Ranger7374 wrote:
That would be nice wouldn't be? But let's not put the cart before the horse, let's not be like the Democrats.
First, we need to bring this into an open court.
We need to get a list of witnesses, I been working on that list and here's what I got thus far:
The entire Trump White House from 2016 to present. Not only those who are working for the white house now, but also those who left during the first two years of Trump's administration.
Next,
Comey, Strok, Page, Mueller, the "squad" or like John Kennedy calls them, "the four horsewomen of the apocalypse", Joe Biden, President Obama, Hillary Clinton, John Kerry, Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, Susan Rice, Janet Napolitano, Adam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi and incidentally I'd also call Chuck Schumer. I would also question Jeb Bush, Bernie Sanders, Hunter Biden and Bill Clinton. The entire executive members of the following departments: DOJ, including Sessions; Homeland Security, State Department;
I would recall, General Flynn, Paul Manafort, and Cohn, George Papadopoulos, Rudy Giuliani, Carter Page.
I would also cut into some reporters too, I would call John Solomon and Sean Hannity, as well as the anchors of CNN and NBC.
(I would leave ABC and CBS alone, for now at least)
The reason I would call the members of the press, is to establish why they wrote the stories they wrote, why they felt their opinions were the way they were. Getting all the information out in one setting before a grand jury.
I also believe that we should nominate as a grand jury. Since there are 100 senators, two from each state, I believe this Justice Department Grand Jury should be made up of a single staff member from the Senators. In the event of a Tie, then a Judge that represents the Judicial Department should be the referee.
That would be nice wouldn't be? But let's not put ... (
show quote)
Try to put some focus and relevance to such a list, what are you hoping to establish here?