One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
OPP Poll...........Roe V Wade
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Oct 22, 2021 19:33:20   #
Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
And why were the social, emotional & physical damages so devastating? Answer the question & you'll likely come to some conclusions that are even tougher than the decision.


Apparently you have already drawn conclusions so why don't you tell me first and then I will tell you my thoughts.

Reply
Oct 22, 2021 19:43:33   #
crazylibertarian Loc: Florida by way of New York & Rhode Island
 
It's human life that is being ended; human life that the woman had within her and they know, and can not avoid that conclusion because there is none.

Reply
Oct 22, 2021 20:49:33   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
American Vet wrote:
What do you believe would be an acceptable compromise?


As the progressives love everything about Europe; France’s model is NO abortion after 12 weeks unless it can be shown, by medical committee, as a medical necessity.

Reply
 
 
Oct 22, 2021 21:08:51   #
Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
It's human life that is being ended; human life that the woman had within her and they know, and can not avoid that conclusion because there is none.


What determines that it is human life? Is it is a human life because it has human DNA at conception? Some states call the murder of a pregnant woman as two murders. Is an abortion murder and then should the doctor and woman be charged as such? Is the morning after pill also premeditated murder? Are you prepared to call every miscarriage as possible negligent homicide or murder to be investigated and prosecuted as such? If the zygote is in fact human life then these murders or negligent homicides should be prosecuted... right? If all these women who have a miscarriage shouldn't be prosecuted as murderers then you have a contradiction in your beliefs.

Reply
Oct 22, 2021 21:24:46   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
Kevyn wrote:
I sort of hope so, if they do we will not see another Republican administration for a half century.


that would result in the end of any liberties/freedom this country has. Hope I'm dead if that happens.

Reply
Oct 22, 2021 21:28:13   #
American Vet
 
Strycker wrote:
What determines that it is human life? Is it is a human life because it has human DNA at conception? Some states call the murder of a pregnant woman as two murders. Is an abortion murder and then should the doctor and woman be charged as such? Is the morning after pill also premeditated murder? Are you prepared to call every miscarriage as possible negligent homicide or murder to be investigated and prosecuted as such? If the zygote is in fact human life then these murders or negligent homicides should be prosecuted... right? If all these women who have a miscarriage shouldn't be prosecuted as murderers then you have a contradiction in your beliefs.
What determines that it is human life? Is it is a ... (show quote)


"What determines that it is human life? Is it is a human life because it has human DNA at conception?"
What else would one call it? DNA proves that it is indeed a human.


"Are you prepared to call every miscarriage as possible negligent homicide or murder to be investigated and prosecuted as such?"
Try another analogy. Saying a miscarriage is 'negligent homicide' would be akin to say a heart attack is negligent homicide and/or suicide. Miscarriages occur; just as a ruptured aneurysm might occur. No contradiction in beliefs there.

Reply
Oct 22, 2021 21:29:57   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
Strycker wrote:
Disregarding the 10th amendment argument for now, I think Roe Vs Wade got about the best compromise currently possible for elective abortions. Going back to back alley abortions is not an option in my mind. Neither is prosecuting desperate women who find themselves in a difficult position. However going to no limit on all elective abortions is not right either. Fetuses, at some point, have a right to life. The issue is what that point is. In my opinion, somewhere between 15 to 20 weeks seems to currently be a decent compromise for elective abortions. Abortion after twenty weeks should be allowed only when a women's life is in physical danger. Exceptions for mental illness is not a acceptable reason. There is more than ample time for a women to choose on how to proceed long before 20 weeks.
Disregarding the 10th amendment argument for now, ... (show quote)


I don't know if you have ever seen a fetus at 14/15 week gestation, maybe take a look.

Reply
 
 
Oct 22, 2021 21:35:12   #
microphor Loc: Home is TN
 
Strycker wrote:
I don't know the number of actual deaths from abortions in the 60's. I'll take your word for it. I do know a lot of women who suffered a lot of physical and emotional damage having to suffer through the process of illegal or self induced abortions. Some I have known personally. The decisions were never easy for them but the social, emotional and physical damage was devastating.


Part of the problem of that era was how women were treated if pregnant outside of marriage. That does not exist today. The list of people waiting for babies to adopt is huge. An estimated 2 million couples in the US waiting to adopt.

Reply
Oct 22, 2021 22:23:09   #
EN Submarine Qualified Loc: Wisconsin East coast
 
crazylibertarian wrote:
And why were the social, emotional & physical damages so devastating? Answer the question & you'll likely come to some conclusions that are even tougher than the decision.


What is so difficult to understand within the 4 words "Thou shalt not kill"?

Reply
Oct 22, 2021 23:30:35   #
Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
 
microphor wrote:
Part of the problem of that era was how women were treated if pregnant outside of marriage. That does not exist today. The list of people waiting for babies to adopt is huge. An estimated 2 million couples in the US waiting to adopt.


And 400,000 kids in foster care waiting to be adopted. Why is that?

Reply
Oct 22, 2021 23:38:07   #
Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
 
American Vet wrote:
"What determines that it is human life? Is it is a human life because it has human DNA at conception?"
What else would one call it? DNA proves that it is indeed a human.


"Are you prepared to call every miscarriage as possible negligent homicide or murder to be investigated and prosecuted as such?"
Try another analogy. Saying a miscarriage is 'negligent homicide' would be akin to say a heart attack is negligent homicide and/or suicide. Miscarriages occur; just as a ruptured aneurysm might occur. No contradiction in beliefs there.
"What determines that it is human life? Is it... (show quote)


What about, say, a drug addict having a miscarriage because of her drug use? Or someone driving under the influence having an accident that causes a miscarriage? I can think of a lot of instances where a miscarriage would not have happened if the woman had been more careful. Isn't that the definition of negligence? Knowing the likely outcome and doing it anyway.

Someone with a high risk of a heart attack who does activities likely to induce a heart attack may in fact be committing suicide.

My point is, there is no simple one size fits all answer on either side of the issue. Hence, a need for a compromise.

Reply
 
 
Oct 22, 2021 23:41:49   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Strycker wrote:
Disregarding the 10th amendment argument for now, I think Roe Vs Wade got about the best compromise currently possible for elective abortions. Going back to back alley abortions is not an option in my mind. Neither is prosecuting desperate women who find themselves in a difficult position. However going to no limit on all elective abortions is not right either. Fetuses, at some point, have a right to life. The issue is what that point is. In my opinion, somewhere between 15 to 20 weeks seems to currently be a decent compromise for elective abortions. Abortion after twenty weeks should be allowed only when a women's life is in physical danger. Exceptions for mental illness is not a acceptable reason. There is more than ample time for a women to choose on how to proceed long before 20 weeks.
Disregarding the 10th amendment argument for now, ... (show quote)
What Roe v Wade actually did was open the door for a booming abortion industry and gave PPH carte blanche in disposition of body parts.

63 million babies killed in the womb since R v W.

Abortion Clock: real time

Reply
Oct 22, 2021 23:46:39   #
Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
What Roe v Wade actually did was open the door for a booming abortion industry and gave PPH carte blanche in disposition of body parts.

63 million babies killed in the womb since R v W.

Abortion Clock: real time


If a woman is likely to die during pregnancy or child birth is an abortion permissible to save her life?

Reply
Oct 23, 2021 02:06:11   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Strycker wrote:
If a woman is likely to die during pregnancy or child birth is an abortion permissible to save her life?
A fraction of all abortions are performed to save a mother's life.

A survey of more than 2.4 million aborting women performed by the states of Florida, Louisiana, Minnesota, Nebraska, South Dakota and Utah during the years 1996 to 2020 gives us an accurate estimate of the number of “hard case” abortions, since these are the numbers that abortion clinics must report in official documents to these states:

1.14% are done to save the life or physical health of the mother.
1.28% to preserve the mental health of the mother.
0.39% in cases of rape or incest.
0.69% for fetal birth defects, or eugenics.
3.50% for all the hard cases combined.
96.50% of all abortions are therefore performed for social or economic reasons.

Reply
Oct 23, 2021 02:38:13   #
proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA
 
Meet the woman whose conception initiated Roe V Wade....Although it was an abortion case, her mom never had an abortion, instead she put her up for adoption...This is Baby Roe's story....

https://abcnews.go.com/US/daughter-jane-roe-woman-landmark-abortion-case-terms/story?id=80329351

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.