GUN GRAB !!! "There can No Free Speech, No Freedom from Opression, No Freedom to Worship your God, No Freedom to Speak Your Mind, No Freedom from Fear, No Freedom for Anyone, Anywhere...

zillaorange

"There can No Free Speech, No Freedom from Opression, No Freedom to Worship your God, No Freedom to Speak Your Mind, No Freedom from Fear, No Freedom for Anyone, Anywhere Without the 2nd Amendment & the Freedom For It "
Charlton Heston

Kevyn

zillaorange wrote:

"There can No Free Speech, No Freedom from Opression, No Freedom to Worship your God, No Freedom to Speak Your Mind, No Freedom from Fear, No Freedom for Anyone, Anywhere Without the 2nd Amendment & the Freedom For It "
Charlton Heston

What has your panties in a bunch? No one is grabbing any guns.

buffalo Loc: Texas

Kevyn wrote:

What has your panties in a bunch? No one is grabbing any guns.

Come on, kevie, be honest. You and other anti-gun moonbats would love to repeal the 2nd Amendment and grab guns, everybody's guns. Just as long as stricter and stricter gun legislation keeps moving in that direction, right? Now, be honest...

bylm1-Bernie

Kevyn wrote:

What has your panties in a bunch? No one is grabbing any guns.

Not yet but they would sure like to. If they could get by with it they would be on it in a heartbeat. Don't try to convince anyone differently.

Kevyn

buffalo wrote:

Come on, kevie, be honest. You and other anti-gun moonbats would love to repeal the 2nd Amendment and grab guns, everybody's guns. Just as long as stricter and stricter gun legislation keeps moving in that direction, right? Now, be honest...

Of course not, I am a gun owner and have no desire to overturn the second amendment. The idea that common sense regulation such as universal background checks and precluding felons and those adjudicated crazy from buying or possessing guns makes sense to me and a vast majority of Americans and gun owners. This is no more a slippery slope than suggesting that speed limits and license plates are a slippery slope toward banning automobiles.

bylm1-Bernie

Kevyn wrote:

Of course not, I am a gun owner and have no desire to overturn the second amendment. The idea that common sense regulation such as universal background checks and precluding felons and those adjudicated crazy from buying or possessing guns makes sense to me and a vast majority of Americans and gun owners. This is no more a slippery slope than suggesting that speed limits and license plates are a slippery slope toward banning automobiles.

I don't think placing automobiles in the same category as guns is accurate at all. I don't know of anybody who h**es automobiles. Not so with guns. In my small circle of friends and acquaintances there are several whose blood pressure spikes at the mention of the word "Gun." I sat with my father-in-law, God rest his soul, several years ago and his reaction to the gun problem was, "I don't see the problem, why don't they just outlaw guns." I've seen this over and over again. Dad, not an educated man, lived in Chicago. I thought it counter-productive to point out the irony in that little discussion.

zillaorange

Kevyn wrote:

What has your panties in a bunch? No one is grabbing any guns.

NOT YET !!!

buffalo Loc: Texas

Kevyn wrote:

Of course not, I am a gun owner and have no desire to overturn the second amendment. The idea that common sense regulation such as universal background checks and precluding felons and those adjudicated crazy from buying or possessing guns makes sense to me and a vast majority of Americans and gun owners. This is no more a slippery slope than suggesting that speed limits and license plates are a slippery slope toward banning automobiles.

kevie wrote:

precluding felons and those adjudicated crazy from buying or possessing guns

LOL There are laws already in force that preclude criminals and crazies from buying or possessing guns. By your incessant moonbatty postings here on OPP, I am convinced you belong in the latter category and the fact that you admit that YOU own gun/s is proof that criminals and crazies don't obey laws.

"Legislators" (if that is what you want to call them) can pass all the restrictive guns laws they can get by with, but until they can figure out how to make criminals and crazies obey the laws they are just feel good, look what we're doing exercises in bulls**t.

TrueAmerican

Kevyn wrote:

What has your panties in a bunch? No one is grabbing any guns.

Some people a just plain evil, corrupt and stupid !!!!!!

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

zillaorange wrote:

"There can No Free Speech, No Freedom from Opression, No Freedom to Worship your God, No Freedom to Speak Your Mind, No Freedom from Fear, No Freedom for Anyone, Anywhere Without the 2nd Amendment & the Freedom For It "
Charlton Heston

F the 2nd amendment without real gun control.

Bad Bob Loc: Virginia

TrueAmerican wrote:

Some people a just plain evil, corrupt and stupid !!!!!!

Yes and they v**ed for the lying criminal scum bag POS tRump.

plainlogic

Kevyn wrote:

What has your panties in a bunch? No one is grabbing any guns.

Sorry Kevin, but U R CLUELESS! Just explain yourself with the statement " No one is grabbing any guns "

TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA

Bad Bob wrote:

F the 2nd amendment without real gun control.

“...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

Infringed:

“in·fringe
verb
past tense: infringed; past participle: infringed
actively break the terms of (a law, agreement, etc.).
"making an unauthorized copy would infringe copyright"
synonyms: contravene, violate, t***sgress, break, breach, commit a breach of, disobey, defy, flout, fly in the face of, ride roughshod over, kick against;

act so as to limit or undermine (something); encroach on.
"his legal rights were being infringed"
synonyms: undermine, erode, diminish, weaken, impair, damage, compromise;” (close quote)

To limit the 2nd amendment with “controls” is to impose “infringements” which is to nullify it.

You lib liars aren’t fooling anyone with your illiteracy and word games.

bylm1-Bernie

TommyRadd wrote:

“...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,... (show quote)

Tommy, I'm afraid you might as well be talking to your fireplace.

Kevyn

TommyRadd wrote:

“...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,... (show quote)

Here is the entire second amendment,

A well regulated M*****a, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Please note two very important things you have chosen to ignore, the first the amendment says “the people” in the collective sense. The founders were pretty specific with words and could have written in in the singular if that was their intention, in other words “a persons right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” there is of course a big difference in meaning between individual and plural.

The other, and perhaps most important thing you missed is the first line, A well regulated Milita being necessary to the security of a free state. The M*****a of course refers to the National Guard of each state not gangs of crackpots playing cowboys and Indianns in the woods. And who regulates this M*****a, that’s right the individual states and federal government.