lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Holy hell!!! Lololololo you got me with that one!!! Lolololok coffee and all!!! You are a trip missy!!!

Lolol still laughing!! Perfect!!!
Charlie Brown is very happy too!!

I too have one just like you!! It sits adorned in my son’s bedroom that I have for him when he comes visiting... Or other guests...

You made my day~~ off to do a few things...❤️🌲

Morgan

EmilyD

HAHAHA!!! Hilarious!

Morgan

I understand religious liberty perfectly. Do you understand bias? Under our laws when serving the public, an establishment is not allowed to be prejudice in any way, that includes race, g****r, religion, or any other form of bigotry, do you understand those American ideals. We are a melting pot, therefore, we stand strong to our constitution and it's amendments against prejudice, all must all be treated equally. Is that premise too hardcore liberal for you? Which I am not by the way, unaffiliated.

Tell me also, since when are the goods we buy be continued to be linked to the vendor we purchased them from and their beliefs. If a person selling bed quilts ask me how I practice sex with my partner because it might not be aligned with his /her religious beliefs? Utterly ridiculous... and the case should have stood strong against the baker being prejudice, it was against the LAW! Do you understand?

Morgan

Let me make this crystal clear as you are an expert at smoke and mirrors and misleading with you posts.

First, it was I who originally posted the true meaning of the poem, because you had mislead its interpretation of it with your own.

Second, I never changed to edit anything in the of your post, I understood it just as you intended, for people to rise up against the so called socialist Democrats as stated in the posts previous and following your rendition of the poem. I was shocked over how you used this loving poem, to incite people to be bold and fight. What do you think that means? That means war Linda, look at the two posts immediately following your poem passage(messa.

1st quote: “You are spot on in your assessment and our country is indeed at a crossroads, which will be the fight for our lives in maintaining our way of life, freedoms and basic human rights. Socialist democrats are intent on changing the basic concept of our once great and proud country to the failed EU model and in preventing this assault by l*****ts may require extreme measures. Thus the importance of the 2nd Amendment.”

2nd quote: “I h**e to say it, but I think we may have to form a secret Patriotic assasination team of some sort to eliminate those in government, and possibly medea that promote idealisms that are contradictory to our Constitutional law.

I know that sounds pretty strong amd maybe far out. ... There would also have to be safeguards against any members or leaders of such a group getting big-headed with power and wanting to control such a group for personal reasons. .. However, some people need to be eliminated to stop selling their ultra liberal ideas to our younger folks. ... I will mention no names but they are in our government now and blabbering in the media.

Some in government have been proven to have made treasonist moves that have not been brought to court and justice. .... You know who they are.

A good sniper team may be the only answer, I am sorry to say.”
This is what you incited! That is about fighting and k*****g, wake up Linda! This is why I asked you …who are you?

My quote: “It is so sad that you use this poem to try and ignite a fight against other Americans, who are you really?
Or do you just not know the true meaning behind this poem. It certainly is not about fighting and k*****g.”

Where did I change your wording in your post? Nowhere.

Which one of my statements was untrue?

If you truly believe in our county then you have to stop that type of mantra and stop instigating those types of reaction.
Look at what happened Sarah Palin went on TV with pictures of Democrats in targets and said lock and load. We have to be conscious of what we say, words do have impact.

We need to come together.

~PS I didn't call you a troll I asked if you were one, since your position is to try and divide us.

Oh yes tsk tsk, all I have done is try and try to have people on the right converse without insults, an unattainable bar for most on the right. BTW I'm not the instigator by any means. You seem to think a lying accusation stated simply makes it true, you think like Trump, you are aligned well with him.

Peace,love and Merry Christmas to you too!

EmilyD

The baker was expressing religious freedom, as is his right according to the Constitution that our founding fathers thought long and hard about after all the tribulations they endured by getting here. It's called freedom. Freedom of speech. Freedom to bear arms. Freedom of worship. The clients specifically expressed that their cake was for a gay wedding. GAY male wedding...meaning penis to penis, or penis to mouth, or penis to a$$hole. If that's not clear to you, Morgan, than you have a problem. The baker was attacked.

Don't even get me started on gays "having" babies.

debeda

thanks, Emily

debeda

You're right in theory. Isn't it amazing that conservatives are harassed and booted from establishments regularly? With no legal consequences? Shameful.

Capt-jack Loc: Home

Thank you so much. It's rear on this forum.
A very Merry Christmas to you and yours.

Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, CO

Exactly Emily. I live in the Denver area where this fiasco took place and followed the story closely. Most of the people sided with the baker, as well as SCOTUS. This was nothing more than a couple of radical homosexuals trying to create an issue knowing full well the beliefs of the baker. There are a plethora of bakeries who would have gladly baked a cake for these two homo's.

Morgan

That is Not religious freedom, that is promoting bigotry, it's a shame you don't know the difference. What right exactly are you referring too? Freedom of religion is your right to practice. No one should be attacked and that is a different issue, don't try to muddy the waters. When something is sold, there is no longer an attachment to the vendor,(the maker of the product) he or she has relinquished ALL ownership of the property once sold. Do you get this?

Jakebrake Loc: Broomfield, CO

Don't come sniveling and crying to me for my beliefs on homosexuality and a Christian baker exercising his beliefs as well, because they go right in file 13. I think your quarrel is with SCOTUS. You've heard of them right??? Fortunately he is not FORCED to make homo-sexually themed cakes for them, much to the chagrin of you lefty socialist democrats. Get a life Morg~~~

emarine

Interesting twist on Thomas... a plea for life or a political battle cry... very interesting looking from the middle out to both sides … It's not hard to see where the violence starts... Maybe part of our problem is not understanding Thomas's true intent... the rage for ones life... not conflict with others...

Morgan

Since when is someone's product tied to it afterward it's been sold?

Ridiculous and absolutely nothing to do with religious rights, just another deceptive mask to their bigotry, they fool no one, well except maybe you and other righteous bigots. If what he said was true he simply could have told them, he could make them a cake without the top embellishments. Bigots always find a way to be self-righteous about it. My life is just fine thanks, maybe you should stick to worrying about your own life.

Morgan