One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Posts for: ImLogicallyRight
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 299 next>>
May 26, 2021 01:48:35   #
permafrost wrote:
LOL,,,, gosh what a hopeless thing to say.. you got nothing and fear everything..

sleep on it, the sun will rise tomorrow and the birds sing and sun shine, you will feel better..

Having your special criminal fired is not the end of the world.. live a little, life is short enjoy!!!


Comprehension is not your strong suit
Go to
May 26, 2021 01:46:25   #
They don't understand facts
Go to
May 26, 2021 01:43:21   #
Good interview.
Go to
May 26, 2021 01:20:11   #
SOS
Go to
May 26, 2021 01:18:32   #
That is what China bought with their business connections with H****r
Go to
May 26, 2021 00:42:29   #
EmilyD wrote:
I am writing this to let you know that on Saturday my brother, Tom, passed away from complications stemming from his first shot of the M*****a v*****e. He received the shot on Tuesday, April 26 and was awaiting his second shot to be given on May 27.

On April 27, Tom's arm swelled up where he got the shot, and it was very sore. On May 3, he started to feel dizzy and experienced a severe headache and nausea. According to his wife, he said he hadn't been feeling good for a few days. By May 7 he had all the symptoms of an allergic reaction to the v*****e...body aches, very tired, chills and the injection site and his armpit, shoulder and upper arm became very red and swollen. He had no history wh**ever of any allergies to anything that he knew of in his 66 years of life. On May 9 he began having a fever. It persisted for two more days when on May 11, his wife became alarmed and called an ambulance because he was so fatigued he was unable to get up from his chair. He was rushed to a hospital in a city near his hometown where they pronounced that he was in the midst of an acute reaction to the M*****a shot. They kept him there for a few days, where he continued to worsen. His O2 was decreasing, BP was all over the place and he was becoming more and more unstable. On May 16 he was airlifted to the Mass General Hospital in Boston. His breathing became labored on May18, and he was intubated. His body continued to deteriorate and on Saturday, May 22 early in the afternoon his kidneys started to break down. He passed away Saturday night at 10:23 PM.

We bury him on Friday. His cause of death: "m**A-1273 hypersensitivity."

I am extremely grieved over his death, but I am beyond angry that his life has been taken from him because of this. And of course, there's nothing to be done about it. There are disclaimers all over the place. The hospital gave us their disclaimers and showed us the pharmaceutical company's disclaimers. We can't blame the hospital, anyway. They did everything they possibly could to save his life. I am just so angry right now. This is wrong.....wrong.
I am writing this to let you know that on Saturday... (show quote)


My sincerest sympathies. No one should die from the cure. And to suffer that long is also hard. That is ten times as hard as actually getting c***d and dying. One more reason for me to not take that chance. Thanks for alerting us believers and the serious investigators of these drugs.
Go to
May 26, 2021 00:29:05   #
Thanks for posting that.
Go to
May 25, 2021 17:55:07   #
Milosia2 wrote:
You should’ve learned to read when you had the chance.


I don't need to read bull schitte. And it that was a cut and paste from ewe, it is bull schitte.
Go to
May 25, 2021 17:52:58   #
SWMBO wrote:
Unfortunately the Marxist Socialists that make up the Democrat party would refuse to pay attention to the t***h because it would negate their goal of taking over the country and making the USA a puppet state of the Chinese C*******ts.


Agreed.
Go to
May 25, 2021 17:48:58   #
ChJoe wrote:
Good point. And even if they aren't gas lighting us and truly believe their false premise, there is no educating them.


***there is no educating them.
>>>But it is so much fun making them look like the fools they are.
Go to
May 25, 2021 17:21:42   #
Michael Rich wrote:
I suspect that rinaldo is a retread....


Is that retread or r****d?
Go to
May 25, 2021 17:18:10   #
nonalien1 wrote:
Why hold a new e******n? If T***p w*n shouldn't be be sworn in and take his place in the oval office.?


SCOTUS would have to step in and I'm not sure there is a law or constitutional process that would allow it. I would agree with you, if it were legally possible.
Go to
May 25, 2021 17:14:30   #
moldyoldy wrote:
Has any repugnant suggested that? No.


YES
Go to
May 25, 2021 17:08:27   #
lindajoy wrote:
Women who wear primarily suits, do so to send a message of “ authority or respect.” Image in other words..But in fact what they are doing is exposing their own lack of self confidence..

Its all about female empowerment and paving the way in wearing menswear.. Stupid I know but hey there’s an i***t born every day, correction, there’s a lot of women who do not have any self confidence or self respect ...

They b***h (women's march, ) but fall flat in delivering wh**ever with action instead of just words..You know men are bad~~~😉

harris needs a fashion coordinator no doubt, but still she will look as silly as she does every ,few time, she’s out of her closet basement..She’s an 80’s throw back thats all...
Women who wear primarily suits, do so to send a me... (show quote)


I do agree with, "send a message of “authority or respect.” And in many positions of power or industry, those with the power should look the part. That goes for Congress and V. P. and diplomats and bosses of companies. Men might sit in their office and take off their coat, rarely the tie, and when greeting people or walking about they grab that damn suit coat. It is the uniform of the day, every day at work. Dark gray etc. No bright reds or yellows or greens. You are there for business and acting with earned authority, and should have an image of authority. That might mean a skirt or pants for ladies, but a suit like, women's cut, top over a blouse. All I see form all to many women in Congress or news casts is ladies looking like they are going to a party or casual Friday. And they often look great. Just out of place to my way of thinking. It makes it a lot harder to take their words or commentary, with the same values as someone in a suit, looking like they actually have authority and came to work. Sleeveless, short sleeves, to much jewelry, to much cleavage, skin tight pants. They aren't secretaries, receptionists or clerks or that 16 year old page. They are now there, and should dress the part. If they don't want to be treated as sexual objects, quit dressing the part. Dress to fit into the role, and not standout for your clothes, instead of your intellect and knowledge and authority.

Anyway, just an opinion, and thanks for a decent reply. I was really waiting for the trolls to step in.

One more point. Women in the military. They have fatigues when doing the dirty jobs, but for office work of situations where they wear the dress uniforms, they do have women's cut clothes, but uniform and respectfully dressed with a jacket or coat. Easier to accept their authority like that. Even different hats. And they have more freedom with hair styles.

Cheers and have a nice day.
Go to
May 25, 2021 16:20:11   #
Milosia2 wrote:
Blather!
You lost me at capitalism is the government.
Capitalism is not a form of government. It is an economic model .
And Bernie was also a capitalist .
So, mostly blather.


Milosia responds again with his usual nonsense. Mostly blather.
Go to
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 299 next>>
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.