cold iron Loc: White House

How many times have we seen this? A conservative is invited to speak on a college campus and the l*****ts won't have it!

The speaker is accused of being a dangerous, h**eful, sexist, Islamophobic, xenophobic, h********c, r****t bigot and worse.

Students, administrators, and campus organizations mobilize to shut down the event.

The media is complicit, with libelous opinion pieces masquerading as news stories, filled with cherry-picked or manufactured quotes in support of the protestors agenda.

If the event isn't cancelled, additional and expensive security measures are required to protect the speaker and the audience from the protestors. Often these peaceful protests turn violent from the left, resulting in injuries and property damage.

Free speech and the open exchange of ideas take another hit.

This is yet another example of the illiberal left's attempt to shut down free speech on college campuses. Rather than simply choosing not to attend, or offering a dissenting viewpoint in an informed, respectful and courteous manner, their preferred approach is to intimidate and shut down conservative speakers. They've even resorted to calling me, a practicing Jew, anti-Semitic and a neo-N**i. The t***h is the left are the N**i impersonators.


Once Liberals embraced the competition of ideas and believed that if their idea is the best, it will ultimately win the day. But liberalism has essentially died on American campuses k**led by George Soros l*****ts. We can only hope they will see who the real h**ers and bigots are, since the right seems unwilling to fight back. The police just stand by and watch the war go on.

Randy131 Loc: Florida

Here is what the liberals, progressives, and Democrats h**e for the American people to learn, who the real F*****ts are, and historically have always been:

Left Is Now The Party Of F*****m !!! History Repeats It's-Self !!!

August 9, 2017

The American Left Is Now The Party Of F*****m. The Democrats’ 'big lie', blaming own F*****t sins on Trump and Republicans.

We hear the word “f*****t” a whole lot these days: Trump is a f*****t, if not a N**i; The Republican Party is the f*****t party.

As for the left, the Democrats, they present themselves as the anti-f*****ts, the people fighting f*****m. We can see this in the names of l*****t groups like A****a, which stands for anti-f*****m. Yet, when we look around, we see the Democratic and l*****t protesters who are disrupting the inauguration. Who are organizing violent rallies around the country, who are stopping campus speakers from speaking.

These are people who seem to be using f*****t and N**i tactics. The masked A****a thugs carrying weapons seem eerily similar to the f*****t B****shirts and the N**i Brownshirts.

So isn’t it strange that the people purporting to fight f*****m resemble the f*****ts in shutting down speech. And disrupting democratic debate through the use, or threats, of violence?

We need to look at f*****m more closely and ask: Is f*****m really a phenomenon of the left or of the right? Let’s begin with the remarkable statement by Adolf Hitler in a 1927 speech. “We are socialists,” he said. “We are the enemies of today’s capitalist system of exploitation and we are determined to destroy the system under all conditions.” Does that sound like Donald Trump? Actually, it sounds a lot more like Elizabeth Warren or Bernie Sanders.

Hitler changed the name of the German Workers Party to the National Socialist German Workers Party. He wanted to emphasize that the N**is were socialists, and that N**i economic policy involved complete state control of the private sector. Indeed, the very name N**i is a compression of the two terms “national” and “socialist.”

All the leading figures of early f*****m, not merely in Germany, but also in Italy, France and England – were men of the left. Most of them moved seamlessly from Marxism and socialism, to f*****m and N**ism during the 1920s and 1930s.

Here are some examples. Jean Allemane, famous for his role in the Dreyfus case, one of the great figures of French socialism, became a f*****t. So did the socialist organizer Georges Valois. Marcel Deat, the founder of the Parti Socialiste de France, eventually quit and started a pro-f*****t party in 1936. Jaques Dor**t, a French c*******t, moved his Parti Populaire Francais into the f*****t camp. Belgian socialist writer Henri de Man t***sitioned into becoming a f*****t theoretician. In England, Oswald Mosley, a socialist and Labor Party Member of Parliament, broke with the laborites because he found them insufficiently radical. He later founded the British Union of F*****ts and became the country’s leading N**i sympathizer.

In Germany, there was a similar traffic from socialism to f*****m. To give a single example, the socialist playwright Gerhart Hauptmann embraced Hitler’s National Socialism and produced plays during the Third Reich. After the war, he called himself a c*******t and staged his productions in Soviet-dominated East Berlin.

In Italy, philosopher Giovanni Gentile moved from Marxism to become f*****m’s leading intellectual. Many Italian labor organizers made the same journey: Ottavio Dinale, Tullio, Masotti, Carlo Silvestri and Umberto Pasella. The socialist writer Agostino Lanzillo joined Mussolini’s parliament as a member of the f*****t party.

Nicola Bombacci, one of the founders of the Italian Community Party, became Mussolini’s top adviser in 1943.
Gentile’s disciple Ugo Spirito, who also served Mussolini, moved from Marxism to f*****m and then back to Marxism. Like Hauptmann, Spirito became a c*******t sympathizer after World War II and called for a new “synthesis” between c*******m and f*****m.

All of this is incomprehensible if f*****m is considered somehow “right wing.” None of these men saw it that way. They didn’t “convert” from left to right. Rather, they viewed themselves as moving seamlessly from one form of socialism to another. From a purely class-based socialism to a broader form of socialism that took into account class as well as national loyalties.

We can see this in the example of Mussolini, who established the world’s first f*****t regime in Rome, a decade before Hitler came to power. Mussolini was the leading Marxist in Italy, the recognized leader of Italian socialism. After his successful March on Rome, Lenin sent his congratulations, praising Mussolini as a fellow revolutionary on the left. Mussolini’s career shows how f*****m grew out of Marxism. Marx had predicted that the increased impoverishment of workers would cause a socialist revolution to erupt in the most advanced industrial countries: Germany and Great Britain.

That didn’t happen. This created the famous “crisis of Marxism” in the late 19th and early 20th century. Out of that crisis came two new forms of socialism: Leninist Bolshevism and Mussolini’s F*****m.

“The foundation of f*****m,” Mussolini writes in his “Autobiography,” “is the conception of the state. F*****m conceives the State as an absolute. In comparison to which all individuals or groups are relative, only to be conceived of in their relation to the State. For us F*****ts, the State … represents the immanent spirit of the nation.” Replace the word “f*****m” with “progressivism,” and we could be hearing these words recited at a Democratic National Convention.

Mussolini broke with Marx on a single point. Marx insisted that workers are loyal only to their class. “The working man,” Marxists liked to say, “has no country.” Mussolini knew that people are no less attached to their nation than to their occupation. Consequently, Mussolini, like Hitler, embraced socialism of a special kind, namely national socialism.

Like the Marxists, the f*****ts and the N**is also embraced violence as a revolutionary concept. N**i violence involved disrupting campus events, threatening and beating up dissenters. And enforcing a conformity of thought and practice in line with the regnant ideology. Notice the close similarity between this f*****t bullying and the conduct of the American left today.

In ideology and in tactics, the American left today is the party of f*****m. The only difference is that it denies its true pedigree. Their big lie is to blame their own sins on Trump and the Republicans. In a sick twist, the real f*****ts in America pretend to be anti-f*****ts. And accuse the true anti-f*****ts of being f*****ts.

cold iron Loc: White House

Excelent, this should be taught in every school in the US. Seems the IQ of our country is sinking into ignorance.

pafret Loc: Northeast

All too true! The left consistently changes the meanings of words and invests them with their own definitions in order to calumniate the right. The concerted efforts of the media and our "entertainment" industry combine to heap scorn on conservatives, conditioning the unthinking gimme class, to h**e reason and order.

Ricktloml

Thanks for the details