4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory

billy a Loc: South Florida

...muscle-memory.

DaWg44

We are so lucky to have a Vice President with such class & sense of personal decorum. Not only does she wipe her hand, she immediately turns & walks away.

Obviously, this man is of no importance in her grand scheme of becoming President. It reminds me of the show she put on with Clyburn in SC. She was reluctant to have any contact with his v**ers & repeatedly turned away from him & them, almost running to an suv to leave.

Maybe we could come up with some kind o lend/lease program for her to work for other Third World countries when she is not having to work herself to death solving our border problems.

It is unfair for America to not share her with other struggling nations now that we have v**ed ourselves into being a struggling, impoverished nation. Young girls in other countries need to be able to her melodious laughter in adversity,

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

“She” is an insult, period...

Smedley_buzkill

I liked her better when she was still giving the mayor of San Francisco hummers for job security.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Her true accomplishments, I guess~~

ImLogicallyRight

Maybe it is just instinctive. You shake a hand you wipe it off. Fron the old days. You shake a tally wacker you wipe it off.

ImLogicallyRight

I will give Harris a little credit. Nothing about her manner or politics of course. Her credit account is well over drawn in those areas.

But it is her dress, or lack of one. Men in politics and CEO's of business (Suckerberg excluded) all seem to know, the uniform of the job and position. If a woman wears pants, and many in politics often do, they ought to at least have some class while doing it. Harris seems to always be in a dark suit that is sort of well fitting and cut for a woman.

On the other hand their was the absolutely hideous outfits of Hilliary Clinton (looking like an cracked easter egg) and that stupid little vest of Elizabeth Warren was gawd awful. But the absolute worst is Lori Lightfoot dressed in an ill fitting dumpy mens suit.

So, lets give Harris a little credit. Damn little. When it comes to wearing pants, look at what else is out there.

Been wanting to criticize those other b***hes for the way they dress for a long time. Seemed like a good time to do it. Cheers

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Women who wear primarily suits, do so to send a message of “ authority or respect.” Image in other words..But in fact what they are doing is exposing their own lack of self confidence..

Its all about female empowerment and paving the way in wearing menswear.. Stupid I know but hey there’s an i***t born every day, correction, there’s a lot of women who do not have any self confidence or self respect ...

They b***h (women's march, ) but fall flat in delivering wh**ever with action instead of just words..You know men are bad~~~😉

harris needs a fashion coordinator no doubt, but still she will look as silly as she does every ,few time, she’s out of her closet basement..She’s an 80’s throw back thats all...

ImLogicallyRight

I do agree with, "send a message of “authority or respect.” And in many positions of power or industry, those with the power should look the part. That goes for Congress and V. P. and diplomats and bosses of companies. Men might sit in their office and take off their coat, rarely the tie, and when greeting people or walking about they grab that damn suit coat. It is the uniform of the day, every day at work. Dark gray etc. No bright reds or yellows or greens. You are there for business and acting with earned authority, and should have an image of authority. That might mean a skirt or pants for ladies, but a suit like, women's cut, top over a blouse. All I see form all to many women in Congress or news casts is ladies looking like they are going to a party or casual Friday. And they often look great. Just out of place to my way of thinking. It makes it a lot harder to take their words or commentary, with the same values as someone in a suit, looking like they actually have authority and came to work. Sleeveless, short sleeves, to much jewelry, to much cleavage, skin tight pants. They aren't secretaries, receptionists or clerks or that 16 year old page. They are now there, and should dress the part. If they don't want to be treated as sexual objects, quit dressing the part. Dress to fit into the role, and not standout for your clothes, instead of your intellect and knowledge and authority.

Anyway, just an opinion, and thanks for a decent reply. I was really waiting for the trolls to step in.

One more point. Women in the military. They have fatigues when doing the dirty jobs, but for office work of situations where they wear the dress uniforms, they do have women's cut clothes, but uniform and respectfully dressed with a jacket or coat. Easier to accept their authority like that. Even different hats. And they have more freedom with hair styles.

Cheers and have a nice day.

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

I agree with everything you said here... Women can dress the power role but do not have to give up their femininity in the process. There is a respectable balance often displayed with the career woman who is confident in her job because of her knowledge and ability and does not fear her male counter part..

Establish the boundaries early and all is well..More importantly Establish your values through your abilities not your body... Some women believe it takes both and later on find out they lost out..

Thank You as well...

elledee

Her fashion issues are almost as bad as her moral issues but she is a perfect demonrat morally and ethically bankrupt ....looking forward to impeaching her and creepy after the midterms and send her back to California back on her back doing what she's good at