One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Ban all Semi-Auto's For The Common Good!!!
Page <<first <prev 10 of 24 next> last>>
Jun 6, 2019 14:09:01   #
JoyV
 
badbob85037 wrote:
The reality of this is the first few gun owners will be killed, jailed,and fined and that is only if these gun grabbers can find some group stupid enough to enforce it. More and more they will start seeing on the other side of the door a guy wearing a CS mask sporting a semi Automatic rifle. What ever their tactics they will be coming into someone's home through a door and some will die. As their ranks thin they will either stop or be carved down to nothing. No civil war just the deaths of gun owners and a group of stupid people.

If they employ the military you will have at the least 3/4 of them deserting taking their weapons with them taking up the cause for basic human rights. They won't be crashing into family homes to kill civilians. You will have the raiding of armories and pilots will man fighter jets with groups manning bombers taking the fight to the tyrants that try to disarm us. DC will be leveled and tyrants will start hiding under rocks.

If every member of the military joined in they would still be out numbered 20 to one. There are millions of vets out their that still remember their MOS. including generals that would organize the citizens within days.They would over whelm national guard units. Many would die on both sides but the outcome would remain the same due to the numbers. Fines? Jail. We ain't talking British or Australians. We are talking about Americans and I don't know anyone that wouldn't act like an American when the SHTF except you and you will be to busy finding a rock to crawl under.

Now do you understand? If still nothing go to Arizona and see the people practice what they preach. Out of my cold dead hand.
The reality of this is the first few gun owners wi... (show quote)



Reply
Jun 6, 2019 14:19:35   #
JoyV
 
PeterS wrote:
Because a race car driven on a public road has a higher propensity for danger to others than does a VW. It's the propensity to harm others that's being measured by the comparison. I don't expect you to understand because it's not a logical fallacy.

As for logic, the only reason you con's cling to semi-auto's is because of your paranoia of government. You think that somehow your semi-auto is going to allow you to overthrow an Obamaesque type government. So you are holding the rest of the nation hostage over the false sense of security you gain by owning semi-auto's. What you are overlooking is that you will have to go through the local police, the state police, the national guard, the FBI, the ATF, and if that isn't enough--eventually, our military.

And I know, you people think that all those forces will support you in your quest built around fallacies spoon feed to you by your various talking heads. But if anywhere down the line the support is to defend government you people will be nothing but rolls of body bags. So where's the logic in that?

So again, for the common good, let's ban all semi-auto's and eliminate the favorite arm lunatics crave to harm society...
Because a race car driven on a public road has a h... (show quote)


You are correct that a race car driven at on a public road in traffic is inherently more than a VW bug if both are driven by an average driver. But the same isn't true of a semiautomatic vs a shotgun in the hands of the average citizen. It is the shotgun which is inherently more dangerous in close quarters or crowded conditions. The very conditions which are likely to prevail in an active mass shooting situation. Not to mention, the vast majority of guns owned by citizens are semiautomatics. While it is the rare citizen who owns a race car.

So it is YOUR analogy which is the illogical one.

Reply
Jun 6, 2019 14:22:35   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
permafrost wrote:
Well, byron... why are all you right wingers such lousy shots you need a 30 round magazine to feel you have a chance to save yourself??

If you can not do better, you do not deserve to be saved..


Hit him with 5 or less or die...


Perm, I don't have any reservations putting my shooting skills up against world class shooters.

Let me tell you of a little happening while visiting friends for dinner.

They have long road driving into their place..while sitting at the table, a unfamiliar van came bouncing up the drive.

I asked the lady of the house, do you know these people...she answered no.

Her husband was outside retrieving his briefcase from his vehicle, I stepped out and ducked behind a tree, the doors flew open on the van and a few men started piling out.

I peeked around the tree and asked them what they needed..one asshole said they were looking for a certain unknown person.

Just about then the owner was coming out of his briefcase with iron.

These guys were starting to spread out and with the firepower that I came out from behind the tree with, convinced these home invaders to quickly leave.

If it would have been a single shot 22 or a Bullbiden defensive ball point pen, maybe they would have challenged our resolve.

Obama believed in negotiating peace by backing in a bending over.

Ronald Reagan believed being well armed is the deterrent.

I choose Reagan's style.

Reply
 
 
Jun 6, 2019 14:34:27   #
bylm1-Bernie
 
permafrost wrote:
Well, byron... why are all you right wingers such lousy shots you need a 30 round magazine to feel you have a chance to save yourself??

If you can not do better, you do not deserve to be saved..


Hit him with 5 or less or die...



Could you maybe point out where in the Constitution it specifies the number of allowable rounds a magazine may contain?

Reply
Jun 6, 2019 14:36:53   #
JoyV
 
PeterS wrote:
What's your argument--because we can't get them all we shouldn't even try? 1) The manufacture and import of semi-autos come to an end so the amount of semi-auto's will start to go down. 2) Let the crazies fight over the remainder. What will happen is the price will go through the roof and they will become so price prohibitive that will remove guns from circulation right there. 3) What do you mean--set us up for defeat? We have the largest combined military/police forces of any nation on earth. Who can beat us? 4) We can't ever get anywhere unless we start. The conservative solution has always been to do nothing--or better yet put guns in the hands of everyone in this country. That's less of a solution than I am offering.
What's your argument--because we can't get them al... (show quote)


1)How will they start to go down. They are not a throw away commodity with a capability for single or even a dozen uses. The number of guns at the time that US manufacturing ceased would remain for years after. And the US isn't the only place guns are or can be manufactured. Not to mention home made guns.

2)Only if they become scarce would the price go through the roof. As I stated in #1, that would not be the case if their manufacturing were stopped in the US. And even if semiautomatics became scarce for some unforeseen reason, why would a murderer cease to murder simply because he would have to use some other type of gun or some other tool?

3)Anyone who has ever served in our military has taken an oath to defend our constitution. The average soldier, sailor, marine, or other; take an oath VERY SERIOUS!!!! Also, all are taught that obeying an illegal order does not absolve them of guilt. In this case the guilt would be treason. So just because our military might be ordered to attacked civilians exercising their constitutionally guaranteed right, does not mean they would ignore their oath and commit treason because they were ordered to.

4)And that is why the constitutionalist, as well as conservative (even if they aren't both) will do all in our power to block any START to dismantling our constitution!

Semper Forte

Reply
Jun 6, 2019 14:40:46   #
Mikeyavelli
 
permafrost wrote:
Well, byron... why are all you right wingers such lousy shots you need a 30 round magazine to feel you have a chance to save yourself??

If you can not do better, you do not deserve to be saved..


Hit him with 5 or less or die...


30 rounds to a marksman means 30 hits to the enemy. Don't worry, my .45 only holds eight rounds.
But I keep loaded clips. Less than a second to reload.

Reply
Jun 6, 2019 14:41:49   #
JoyV
 
permafrost wrote:
LOL...yes masks are the problem.. no doubt..


But I maintain.. just as we have reasonable and sensible laws for abortion, we can and need reasonable ans sensible laws concerning guns..

No action which kills so many people can be shrugged off as a by product of our constitutional rights..

Did our founding fathers feel that running down to the local inn and shooting up the diners would be the thing to do? No, not at all..


Note that our founding fathers did not think that because a gun could be used for bad outcomes, they should limit their use under the law. Your argument is one that can be better used FOR our constitutionally guaranteed rights, not against them.

Reply
 
 
Jun 6, 2019 15:37:25   #
Mikeyavelli
 
byronglimish wrote:
Maybe FEMA should fence them in.

They're most dangerous, in local areas, and to our whole sovereign existence.

The left is willing to sell us out as a sovereign people, we the people of all creeds and colors....hell, they're selling their own self interest out.


But hey man, like, you know, everybody will be equal. No rich people, no corporations, man, like everybody will be free and happy. No wars man, like peace and love and equality all over the world. No countries and no religion, wow man, crazy good.

Reply
Jun 6, 2019 15:43:29   #
John King
 
woodguru wrote:
You are aware that sheriff's departments in rural areas typically fear hard right wing supremacist nut jobs far more than they do the muslim variety terrorists?

They are far more likely to encounter the home grown type in a routine traffic stop and have it go south.


Really?!? Do you know people in the sheriff's departments in rural areas? Are you a sheriff in these rural areas? What credentials of justification do you have to make such a comment?

Reply
Jun 6, 2019 15:43:32   #
JoyV
 
permafrost wrote:
What a dumb dream to believe in...dah.. LOL


All were in strict gun control areas. Nor were they all with the AR15 despite your posted sign.

Several types of guns have been used in mass shootings in the United States. A 2014 study of 142 shootings by Dr. James Fox found 88 (62%) were committed with handguns of all types; 68 (48%) with semi-automatic handguns, 20 (14%) with revolvers), 35 (25%) with semi-automatic rifles, and 19 (13%) with shotguns. The study was conducted using the Mother Jones database of mass shootings from 1982–2018. High capacity magazines were used in approximately half of mass shootings. Semi-automatic rifles have been used in six of the ten deadliest mass shooting events.

AURORA- Holmes threw two canisters emitting a gas or smoke, partially obscuring the audience members' vision, making their throats and skin itch, and causing eye irritation.[16] He then fired a 12-gauge Remington 870 Express Tactical shotgun, first at the ceiling and then at the audience. He also fired a Smith & Wesson M&P15[17] semi-automatic rifle with a 100-round drum magazine, which eventually malfunctioned.[17][18][19] Finally, he fired a .40-caliber Glock 22 Gen4 handgun.[20][21]
NO AR15

ORLANDO- YES AR15

PARKLAND- YES AR15

LAS VEGAS- A .38-caliber Smith & Wesson Model 342 revolver. A .308-caliber Ruger American bolt-action rifle. Eight .308-caliber AR-10-type rifles. Two by FN Herstal, two by LWRC International, two by POF-USA, one with a .223 Wylde chamber by Christensen Arms, one made-to-order by LMT, and one by Noveske. Fourteen of the firearms were .223-caliber AR-15-type semi-automatic rifles: three manufactured by Colt, two by Daniel Defense.
Not all AR15s.

SANDY HOOK- Bushmaster XM15-E2S rifle.
NO AR15.

WAFFLE HOUSE- YES AR15

SAN BERNADINO- 3 explosive devices. Two 9 mm caliber semi-automatic pistols. Two Remington .223-caliber semi-automatic rifles.
NO AR15.

COLORADO SPRINGS- SKS semi-automatic rifles.
NO AR15

SUTHERLAND- Ruger AR-556 semi-automatic rifle.
NO AR15.

So 5 in your list of 9, did not involve any AR15. AR15s were one of many weapons used in 1 of your list of 9. And 3 of the 9 used only AR15s.

Reply
Jun 6, 2019 15:47:05   #
JoyV
 
permafrost wrote:
to conclude that I lobby for disarming anyone.. you have not read what I posted..

If a mob came to my house and attacked me or mine.. i would head for one of my guns and shoot..

Does that mean I need that gun to be the AR-15 or its equivalent?? heck no..

Did I say that I wanted these styles confiscated?? NO..

Did I say I wish the y were not legal for civilians?? Yes..

Byron,,, I am all for gun ownership and solid on the 2nd amendment..

But I am also very solid on needing to end (wishing) the mass shootings..

After the Red Lake killings some years ago, one of the FBI investigators wrote a very good op-ed on the problem. He addressed all the points I could think of including ownership and semi-automatics.

I will not try and quote the guy, but hopefully I can find his remarks and repeat some of them.

It was the best, most inclusive that I have read, so would really like to share it..
to conclude that I lobby for disarming anyone.. yo... (show quote)


One of your guns? Are any semiautomatic? So what non semiautomatic guns do you have?

Reply
 
 
Jun 6, 2019 15:47:46   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
But hey man, like, you know, everybody will be equal. No rich people, no corporations, man, like everybody will be free and happy. No wars man, like peace and love and equality all over the world. No countries and no religion, wow man, crazy good.


Whoa dude..bad ass!

Reply
Jun 6, 2019 15:50:11   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
John King wrote:
Really?!? Do you know people in the sheriff's departments in rural areas? Are you a sheriff in these rural areas? What credentials of justification do you have to make such a comment?


Woodford knows everything and once flew to the moon, just because he can.

Reply
Jun 6, 2019 16:12:32   #
JoyV
 
woodguru wrote:
You are aware that sheriff's departments in rural areas typically fear hard right wing supremacist nut jobs far more than they do the muslim variety terrorists?

They are far more likely to encounter the home grown type in a routine traffic stop and have it go south.


You realize that sheriff's offices in most rural areas rarely see "hard right wing supremacist nut jobs". In the rural areas of my state of AZ you are far more likely to come across Muslim variety terrorists. There have been several apprehended in my county who crossed from Mexico. I've not heard of any apprehensions of supremacists in my county. But the sheriffs are generally very welcoming of right wing armed citizens!!!! In fact, on multiple occasions I have had sheriff deputies or CBP agents who have come out to my place tell me I should not just rely on my German Shepherds but really should by a gun. Because of semi paralysis and episodic blindness connected to my seizures (now under control), I was reluctant to keep a gun.

https://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2019/01/07/the-terror-threat-on-the-southern-border/

Reply
Jun 6, 2019 16:13:15   #
JoyV
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Thanks. I'll go in with dynamite strapped to my chest and a checkered towel on my head.
It will calm everyone in the Sheriff's office much more than seeing a retired white male come in with all his papers in order.



Reply
Page <<first <prev 10 of 24 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.