Really good questions half the U.S. wants answered:


Just one more thing on Obamacare Repeal.
Since only 11 million people have Obamacare, how will 24 million people die if it is repealed?
Will an additional 13 million people be randomly shot?


Just one more thing on Donald Trump.
If Donald Trump deleted all of his emails, wiped his server with BleachBit and destroyed all of his phones with a hammer, would the Mainstream Media suddenly lose all interest in the story and declare him innocent?


Just one more thing on Equal Pay.
If women do the same job for less money, why do companies hire men to do the same job for more money?

Just one more thing on Sanctuary Cities.
If you rob a bank in a Sanctuary City, is it illegal or is it just an Undocumented Withdrawal?


Just one more thing on ISIS
Each ISIS attack now is a reaction to Trump policies, but all ISIS attacks during Obama's term were due to C*****e C****e and a plea for jobs.


Just one more thing on the London 'Lone Wolf' terror attack.
After the London 'Lone Wolf' terrorist attack government officials have arrested at least eight other 'Lone Wolves' who had conspired with the original 'Lone Wolf' in planning the 'Lone Wolf' attack. Even though all involved are Muslims, you can be assured, the 'Lone Wolf' attack has nothing at all to do with Islam, just like the other 1000 plus 'Lone Wolf' attacks by Muslims, are completely unassociated with Islam.


Just one more thing on Entitlements.
We should stop calling them all 'Entitlements'.
Welfare, Food Stamps, WIC, ad nauseum are not entitlements. They are taxpayer-funded handouts, and shouldn't be called entitlements at all. Social Security and Veterans Benefits are Entitlements because the people receiving them are entitled to them. They were earned and paid for by the recipients.


Just one more thing on the Muslim Refugees.
If Muslims want to run away from a Muslim country, does that mean they're Islamophobic?


Just one more thing on The Women's March.
If Liberals don't believe in biological g****r then why did they march for women's rights?


Just one more thing on the Russians hacking the e******n.
How did the Russians get Debbie Wasserman Schultz and the DNC to steal the Primary from Bernie Sanders? How did Russia get Donna Brazile to leak debate questions to Hillary Clinton in advance of the debates?


Just one more thing on Democrats and the E*******l College.
Why is it that Democrats think Superdelegates are fine, but they have a problem with the E*******l College?


Just one more thing on the FBI and e******ns.
If you don't want the FBI involved in e******ns, don't nominate someone who's being investigated by the FBI.


Just one more thing on Hillary's speeches.
If Hillary's speeches cost $250,000 an hour, how come no one shows up to her free ones?


Just one more thing on Russia manipulating our e******n.
The DNC is mad at Russia because they 'think' they are trying to manipulate our e******n by exposing that the DNC is manipulating our e******n?


Just one more thing on foreign involvement in our e******ns.
If Democrats don't want foreigners involved in our e******ns, why do they think it's alright for i******s to v**e?

I would be inclined to agree that Trump is not a role model.

Nor do I believe he is the example of leadership when viewed through the eyes of a ranking Navy seal.

Mr Brennan is without a doubt, a very fine example of leadership and is a superb role model.

Trump is perpetually bombarded by unwarranted criticism from all directions.

So I don't think his concern is centered on Brennan's criticisms.

I don't see how Trump yanking Brennan's security clearance constitutes an intent to stifle the man's right to speak freely.

Brennan is free to say what he pleases, whenever he pleases and as often as he pleases.

As long as he's not leaking classified information, no one is stopping him from voicing his opinion.

I would be compelled to infer that Trump may very well be perturbed by Brennan's comments, but I don't believe that is the sole reason for revoking his security clearance.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/pennsylvania-releases-damning-report-catholic-184756036.html

Pennsylvania’s attorney general released on Tuesday the long-awaited results of a damning grand jury investigation into how six Roman Catholic dioceses in the state covered up sexual abuse by 301 “predator priests” over 70 years.
The 884-page report is the largest, most comprehensive investigation on the church’s sex abuse scandal by a U.S. state, according to Attorney General Josh Shapiro. The grand jury identified over 1,000 victimsin the six dioceses examined in the report: Allentown, Erie, Greensburg, Harrisburg, Pittsburgh and Scranton. But the jurors suspected the real number of victims could be much higher.
Shapiro said the report, which was delayed for months while individuals named in it raised legal challenges over what portions should be redacted, showed that senior church leaders in these dioceses and even at the Vatican knew abuse was occurring but systematically covered it up.
“The pattern was abuse, deny and cover up,” Shapiro said during a news conference Tuesday.
Listen to Attorney General Josh Shapiro’s news conference with victims below.
Most of the victims identified in the report were boys, but some were girls. The abuse documented included groping, being made to masturbate with assailants, and being raped orally, vaginally or anally.
The jurors accused Catholic Church leaders in the state of working hard to avoid public scandal and protect abusers. The grand jury found that victims were “brushed aside, in every part of the state, by church leaders who preferred to protect the abusers and their institutions above all.”
“Church officials routinely and purposefully described the abuse as horseplay and wrestling and inappropriate conduct. It was none of those things. It was child sexual abuse, including rape,” Shapiro said.
Matt Haverstick, an attorney representing the dioceses of Harrisburg and Greensburg, insisted in a statement that the Catholic Church discussed in the grand jury report no longer exists.
“The Dioceses I’ve gotten to know so well over the past two years are incredibly sorry for the harm to these survivors,” Haverstick said. “Today’s Church has listened and learned from its mistakes, and its reforms over the past two decades keep children safe.”
At the end of their report, jurors included hundreds of pages of previously hidden church documents that illustrate how officials handled reports of abuse. The report also included statements from the dioceses’ current bishops.
In one egregious case in the Diocese of Scranton, a priest impregnated a young girl and then arranged an a******n, the report reads. The priest resigned in 1986 and was sent to a Catholic psychiatric treatment center. One year later, in 1987, he was reassigned to another Pennsylvania parish. In 1989, the victim received a settlement from the diocese and, in exchange, was asked to sign a confidentiality agreement. Meanwhile, the priest continued in active ministry until 2002.
In the Diocese of Allentown, the report claims a priest who freely admitted to sexually molesting a boy was allowed to continue in ministry for several years after his confession. The diocese concluded at the time that “the experience will not necessarily be a horrendous trauma” for the victim.
In the Diocese of Pittsburgh, church officials dismissed a report that a priest had abused a 15-year-old girl, claiming the girl had “literally seduced” him into a relationship.
Tim Lennon, president of the Survivors Network of those Abused By Priests, told HuffPost he was saddened and angered by the report. He believes it proves the church hierarchy was complicit in the abuse. They knew abuse was happening and didn’t work hard enough to discipline abusers, he said, which in turn enabled more abuse to happen over the years.
“They knew for years if not decades of this vile corruption. Those in the church hierarchy went to great lengths to hide and dismiss the suffering of survivors,” Lennon told HuffPost. “How many children were r---MORE

-43GH.,b60
MSNBC host and civil rights activist Al Sharpton said in a new interview he won't rule out a run for president in 2020, adding he isn't currently mounting a bid.
"I never rule anything out," Sharpton told BuzzFeed News.
The progressive firebrand and outspoken critic of President Donald Trump ran for the Democratic p**********l nomination in 2004, although it was viewed as more of a stunt than a serious attempt at the White House. He also ran previously for U.S. Senate and New York mayor.
Sharpton was a strong ally of President Barack Obama and said he would never use his MSNBC platform to criticize his administration.
This article was sourced from Washington Free Beacon
SOURCE- Written by David Rutz--BuzzFeed News.

They wanna rename Austin, Texas. Are these morons serious? I have heard some rumblings that this effort was afoot, however, at this point, I haven't heard the reasons behind it. If it weren't for Steven Austin there might not be a Texas. I think these nitwits need to study a bit of history before attempting to rename anything.

Steven Austin's family were involved in various business pursuits prior to Mexico granting Steven the right to colonize parts of the area that is now Texas. I've read so much Texas history that at one time, I probably knew more than most Texans. Unfortunately, I've forgotten much of it.

However, I think I can state, unequivocally, that Texas has a unique and mystique history, unmatched by any other state in the union.

Long live, Texas!

From The Wall Street Journal:

"Facebook Inc. wants your financial data.

The social media giant has asked large U.S. banks to share detailed financial information about their customers, including card t***sactions and checking account balances, as part of an effort to offer new services to users.

Facebook increasingly wants to be a platform where people buy and sell goods and services, besides connecting with friends. The company over the past year asked JPMorgan Chase & Co., Wells Fargo & Co., Citigroup Inc. and U.S. Bancorp to discuss potential offerings it could host for bank customers on Facebook Messenger, said people familiar with the matter." [.......Right!]

2 Things to Keep in Mind -

A. Politicians aren'€™t at all concerned about the outsized influence of centralized tech behemoths engineering society using secret algorithms, they just want to be in control of how this power is abused. U.S. politicians prefer to use the power and reach of tech giants for their own ends rather than take them down a notch.

B. Facebook executives don'€™t actually care about anything besides their profits and power.

"If you agree that Facebook'€™s primarily a nefarious narcissism-factory wasteland masquerading as a platform just delete it... before it deletes you."

https://libertyblitzkrieg.com/2018/08/06/stop-complaining-and-just-delete-facebook/

I will tell you this PeterS. That SOB should be put right into the middle of the main population at the most severe prison that is available!!!!!!!!!! I don't give a rats ass if he declared himself a Christian or Catholic or a Dried up old moon faced dildo. He needs to experience the pain that all of those children will suffer their entire lives!!!!!!!!! OMG, how violated they must all feel! Just because someone declares themselves to be religious doesn't mean squat.
MIke