One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
GUN GRAB !!!
Page <<first <prev 4 of 7 next> last>>
Mar 3, 2019 23:12:12   #
oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)
 
Bad Bob wrote:
Yes and they voted for the lying criminal scum bag POS tRump.


BB, when will you and the others like you recognize that most of us voted for Trump to keep our votes from going to the Hildabeast? Hell, man, I didn't really want him but I sure didn't want her at all. No silly, I didn't want her. Now I have little choice because I surely don't want any of those women looking to be President after this. Yep, I will surely vote for him the next time.

Reply
Mar 4, 2019 00:10:36   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
byronglimish wrote:
Blade that is a Clear and Definite layout of the Second Amendment.

Case Closed!!!
Yeah, I know, Byron, many times in my life I have had to defend the 2nd amendment, in some cases with every means available to me short of gunfire.

What stuck in my craw regarding this thread is the implication that the patriots among us who would, if necessary, invoke our 2nd amendment right based on the primary purpose for which it was written are "gangs of crackpots playing cowboys and Indianns in the woods."

This implication came from a lib prog who says he's a gun owner and a supporter of the 2nd amendment. The fool sat there and parroted one of the left's erroneous interpretations of the 2nd amendment--a highly prejudicial and remarkably ill-conceived view of the 2nd amendment, a view that seems to ignore its real history and purposely denies its original intent.

The fact is that the primary purpose of the 2nd amendment scares the living crap out of leftists, especially the pathological pukes that infest our state houses and our national capitol. They cannot abide its true purpose, so they have wasted enormous amounts of time, energy, and money interpreting the amendment so that it puts ALL guns in the hands of a government entity, be it a national guard, the cops, or the military. The idea that all across the nation there are ""gangs of crackpots playing cowboys and Indianns in the woods," terrifies those bent on despotism.

In my estimation, this angry, hateful leftist fop could be the poster boy for the law that prohibits mentally challenged people from owning guns.

Reply
Mar 4, 2019 01:52:59   #
Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
Yeah, I know, Byron, many times in my life I have had to defend the 2nd amendment, in some cases with every means available to me short of gunfire.

What stuck in my craw regarding this thread is the implication that the patriots among us who would, if necessary, invoke our 2nd amendment right based on the primary purpose for which it was written are "gangs of crackpots playing cowboys and Indianns in the woods."

This implication came from a lib prog who says he's a gun owner and a supporter of the 2nd amendment. The fool sat there and parroted one of the left's erroneous interpretations of the 2nd amendment--a highly prejudicial and remarkably ill-conceived view of the 2nd amendment, a view that seems to ignore its real history and purposely denies its original intent.

The fact is that the primary purpose of the 2nd amendment scares the living crap out of leftists, especially the pathological pukes that infest our state houses and our national capitol. They cannot abide its true purpose, so they have wasted enormous amounts of time, energy, and money interpreting the amendment so that it puts ALL guns in the hands of a government entity, be it a national guard, the cops, or the military. The idea that all across the nation there are ""gangs of crackpots playing cowboys and Indianns in the woods," terrifies those bent on despotism.

In my estimation, this angry, hateful leftist fop could be the poster boy for the law that prohibits mentally challenged people from owning guns.
Yeah, I know, Byron, many times in my life I have ... (show quote)


Agreed!!!

Reply
 
 
Mar 4, 2019 05:46:07   #
plainlogic
 
Bad Bob wrote:
F the 2nd amendment without real gun control.


????????.

Reply
Mar 4, 2019 05:47:38   #
plainlogic
 
TommyRadd wrote:
Spin doctors extraordinaire!


U R a spin Dr.

Reply
Mar 4, 2019 05:52:06   #
plainlogic
 
Bad Bob wrote:
F the 2nd amendment.




Hey Bob? Do you and Kevin sleep together? Dream about F the 2nd Amendment?

Reply
Mar 4, 2019 06:00:29   #
plainlogic
 
Bad Bob wrote:
The cops NNs.


LMAO. Then Bob, whyAREN'T THEY DOING IT???? Enlighten us,Mmm?NNs

Reply
 
 
Mar 4, 2019 06:08:37   #
plainlogic
 
Bad Bob wrote:
Did you F your mother?



Gee, hate to admit but we must be brothers. Mom was great great, wasn't she. Ya know, you look more like her. Kevyn doesn't though.

Reply
Mar 4, 2019 06:56:59   #
Reaper13
 
buffalo wrote:
It doesn't in the 2nd but is covered elsewhere:

As spelled out in Chapter 44 of Title 18 of the United States Code (U.S.C.), federal law bans convicted felons from possessing firearms or ammunition. (The U.S.C. is a compilation of congressional laws organized by topic and subtopic: Title 18 defines federal crimes and criminal procedure, and Chapter 44 (Sections 921-931) covers firearms.)

According to Section 922(g)(9), no one "who has been convicted in any court of a crime punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding one year" may own or possess a gun. This rule covers all felonies, but does not apply to state misdemeanors that carry less than a two-year sentence. It also exempts several kinds of felonious white-collar crime, as well as felony convictions handed down in foreign countries [sources: 18 U.S.C. § 921; 544 U.S. 385; Williams].

Lest you think Section 922(g) is too lenient, however, read on: It also bans guns for (among others) fugitives, illegal users of controlled substances, mental defectives, illegal aliens, dishonorably discharged soldiers, renounced citizens, subjects of certain court orders and persons convicted of misdemeanor domestic violence. Violating these statutes can net you 10 years of imprisonment and/or a $250,000 fine [source: Rhode Island Probation].

As for persons convicted of a federal crime, they can always apply to the president for a pardon [sources: 28 C.F.R. § 1; DOJ].

LOL ... good luck with that.
It doesn't in the 2nd but is covered elsewhere: br... (show quote)




Those are all unconstitutional. 2A day “ Shall NOT be infringed!”

Reply
Mar 4, 2019 07:08:29   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Reaper13 wrote:
Those are all unconstitutional. 2A day “ Shall NOT be infringed!”


You for allowing convicted felons to possess firearms? Hmmm...Seems to me those convicted of felonies have forfeited their rights. Don't commit crimes...especially felonies.

Now, that being said, I would surmise that a lot of felons ignore that ban and all the background checking that can be legislated doesn't preclude them from being able to obtain firearms if they are determined.

Reply
Mar 4, 2019 07:15:49   #
Rose42
 
Something i saw recently -

Want to stop drumk drivers from killing people? Ban sober drivers. That’s how gun control works.

Reply
 
 
Mar 4, 2019 07:41:37   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Rose42 wrote:
Something i saw recently -

Want to stop drumk drivers from killing people? Ban sober drivers. That’s how gun control works.


Just ban cars. Bingo, problem solved and "green new deal" achieved. What a deal, NOT!

Reply
Mar 4, 2019 07:49:17   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
Reaper13 wrote:
Those are all unconstitutional. 2A day “ Shall NOT be infringed!”


"Well regulated"

Reply
Mar 4, 2019 08:50:37   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
Bad Bob wrote:
"Well regulated"


Before you expose your ignorance any further, (in the unlikely event such a thing can happen) you should look up the meaning of well-regulated as it was defined in 1790. I know that would probably tax your limited mental resources to the utmost, but do try and keep up, troll. There is more to this posting business that typing f this or f that and posting childish pictures that do nothing other than reaffirm your ignorance, which needs no further reaffirmation.

Reply
Mar 4, 2019 09:49:08   #
zillaorange
 
Kevyn wrote:
What has your panties in a bunch? No one is grabbing any guns.


I don't wear panties ! Do you ?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 7 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.