Posts for: Randy131
Nov 8, 2017 11:10:53 #
(Main)
"YOU WISH"!!!
President Trump is our man, he knows what we want done, and he is accomplishing it, fighting more organized resistance and complete obstructionism by all the Democrats in the US Congress, than any President in history (what goes around will come around, we have long memories), yet he's still accomplishing what he promised and what we want done, and when he's finished doing that, with the help he'll get from the replacements in the US Congress from the results of the 2018 midterm e******ns, he will get re-elected in 2020.
We don't care if President Trump is courteous or not, for we've had too many courteous Republicans that get nothing done, because they're always capitulating to wh**ever the Democrats want to force down the American people's throats. President Trump is getting done what needs to be done, and what we want him to get done, and he can call all you liberals, progressives, Democrats, and RINOs wh**ever he wants, because most of the time it is true anyway. But because you democrats fight him at everything the American people elected him to do, it's taking longer than it should, but the American people will correct that problem come the 2018 midterm e******ns, because they see him trying to fulfill his promes, and we also see who is stopping him from fufilling his promises, and will take care of that with our v**es.
President Trump is our man, he knows what we want done, and he is accomplishing it, fighting more organized resistance and complete obstructionism by all the Democrats in the US Congress, than any President in history (what goes around will come around, we have long memories), yet he's still accomplishing what he promised and what we want done, and when he's finished doing that, with the help he'll get from the replacements in the US Congress from the results of the 2018 midterm e******ns, he will get re-elected in 2020.
We don't care if President Trump is courteous or not, for we've had too many courteous Republicans that get nothing done, because they're always capitulating to wh**ever the Democrats want to force down the American people's throats. President Trump is getting done what needs to be done, and what we want him to get done, and he can call all you liberals, progressives, Democrats, and RINOs wh**ever he wants, because most of the time it is true anyway. But because you democrats fight him at everything the American people elected him to do, it's taking longer than it should, but the American people will correct that problem come the 2018 midterm e******ns, because they see him trying to fulfill his promes, and we also see who is stopping him from fufilling his promises, and will take care of that with our v**es.
saltwind 78 wrote:
The GOP took a big defeat in yesterdays e******ns ... (show quote)
Nov 8, 2017 10:48:42 #
(Main)
Here is what the liberals, progressives, and Democrats h**e for the American people to learn, who the real F*****ts are, and historically have always been:
Left Is Now The Party Of F*****m !!! History Repeats It's-Self !!!
August 9, 2017
The American Left Is Now The Party Of F*****m. The Democrats’ 'big lie', blaming own F*****t sins on Trump and Republicans.
We hear the word “f*****t” a whole lot these days: Trump is a f*****t, if not a N**i; The Republican Party is the f*****t party.
As for the left, the Democrats, they present themselves as the anti-f*****ts, the people fighting f*****m. We can see this in the names of l*****t groups like A****a, which stands for anti-f*****m. Yet, when we look around, we see the Democratic and l*****t protesters who are disrupting the inauguration. Who are organizing violent rallies around the country, who are stopping campus speakers from speaking.
These are people who seem to be using f*****t and N**i tactics. The masked A****a thugs carrying weapons seem eerily similar to the f*****t B****shirts and the N**i Brownshirts.
So isn’t it strange that the people purporting to fight f*****m resemble the f*****ts in shutting down speech. And disrupting democratic debate through the use, or threats, of violence?
We need to look at f*****m more closely and ask: Is f*****m really a phenomenon of the left or of the right? Let’s begin with the remarkable statement by Adolf Hitler in a 1927 speech. “We are socialists,” he said. “We are the enemies of today’s capitalist system of exploitation and we are determined to destroy the system under all conditions.” Does that sound like Donald Trump? Actually, it sounds a lot more like Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders.
Hitler changed the name of the German Workers Party to the National Socialist German Workers Party. He wanted to emphasize that the N**is were socialists, and that N**i economic policy involved complete state control of the private sector. Indeed, the very name N**i is a compression of the two terms “national” and “socialist.”
All the leading figures of early f*****m, not merely in Germany, but also in Italy, France and England – were men of the left. Most of them moved seamlessly from Marxism and socialism, to f*****m and N**ism during the 1920s and 1930s.
Here are some examples. Jean Allemane, famous for his role in the Dreyfus case, one of the great figures of French socialism, became a f*****t. So did the socialist organizer Georges Valois. Marcel Deat, the founder of the Parti Socialiste de France, eventually quit and started a pro-f*****t party in 1936. Jaques Dor**t, a French c*******t, moved his Parti Populaire Francais into the f*****t camp. Belgian socialist writer Henri de Man t***sitioned into becoming a f*****t theoretician. In England, Oswald Mosley, a socialist and Labor Party Member of Parliament, broke with the laborites because he found them insufficiently radical. He later founded the British Union of F*****ts and became the country’s leading N**i sympathizer.
In Germany, there was a similar traffic from socialism to f*****m. To give a single example, the socialist playwright Gerhart Hauptmann embraced Hitler’s National Socialism and produced plays during the Third Reich. After the war, he called himself a c*******t and staged his productions in Soviet-dominated East Berlin.
In Italy, philosopher Giovanni Gentile moved from Marxism to become f*****m’s leading intellectual. Many Italian labor organizers made the same journey: Ottavio Dinale, Tullio, Masotti, Carlo Silvestri and Umberto Pasella. The socialist writer Agostino Lanzillo joined Mussolini’s parliament as a member of the f*****t party.
Nicola Bombacci, one of the founders of the Italian Community Party, became Mussolini’s top adviser in 1943.
Gentile’s disciple Ugo Spirito, who also served Mussolini, moved from Marxism to f*****m and then back to Marxism. Like Hauptmann, Spirito became a c*******t sympathizer after World War II and called for a new “synthesis” between c*******m and f*****m.
All of this is incomprehensible if f*****m is considered somehow “right wing.” None of these men saw it that way. They didn’t “convert” from left to right. Rather, they viewed themselves as moving seamlessly from one form of socialism to another. From a purely class-based socialism to a broader form of socialism that took into account class as well as national loyalties.
We can see this in the example of Mussolini, who established the world’s first f*****t regime in Rome, a decade before Hitler came to power. Mussolini was the leading Marxist in Italy, the recognized leader of Italian socialism. After his successful March on Rome, Lenin sent his congratulations, praising Mussolini as a fellow revolutionary on the left. Mussolini’s career shows how f*****m grew out of Marxism. Marx had predicted that the increased impoverishment of workers would cause a socialist revolution to erupt in the most advanced industrial countries: Germany and Great Britain.
That didn’t happen. This created the famous “crisis of Marxism” in the late 19th and early 20th century. Out of that crisis came two new forms of socialism: Leninist Bolshevism and Mussolini’s F*****m.
“The foundation of f*****m,” Mussolini writes in his “Autobiography,” “is the conception of the state. F*****m conceives the State as an absolute. In comparison to which all individuals or groups are relative, only to be conceived of in their relation to the State. For us F*****ts, the State … represents the immanent spirit of the nation.” Replace the word “f*****m” with “progressivism,” and we could be hearing these words recited at a Democratic National Convention.
Mussolini broke with Marx on a single point. Marx insisted that workers are loyal only to their class. “The working man,” Marxists liked to say, “has no country.” Mussolini knew that people are no less attached to their nation than to their occupation. Consequently, Mussolini, like Hitler, embraced socialism of a special kind, namely national socialism.
Like the Marxists, the f*****ts and the N**is also embraced violence as a revolutionary concept. N**i violence involved disrupting campus events, threatening and beating up dissenters. And enforcing a conformity of thought and practice in line with the regnant ideology. Notice the close similarity between this f*****t bullying and the conduct of the American left today.
In ideology and in tactics, the American left today is the party of f*****m. The only difference is that it denies its true pedigree. Their big lie is to blame their own sins on Trump and the Republicans. In a sick twist, the real f*****ts in America pretend to be anti-f*****ts. And accuse the true anti-f*****ts of being f*****ts.
Left Is Now The Party Of F*****m !!! History Repeats It's-Self !!!
August 9, 2017
The American Left Is Now The Party Of F*****m. The Democrats’ 'big lie', blaming own F*****t sins on Trump and Republicans.
We hear the word “f*****t” a whole lot these days: Trump is a f*****t, if not a N**i; The Republican Party is the f*****t party.
As for the left, the Democrats, they present themselves as the anti-f*****ts, the people fighting f*****m. We can see this in the names of l*****t groups like A****a, which stands for anti-f*****m. Yet, when we look around, we see the Democratic and l*****t protesters who are disrupting the inauguration. Who are organizing violent rallies around the country, who are stopping campus speakers from speaking.
These are people who seem to be using f*****t and N**i tactics. The masked A****a thugs carrying weapons seem eerily similar to the f*****t B****shirts and the N**i Brownshirts.
So isn’t it strange that the people purporting to fight f*****m resemble the f*****ts in shutting down speech. And disrupting democratic debate through the use, or threats, of violence?
We need to look at f*****m more closely and ask: Is f*****m really a phenomenon of the left or of the right? Let’s begin with the remarkable statement by Adolf Hitler in a 1927 speech. “We are socialists,” he said. “We are the enemies of today’s capitalist system of exploitation and we are determined to destroy the system under all conditions.” Does that sound like Donald Trump? Actually, it sounds a lot more like Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders.
Hitler changed the name of the German Workers Party to the National Socialist German Workers Party. He wanted to emphasize that the N**is were socialists, and that N**i economic policy involved complete state control of the private sector. Indeed, the very name N**i is a compression of the two terms “national” and “socialist.”
All the leading figures of early f*****m, not merely in Germany, but also in Italy, France and England – were men of the left. Most of them moved seamlessly from Marxism and socialism, to f*****m and N**ism during the 1920s and 1930s.
Here are some examples. Jean Allemane, famous for his role in the Dreyfus case, one of the great figures of French socialism, became a f*****t. So did the socialist organizer Georges Valois. Marcel Deat, the founder of the Parti Socialiste de France, eventually quit and started a pro-f*****t party in 1936. Jaques Dor**t, a French c*******t, moved his Parti Populaire Francais into the f*****t camp. Belgian socialist writer Henri de Man t***sitioned into becoming a f*****t theoretician. In England, Oswald Mosley, a socialist and Labor Party Member of Parliament, broke with the laborites because he found them insufficiently radical. He later founded the British Union of F*****ts and became the country’s leading N**i sympathizer.
In Germany, there was a similar traffic from socialism to f*****m. To give a single example, the socialist playwright Gerhart Hauptmann embraced Hitler’s National Socialism and produced plays during the Third Reich. After the war, he called himself a c*******t and staged his productions in Soviet-dominated East Berlin.
In Italy, philosopher Giovanni Gentile moved from Marxism to become f*****m’s leading intellectual. Many Italian labor organizers made the same journey: Ottavio Dinale, Tullio, Masotti, Carlo Silvestri and Umberto Pasella. The socialist writer Agostino Lanzillo joined Mussolini’s parliament as a member of the f*****t party.
Nicola Bombacci, one of the founders of the Italian Community Party, became Mussolini’s top adviser in 1943.
Gentile’s disciple Ugo Spirito, who also served Mussolini, moved from Marxism to f*****m and then back to Marxism. Like Hauptmann, Spirito became a c*******t sympathizer after World War II and called for a new “synthesis” between c*******m and f*****m.
All of this is incomprehensible if f*****m is considered somehow “right wing.” None of these men saw it that way. They didn’t “convert” from left to right. Rather, they viewed themselves as moving seamlessly from one form of socialism to another. From a purely class-based socialism to a broader form of socialism that took into account class as well as national loyalties.
We can see this in the example of Mussolini, who established the world’s first f*****t regime in Rome, a decade before Hitler came to power. Mussolini was the leading Marxist in Italy, the recognized leader of Italian socialism. After his successful March on Rome, Lenin sent his congratulations, praising Mussolini as a fellow revolutionary on the left. Mussolini’s career shows how f*****m grew out of Marxism. Marx had predicted that the increased impoverishment of workers would cause a socialist revolution to erupt in the most advanced industrial countries: Germany and Great Britain.
That didn’t happen. This created the famous “crisis of Marxism” in the late 19th and early 20th century. Out of that crisis came two new forms of socialism: Leninist Bolshevism and Mussolini’s F*****m.
“The foundation of f*****m,” Mussolini writes in his “Autobiography,” “is the conception of the state. F*****m conceives the State as an absolute. In comparison to which all individuals or groups are relative, only to be conceived of in their relation to the State. For us F*****ts, the State … represents the immanent spirit of the nation.” Replace the word “f*****m” with “progressivism,” and we could be hearing these words recited at a Democratic National Convention.
Mussolini broke with Marx on a single point. Marx insisted that workers are loyal only to their class. “The working man,” Marxists liked to say, “has no country.” Mussolini knew that people are no less attached to their nation than to their occupation. Consequently, Mussolini, like Hitler, embraced socialism of a special kind, namely national socialism.
Like the Marxists, the f*****ts and the N**is also embraced violence as a revolutionary concept. N**i violence involved disrupting campus events, threatening and beating up dissenters. And enforcing a conformity of thought and practice in line with the regnant ideology. Notice the close similarity between this f*****t bullying and the conduct of the American left today.
In ideology and in tactics, the American left today is the party of f*****m. The only difference is that it denies its true pedigree. Their big lie is to blame their own sins on Trump and the Republicans. In a sick twist, the real f*****ts in America pretend to be anti-f*****ts. And accuse the true anti-f*****ts of being f*****ts.
cold iron wrote:
How many times have we seen this? A conservative i... (show quote)
Nov 8, 2017 07:14:19 #
(Main)
The funny thing is that those who matter know whose tearing the country apart, and have been doing it over the last ten years, and those are the patriots who know the liberals and progressives are the ones tearing our country apart, and are just waiting to have to take action to preserve the country and the Presidency.
How many generations does it take to no longer be considered an immigrant, but a citizen of our country, just like the Ruaaians, Germans, Australians, and etc., are to their countries? Our country has been being torn apart by all the i*****l i*******ts that Obama and the Democrats allowed in by not enforcing our laws and securing our borders, as well as the 1.45 million legal immigrants that Obama brought in each of his 8 years as President, then also the millions of refugees that are not in those counts. We no longer have a melting pot, but areas of foreign cultures replacing our own cultured melting pot, because we've allowed to many foreigners in at one time and have allowed them to recreate their country that thye were running away from, right here in the USA, as they become the heads of their own types of governments that persecuted them from where they have come from, in the new areas that they are settling.
That is just one way the liberals and progressives have been tearing our country apart, as they also force deviancy on us and usurp our religious rights, and President Trump is doing none of this, but instead is reversing this, which Obama and the Democrats have been forcing on us for the last ten years, and that's what is tearing the liberals and progressives apart, not the country.
How many generations does it take to no longer be considered an immigrant, but a citizen of our country, just like the Ruaaians, Germans, Australians, and etc., are to their countries? Our country has been being torn apart by all the i*****l i*******ts that Obama and the Democrats allowed in by not enforcing our laws and securing our borders, as well as the 1.45 million legal immigrants that Obama brought in each of his 8 years as President, then also the millions of refugees that are not in those counts. We no longer have a melting pot, but areas of foreign cultures replacing our own cultured melting pot, because we've allowed to many foreigners in at one time and have allowed them to recreate their country that thye were running away from, right here in the USA, as they become the heads of their own types of governments that persecuted them from where they have come from, in the new areas that they are settling.
That is just one way the liberals and progressives have been tearing our country apart, as they also force deviancy on us and usurp our religious rights, and President Trump is doing none of this, but instead is reversing this, which Obama and the Democrats have been forcing on us for the last ten years, and that's what is tearing the liberals and progressives apart, not the country.
Raylan Wolfe wrote:
According to Fox News Trump is losing the battle!
Nov 8, 2017 06:41:16 #
(Main)
What a bunch of BS! It's been reported that three laws banning this person from being able to purchase a gun werre violated.
When felons attempt to purchase guns they are supposed to be arrested and prosecuted, which happened a lot under the Bush Presidency, but the numbers of those prosecutions declined by 97% during the 8 years of Obama's Presidency.
This shows us one thing, liberals want gun banning laws, but then refuse to enforce them when they get their way.
Most gun laws are only good for people who self-enforce our laws, because they are law abiding people, while all others ignore the laws and do wh**ever they want, and who are the people who commit 95% of the gun crimes and gum murders every year in the US, because the liberals refuse to enforce our laws.
Obama was the biggest nonenforcer of our laws out of all our Presidents, i*********n l*ws being just one example of that, as he also refused to enforce our gun bannibg laws, in the hopes more k*****gs would allow the liberals to make more gun banning laws to disarm all of the American people.
But the liberals want the law abiding Americans disarmed, not because they commit the gun crimes and murders that the USA is suffering from, but so the American people then become defenseless against the people that make a living by violating our laws.
But patriotic Americans will never allow the liberals to disarm law abiding citizens, mainly so the liberals can't be successful at a c**p to take over our government, which in reality is the only reason why they would want law abiding Americans to be disarmed, especially our military veterans who have taken an oath to our US Constitution, and have been trained how to put down and stop a c**p to take over our government.
When felons attempt to purchase guns they are supposed to be arrested and prosecuted, which happened a lot under the Bush Presidency, but the numbers of those prosecutions declined by 97% during the 8 years of Obama's Presidency.
This shows us one thing, liberals want gun banning laws, but then refuse to enforce them when they get their way.
Most gun laws are only good for people who self-enforce our laws, because they are law abiding people, while all others ignore the laws and do wh**ever they want, and who are the people who commit 95% of the gun crimes and gum murders every year in the US, because the liberals refuse to enforce our laws.
Obama was the biggest nonenforcer of our laws out of all our Presidents, i*********n l*ws being just one example of that, as he also refused to enforce our gun bannibg laws, in the hopes more k*****gs would allow the liberals to make more gun banning laws to disarm all of the American people.
But the liberals want the law abiding Americans disarmed, not because they commit the gun crimes and murders that the USA is suffering from, but so the American people then become defenseless against the people that make a living by violating our laws.
But patriotic Americans will never allow the liberals to disarm law abiding citizens, mainly so the liberals can't be successful at a c**p to take over our government, which in reality is the only reason why they would want law abiding Americans to be disarmed, especially our military veterans who have taken an oath to our US Constitution, and have been trained how to put down and stop a c**p to take over our government.
PeterS wrote:
I only mention this because Trump said this latest shooting isn't a gun problem but a mentally ill problem. One has to wonder if Trump really knows the implications of the bills that he signs...or does he just sign what they put before his face???
http://time.com/5011519/texas-church-shooting-mental-health-donald-trump/
http://time.com/5011519/texas-church-shooting-mental-health-donald-trump/
Nov 8, 2017 05:54:59 #
(Main)
Ms Factual, I don't know you, but I have a lot of respect for you, for sticking up for the t***h when I know you must be getting tremendous backlash for doing so and for what you believe, for that is true heroism, and I've seen it before, but only in a very few, may GOD bless you for being the honest person you are, and against tremendous odds and much degradation. May GOD bless you and yours, and keep you strong and stoic.
MS. FACTUAL wrote:
img src="https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/ima... (show quote)
Nov 7, 2017 21:05:49 #
(Main)
Good night Bob, take care and may GOD bless you and yours.
Bad Bob wrote:
Good night Randy.
Nov 7, 2017 20:31:41 #
(Main)
Well if that is true and important to you, then why did you ask me if I thought any of the people you listed could prove Obama wasn't a US citizen? (Jediknight's big boom bomb? Didn't you noticed that he says that he can't answer my last comment to him in response to his comment, because he has a job, yet he's still here on this site passing out his BS, don't you think that is really because he has no answers for what I said, and has proven himself not to be the man that you proved you are to everyone when you admitted to the t***h in that first discussion that we were in about Obamacare? You're a much better man than he is, so use your head and show your intelligence that I and others know that you possess.)
Don't you know that the US Constitution does not mandate anyone to prove someone is not a US citizen, but it does mandate that anyone and everyone who seeks the officie of POTUS must prove that they are "Natural Born US Citizens", which was never done in Obama's case.
But don't worry about it Bob, I know the reason you're now changing the subject is because you haven't any proof that Obama is a US citizen, but don't worry, nobody else does either, even Obama himself.
Think about that for a minute Bob, and be honest to yourself, never mind what I think or believe, but if you can't be t***hful to yourself, who can you be t***hful to, or for?
Don't you know that the US Constitution does not mandate anyone to prove someone is not a US citizen, but it does mandate that anyone and everyone who seeks the officie of POTUS must prove that they are "Natural Born US Citizens", which was never done in Obama's case.
But don't worry about it Bob, I know the reason you're now changing the subject is because you haven't any proof that Obama is a US citizen, but don't worry, nobody else does either, even Obama himself.
Think about that for a minute Bob, and be honest to yourself, never mind what I think or believe, but if you can't be t***hful to yourself, who can you be t***hful to, or for?
Bad Bob wrote:
Randy Obama is gone we have more important things to do than on this nonsense.
Nov 7, 2017 20:21:25 #
(Main)
Yeah Nighty, you can't afford the 3 minutes to read what you have no answers for, or you'll lose your job. Yeah, we all understand. Don't worry your little conscience about it, we all know what you're saying, you liberals all have the same excuses for what you can't answer. FYI, I never have used sites like FreedomDaily.com, or InfoWars, and I don't listen to Limbaugh either, and I'm sure not going to go to your liberal propaganda site, for all the lies would just make me sick. But since you are always talking about Trump's lies, why you never said anything about all those proven Obama lies, let alone the lies of the hag who wanted to take Obama's place by promising to continue all of Obama's failed policies and agendas, giving all those millions of Democrats in the "Great Blue Wall" states of the rust belt, and every single one of the battleground states, to v**e for President Trump, instead of wanting to go through another 4 years of what Obama forced on them, continuous suffering with no relief.
Robert Mueller may be tightening the noose, but we have to wait and see whose neck that noose is around, and what he's using to tighten it, which I'm so excited about that I can hardly wait, it's almost like Christmas eve when I was a child, with all this great anticipation.
"...DeVos, Sessions, Kushner, and Ross are all considering resigning over their ties to Russian agents...", this is why you won't except anyone else's conspiracy theories, because you keep making up your own conspiracy theories, which is funny, because when they fail to come true, we won't be able to find you anywhere, because you'll be hiding from everyone, from the embarrassment of making up stuff that doesn't come true, just more of your fantasies.
Robert Mueller may be tightening the noose, but we have to wait and see whose neck that noose is around, and what he's using to tighten it, which I'm so excited about that I can hardly wait, it's almost like Christmas eve when I was a child, with all this great anticipation.
"...DeVos, Sessions, Kushner, and Ross are all considering resigning over their ties to Russian agents...", this is why you won't except anyone else's conspiracy theories, because you keep making up your own conspiracy theories, which is funny, because when they fail to come true, we won't be able to find you anywhere, because you'll be hiding from everyone, from the embarrassment of making up stuff that doesn't come true, just more of your fantasies.
JediKnight wrote:
Nawww....its just that some of us have jobs and no... (show quote)
Nov 7, 2017 19:44:36 #
(Main)
So you think people that want to see the US Constitution's mandates be upheld are "h**e Obama wackos"? Wait a minute, you could be right, Obama violated the US Constitution more than any President in US history, also losing more SCOTUS court cases than any President in US history, and had the most unanimous SCOTUS court cases (9) than any President in US history, except all of Obama's unanimous SCOTUS court cases were all loses, even when at least two of the justices were his own appointees, and just the unanimous SCOTUS court cases are more loses than any other President in US history, so you may be right about h**e Obama wackos that respect our US Constitution, who knows.
But during Obama's 8 years as President, he stacked the CIA and FBI with people loyal to him, not the USA or the US Constitution, so I wouldn't expect either of those organizations to prove anything that Obama doesn't want them to prove, and actually I don't want them to prove Obama is not a US citizen either.
What I would like to see Bob, is for Obama to prove that he is a US citizen, because I can do it, you can do it, everybody I know can do it, so why can't Obama do it, and why did he try to do it with two different Hawaii 'Certificates of Live Birth' that each was proven a terrible forgery in at least a dozen different ways and methods.
Bob, wouldn't you like to see Obama prove himself to be a US citizen, and when doing it please explain why he has refused to prove his citizenship for at least the last 10 years now. So what do you think Bob, can Obama prove himself to be a US citizen, and why didn't he, when he was first asked to do so, and also why did he spend millions of dollars on lawyers' fees to prevent other Americans from making him prove it in a court of law?
Don't you think that would be the simplest way to end this nonsense, if Obama is really capable of doing that? Until he does, the only people that say they believe Obama is a US Citizen are the far left radical liberals, progressives, and Democrats, as I have heard many of my Democrat friends say they don't believe he is a US citizen either, and say what difference does it make, and I always tell them that the difference is "law and order", do we follow our own laws, or just break them if we don't like them, or if they're inconveniet for us to obey.
What do you say Bob, would you like to see Obama prove himself a US citizen, and if you say he already has, then you show us some authenticated proof that he is, and then we'll all agree Obama is a US citizen, but until then, it's still up in the air, and just about all Republicans and Independents don't believe that Obama has ever been a US citizen, as many millions of Democrats don't believe he is either, those Democrats are the ones with the integrity and honor to seek the t***h.
But during Obama's 8 years as President, he stacked the CIA and FBI with people loyal to him, not the USA or the US Constitution, so I wouldn't expect either of those organizations to prove anything that Obama doesn't want them to prove, and actually I don't want them to prove Obama is not a US citizen either.
What I would like to see Bob, is for Obama to prove that he is a US citizen, because I can do it, you can do it, everybody I know can do it, so why can't Obama do it, and why did he try to do it with two different Hawaii 'Certificates of Live Birth' that each was proven a terrible forgery in at least a dozen different ways and methods.
Bob, wouldn't you like to see Obama prove himself to be a US citizen, and when doing it please explain why he has refused to prove his citizenship for at least the last 10 years now. So what do you think Bob, can Obama prove himself to be a US citizen, and why didn't he, when he was first asked to do so, and also why did he spend millions of dollars on lawyers' fees to prevent other Americans from making him prove it in a court of law?
Don't you think that would be the simplest way to end this nonsense, if Obama is really capable of doing that? Until he does, the only people that say they believe Obama is a US Citizen are the far left radical liberals, progressives, and Democrats, as I have heard many of my Democrat friends say they don't believe he is a US citizen either, and say what difference does it make, and I always tell them that the difference is "law and order", do we follow our own laws, or just break them if we don't like them, or if they're inconveniet for us to obey.
What do you say Bob, would you like to see Obama prove himself a US citizen, and if you say he already has, then you show us some authenticated proof that he is, and then we'll all agree Obama is a US citizen, but until then, it's still up in the air, and just about all Republicans and Independents don't believe that Obama has ever been a US citizen, as many millions of Democrats don't believe he is either, those Democrats are the ones with the integrity and honor to seek the t***h.
Bad Bob wrote:
Randy do you think our CIA,FBI, all the conservative journalist, the h**e Obama wackos, the world famous sheriff Joe and all of Trump's detectives are so incompetent that they couldn't prove Obama wasn't a citizen?
Nov 7, 2017 15:18:14 #
(Main)
Willy, I must admit you have a great sense of humor, that always ends up resting on the t***h. Keep it up, I just love it.
Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:
Nah...Bush is a solid American citizen, everyone knows that.......now the Kenyan is another story, then again.....he was never my President, just a half black terrorist trying to destroy America....nothing more, nothing less.
Nov 7, 2017 15:16:05 #
(Main)
Bob, those are not my words, they are a quote from jediknight, and my answer and comment to that quote.
But Bob, I don't think, I know that we had a President for 8 years that could never prove that he was a US citizen, and still hasn't to this day.
If you think he has proven his US citizenship, then please show all of us that proof where he has proven his US citizenship.
He might be a US Citizen, but if he is, why does he refuse to prove it, and why did he spend millions of dollars in lawyers fees to keep from having to show in a US court that proof?
Why can't a sitting US President not get ahold of his own birth certificate, and show it to the American people?
Bob, really, "WHY", why do you think that Obama has never proven his US citizenship, and still refuses to do so today, and why the first thing he did just hours after his inauguration was to make all his records illegal to be given out for anyone to see or check with an 'Executive Order'?
Before Obama became President, any American could see, and did, the college records of all our previous Presidents, but because of Obama's "Executive Order", we can no longer do that. So why do you think he stopped that with his "Executive Order"?
Why do you think liberals want to belitttle anyone who wants to see that proof by calling them a "Birther", to shame then from bringing up that question that tens of millions of Americans would like to see the answer and proof of?
When you figure out the answers to all these questions, please let me know what the answers are, because I still anxiously wonder why, because it just doesn't make any sense and has no logical reason for this situation to exist.
But Bob, I don't think, I know that we had a President for 8 years that could never prove that he was a US citizen, and still hasn't to this day.
If you think he has proven his US citizenship, then please show all of us that proof where he has proven his US citizenship.
He might be a US Citizen, but if he is, why does he refuse to prove it, and why did he spend millions of dollars in lawyers fees to keep from having to show in a US court that proof?
Why can't a sitting US President not get ahold of his own birth certificate, and show it to the American people?
Bob, really, "WHY", why do you think that Obama has never proven his US citizenship, and still refuses to do so today, and why the first thing he did just hours after his inauguration was to make all his records illegal to be given out for anyone to see or check with an 'Executive Order'?
Before Obama became President, any American could see, and did, the college records of all our previous Presidents, but because of Obama's "Executive Order", we can no longer do that. So why do you think he stopped that with his "Executive Order"?
Why do you think liberals want to belitttle anyone who wants to see that proof by calling them a "Birther", to shame then from bringing up that question that tens of millions of Americans would like to see the answer and proof of?
When you figure out the answers to all these questions, please let me know what the answers are, because I still anxiously wonder why, because it just doesn't make any sense and has no logical reason for this situation to exist.
Bad Bob wrote:
Randy, you just choose not to believe every conspiracy theory. But you think we had a president of the United States for 8 years that was not a citizen. Right????
Nov 7, 2017 14:18:31 #
(Main)
Facts are quality Bob and there were a lot of facts in answering his comments, and he had no answers to any of those facts I put up. It would take a whole three minutes to read those comments, five minutes for a very slow reader, but without answers to those facts, it would take days to make up something for those facts, just like he did in the next comment he made to someone else, and which I also answered by saying:
"I just choose not to believe every conspiracy theory that comes down the pipe (pyke)." -- No, you just make up your own conspiracy theories instead, just like what you have posted here about Rubio & Cruz, or did you also read that in some fantasy article?
He'll be back once he figures out what to make up about the facts that I said to him. He just keeps coming up with the same line when people give him facts that he doesn't want to affirm, "It is interesting that you know so much more about this than anyone else." Go back on all his comments on this thread and count how many times he answered someone's facts with that phrase, which is what he always says when he can't refute their facts.
You're becoming disappointing Bob, you're starting to allow your indoctrination to overcome your ability to think and reason, which you have already proven to me that you still possess, but if you keep allowing the liberal indoctrination to trump that mental ability, you're going to lose it for good, and then where will you be?
Don't lose your mental abilities just because you want to belong to one political side over the other. Indoctrination is the k*****g of individuality and independent thinking, always think everything out as far as possible before accepting it as the t***h. What makes you think that it is better being a liberal than being a conservative anyway? Be the best you can be, don't settle to be less than best because you think it is cool to be called one thing than another.
One day you'll see and discern who lies, and who it is that really cares for others, not by their words, but by their actions. There have been many books written in the last ten years that are the results of many investigations into who the real givers and protectors of of the less fortunate are, and the government giving to the less fortunate what it forcibly takes from everyone does not determine that, but the giving from the individual does.
I am and have always been an Independent v**er, but I am a Christian conservative who believes that GOD gives out souls at conception, and don't believe that souls' lives should be snuffed out for convenience, and don't believe people can or should change the sex of what GOD created them to be, which is the true definition of a*********n, and that some day we will all answer to GOD for what we have and have not done, especially in accepting Him and his teachings, precepts, and mandates.
But it is your life and your decision, please do the best you can, and you will be rewarded for being smart enough to have put that decision into action.
"I just choose not to believe every conspiracy theory that comes down the pipe (pyke)." -- No, you just make up your own conspiracy theories instead, just like what you have posted here about Rubio & Cruz, or did you also read that in some fantasy article?
He'll be back once he figures out what to make up about the facts that I said to him. He just keeps coming up with the same line when people give him facts that he doesn't want to affirm, "It is interesting that you know so much more about this than anyone else." Go back on all his comments on this thread and count how many times he answered someone's facts with that phrase, which is what he always says when he can't refute their facts.
You're becoming disappointing Bob, you're starting to allow your indoctrination to overcome your ability to think and reason, which you have already proven to me that you still possess, but if you keep allowing the liberal indoctrination to trump that mental ability, you're going to lose it for good, and then where will you be?
Don't lose your mental abilities just because you want to belong to one political side over the other. Indoctrination is the k*****g of individuality and independent thinking, always think everything out as far as possible before accepting it as the t***h. What makes you think that it is better being a liberal than being a conservative anyway? Be the best you can be, don't settle to be less than best because you think it is cool to be called one thing than another.
One day you'll see and discern who lies, and who it is that really cares for others, not by their words, but by their actions. There have been many books written in the last ten years that are the results of many investigations into who the real givers and protectors of of the less fortunate are, and the government giving to the less fortunate what it forcibly takes from everyone does not determine that, but the giving from the individual does.
I am and have always been an Independent v**er, but I am a Christian conservative who believes that GOD gives out souls at conception, and don't believe that souls' lives should be snuffed out for convenience, and don't believe people can or should change the sex of what GOD created them to be, which is the true definition of a*********n, and that some day we will all answer to GOD for what we have and have not done, especially in accepting Him and his teachings, precepts, and mandates.
But it is your life and your decision, please do the best you can, and you will be rewarded for being smart enough to have put that decision into action.
Bad Bob wrote:
Randy quality over quantity.
Nov 7, 2017 13:19:43 #
(Main)
"I just choose not to believe every conspiracy theory that comes down the pipe (pyke)." No, you just make up your own instead, just like what you have posted here about Rubio & Cruz, or did you also read that in some fantasy article? Then you keep telling everyone when they make a comment that you don't want to agree with, "it is interesting that you know so much more about this than anyone else", while you do the exact same thing. Do you know how many times that you've written that phrase when responding to someone commenting on what they've learned that you don't agree with? Do these two statements of yurs make you a hypocrite? Just because the information another comments on is new to you, and you've never heard of it, and don't want to believe what goes against your agenda, doesn't mean that person is the only person that knows so much more about what you know nothing of.
JediKnight wrote:
I have no more difficulty comprehending English th... (show quote)
Nov 7, 2017 13:15:18 #
(Main)
I understand, it's hard for some people to stay focused for 5 minutes at a time.
JediKnight wrote:
Randy: I really do not have the time to read your ... (show quote)
Nov 7, 2017 12:59:22 #
(Main)
I know what I read and is reported in the news, as all last week the 'Washington Free Beacon' came forward and admitted they were the ones who first signed a contract with Fusion GPS for information on Donald Trump, but also on Hillary Clinton at the same time. Now since you claim to be a well informed person and a purviewer of the news, and you know for sure that a Republican started the funding of the "Tump Dossier", then tell us who that Republican is, and when he actually did that funding that you're so sure of, for "it is interesting that you know so much more about this than anyone else."
I haven't read anything on Breibart since he died, and I don't like InfoWars, so I don't watch anything that they provide either.
But you claim you don't care who funded the "Trump Dossier", yet you keep passing on the lies that it was a Republican, which if you know that for sure you should at least know who that Republican is, and the date he funded it, as I won't even ask how much he funded.
But as far as opposition research being unimportant to you, it seems that is what you and others are going after President Trump for, colluding with the Russians to get information against Hillary Clinton, and publishing it to win the e******n, when that is exactly what Hillary Clinton, the DNC, and Obama was attempting to do with the false Russian information that they got in collusion with those Russians in producing the "Trump Dossier", which they tell us is against the law and how they're going to get President Trump and impeach him, for supposedly doing this exact same thing.
Also all the political advertisements on social media that the Russians paid for, was in favor of Hillary Clinton and against President Trump, if the owners of all those social media companies were telling the t***h to the congressional committee investigating it last week.
That's a neat way to explain why Hillary Clinton, the DNC, and Obama paid $12 million to the liberal law firm that was paying Fusian GPS to pay the British spy Steele and the Russians to produce that "Trump Dossier", which Robert Mueller says he has proof of Paul Manafort and Rick gates paying only $4 million for the report they provided to the Ukranians that was used to get their political opposition convicted and sent to prison, which is what Hillary Clinton, the DNC, and Obama was funding that "Trump Dossier", to do the exact same thing to President Trump. So how much of the $12 million went to the British spy and the Russians for that false "Trump Dossier" being used to try to get President Trump convicted and sent to prison, which Paul Manafort and Rick Gates are being prosecuted for by Robert Mueller, since "you know so much more about this than anyone else", and seem to know more about what Hillary Clinton's, the DNC's, and Obama's monies are funding "than anyone else?"
WOW, even more lies! "All of the concocted stories claiming 'Hillary r****d the DNC' against Bernie" were not concocted, they were gotten from the e-mails that Hillary Clinton and John Podesta claimed that the Russians hacked from the DNC and Clinton campaign computers and gave to Wikileaks to publish, which Julian Assange and those working for and associated with Wikileaks said that they got nothing from the Russians, but those DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails were leaked to them by an IT worker with the DNC, who most people speculate was Seth Rich who they also believe was murdered for those leaks, since the FBI has reported that they found all those DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails on Seth Rich's personal lap top computer that the FBI confiscated from Seth Rich's apartment when investigating his murder. Debbie Wasserman Schultz was fired and resigned as DNC Chairwoman when those e-mails proved that she colluded with the Hillary Clinton campaign to rig the primary e******ns for Hillary Clinton and against Bernie Sanders. But it didn't stop there, because Donna Brazile then took over the DNC Chairwoman job from the #2 position in the DNC, but then it was discovered that she too was rigging the e******n against Bernie Sanders when it was discovered that she had gotten P**********l debate questions in advance from CNN who she also worked for, and during the primary P**********l Debate between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, she had given those CNN debate questions to Hillary Clinton in advance of that debate. Then she did the same thing in the general e******n P**********l Debate between Hillary Clinto and Donald Trump, which caused her to eventually be fired and having to resign too. You need to get Donna Brazile's book and read it, for even though she's as guilty as the rest, she is "ratting" them all out, because she doesn't want to take the blame and the fall all by herself, as Hillary Clinton had been blaming her loss on everyone else but herself.
You claim that, "I keep reading news articles that say 'more and more of the dossier is being confirmed'," but nobody else are finding any news articles saying that, not even the liberal biased mainstream media, for if it was true, that is all we'd be hearing from those liberal biased mainstream media, and since they couldn't prove it true when it first came out, they never published it, calling it unfounded and undocumented, and if that had changed, then they'd be the first to tell us and publish what is true in the dossier. So since you are reading articles that, "more and more of the dossier is being confirmed", then tell us which parts are they saying that is being confirmed, because if an article like that is really being published, they'd certainly tell everyone which parts have been found to be true, so which parts is it that they've now found to be true?
I'm waiting for the final outcome too, and I'm "tickled pink about it", because everything that Robert Mueller is charging his scapegoats with, which so far has had nothing to do with any Trump/Russian collusion, are things that Democrats are deeply involved in and are guilty of also, like John and Tony Posesta working for those exact same Ukranians, at the exact same time, and for the exact same reasons, as Robert Mueller has indicted Paul Manafort and Rick Gates for, and now Tony Podesta has resigned from his company to seperate the two entities, where he either accepts the guilt to save his comapnay, or blames his company to make himself look innocent, and time will tell, as the DOJ is waiting and watching, before they start the same type of indictments on mostly Democrats that have doing the exact same things, for the Podestas did not register as foreign agents until after the fact also, just as Paul Manafort and Rick gates also did, and there are many, many more out there that are guilty of the same, and this is only the beginning, which will also engulf the Clintons and their foundation. So I wait with great anticipation too.
I haven't read anything on Breibart since he died, and I don't like InfoWars, so I don't watch anything that they provide either.
But you claim you don't care who funded the "Trump Dossier", yet you keep passing on the lies that it was a Republican, which if you know that for sure you should at least know who that Republican is, and the date he funded it, as I won't even ask how much he funded.
But as far as opposition research being unimportant to you, it seems that is what you and others are going after President Trump for, colluding with the Russians to get information against Hillary Clinton, and publishing it to win the e******n, when that is exactly what Hillary Clinton, the DNC, and Obama was attempting to do with the false Russian information that they got in collusion with those Russians in producing the "Trump Dossier", which they tell us is against the law and how they're going to get President Trump and impeach him, for supposedly doing this exact same thing.
Also all the political advertisements on social media that the Russians paid for, was in favor of Hillary Clinton and against President Trump, if the owners of all those social media companies were telling the t***h to the congressional committee investigating it last week.
That's a neat way to explain why Hillary Clinton, the DNC, and Obama paid $12 million to the liberal law firm that was paying Fusian GPS to pay the British spy Steele and the Russians to produce that "Trump Dossier", which Robert Mueller says he has proof of Paul Manafort and Rick gates paying only $4 million for the report they provided to the Ukranians that was used to get their political opposition convicted and sent to prison, which is what Hillary Clinton, the DNC, and Obama was funding that "Trump Dossier", to do the exact same thing to President Trump. So how much of the $12 million went to the British spy and the Russians for that false "Trump Dossier" being used to try to get President Trump convicted and sent to prison, which Paul Manafort and Rick Gates are being prosecuted for by Robert Mueller, since "you know so much more about this than anyone else", and seem to know more about what Hillary Clinton's, the DNC's, and Obama's monies are funding "than anyone else?"
WOW, even more lies! "All of the concocted stories claiming 'Hillary r****d the DNC' against Bernie" were not concocted, they were gotten from the e-mails that Hillary Clinton and John Podesta claimed that the Russians hacked from the DNC and Clinton campaign computers and gave to Wikileaks to publish, which Julian Assange and those working for and associated with Wikileaks said that they got nothing from the Russians, but those DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails were leaked to them by an IT worker with the DNC, who most people speculate was Seth Rich who they also believe was murdered for those leaks, since the FBI has reported that they found all those DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails on Seth Rich's personal lap top computer that the FBI confiscated from Seth Rich's apartment when investigating his murder. Debbie Wasserman Schultz was fired and resigned as DNC Chairwoman when those e-mails proved that she colluded with the Hillary Clinton campaign to rig the primary e******ns for Hillary Clinton and against Bernie Sanders. But it didn't stop there, because Donna Brazile then took over the DNC Chairwoman job from the #2 position in the DNC, but then it was discovered that she too was rigging the e******n against Bernie Sanders when it was discovered that she had gotten P**********l debate questions in advance from CNN who she also worked for, and during the primary P**********l Debate between Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders, she had given those CNN debate questions to Hillary Clinton in advance of that debate. Then she did the same thing in the general e******n P**********l Debate between Hillary Clinto and Donald Trump, which caused her to eventually be fired and having to resign too. You need to get Donna Brazile's book and read it, for even though she's as guilty as the rest, she is "ratting" them all out, because she doesn't want to take the blame and the fall all by herself, as Hillary Clinton had been blaming her loss on everyone else but herself.
You claim that, "I keep reading news articles that say 'more and more of the dossier is being confirmed'," but nobody else are finding any news articles saying that, not even the liberal biased mainstream media, for if it was true, that is all we'd be hearing from those liberal biased mainstream media, and since they couldn't prove it true when it first came out, they never published it, calling it unfounded and undocumented, and if that had changed, then they'd be the first to tell us and publish what is true in the dossier. So since you are reading articles that, "more and more of the dossier is being confirmed", then tell us which parts are they saying that is being confirmed, because if an article like that is really being published, they'd certainly tell everyone which parts have been found to be true, so which parts is it that they've now found to be true?
I'm waiting for the final outcome too, and I'm "tickled pink about it", because everything that Robert Mueller is charging his scapegoats with, which so far has had nothing to do with any Trump/Russian collusion, are things that Democrats are deeply involved in and are guilty of also, like John and Tony Posesta working for those exact same Ukranians, at the exact same time, and for the exact same reasons, as Robert Mueller has indicted Paul Manafort and Rick Gates for, and now Tony Podesta has resigned from his company to seperate the two entities, where he either accepts the guilt to save his comapnay, or blames his company to make himself look innocent, and time will tell, as the DOJ is waiting and watching, before they start the same type of indictments on mostly Democrats that have doing the exact same things, for the Podestas did not register as foreign agents until after the fact also, just as Paul Manafort and Rick gates also did, and there are many, many more out there that are guilty of the same, and this is only the beginning, which will also engulf the Clintons and their foundation. So I wait with great anticipation too.
JediKnight wrote:
Randy: it is interesting that you know so much mor... (show quote)