One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
I saw this in my Facebook.. This is so true!!!!!....
Page <<first <prev 10 of 22 next> last>>
Dec 7, 2018 11:55:18   #
Morgan
 
Jakebrake wrote:
Aw Morg, Morg, Morg you are on a rant today. If, as you say "unconstitutional and crooked s**ms have been PROVEN" why have the democrats NOT launched impeachment proceedings to date? Simply nothing more than partisan left wing nut hyperbole.


Aww Jakey Jakey, Jakey, have you even listen what is on the news today concerning NC, it's been a proven s**m and they are now considering what to do about it. The man who was doing the s**m was a Republican running and running to win , no impeachment necessary he never made it to the office, luckily. But by the way Jakey we at the present time have a Republican majority, and knowing the Republicans don't do what's right, they do what's right to keep their control in congress. That's the new sign of the new Republicans.

Now for us, this isn't our first Rodeo, it was done a while ago by Gerrymandering, I believe all the way back at the 2010 e******ns and thereafter, also PROVEN by the supreme court, as unconstitutional. Now we have been trying to get the state to do something about this injustice, but since it is under their majority rule, they have done nothing but postpone, you see that works in their favor directly, affecting the v****g year, after v****g year. Attorney's, this is what they do best, manipulate the courts.

Reply
Dec 7, 2018 11:58:33   #
Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, CO
 
eagleye13 wrote:
He is a she.
She is getting out of the kitchen! LOL


Oops, I'm kinda new here. Thanks for the g****r ID. Now, I just wish they would use ID for v****g...

Reply
Dec 7, 2018 12:07:16   #
Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, CO
 
Morgan wrote:
Aww Jakey Jakey, Jakey, have you even listen what is on the news today concerning NC, it's been a proven s**m and they are now considering what to do about it. The man who was doing the s**m was a Republican running and running to win , no impeachment necessary he never made it to the office, luckily. But by the way Jakey we at the present time have a Republican majority, and knowing the Republicans don't do what's right, they do what's right to keep their control in congress. That's the new sign of the new Republicans.

Now for us, this isn't our first Rodeo, it was done a while ago by Gerrymandering, I believe all the way back at the 2010 e******ns and thereafter, also PROVEN by the supreme court, as unconstitutional. Now we have been trying to get the state to do something about this injustice, but since it is under their majority rule, they have done nothing but postpone, you see that works in their favor directly, affecting the v****g year, after v****g year. Attorney's, this is what they do best, manipulate the courts.
Aww Jakey Jakey, Jakey, have you even listen what ... (show quote)


Nice rant Morg on NC, but I noticed your obvious omission of the dem Brenda Snipes in FL. Way to go gal, (oops, I hope that's not sexist) with your selective references. I'm sure you are bright enough to realize each l*****t point you bring up, there is a RIGHT counterpoint...but, the debate is indeed fun...

Reply
 
 
Dec 7, 2018 12:09:06   #
debeda
 
Jakebrake wrote:
Oops, I'm kinda new here. Thanks for the g****r ID. Now, I just wish they would use ID for v****g...



Reply
Dec 7, 2018 14:21:00   #
Bcon
 
Morgan, I have been following these posts and I still haven’t seen your answer to Eagleeyesquery.. which of the six items that he refers to would you oppose? The answer th this question should easily point to your philosophy.

Reply
Dec 7, 2018 14:38:26   #
Capt-jack Loc: Home
 
proud republican wrote:
When all the guns been banned.....

When all the words been censored.....


When all the history been erased......

When all the freedom have been taken.......

Only then will you discover that you should've spoken up and done something about it!!!......

When all the guns been banned..... br br When all... (show quote)




O' that can't happen here in America! LOL LOL LOL LOL

Reply
Dec 7, 2018 17:23:11   #
Morgan
 
debeda wrote:
Do you see Google, ABC, Facebook or Twitter as raving radicals? Because all of the above companies have censored conservatives simply for voicing a conservative opinion, fired employees simply for voicing a conservative opinion (in a rather prominent recent case Facebook had to pay out a cool 100 million to an employee for this), disallowed advertisers simply for voicing a conservative opinions. These are facts, easily proven. And no, I don't have the time or the inclination to post 30 links for you. In counterpoint. ABC, for instance, keeps people like Jimmy Fallon, the clucks on the view, and others who use their platform and fame to excoriate our President, his administration and conservatives in general. Day after day, week after week and year after year with no let up. Bluntly, liberals are allowed to say any insulting, outrageous, biased and hurtful on public forums not meant for such over and over and over again, day after week after month after year with little or no consequences. While conservatives? De-platformed, censored, fired, depersoned for .....being conservative. More and more often. Im sure you won't look at any of this with unjaundiced eyes, but it felt good to get it out.
Do you see Google, ABC, Facebook or Twitter as ra... (show quote)


Oh my, you righty's are always a victim, which is hilarious, trust us, your conservative opinions are heard, how can you not be, your always squawking, quite loudly too. Your Christian rights are being taken away, now your conservative views, your money, what next? Why do I always get the people who reply to me to the opportunity to spew and vent? Tell it to your cohorts, you can all bang your drums together which you already do a lot, I'm all filled up here.

Reply
 
 
Dec 7, 2018 17:37:50   #
Morgan
 
Bcon wrote:
Morgan, I have been following these posts and I still haven’t seen your answer to Eagleeyesquery.. which of the six items that he refers to would you oppose? The answer th this question should easily point to your philosophy.


I already have, posted it back to Jake, except for possibly two. OWS I'm assuming, you would have to be a bit more specific, do I think the 1% own too much of our wealth, yes I do, have they made overwhelming profits for a decade, while wages have hardly increased down to the blue collar worker. Should they get a tax break at the cost to our health system where they just reinvest in their own stocks? No, I don't think they should have. if you receive 85% of the wealth through profit I think there is a moral and economic duty to give more back in return.

To B*M, no real comment here except that I understand where the anger and frustration stems from.

Reply
Dec 7, 2018 17:40:06   #
debeda
 
Morgan wrote:
Oh my, you righty's are always a victim, which is hilarious, trust us you conservative opinions are heard, how can you not be, your always squawking, quite loudly too. Your Christian rights are being taken away, now your conservative views, your money, what next? Why do I always get the people who reply to me to the opportunity to spew and vent? Tell it to your cohorts, you can all bang your drums together which you already do a lot, I'm all filled up here.
Oh my, you righty's are always a victim, which is ... (show quote)

Same old deflection crap Morgan. Yawn......

Reply
Dec 7, 2018 17:50:42   #
Morgan
 
Jakebrake wrote:
Nice rant Morg on NC, but I noticed your obvious omission of the dem Brenda Snipes in FL. Way to go gal, (oops, I hope that's not sexist) with your selective references. I'm sure you are bright enough to realize each l*****t point you bring up, there is a RIGHT counterpoint...but, the debate is indeed fun...


Rant, you like that word huh... I was talking about NC because that's what we were talking about, not Florida. in talking about the crookedness and s**mming in NC that had specifically to do with the Republicans, time to own up to it good buddy. What does it matter what my g****r is? It shouldn't unless of course, you're another one of those...please say you're not.

Reply
Dec 7, 2018 17:51:30   #
Morgan
 
debeda wrote:
Same old deflection crap Morgan. Yawn......


Yep, I'm sure it's past your bedtime, nite-nite.

Reply
 
 
Dec 7, 2018 17:52:46   #
Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, CO
 
Morgan wrote:
Rant, you like that word huh... I was talking about NC because that's what we were talking about, not Florida. in talking about the crookedness and s**mming in NC that had specifically to do with the Republicans, time to own up to it good buddy. What does it matter what my g****r is? It shouldn't unless of course, you're another one of those...please say you're not.


Ah ha, now I see what you are all about...very enlightening.

Reply
Dec 7, 2018 19:57:42   #
1ProudAmerican
 
proud republican wrote:
I guess we should say NO to Socialism and C*******m!!!..What do you think????...Silence = We give up our rights!!!!.....Its my opinion ......



Reply
Dec 8, 2018 09:59:39   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Morgan wrote:
No Linda wong, it is not my interpretation, it is "the" interpretation, studied in many colleges. Her just for you, and others also:

An Analysis of "Do Not Go Gentle Into That Good Night" by Dylan Thomas
Updated on February 1, 2018
jngtr2 profile image
jngtr2 more
Contact Author



Choose Life

The poem “Do Not Go Gentle into That Good Night”, by Dylan Thomas is a son’s plea to a dying father. His purpose is to show his father that all men face the same end, but they fight for life, nonetheless. “Old age should burn and rave at close of day,” (line 2) is almost the thesis for this poem. Thomas classifies men into four different categories to persuade his father to realize that no matter the life choices, consequences, or personalities, there is a reason to live. It is possible that Thomas uses these categories to give his father no excuses, regardless of what he did in life.

Wise men are the first group that Thomas describes. The first line in the stanza, “Though wise men at their end know dark is right,” (4) suggests that they know that death is a natural part of life and they are wise enough to know they should accept it. However, the next line reasons that they fight against it because they feel they have not gained nearly enough repute or notoriety. “Because their words had forked no lighting” (5) is Thomas’ way of saying that they want to hold on to life to be able to leave their mark, thereby sustaining their memory in history as great scholars or philosophers.

Thomas moves forward and describes the next group as good men. They reflect on their lives as the end approaches. “Good men, the last wave by, crying how bright,” (7) This line can be broken down into two parts. First’ good men are few now, as it says “the last wave by,” perhaps this is emphasis on the fact that Thomas believes his father to be a good man and that the world can still use him. Second, the line “crying how bright,” refers to men telling their stories in a limelight. They self-proclaim their works as good, but as Thomas goes on into the next line “their frail deeds might have danced in a green bay,” (8) it describes men knowing that their deeds will not be remembered regardless of their seemingly significant achievements. Green bay refers to an eternal sea, which marks their place in history. After reflecting on the past, they decide that they want to live if for nothing more than to leave their names written down in history.

Wild men, however as the next group is revealed, have learned too late that they are mortal. They spent their lives in action and only realize as time has caught up with them that this is the end. “Wild men who caught and sang the sun in flight,” (10) exaggerates their experiences and how they have wasted away their days chasing what they could not catch. Even more so “caught and sang the sun,” refers to how these wild men lived. They were daredevils who faced peril with blissful ignorance. They wasted away their lives on adventures and excitements. The next line, “And learn, too late, they grieved it on its way,” (11) refers to the realism of their own mortality. They grieve because they have caused much grief living their lives in folly. Even though the end is approaching, they will not give in because they want more time to hold on to the adventure of their youth and perhaps right a few wrongs that they have done.

Grave men, are the last group of men Thomas describes. “Grave men, near death, who see with blinding sight,” (13) in this line his use of grave men has almost a double meaning, referring to men who are saddened as well as being physically near death. They feel the strains of a long life, and they know they are physically decaying. Their eyes are failing along with the rest of their body, however there is still a passion burning within their eyes for an existence, even if it is a frail state. “Blind eyes could blaze like meteors and be gay,” (14) is an expression that represent man’s struggle for survival. He is possibly offering that even in this frail state that his father could be happy living longer.

Finally, in the last stanza the intent is presented, Thomas is showing that all men no matter their experiences or situations fight for more time. He urges his father to do the same. “Curse, bless, me now with your fierce tears, I pray,” (17) describes his pain and passion that are causing him to beg his father not to die. Thomas is watching his father fade and is begging for his father no to give in. It appears that his father has either peacefully surrendered himself, or rather that he has resigned himself to his fate.

Thomas starts the poem referring to wise men, then to good men, then changes pace to wild men, and finally fades out with grave men. One reason he uses this progression is to start with where he sees his father’s character lie, and then finally move toward what Thomas believes his father has resigned himself as. Thomas’ father was a military man and his father’s resignation to his current state is eating away at him. He suggests that every man needs to make his mark in life and his father has not done so. He is trying to postpone the inevitable by pleading for a little more time, feeling that his father is giving up, and maybe if he can prove to his father that no one gives up regardless of his or her disposition then his father will be able to get off his deathbed. His final plea to his father ends the poem, giving a passionate, but ultimately hopeless expression, “Do no gentle into that good night / Rage, rage against the dying of the light.” (19)

The use of the metaphor “that good night” (1, 6, 12, 18) gives the impression that Thomas knew that death was right. He calls it that good night instead of another ghastly term for death. However, he also calls it “the dying of the light,” (3, 9, 15, 19) which suggest a peaceful surrender. He urges his father to rage against a peaceful end and endeavor to resist his demise. Thomas uses the words night and light as metaphors for death and life and alternates them to hammer home his point. Part of this poem seems to be almost a lighthearted when he declares “Old age should burn and rave at close of day,” (2) almost as if saying old people should be allowed to live long and complain as long as they do not give up. The purpose of his use of division into categories remains, however to emphasize the importance of living, leaving his father with an unmistakable argument…choose life.
https://owlcation.com/humanities/An-analysis-of-Do-Not-Go-Gentle-into-That-Good-Night-by-Dylan-Thomas
It is YOUR interpretation of it that is your own and to any of the other misguided.

You really don't get it or you are trying to cover up your own intention here, for me it is very clear, so I ask again, who are you really? Stop it your falling over yourself, with you now stating the interpretation as if you had known, I call BS or you never would have used it as you did. I never changed anything of yours , now your tying to accuse me of something I never did.

It would be better if you were to just admit that you misread/misinterpreted the poem.

Give it up you are no english teacher and the copy and paste isn't going to save you out of this.

But more important is still the question why you try to spew on contention and instigate for people to rise up against Democrats, are you really a Russian troll, I've been suspect for a long time watching your strategy since you've been here. It would make sense, and it is so hard to tell on an online forum.
No Linda wong, it is not my interpretation, it is ... (show quote)


You certainly went to great strides in summation of this poem which is basically what I said to you in an earlier post. It is the recitation of the son watching his father die.... No disagreement..

Poems in a metaphorically state mean many things to those reading it.. For me it signified our need to never give up the fight and since our country is under attack from the progressives it is encumbent upon us to never ever give up the fight to protect her.. I’ll not change that for you or anyone else.. The “dying of the light “does not mean surrender to we patriots of this nation and will never allow the light to go out...We bring the light of wisdom and protection of our Constitution, that is our light..

You were the one that read the poem and then claimed I was calling for fighting and k*****g Americans..Wholely inaccurate and the need to be sure posts are not altered is a proven when you come in trying to change them..

Now I’m a Russian troll~~ well, Yes, of course I am...😁

Tsk, tsk, seems you write many a retort to any number of other posters claiming you are “unjustly attacked and called names instead of just staying on topic”.. I guess this means its ok for you to call other people names but not them?? And then you wonder why others revert to name calling with you...Hypocrisy 101....

Copy and past I do when posting on the topic of the article,~ I see you did the very same right here... That means what??

Anyway, its a joyous season to come together and spread peace instead of h**e~~If we did more of that we could truly make a difference..
Hope you enjoy this~~

https://youtu.be/LRP8d7hhpoQ

Reply
Dec 8, 2018 10:05:25   #
Capt-jack Loc: Home
 
Morgan wrote:
Aww Jakey Jakey, Jakey, have you even listen what is on the news today concerning NC, it's been a proven s**m and they are now considering what to do about it. The man who was doing the s**m was a Republican running and running to win , no impeachment necessary he never made it to the office, luckily. But by the way Jakey we at the present time have a Republican majority, and knowing the Republicans don't do what's right, they do what's right to keep their control in congress. That's the new sign of the new Republicans.

Now for us, this isn't our first Rodeo, it was done a while ago by Gerrymandering, I believe all the way back at the 2010 e******ns and thereafter, also PROVEN by the supreme court, as unconstitutional. Now we have been trying to get the state to do something about this injustice, but since it is under their majority rule, they have done nothing but postpone, you see that works in their favor directly, affecting the v****g year, after v****g year. Attorney's, this is what they do best, manipulate the courts.
Aww Jakey Jakey, Jakey, have you even listen what ... (show quote)


Boy, you sure know how to screw up the facts boy.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 10 of 22 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.