Morgan wrote:
Pure BS, prove it, and don't give me some incident of some radical, a raving radical from either side does not speak for the core and general base. Or I could do the same with the neo-radical right movements and we could be here all day and prove nothing because they would both be wrong.
All anyone has to do is look to see the intentions of either side. somewhere close to the middle is reasonable from both groups, the middle independents are the most logical as they are not getting swayed, or as swayed by party mantra.
What you say about Democrats is an outright lie, they protect the rights of the people and not lead by corporate.
Pure BS, prove it, and don't give me some incident... (
show quote)
Au Contraire~~ democrats first wall street fed are now coming out and openly declaring their support for Democrat corporation and even call themselves New Democrats, Moderates etc.. Why everyone finds a need to label themself for distinguishment never ceases to amaze me but they do...
Here’s another copy and paste for you...A good article should you wish to read it..
A prelude to what it suggests:
In the past seven years, a new brand of Democrat has begun to emerge. Calling themselves “New Democrats”, “Moderates” and “Centrists”, these corporate-backed Democrats are exceedingly attentive to the interests of big-oil, the pharmaceutical industry, and big retailers. Backed by deep-pocketed corporate interests, these Democrats have seen increasing success in elections. In the legislature, they are organized into an unofficial “Moderate Caucus” that has been successful in stopping key bills on labor, health care, and environmental policy.
The rise of Corporate Democrats has, in recent years, become increasingly salient in public and policy debates and media in California. A trove of articles and coverage have been published in varying attempts to describe and articulate this trend and its rise to prominence in California politics. Organizers, academics, and progressive organizations have, up to this point, attempted to combat the gains of corporate Democrats in the legislature with varying degrees of success...
https://haasinstitute.berkeley.edu/corporate-democrats-and-corporate-power-structure-california-politicsAnd another that is about the same issue pointing out two super pacs that will not back candidates if funded by corporations with another pointing out corpirate finances is needed and alright..??? Geez the pull inside the erratic dems party seen so clearly even they don’t know whats going on..
Have to put this tid bit in as it helps explain the rise of Cortez and by whom~ what a Joke she is..and of course not a socialist at all. 🙄
Justice Democrats, an upstart PAC that backed Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez in her surprise primary victory over Rep. Joe Crowley (D-N.Y.) in June, will endorse only candidates who vow to reject corporate PAC money.
Another Democratic PAC, End Citizens United, has encouraged the candidates it’s endorsed to refuse corporate PAC money. A handful of Democratic lawmakers have said recently that they’d no longer accept contributions from corporate PACs.
Contributions from lobbyists and corporate PACs are the lifeblood of Washington fundraising, and many Democratic lawmakers say there’s nothing wrong with accepting such contributions to help retake the House...
https://www.politico.com/amp/story/2018/08/05/corporate-america-contributions-democrats-762475