnah, teaches that the universe depends on three things: on Torah (law), on avodah (service to G-d), and on g'milut chasadim (usually t***slated as "acts of loving kindness") (Avot 1:2), perhaps drawing from Psalm 89:3, "the universe is built on kindness" (more commonly t***slated as "forever is mercy built"). In fact, this quote has become a popular song in synagogues: Al Shlosha D'varim (On Three Things). The Mishnah also describes g'milut chasadim as one of the few mitzvot (commandments) for which there is no minimum amount sufficient to satisfy your obligation. (Pe'ah 1:1; reiterated in Talmud Chagigah 7a). That verse also describes g'milut chasadim as one of the few things that one derive benefit from in this world and yet still be rewarded for in the world to come. The Talmud says that g'milut chasadim is greater than tzedakah (charity), because unlike tzedakah, g'milut chasadim can be done for both poor and rich, both the living and the dead, and can be done with money or with acts. (Talmud Sukkah 49b).
At no place does it say that we are obligated to behave as others, adopt their habits, or conform to laws that would cause us to breech our covenant with God. Homosexual orientation is not a sin in Judaism, but homosexual acts are and forbidden by the Torah.

Having educated you, I have just one more point. You are known by the company you keep. In that, if you are always in the company of sin, it often becomes common for you and can become accepted. My attitude is to always be kind in word and action, to give feely without regret and not to judge others.

I support those people who do not want to associate with those that make them uncomfortable for any reason. I think that denial of service is rare, but should someone elect to not serve because it offends their religious convictions, then they should have that right.


V***l wrote:
The amendment clearly states Citizens rights shall not be abridged by a law of a State. Arizona is a State making a law that abridges the rights of Citizens by allowing them to be discriminated against. It also violates the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Unless you're discriminating against homosexuality which isn't specifically mentioned in that law, but once the Constitutionality of this travesty is challenged (if it even gets signed into law) the SCOTUS will likely find that discrimination based on sexual orientation is equally reprehensible.

You do all these wonderfully Christian things, though you left out loving thy neighbor as thyself. Just because you don't agree with someone doesn't make them less of a person worthy of State sanctioned discrimination.

And how exactly is State sanctioned discrimination a good thing for all Citizens? We can already see in the microcosm of this board that h**e and intolerance get us nowhere.
The amendment clearly states Citizens rights shall... (show quote)
Go to
Feb 22, 2014 01:24:38   #
Shirbojo wrote:
Our streets could be as safe as it is in Russia if only we would adopt their strict gun control laws.


Suggest you do some homework. Here are a few examples:


Civilian Guns

Compare
Number of Privately Owned Firearms
The estimated total number of guns (both licit and illicit) held by civilians in Russia is 12,750,0001

Compare
Rate of Civilian Firearm Possession per 100 Population
The estimated rate of private gun ownership (both licit and illicit) in Russia is 8.91 firearms per 100 people

Compare
Number of Privately Owned Rifles
In Russia, the number of rifles in civilian possession is reported to be 226,0002

Compare
Number of Privately Owned Shotguns
In Russia, the number of shotguns in civilian possession is reported to be 3,410,0002

Compare
Number of Privately Owned Firearms - World Ranking
In a comparison of the number of privately owned guns in 178 countries, Russia ranked at No. 93

Compare
Rate of Privately Owned Firearms per 100 Population - World Ranking
In a comparison of the rate of private gun ownership in 178 countries, Russia ranked at No. 681

Compare
Number of Registered Firearms
The number of registered guns in Russia is reported to be 5,000,0003

Compare
Rate of Registered Firearms per 100 Population
The rate of registered guns in Russia is 3.504 per 100 people

See http://www.gunpolicy.org/firearms/region/russia for details.

Same site has information on homicides and suicides.
Go to
Feb 22, 2014 01:13:55   #
AuntiE wrote:
I was being perverse. I have acquaintance with several who are computer engineers. I understood your post. It seems the "evil genie" loosed herself. :lol: :roll: :D


I am working on humor.... I am doing my best. And no, I took your post the way you intended.

Imagine, I had to set through Mom last night with Mike.... I did not get it! He has also made me listen to George Carland. I did not like him, did not find him funny. Am I a lost cause?
Go to
Feb 22, 2014 01:09:06   #
AuntiE wrote:
Spelling 1 would be one.

Spelling 0 would be zero.

Sorry, perverse sense of humor on the loose. :| :)


You are right. I forget and fall back into program mode.
Go to
Page: <<prev 1 ... 1201 1202 1203 1204 1205 1206 1207 1208 1209 ... 1349 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.