For anyone confused...
SkptkSumthin wrote:
My concern is about stopping vote fraud. That is very easy to understand, 'tho it
may be hard to accept.
The effect of voter fraud is quite minimal despite what the alt-right wants us to believe. Many of the initiatives that the alt-right promote to counter the minimal impact of what little voter fraud actually does occur (much of it by accident), are primarily aimed at suppressing minority votes, because they know that minorities tend to vote Democratic. It is all about trying to rig the elections in favor of the Republicans.
Well, good: now your cards are on the table. Denying or minimizing the existence of
voter fraud will not make the charge go away. The evidence is overwhelming.
Counties whose voter rolls are 114% of eligible voters. Non citizens admitting they
registered and voted. Election officials admitting they voted 4 times. The constant push to change the laws whose purpose was to minimize fraud, in order to make fraud easier to commit, and get away with (motor-voter, election day registration, mail-in ballots,
on-line voting). And it's always Democrats behind it. No wonder they want to deny
it exists!
SkptkSumthin wrote:
Well, good: now your cards are on the table. Denying or minimizing the existence of
voter fraud will not make the charge go away. The evidence is overwhelming.
Counties whose voter rolls are 114% of eligible voters. Non citizens admitting they
registered and voted. Election officials admitting they voted 4 times. The constant push to change the laws whose purpose was to minimize fraud, in order to make fraud easier to commit, and get away with (motor-voter, election day registration, mail-in ballots,
on-line voting). And it's always Democrats behind it. No wonder they want to deny
it exists!
Well, good: now your cards are on the table. Denyi... (
show quote)
Voter rolls will always be greater than eligible voters numbers until you find a way to prevent deaths, dead people rarely have the courtesy to remove their names from the voter rolls. Non-citizens registering and voting, Please provide evidence of claim and perhaps we can figure out who may be responsible. I haven't seen any looking to change current laws to enable voter fraud, have seen some trying to allow for voter suppression but that isn't the same thing now is it? Election officials voting more than once, that will be problematic regardless what we do to try to prevent it. As for your claim that Democrats are behind it, that is only what your alt-right media tells you, they lie.
"Voter rolls will always be greater..." Which is why there is a law requiring counties to
periodically purge their voter rolls of dead or otherwise inactive voters. But some counties
prefer not to go to much effort in that regard until sued by some good government group
like Judicial Watch, and then ordered by a judge. They like to keep those registrations
handy, just in case.
Here's a little something from Obama's second election, after which he could be more
flexible towards Putin:
https://www.wnd.com/2012/11/the-big-list-of-vote-fraud-reports/I've got a beauty saved from 2014, but I saved the article, not the link.
However, trouble though it may be, I will be happy to copy and paste it here.
Just ask.
As to only getting the information from "alt-right" sources, the Dem-supporting
mainstream media won't report it, so what do you expect? And they don't lie.
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
The effect of voter fraud is quite minimal despite what the alt-right wants us to believe. Many of the initiatives that the alt-right promote to counter the minimal impact of what little voter fraud actually does occur (much of it by accident), are primarily aimed at suppressing minority votes, because they know that minorities tend to vote Democratic. It is all about trying to rig the elections in favor of the Republicans.
Voter fraud effect is only minimal to those who favor democrats. Real Americans want totally honest elections, ergo Voter ID. If you are against this, you are against truth in elections and. Therefor a fraudulent American.
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
The effect of voter fraud is quite minimal despite what the alt-right wants us to believe. Many of the initiatives that the alt-right promote to counter the minimal impact of what little voter fraud actually does occur (much of it by accident), are primarily aimed at suppressing minority votes, because they know that minorities tend to vote Democratic. It is all about trying to rig the elections in favor of the Republicans.
"The effect of voter fraud is quite minimal despite what the alt-right wants us to believe." - Common_Sense_Matters
Well surprise surprise, Common_Sense_Matters is against honest elections.
She says that getting honest vote counts is "rigging" the elections.
SkptkSumthin wrote:
Well, good: now your cards are on the table. Denying or minimizing the existence of
voter fraud will not make the charge go away. The evidence is overwhelming.
Counties whose voter rolls are 114% of eligible voters. Non citizens admitting they
registered and voted. Election officials admitting they voted 4 times. The constant push to change the laws whose purpose was to minimize fraud, in order to make fraud easier to commit, and get away with (motor-voter, election day registration, mail-in ballots,
on-line voting). And it's always Democrats behind it. No wonder they want to deny
it exists!
Well, good: now your cards are on the table. Denyi... (
show quote)
THE BIG LIST of vote fraud reports
108% of voting population endorses Obama
Read more at
https://www.wnd.com/2012/11/the-big-list-of-vote-fraud-reports/#Wia8jRuHd0cra7qs.99
SkptkSumthin wrote:
"Voter rolls will always be greater..." Which is why there is a law requiring counties to
periodically purge their voter rolls of dead or otherwise inactive voters. But some counties
prefer not to go to much effort in that regard until sued by some good government group
like Judicial Watch, and then ordered by a judge. They like to keep those registrations
handy, just in case.
Here's a little something from Obama's second election, after which he could be more
flexible towards Putin:
https://www.wnd.com/2012/11/the-big-list-of-vote-fraud-reports/I've got a beauty saved from 2014, but I saved the article, not the link.
However, trouble though it may be, I will be happy to copy and paste it here.
Just ask.
As to only getting the information from "alt-right" sources, the Dem-supporting
mainstream media won't report it, so what do you expect? And they don't lie.
"Voter rolls will always be greater..." ... (
show quote)
Sorry, I don't do conspiracy theories, WND is so far alt-right, you can't believe a word they say, please provide something a bit more centered, a bit more legitimate.
As for your claim that MSM won't cover it due to their "bias", that is just hogwash, likely they won't cover it because it isn't factual. You don't think a right leaning "conservative" site would carry it if it were legit? If it only shows on alt-right sites, that is your first clue it is bogus, period.
I have told you MANY times in the past, I don't do conspiracy theories, find a legitimate source that makes the same claim, I will read that source. Don't tell me there aren't any more centered right leaning sites, I know better than that.
eagleye13 wrote:
"The effect of voter fraud is quite minimal despite what the alt-right wants us to believe." - Common_Sense_Matters
Well surprise surprise, Common_Sense_Matters is against honest elections.
She says that getting honest vote counts is "rigging" the elections.
Well surprise, surprise, "eagleye" isn't any more above making false allegations than his alt-right media that he cherishes so. I am FOR HONEST elections, too bad Republicans aren't.
Edit: And no surprise, eagleye is too ignorant to get it through HER head that I am male.
I guess we're stuck in a confirmation bias tarpit. WND does very in-depth checking of
facts, but you're like my "progressive" sister, who refuses to read any "right-wing crap".
But of course, you are no doubt very proud of your openmindedness.
You probably have more faith in WND than I have in Snopes.
Like I said, a confirmation bias tarpit.
What's your opinion if the Southern Poverty Law Center?
SkptkSumthin wrote:
You probably have more faith in WND than I have in Snopes.
Like I said, a confirmation bias tarpit.
What's your opinion if the Southern Poverty Law Center?
Haven't done research on it yet, but then I also haven't read any articles by SPLC either, probably because they are't a news site really. Pick one of the articles that Snopes fact checked that you think they improperly fact checked and I will do my own leg work and fact check their fact check, if I find they did a poor job, I will do the rest and perhaps change my mind.
Maybe tomorrow. Goodnight.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.