HPSCI FISA MEMO (Page 3): I wouldn't be so hard on Rosenstein and Wray, considering IF they knew there was an internal investigation going on of these activities they clearly couldn't...

Bug58

I wouldn't be so hard on Rosenstein and Wray, considering IF they knew there was an internal investigation going on of these activities they clearly couldn't tip their hand to those being investigated.

Rosenstein clearly couldn't just refuse to submit the new fisa extension request without them questioning WHY he refused. And wanting to know 'what he knows' and what's going on.

Bug58

What do people know about Project Cassandra?? Anything??

https://www.opslens.com/2017/12/20/obama-iran-project-cassandra/?utm_source=Keywee&utm_medium=facebook&kwp_0=642136&kwp_4=2303782&kwp_1=968921

https://twitter.com/RepPittenger/status/942884682991112199

My stolen assault weapons stolen by ATF agent Tommy Ho and Matt Wear w/Julie Ann Shields who are selling on internet. In BULK TOO” https://twitter.com/wesleyfelixpsi/status/949890803601760256

https://twitter.com/wesleyfelixpsi/status/949894691989938177

Peewee Loc: San Antonio, TX

Pennylynn wrote:

I have a general question for anyone that may know.... If the warrants were not legal, then can the case be legal? If the case is not legal, does this means that Mueller must start over and not use any of the Steele Dossier because up until today, nothing in the Dossier has been validated?

Second question.... what does this do to the integrity of FBI? And, does this mean that Carter Page is now off the hook?

I'll try. Nothing gets resolved until it goes through a court and legal proceedings. The FBI, head shed, took the case from the field agents to handle "personally". They relied on a bogus dossier to con the FISA court into signing the warrant. They're off to the races. Until there is a ruling on the dossier being fraudulent or obtained by fraudulent means, it will remain in effect. The dirty cops will just say it was an honest mistake until then.

Muller proceeds until he is stopped legally or fired. Trump can fire him or anyone else in the FBI and DOJ as is his executive privilege. The fallout and howls would be very loud and continuous and the D's would try to impeach him. It would be flimsy but you can indict a ham sandwich, so they say.

Carter Page should be totally off the hook soon, he already has a lawsuit in the works, and can prove he isn't guilty of any charges. He appears to be someone they were just harassing like the IRS did the Tea Party people. That's my understanding of the facts, but, I'm not a lawyer. More memos are in the pipeline for release. No one knows when. Hope I've helped.

Know you're not a big fan of You Tube, but if you have heard of Q, and want to stay up to speed on things going on beneath the surface, I encourage you to watch the following blogs: CBTS, Dustin Nemos, Tracy Beanz, and Anti School are the best I have found. Dr Jerome Corsi is a frequent guest and helps us all understand what Q is posting, as, it is released in a coded military intel shorthand. But it is like reading tomorrow's newspaper today. Step out of your comfort zone and give it a try. Q doesn't post updates every day. But almost daily.

bahmer

lindajoy wrote:

bahmer, I had not heard this before but will certainly watch for more on it...Thank you...

Here you go lindajoy read and enjoy.

Fox star Monica Crowley says FISA memo is only the first of several – “worse” is coming
February 2, 2018
Fox star Monica Crowley says FISA memo is only the first of several – “worse” is coming
christianthiel.net / Shutterstock.com
The now-infamous FISA memo could be just one of several alleging corruption at the FBI, according to one conservative commentator.

Monica Crowley told Fox News on Thursday morning that “very good sources” had told her that more memos are incoming and that “there is worse coming down the pike.”

If the contents of this one memo are bad enough to send the FBI and the Democrats into a tailspin, how bad could the others be?

President Trump is expected to declassify the now-ubiquitous Nunes memo today.

Crowley: more memos to come
Controversy over the yet-released memo has caused a furor on the left, with liberal journalists, Democrats, and even James Comey accusing Republicans of a bad-faith attempt to discredit the FBI.

But things could get more interesting.

Crowley told Fox that “sources” had told her the Nunes memo is just one of several and that there is “worse to come down the pike.”

“Well, look, this memo is about origination”, said Crowley, a senior fellow at the London Center for Policy Research.

“From what I’m hearing from my sources this is about how this FISA warrant came into being and why and how it got approved and why and how it was used.”

The FISA memo reportedly alleges that the Obama DOJ abused its authority to spy on Trump campaign adviser Carter Page. The infamous Trump dossier obtained by the Clinton campaign was allegedly used to justify that surveillance.

“I also understand from some very good sources that this is the first of several memos. So as bad as this memo might be, my understanding is that there is worse coming down the pike,” Crowley continued.

Their house of cards is falling down.

Memo fight climaxes
The now-infamous memo has driven a wedge between Republicans and the White House on one hand and Democrats and the Justice Department on the other. It’s becoming an unprecedented political battle between the president’s party and the nation’s top law enforcement agency.

Former FBI director James Comey dished out a passive-aggressive attack at Trump and Republicans yesterday, calling them “weasels and liars” who would be remembered like Joe McCarthy, the anti-communist senator.

James Comey
✔
@Comey
All should appreciate the FBI speaking up. I wish more of our leaders would. But take heart: American history shows that, in the long run, weasels and liars never hold the field, so long as good people stand up. Not a lot of schools or streets named for Joe McCarthy.
4:51 PM - Feb 1, 2018
28,485 28,485 Replies 89,743 89,743 Retweets 260,353 260,353 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Democrats, led by Adam Schiff (D-Ca.), claim that the memo is misleading. FBI Director Christopher Wray, who viewed the memo last weekend, has expressed concerns about certain “omissions of fact” in the document.

Trump slammed the FBI/DOJ on Twitter on Friday for favoring Democrats.

Donald J. Trump
✔
@realDonaldTrump
The top Leadership and Investigators of the FBI and the Justice Department have politicized the sacred investigative process in favor of Democrats and against Republicans - something which would have been unthinkable just a short time ago. Rank & File are great people!
5:33 AM - Feb 2, 2018
47,772 47,772 Replies 38,713 38,713 Retweets 129,964 129,964 likes
Twitter Ads info and privacy
Considering what we’ve learned so far about these agencies’ handling of the investigations into Clinton and the probe into alleged collusion between Russia and president Trump’s transition team, President Trump is probably right.

With the Nunes memo set to release today and more memos down the road, things aren’t looking good for the FBI.

teabag09

I heard that also Friday evening. Nunes made that statement. Mike

bahmer wrote:

I have heard that the FISA memo was only the first in a series of memos and the rest are due to be released soon. That is all that I have read so far.

bahmer

teabag09 wrote:

I heard that also Friday evening. Nunes made that statement. Mike

WATCH: Devin Nunes Drops BOMBSHELL After Releasing The Memo: There's More Coming
"We are in the middle of what I call 'phase two' of our investigation, which involves other departments."
Screenshot: Fox News Video
ByRYAN SAAVEDRA February 2, 2018
House Intelligence Committee Chairman Devin Nunes (R-CA) revealed on Friday that there would be more memos released as the committee concluded its investigation into abuse of FISA warrants by the Obama administration – and the State Department is next.

Appearing on Fox News' "Special Report" with host Bret Baier, Nunes said that today's release of the memo on FISA abuse was only the beginning of their investigation.

When asked by Baier if more memos would come out, Nunes responded, "Yes, this completes just the FISA abuse portion of our investigation," adding that the "investigation is ongoing."

"We are in the middle of what I call 'phase two' of our investigation, which involves other departments," Nunes continued. "Specifically, the State Department and some of the involvement they had in this."

WATCH:

READ MORE: BARACK OBAMA DEVIN NUNES DONALD TRUMP STATE DEPARTMENT TRUMP ADMINISTRATION

Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ

lindajoy wrote:

The leaks of the memo were more interesting than t... (show quote)

Your post is correct, but I must add that the judge of FISA court should be the one to bring those, that bought the matter to him, should be brought back before him and state their case for the deletion of their knowledge of this evidence. I think that should be called for at this time.

Bug58

Intel Committee Dems ‘Dangerous,’ ‘Negligent’ In Handling Of Breach By Their Own IT Aide

http://dailycaller.com/2018/02/02/intel-committee-dems/

Ricktloml

Blade_Runner wrote:

READ IT HERE

Thanks, Blade_Runner.

The FBI, DOJ, and the Democrats obviously lied about this memo undermining national security. They don't however seem to have a problem with the Obama administration subverting the Constitution, and the rank abuse of power from that administration

Ricktloml

Pennylynn wrote:

I have a general question for anyone that may know.... If the warrants were not legal, then can the case be legal? If the case is not legal, does this means that Mueller must start over and not use any of the Steele Dossier because up until today, nothing in the Dossier has been validated?

Second question.... what does this do to the integrity of FBI? And, does this mean that Carter Page is now off the hook?

Good questions. How about Michael Flynn, does his indictment still stand?

Ricktloml

Blade_Runner wrote:

You can let Hillary off the hook if you want, I can't. She is as much a part of this malfeasance as are all the others involved. This effort to surveil the Trump campaign and undermine his run for POTUS might never have happened had not Hillary Clinton and Obama been leading the pack. As far as I'm concerned the entire liberal progressive movement (democrat party) is guilty.

And a lot of the media is complicit. Probably not legally responsible, but they should be held accountable in some way.

Ricktloml

lindajoy wrote:

First Question~The first is yes for many reasons we could go into but still not have a difinitive conclusion..It is a perfect question but one that falls near to imposible given all the different scenerios that paly into it..

If the stories are correct, Obama or his officials may well face prosecution. But, we are still early in all of this and there are a lot of rumors flying around so the key is if the reports are accurate. We just don’t know at this time. The stories currently are three-fold: first, that Obama’s team tried to get a warrant from a regular, Article III federal court on Trump, and was told no by someone along the way (maybe the FBI), as the evidence was that weak or non-existent; second, Obama’s team then tried to circumvent the federal judiciary’s independent role by trying to mislabel the issue one of “foreign agents,” and tried to obtain a warrant from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act “courts”, and were again turned down, when the court saw Trump named (an extremely rare act of FISA court refusal of the government, suggesting the evidence was truly non-existent against Trump); and so, third, Obama circumvented both the regular command of the FBI and the regularly appointed federal courts, by placing the entire case as a FISA case (and apparently under Sally Yates at DOJ) as a “foreign” case, and then omitted Trump’s name from a surveillance warrant submitted to the FISA court, which the FISA court unwittingly granted, which Obama then misused to spy on Trump and many connected to Trump. Are these allegations true? We don’t know yet, but if any part of them are then Obama and/or his officials acting in cohort with him or even using their power of office to misrepresent the facts to the Judge you can gaurantee he will see some of those faces again but in serious trouble....

Can a President be charged with a crime? Only once out of office. .....
if the facts were misrepresented as it appears is the case then any and all done could be stricken by the Judge along with he calling for charges...Can you imagine if that happened where the dems would then be?? Done, I say!! Charges could range from lying, misrepresenting the facts, obstruction, purjury etc..Remember Flynns agreement to pleade guilty because he lied?? He did so to eliminate that potentia 5 year sentence he could have gotten..

I think every one involved with the dossier wishes it would disappear especially now that we have confirmation of the players used to procure it...

This witch hunt is so exposed for what it is that I doubt Mueller would take it up again or that he would be appointed again..His conflict of Interest was obvious from the beginning and when he accepted the appointees should have pulled him..I don't care who they were...Likewise his little Ukraine involvement really stinks too!

First Question~The first is yes for many reasons w... (show quote)

I still think Mueller is trying to find some process crime to hang on Trump or a close associate. How is Mueller going to explain spending all those millions and no charges filed. And I believe Mueller's goal was to find something to smear Trump with so the Democrats could possible retake the House and try to impeach Trump. Mueller is up to his neck in this witch hunt

teabag09

Nunes made the statement on Friday that more statements are coming, from the State Dept. and others. The left is blowing this off as there is nothing there, there. The fecal matter is going to hit the spinning devise shortly. None of what comes out will be much of a surprise to us on OPP but will be a shocker to the people of this Country paying any attention to our well being as a nation. As several have asked, HELL YES, it's fun to watch, what a show. This is better than "Laugh In" if it wasn't so serious. Mike

bahmer wrote:

WATCH: Devin Nunes Drops BOMBSHELL After Releasing... (show quote)

Crayons Loc: St Jo, Texas

The Klintoon's FusionGPS, Democrats, Neocons, Steele, the FBI, and DOJ all colluded to rig the election.
More will be dripped out on the anti trump Neocon/Rino warmongers who supported the clinton machine.

It appears Carter Page may have been a plant to Openly Spy on Everyone in the trump campaign.
drip,drip,drip

lindajoy Loc: right here with you....

Ricktloml wrote:

I still think Mueller is trying to find some process crime to hang on Trump or a close associate. How is Mueller going to explain spending all those millions and no charges filed. And I believe Mueller's goal was to find something to smear Trump with so the Democrats could possible retake the House and try to impeach Trump. Mueller is up to his neck in this witch hunt

Rick,

Anything is possible as we are seeing in this unbelievable novel of lies, lives, spies and the American government failure..

Muelller was sent in to find or fabricate something while covering the butt of the players we already know about... He was and is damage control..

The smartest thing Trump did was to Unequivocally expose these pathetic criminals, putting it before the people to see and measure!!!

At ths point Mueller is just trying to regain some credibility, highly unlikely given what has come out about his roll in certain Emails of Clintons he knew about but didn't disclose, the Uranium deal etc..

I am so sick of all of this right now !!

It is past time to make the charges to be made and get on with the country!!! What A laughing stock we have made of ourselves before the entire world and it world leaders.!!!! As well as disclosing certain ties to Russia or against Russia..Unbelievable!!!!!!