I have never question your service or your patriotism, pull up something to prove that I have. I stated a simple fact, you are a coward, and I will gladly tell that to your face.
I don't need you or anyone else to glorify my service as a Marine, my record stands on it's own, as I also would suppose yours does too.
But that has nothing to do wih you blaming the white supremist, KKK, and altright for starting the violent riots in Charlottesville, and you did it because you thought it would be safe to blame who you thought were the most detestable of the two sides, but your most detestable were innocent of starting those violent riots in Charlottesville, as everything that happened there was an exact copy of what always happens whereever AntiFa and BLM show up to conduct what they themselves describe as a "Confrontational Protest". When I pointed out that modus operandi that they use at all the events that they go to, to create those violent riots that they also end up instigating, you refused to admit the detestable people that you blamed could actually be innocent of starting those violent riots in Charlottesville, which they were, and the few questions I put to you, had you the guts to answer them, would have proven that. You knew that it would, so your refused to answer those questions, because they would show you were wrong, and you may lose a little of the admiration that you always seek by taking both sides of everything, and giving disclaimers for sources that you use to prove your point.
That is disgusting and cowardly to me, and I don't have to wrap myself in my service to my country, or the flag, to make me look like a nice guy, those things I did many years ago, and I'm a different person today, as is the same situation with you.
You get no sympathy from me for having to go through therapy for doing and going through what a hundred thousand Marines went through in Vietnam.
How did I know about your therapy, again you brought it up out of the blue, for sympathy, and I don't like people fishing for sympathy, that some have had a hard time getting over, and most keep it to themselves because they are ashamed of it.
My younger brother was also a Marine, and he too went through the worse that there was in Vietnam, yet he doesn't talk about it, or fishes for sympathy for what he went trough for his country, as most all Marines that I know of act the same way as he and I do. We don't talk about what we did in Vietnam, not because we're ashamed of it, but because we don't want admiration or sympathy for simply doing our duty, as millions of Americans have done before us. We do like to speak of the good times we had while serving our country, but expect nothing in return, especially admiration or sympathy, as you seem to always fish for. Yeah, it's a brotherhood, but a silent and respectful brotherhood, not one for seeking admiration and sympathy as you use it for.
You could have stopped all this very easily, by admitting you were wrong on what I called you on in the Charlottesville incident. And yes, I saw your comments much later, after you ducked your responsibility of admitting when you made a mistake about what occured in Charlottesville, there again so you could take both sides, admitting much later what you refused to admit when you were caught taking the wrong side in Charlottesville, just so people wouldn't think the lesser of you, because you made one mistake in all your lukewarm attitude toward everything, seeking everyones approval, admiration, and sympathy.
Try growing up, real men admit when they've made a mistake, but not Slatten, because if he did he may lose some of that admiration and sympathy that he is always fishing for. You know what, some people know that just because a person speaks real nice about everything, doesn't mean that they always tell the truth, and you're a priime example of that. I KNOW WHAT YOU ARE, and keep it up, these people will eventually learn that too, for the truth always comes out in the end. We can settle up when we meet. Keep taking both sides of everything, don't make a commitment for anything, orals mean nothing if you can't make everyone like you, do they.
I read a lot of your comments before I spoke up when you made a mistake, and wondered why you always took both sides of every situation that you spoke up on, and also wondered why you would do that. But I finally figured it out when I shot down one of your sources that was wrong, then you told me you always give a disclaimer on all the sources that you use to make your points, and then I understood it all, it became perfectly clear when you wouldn't even side with your own sources, that you were using to prove your points. You don't care about any points, that you or anyone else makes, you just want to be liked by everyone, so you always try to stay lukewarm and never commit to anything, unless you're positive that everyone else has already committed to it, like you thought about the Charlottesville incident, not realizing that there are some people who care more about the truth, no matter how detestable the people are that the truth is in favor for.
You can't take both sides of what I say can you, and that's good, for you may grow up a little from it, by finally showing some confrontational ability, but people are going to see how you really are, and face it, some may not like you as much, on both sides.
slatten49 wrote:
You know what's wrong with you, Randy131? When you're not lying/posting misinformation or misinformation, you're just plain uninformed or purposely obtuse. As I showed you clearly with my earlier post, you know remarkably little about the Founding Fathers, with James Madison in particular. You deftly skipped over your glaring lack of "Factual history."
I am again posting a response I gave you on my abhorrence for violent groups such as BLM, Antifa, KKK, etc. You ignore much of what I write due to your undeserved arrogance and seething anger towards anything that doesn't suit your worldview. Even though this is a a political forum open to discussion, you show anger towards anyone who won't acquiesce to your way of thinking. Read the following from the thread and try to tell me once where I don't voice my displeasure with the aforementioned groups you list in your self-righteous rant.
My post from the thread 'So... about this Antifa group' in response to your accusations...
Aug 22, 2017 20:54:24 #
slatten49 (a regular here) (online) Joined: Aug 11, 2013 Posts: 34955 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
Randy131 wrote:
Thank you Bobby, I really appreciate your attitude, but if Slatten is correct, and I am wrong, as he keeps saying, then why doesn't he answer the questions I put to him to prove which of us is really right, or at least acknowledge the facts in those questions, that most people agree are true and happened at Berkeley, Charlottesville, and Chicago, through the actions of the Antifa and BLM? He refuses to answer, and complains about my redundancy, which there would be no redundancy if he would just answer the questions that I put forward, that would prove which one of us is right in our conclusions, but instead doesn't want that proven by answering those questions, that are based on facts that occurred in Berkley, Charlottesville, and Chicago, perpetrated by AntiFa and BLM, which the alt-right were not in attendence at Berkley and Chicago, but the reuslts were identical in all three places, and antifa and the BLM did all the same things and tactics in all three places. Just answer the questions I put to him at least a half dozen times, which he purposely ignores and refuses to do so.
slatten49wrote:
You really are slow to grasp things, aren't you Randy? You keep insisting on what I state in my posts when the comments you speak of are the words/comments of the authors of the articles I posted. As I've said before, each of my posts you find most criticism with were forwarded with a disclaimer as to what purpose my posting them served...yet, you still can't seem to separate my words/thoughts from those of the writers. I spoke directly to my distaste/abhorrence for AntiFa, BLM and white supremacy groups in an earlier post, and yet again, you skim over what should be sufficient in answering your questions. How in the hell do you come off thinking I owe you any explanations that would be already been answered if you had the capacity to comprehend what has been offered you? Try reading my posts again, S-L-O-W-L-Y. Or, is it that you simply can't handle your obvious discomfort with the truth of my presentations?
Your insistence on attempting to get under my skin with your childish insults and accusations as to my qualifications as to being a patriotic American and a proud Marine just show again how angry, bitter and confused you are...as stated before. I will not denigrate your service in the Corps in such a manner...the USMC is a Brotherhood. You betray that Brotherhood with such underhanded and unfounded accusations.
I owe you nor anyone an explanation for my thoughts, service, patriotism or pride in being an American. If you had any sense of understanding in that stubborn, brick-hard ideological log-jam within your brain, you could get all the answers you seek by just just reading my posts with some comprehension instead of once again assuming and presuming without facts in evidence. Since so far you have failed to do so, I again challenge you to quote or otherwise present evidence of my being guilty of any accusation you have cast at me, to include my mentioning the young man who ran over and killed the young lady. I explained to you exactly what my points of contention were with regard to the misinformation and/or disinformation within your posts. If I had found anything else to factually challenge you, I would have presented arguments as I did with the permits and Jason Kessler. Not that would have done any good, as you seemed unable to decipher even those.
You know what's wrong with you, Randy131? When yo... (
show quote)