One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Who is gone?
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
Oct 12, 2017 12:43:57   #
Randy131 Loc: Florida
 
Very good rob, I agree with you and love the way you put it.



robmull wrote:
It's their job, R131. "Lefty," as warned by "hero" {Chris Matthews/"MSLSD"}, "red-(D)iaper baby," Saul Alinsky (D), "{C}an't go back." Ole' Saul's "Rules for Radicals," makes it quite clear that, "{I}f the c*******t movement is exposed to the enemy, America, the movement must be physically strong-enough to o*******w the Western free-market civilization or the radical movement will be rapidly crushed." "Lefty," is now going "balls to-the-walls," to ignore any opposition to political, "Hollyweird," and "journalistic" secular liberal progressives, OWS, B*M, A****a, OFA, NBPP, AAIG, L***Q {activists}, MB, etc., and if - hummmmmmmm. What IS that "crushing" noise I keep hearing??? GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PATRIOTIC, CONSERVATIVE, CONSTITUTIONALIST, REAL-AMERICAN, PRESIDENT "45" DONALD J. {GOD-FEARING, BORN-AGAIN} TRUMP (R); JUST LIKE THE WEATHER. CHOO-CHOO, CHOO; "the {TRUMP} train is comin', better jump on-board"!!! Or not.
It's their job, R131. "Lefty," as warne... (show quote)

Reply
Oct 12, 2017 12:48:09   #
eden
 
robmull wrote:
It's their job, R131. "Lefty," as warned by "hero" {Chris Matthews/"MSLSD"}, "red-(D)iaper baby," Saul Alinsky (D), "{C}an't go back." Ole' Saul's "Rules for Radicals," makes it quite clear that, "{I}f the c*******t movement is exposed to the enemy, America, the movement must be physically strong-enough to o*******w the Western free-market civilization or the radical movement will be rapidly crushed." "Lefty," is now going "balls to-the-walls," to ignore any opposition to political, "Hollyweird," and "journalistic" secular liberal progressives, OWS, B*M, A****a, OFA, NBPP, AAIG, L***Q {activists}, MB, etc., and if - hummmmmmmm. What IS that "crushing" noise I keep hearing??? GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO PATRIOTIC, CONSERVATIVE, CONSTITUTIONALIST, REAL-AMERICAN, PRESIDENT "45" DONALD J. {GOD-FEARING, BORN-AGAIN} TRUMP (R); JUST LIKE THE WEATHER. CHOO-CHOO, CHOO; "the {TRUMP} train is comin', better jump on-board"!!! Or not.
It's their job, R131. "Lefty," as warne... (show quote)


I'll pass thanks.

Reply
Oct 12, 2017 12:55:12   #
Randy131 Loc: Florida
 
Well thank you rob, I really appreciate that.

Kevyn and oldymoldy just h**e me, because I keep exposing their lies by posting the t***h, which they call lies, but they can't provide an ounce of proof for anything that they say, while most of what I say is factual history. They provide propaganda articles that they say are the t***h, which none of the substance in them can be authenticated, but is only the opinion of yet another liberal, progressive, or Democrat. What hurts them the most are all the historical facts that everyone already knows is the t***h, and instead of trying to deny those facts, they change to another subject, again with no proof of what they espouse. Then try to label me as the liar, not being able to t***hfully deny anything that I posted that they are commenting on, but only showing opposite opinions by other liberals, progressives, and Democrats.



robmull wrote:
"Pigeons/liberal progressives and chess," R131. At this late stage of-the-game, to expect Kevyn or moldy, etc., to understand conservative common-sense is like expecting to see an interesting game of chess with a pigeon. I do love the never-ending conservative lists of liberal progressive hypocrisies you present, and the usual "lefty's" "hypocritical lies," are always enlightening. Keep-up the good work, 131!!!

Reply
 
 
Oct 12, 2017 13:11:18   #
Randy131 Loc: Florida
 
Everything that I said about Seth Rich has been proven, which proves everything that you and your ilk has made up about President Trump is nothing but lies. The American people are learning that slowly, and when Mueller's investigation is over, if he ever gives up because he can't find any proof of your false and unfounded accusations, the American people, as well as the FBI, will turn to the Seth Rich murder to learn the t***hful facts of what all you liberals, progressives, and Democrats have lied about to hide the t***h.

This will expose why a patriotic American was murdered for leaking e-mails and crossing the Clinton mafia, where more deaths are attributed to than any other crime organization.

Seth rich was not the only one involved in copying and leaking all those DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails to Wikileaks, for there were two others involved, and they were also mysteriosly k**led within a couple of weeks of all three meeting their mysterious demise, and they too will be included in Seth Rich's murder investigation.

I'm patient enough to wait silently for the t***h, are you, since it's obvious that you don't know what that is yet, as you haven't provided an ounce of proof for anything that you have accused President Trump of in colluding with the Russians to interfere in our e******ns?



moldyoldy wrote:
You just posted yesterday about the Seth rich lie.

Reply
Oct 12, 2017 13:28:56   #
moldyoldy
 
Randy131 wrote:
Everything that I said about Seth Rich has been proven, which proves everything that you and your ilk has made up about President Trump is nothing but lies. The American people are learning that slowly, and when Mueller's investigation is over, if he ever gives up because he can't find any proof of your false and unfounded accusations, the American people, as well as the FBI, will turn to the Seth Rich murder to learn the t***hful facts of what all you liberals, progressives, and Democrats have lied about to hide the t***h.

This will expose why a patriotic American was murdered for leaking e-mails and crossing the Clinton mafia, where more deaths are attributed to than any other crime organization.

Seth rich was not the only one involved in copying and leaking all those DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails to Wikileaks, for there were two others involved, and they were also mysteriosly k**led within a couple of weeks of all three meeting their mysterious demise, and they too will be included in Seth Rich's murder investigation.

I'm patient enough to wait silently for the t***h, are you, since it's obvious that you don't know what that is yet, as you haven't provided an ounce of proof for anything that you have accused President Trump of in colluding with the Russians to interfere in our e******ns?
Everything that I said about Seth Rich has been pr... (show quote)


You can read the facts or remain in your fox bubble.

http://www.nationalreview.com/article/447903/sean-hannitys-seth-rich-conspiracy-theory-disgrace

http://www.snopes.com/2017/05/25/seth-rich-conspiracy-theory/

http://www.npr.org/2017/09/15/551163406/fox-news-has-yet-to-explain-what-what-wrong-in-seth-rich-story

Reply
Oct 12, 2017 13:41:08   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
Randy131 wrote:
Well thank you rob, I really appreciate that.

Kevyn and oldymoldy just h**e me, because I keep exposing their lies by posting the t***h, which they call lies, but they can't provide an ounce of proof for anything that they say, while most of what I say is factual history. They provide propaganda articles that they say are the t***h, which none of the substance in them can be authenticated, but is only the opinion of yet another liberal, progressive, or Democrat. What hurts them the most are all the historical facts that everyone already knows is the t***h, and instead of trying to deny those facts, they change to another subject, again with no proof of what they espouse. Then try to label me as the liar, not being able to t***hfully deny anything that I posted that they are commenting on, but only showing opposite opinions by other liberals, progressives, and Democrats.
Well thank you rob, I really appreciate that. br... (show quote)


Ironically, your lack of "factual history" was on display throughout the thread 'The left has no clue.' Yet, you often write without a clue.

Randy131 wrote:

Just for curiosity sake, since James Madison, Ethan Allen, and Thomas Paine weren't signers of the 'Declaration of Independence', I also checked if they were signers of the 'US Constitution', which I discovered none of the three were signers of that original 'Founding Fathers' document either, so then I checked the 'Bill of Rights' and discovered that they were not supporters of the 'Bill of Rights' either, absent from the three most important 'Founding Fathers' documents in our histroy, so how do you justify calling them members of our 'Founding Fathers'? This is quite telling how liberals, progressives, and Democrats make their false points, by using people who are not affiliated with what the discussion is about, and those four graphic pictures that you have used must have been put out by another "F**e News" liberal propaganda organization, which fits right in with your type of lying hypocrisy.

And, also, Randy131 wrote...

"James Madison was certainly no 'Founding Father', as he was completely absent in two of the most important 'Founding Father' documents of this nation, the 'Declaration of Independence' and the 'Bill of Rights'."

slatten49 wrote/replied:

James Madison did not sign the Declaration of Independence. Neither did George Washington or other recognized Founding Fathers. Madison not only signed the U.S. Constitution, he was the principle author of it. That would include his authoring The Bill Of Rights, which are the first Ten Amendments to The U.S. Constitution. Apparently, you did not realize that, either. Rather than continuing with your stunning lack of knowledge of one of our greatest American Founding Fathers, I will let the following mini-bio on James Madison speak for itself. BTW, as usual, that was one heck of a research you ran. Similar articles confirming the validity of Ethan Allen and Thomas Paine as Founding Fathers are easily researched.

James Madison, 4th President of The United States

Born in Port Conway, Virginia, The United States; March 16, 1751

Died, June 28, 1836

James Madison, Jr. was an American politician and the fourth President of the United States (1809–1817), and one of the Founding Fathers of the United States. Madison was the last founding father to die. Considered to be the "Father of the Constitution", he was the principal author of the document. In 1788, he wrote over a third of the Federalist Papers, still the most influential commentary on the Constitution. As a leader in the first Congresses, he drafted many basic laws and was responsible for the first ten amendments to the Constitution (said to be based on the Virginia Declaration of Rights), and thus is also known as the "Father of the Bill of Rights". As a political theorist, Madison's most distinctive belief was that the new republic needed checks and balances to limit the powers of special interests, which Madison called factions. He believed very strongly that the new nation should fight against aristocracy and corruption and was deeply committed to creating mechanisms that would ensure republicanism in the United States.

As leader in the House of Representatives, Madison worked closely with President George Washington to organize the new federal government. Breaking with Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton in 1791, Madison and Thomas Jefferson organized what they called the republican party (later called the Democratic-Republican Party) in opposition to key policies of the Federalists, especially the national bank and the Jay Treaty. He secretly co-authored, along with Thomas Jefferson, the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions in 1798 to protest the Alien and S******n Acts.

As Jefferson's Secretary of State (1801-1809), Madison supervised the Louisiana Purchase, doubling the nation's size, and sponsored the ill-fated Embargo Act of 1807. As president, he led the nation into the War of 1812 against Great Britain in order to protect the United States' economic rights. That conflict began poorly as Americans suffered defeat after defeat by smaller forces, but ended on a high note in 1815, with the Treaty of Ghent, after which a new spirit of nationalism swept the country. During and after the war, Madison reversed many of his positions. By 1815, he supported the creation of the second National Bank, a strong military, and a high tariff to protect the new factories opened during the war.

Reply
Oct 12, 2017 14:12:47   #
Weewillynobeerspilly Loc: North central Texas
 
slatten49 wrote:
Ironically, your lack of "factual history" was on display throughout the thread 'The left has no clue'....Yet, you often write without a clue.

Randy131 wrote:

Just for curiosity sake, since James Madison, Ethan Allen, and Thomas Paine weren't signers of the 'Declaration of Independence', I also checked if they were signers of the 'US Constitution', which I discovered none of the three were signers of that original 'Founding Fathers' document either, so then I checked the 'Bill of Rights' and discovered that they were not supporters of the 'Bill of Rights' either, absent from the three most important 'Founding Fathers' documents in our histroy, so how do you justify calling them members of our 'Founding Fathers'? This is quite telling how liberals, progressives, and Democrats make their false points, by using people who are not affiliated with what the discussion is about, and those four graphic pictures that you have used must have been put out by another "F**e News" liberal propaganda organization, which fits right in with your type of lying hypocrisy.

slatten49 wrote:

James Madison did not sign the Declaration of Independence. Neither did George Washington or other recognized Founding Fathers. Madison not only signed the U.S. Constitution, he was the principle author of it. That would include his authoring The Bill Of Rights, which are the first Ten Amendments to The U.S. Constitution. Apparently, you did not realize that, either. Rather than continuing with your stunning lack of knowledge of one of our greatest American Founding Fathers, I will let the following mini-bio on James Madison speak for itself. BTW, as usual, that was one heck of a research you ran. Similar articles confirming the validity of Ethan Allen and Thomas Paine as Founding Fathers are easily researched.

James Madison, 4th President of The United States

Born in Port Conway, Virginia, The United States; March 16, 1751

Died, June 28, 1836

James Madison, Jr. was an American politician and the fourth President of the United States (1809–1817), and one of the Founding Fathers of the United States. Madison was the last founding father to die. Considered to be the "Father of the Constitution", he was the principal author of the document. In 1788, he wrote over a third of the Federalist Papers, still the most influential commentary on the Constitution. As a leader in the first Congresses, he drafted many basic laws and was responsible for the first ten amendments to the Constitution (said to be based on the Virginia Declaration of Rights), and thus is also known as the "Father of the Bill of Rights". As a political theorist, Madison's most distinctive belief was that the new republic needed checks and balances to limit the powers of special interests, which Madison called factions. He believed very strongly that the new nation should fight against aristocracy and corruption and was deeply committed to creating mechanisms that would ensure republicanism in the United States.

As leader in the House of Representatives, Madison worked closely with President George Washington to organize the new federal government. Breaking with Treasury Secretary Alexander Hamilton in 1791, Madison and Thomas Jefferson organized what they called the republican party (later called the Democratic-Republican Party) in opposition to key policies of the Federalists, especially the national bank and the Jay Treaty. He secretly co-authored, along with Thomas Jefferson, the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions in 1798 to protest the Alien and S******n Acts.

As Jefferson's Secretary of State (1801-1809), Madison supervised the Louisiana Purchase, doubling the nation's size, and sponsored the ill-fated Embargo Act of 1807. As president, he led the nation into the War of 1812 against Great Britain in order to protect the United States' economic rights. That conflict began poorly as Americans suffered defeat after defeat by smaller forces, but ended on a high note in 1815, with the Treaty of Ghent, after which a new spirit of nationalism swept the country. During and after the war, Madison reversed many of his positions. By 1815, he supported the creation of the second National Bank, a strong military, and a high tariff to protect the new factories opened during the war.
Ironically, your lack of "factual history&quo... (show quote)




you need a snicker bar slat....just saying

Reply
 
 
Oct 12, 2017 14:15:25   #
slatten49 Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
 
Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:
you need a snicker bar slat....just saying

Thanks, Willy! I'll have one of several I keep in my 'go-to' cache of snacks.

Unbridled arrogance does not set well with me...especially if unwarranted.

Reply
Oct 12, 2017 14:35:18   #
mwdegutis Loc: Illinois
 

If your other "sources" are as "good" as Snopes, you're in some deep doo doo...

With thanks to Geri Ungurean…

It horrifies me when people like you say “I fact checked this on Snopes and they said it’s not true.”

Just say NOPE to SNOPES!
This left leaning outfit, run by an ultra-liberal couple is definitely not the place to go for verification of facts. May I just say that if you want to be lied to, then Snopes is for you! Talk about F**e News – Snopes is the place where left wing f**e news is verified and news stories from Conservative sites are vilified.

Where is the discernment?
Actually, it is just as shocking to me when people like you are duped by rag websites like Snopes. Many years ago, before I knew what this outfit was about, it only took me a few times before it was clear to me that I was dealing with lefties. At that point I began to research Snopes. My suspicions were confirmed when I read that the couple who ran this cesspool of misinformation were died in the wool Liberal Democrats.

Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker’ Is Just A Failed Liberal Blogger
Popular myth-busting website Snopes originally gained recognition for being the go-to site for disproving outlandish urban legends -such as the presence of UFOs in Haiti or the existence of human-animal hybrids in the Amazon jungle.

Recently, however, the site has tried to pose as a political fact-checker. But Snopes’ “fact-checking” looks more like playing defense for prominent Democrats like Hillary Clinton and it’s political “fact-checker” describes herself as a liberal and has called Republicans “regressive” and afraid of “female agency.”

Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing f**e quotes and even downright h**xesas much as anything else.

While at Inquisitr, the future “fact-checker” consistently displayed clear partisanship.She described herself as “openly left-leaning” and a liberal. She trashed the Tea Party as “teahadists.” She called Bill Clinton “one of our greatest” presidents. She claimed that conservatives only criticized Lena Dunham’s comparison of v****g to sex because they “fear female agency.”

She once wrote: “Like many GOP ideas about the poor, the panic about using food stamps for alcohol, pornography or guns seems to have been cut from whole cloth–or more likely, the ideas many have about the fantasy of poverty.” (A simple fact-check would show that food stamp fraud does occur and costs taxpayers tens of millions.)

Lacapria even accused the Bush administration of being “at least guilty of criminal negligience” in the September 11 attacks. (The future “fact-checker” offered no evidence to support her accusation.)

Her columns apparently failed to impress her readership, oftentimes failing to get more than 10-20 shares.

After blogging the Inquisitr, Lacapria joined Snopes, where she regularly plays defense for her fellow liberals.

She wrote a “fact check” article about Jimmy Carter’s unilateral ban of Iranian nationals from entering the country that looks more like an opinion column arguing against Donald Trump’s proposed Muslim ban.

Similarly, Lacapria — in another “fact check” article — argued Hillary Clinton hadn’t included B******i at all in her infamous “we didn’t lose a single person in Libya” gaffe. Lacapria claimed Clinton only meant to refer to the 2011 invasion of Libya (but not the 2012 B******i attack) but offered little fact-based evidence to support her claim.

After the Orlando terror attack, Lacapria claimed that just because Omar Mateen was a registered Democrat with an active v***r r**********n status didn’t mean he was actually a Democrat. Her “fact check” argued that he might “have chosen a random political affiliation when he initially registered.”

Lacapria even tried to contradict the former Facebook workers who admitted that Facebook regularly censors conservative news, dismissing the news as “rumors.”

In that “fact check” article, Lacapria argued that “Facebook Trending’s blacklisting of ‘junk topics’ was not only not a scandalous development, but to be expected following the social network’s crackdown on f**e news sites.” The opinion-heavy article was mockingly titled: The Algorithm Is Gonna Get You.

Lacapria again played defense for Clinton in a fact check article when she claimed: “Outrage over an expensive Armani jacket worn by Hillary Clinton was peppered with inaccurate details.”

One of the “inaccurate details” cited by Lacapria was that, “The cost of men’s suits worn by fellow politicians didn’t appear in the article for contrast.” She also argued the speech Clinton gave while wearing the $12,495 jacket, which discussed “raising wages and reducing ine******y,” wasn’t actually about income ine******y.

Research to Vet Stories
As a writer, I must vet any major story before I publish it on my Word Press. It’s not that difficult. You find credible Conservative websites and do a word search using your search engine on the topic of which you are researching. After your word search, place a coma and then type in one of your trustworthy Conservative sites.

F**e news is everywhere. There are even websites which are known to be satirical. I can’t tell how many times I see people posting articles from “The Onion” and I have to tell them that it’s political satire. At least these websites are up front about their tongue in cheek phony articles!

Brethren, we are not battling flesh and blood. The left wing liberals are serving their master, Satan. We must be as wise as serpents, yet as harmless as doves. Learn the devil’s traps and snares and more importantly, learn how to avoid them!

***Update: I had shared this article in three Facebook groups, when a FB message popped up saying “You have been banned from sharing any articles in groups until October 12th at 11:24 am. Guess I hit a nerve exposing Snopes.

Reply
Oct 12, 2017 14:38:55   #
moldyoldy
 
mwdegutis wrote:
If your other "sources" are as "good" as Snopes, you're in some deep doo doo...

With thanks to Geri Ungurean…

It horrifies me when people like you say “I fact checked this on Snopes and they said it’s not true.”

Just say NOPE to SNOPES!
This left leaning outfit, run by an ultra-liberal couple is definitely not the place to go for verification of facts. May I just say that if you want to be lied to, then Snopes is for you! Talk about F**e News – Snopes is the place where left wing f**e news is verified and news stories from Conservative sites are vilified.

Where is the discernment?
Actually, it is just as shocking to me when people like you are duped by rag websites like Snopes. Many years ago, before I knew what this outfit was about, it only took me a few times before it was clear to me that I was dealing with lefties. At that point I began to research Snopes. My suspicions were confirmed when I read that the couple who ran this cesspool of misinformation were died in the wool Liberal Democrats.

Fact-Checking Snopes: Website’s Political ‘Fact-Checker’ Is Just A Failed Liberal Blogger
Popular myth-busting website Snopes originally gained recognition for being the go-to site for disproving outlandish urban legends -such as the presence of UFOs in Haiti or the existence of human-animal hybrids in the Amazon jungle.

Recently, however, the site has tried to pose as a political fact-checker. But Snopes’ “fact-checking” looks more like playing defense for prominent Democrats like Hillary Clinton and it’s political “fact-checker” describes herself as a liberal and has called Republicans “regressive” and afraid of “female agency.”

Snopes’ main political fact-checker is a writer named Kim Lacapria. Before writing for Snopes, Lacapria wrote for Inquisitr, a blog that — oddly enough — is known for publishing f**e quotes and even downright h**xesas much as anything else.

While at Inquisitr, the future “fact-checker” consistently displayed clear partisanship.She described herself as “openly left-leaning” and a liberal. She trashed the Tea Party as “teahadists.” She called Bill Clinton “one of our greatest” presidents. She claimed that conservatives only criticized Lena Dunham’s comparison of v****g to sex because they “fear female agency.”

She once wrote: “Like many GOP ideas about the poor, the panic about using food stamps for alcohol, pornography or guns seems to have been cut from whole cloth–or more likely, the ideas many have about the fantasy of poverty.” (A simple fact-check would show that food stamp fraud does occur and costs taxpayers tens of millions.)

Lacapria even accused the Bush administration of being “at least guilty of criminal negligience” in the September 11 attacks. (The future “fact-checker” offered no evidence to support her accusation.)

Her columns apparently failed to impress her readership, oftentimes failing to get more than 10-20 shares.

After blogging the Inquisitr, Lacapria joined Snopes, where she regularly plays defense for her fellow liberals.

She wrote a “fact check” article about Jimmy Carter’s unilateral ban of Iranian nationals from entering the country that looks more like an opinion column arguing against Donald Trump’s proposed Muslim ban.

Similarly, Lacapria — in another “fact check” article — argued Hillary Clinton hadn’t included B******i at all in her infamous “we didn’t lose a single person in Libya” gaffe. Lacapria claimed Clinton only meant to refer to the 2011 invasion of Libya (but not the 2012 B******i attack) but offered little fact-based evidence to support her claim.

After the Orlando terror attack, Lacapria claimed that just because Omar Mateen was a registered Democrat with an active v***r r**********n status didn’t mean he was actually a Democrat. Her “fact check” argued that he might “have chosen a random political affiliation when he initially registered.”

Lacapria even tried to contradict the former Facebook workers who admitted that Facebook regularly censors conservative news, dismissing the news as “rumors.”

In that “fact check” article, Lacapria argued that “Facebook Trending’s blacklisting of ‘junk topics’ was not only not a scandalous development, but to be expected following the social network’s crackdown on f**e news sites.” The opinion-heavy article was mockingly titled: The Algorithm Is Gonna Get You.

Lacapria again played defense for Clinton in a fact check article when she claimed: “Outrage over an expensive Armani jacket worn by Hillary Clinton was peppered with inaccurate details.”

One of the “inaccurate details” cited by Lacapria was that, “The cost of men’s suits worn by fellow politicians didn’t appear in the article for contrast.” She also argued the speech Clinton gave while wearing the $12,495 jacket, which discussed “raising wages and reducing ine******y,” wasn’t actually about income ine******y.

Research to Vet Stories
As a writer, I must vet any major story before I publish it on my Word Press. It’s not that difficult. You find credible Conservative websites and do a word search using your search engine on the topic of which you are researching. After your word search, place a coma and then type in one of your trustworthy Conservative sites.

F**e news is everywhere. There are even websites which are known to be satirical. I can’t tell how many times I see people posting articles from “The Onion” and I have to tell them that it’s political satire. At least these websites are up front about their tongue in cheek phony articles!

Brethren, we are not battling flesh and blood. The left wing liberals are serving their master, Satan. We must be as wise as serpents, yet as harmless as doves. Learn the devil’s traps and snares and more importantly, learn how to avoid them!

***Update: I had shared this article in three Facebook groups, when a FB message popped up saying “You have been banned from sharing any articles in groups until October 12th at 11:24 am. Guess I hit a nerve exposing Snopes.
If your other "sources" are as "goo... (show quote)


You hit a nerve by exposing yourself, and your falsehoods.

Reply
Oct 12, 2017 15:43:20   #
Randy131 Loc: Florida
 
David French of 'www.nationalreview.com' is doing nothing but giving his opinionated liberal propaganda, nothing authenticated that can be used as proof, as the FBI has admitted that they have Seth Rich's personal laptop computer which they confiscated from his apartment after his murder, and that said they found all the DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails on it, that Wikileaks made public.

www.snopes.com is nothing but a liberal propaganda organization that has already been caught in many lies, and therefore has nor credibility, but because they put out so much liberal propaganda, all you liberals, progressives, and Democrats love to use them as the end all fact-checker, when their proven lies have shown that they are anything but that.

David Flokenflik is anotheral liberal propagandist that is attempting to take advantage of the people who run FOX News today, Murdoch's two very liberal sons and their far left wifes who actually run the business, more than Murdoch's sons do. They ordered the story stopped because Seth Rich's parents wanted out of the lime-light and was hoping this would all go away, but it has nothing to do with the actual facts of the murder, and all the strange things that have happened, pointing to Debbie Wasserman Schultz's IT employess, that are now under federal indictment, and is showing a good possibility that they were the ones sent to murder Seth Rich (by who is the question), when leaving the bar that Seth Rich was attending an IT party, and from which he was murdered shortly after leaving, as the Aswan brothers were on the security cameras in the bar, watching Seth Rich and the party that was going on, uninvited.

Believe wh**ever you want, but you cannot deny all the evidence that is piling up about the false accusations that Russia hacked the DNC and gave the e-mails to Wikileaks in order to help President Trump win the e******n. How ironic that would be for the Russians to allow the t***h to be exposed about Hillary Clinton to the American people, through what she and other Democrats said in their own e-mails, and that t***h caused her to lose the e******n. But what is wrong with that lie is that Debbie Wasserman Schultz who ran the DNC at that time, and Donna Brazile her assistant helping her run then DNC, both swear adamantly that the DNC computers never were hacked, and they would never allow the DHS and FBI to investigate (what would have been a crime, if crimes ever really mattered to liberals, progressives, and Denocrats) their computers to see if anyone really did hack those computers, and learn who it was if anyone had.

You're pathetic, and everyone on this site can see that t***h and attest to it, but your liberal friends will stick up for you, just like they stuck up for Bill Clinton, which a known fact is that he paid sttlements to women to stop lawsuits and to keep them quiet about what he had done to them, just as O'Reilly and Weistein has done, and which all you liberals, progressives, and Democrats demanded that they be fired for, but said nothing when Bill Clinton, as our President, did the exact same things, but now since being elected, make unfounded and false accusations that President Trump has done the same. What a "PATHETIC HYPOCRITE"!!!




Reply
 
 
Oct 12, 2017 15:48:46   #
mwdegutis Loc: Illinois
 
moldyoldy wrote:
You hit a nerve by exposing yourself, and your falsehoods.

Keep believing the liberal lies moldy. You're so blind that you can't see.

Reply
Oct 12, 2017 15:58:41   #
moldyoldy
 
Randy131 wrote:
David French of 'www.nationalreview.com' is doing nothing but giving his opinionated liberal propaganda, nothing authenticated that can be used as proof, as the FBI has admitted that they have Seth Rich's personal laptop computer which they confiscated from his apartment after his murder, and that said they found all the DNC and Clinton campaign e-mails on it, that Wikileaks made public.

www.snopes.com is nothing but a liberal propaganda organization that has already been caught in many lies, and therefore has nor credibility, but because they put out so much liberal propaganda, all you liberals, progressives, and Democrats love to use them as the end all fact-checker, when their proven lies have shown that they are anything but that.

David Flokenflik is anotheral liberal propagandist that is attempting to take advantage of the people who run FOX News today, Murdoch's two very liberal sons and their far left wifes who actually run the business, more than Murdoch's sons do. They ordered the story stopped because Seth Rich's parents wanted out of the lime-light and was hoping this would all go away, but it has nothing to do with the actual facts of the murder, and all the strange things that have happened, pointing to Debbie Wasserman Schultz's IT employess, that are now under federal indictment, and is showing a good possibility that they were the ones sent to murder Seth Rich (by who is the question), when leaving the bar that Seth Rich was attending an IT party, and from which he was murdered shortly after leaving, as the Aswan brothers were on the security cameras in the bar, watching Seth Rich and the party that was going on, uninvited.

Believe wh**ever you want, but you cannot deny all the evidence that is piling up about the false accusations that Russia hacked the DNC and gave the e-mails to Wikileaks in order to help President Trump win the e******n. How ironic that would be for the Russians to allow the t***h to be exposed about Hillary Clinton to the American people, through what she and other Democrats said in their own e-mails, and that t***h caused her to lose the e******n. But what is wrong with that lie is that Debbie Wasserman Schultz who ran the DNC at that time, and Donna Brazile her assistant helping her run then DNC, both swear adamantly that the DNC computers never were hacked, and they would never allow the DHS and FBI to investigate (what would have been a crime, if crimes ever really mattered to liberals, progressives, and Denocrats) their computers to see if anyone really did hack those computers, and learn who it was if anyone had.

You're pathetic, and everyone on this site can see that t***h and attest to it, but your liberal friends will stick up for you, just like they stuck up for Bill Clinton, which a known fact is that he paid sttlements to women to stop lawsuits and to keep them quiet about what he had done to them, just as O'Reilly and Weistein has done, and which all you liberals, progressives, and Democrats demanded that they be fired for, but said nothing when Bill Clinton, as our President, did the exact same things, but now since being elected, make unfounded and false accusations that President Trump has done the same. What a "PATHETIC HYPOCRITE"!!!
David French of 'www.nationalreview.com' is doing ... (show quote)


Even though all the right wing sites claim the FBI has the laptop and DNC e mails, the FBI is not investigating this simple murder.
http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/17/fbi-not-investigating-seth-rich-murder/

http://www.newsweek.com/seth-rich-dnc-staffer-wikileaks-leaked-emails-fbi-610383

Reply
Oct 12, 2017 16:08:10   #
Randy131 Loc: Florida
 
You know what's wrong with you Slatten, just what Jesus warned us about, that he wants us to be hot or cold, never lukewarm, or if we are lukewarm, he will spit us out. You always try to be lukewarm, by always taking both sides of any argument or controversity, in your attempt to make eveyone like you, just the opposite of me. I am what I am, and I always try to take the side that is right, both morally and legally, and those who know this of me can either like me or not, but I'm not compromising anything just to get somebody to like me.

When I finally caught you taking a side, against the horrendous white supremist, KKK, and altright, in Charlottesville, blaming them for what the A****a did and instigated, because you thought everyone would agree with you because they are so detestible, but were really innocent of what the side you took lied about, and the side that you took, A****a, was really the guilty side, no matter how detestable the white supemist, KKK, altright are, they were still the innocent ones, and when I called you on it, you refused to answer some simple questions that those true answers would have proven you wrong, so instead you started personally attacking me, especially when I declared you were a coward for refusing to answer those questions.

But don't worry, I'm sure that one day we will meet face to face, and I'll give you the chance to get satisfaction for me calling you what you are, a coward, especially when it comes to taking a side for what is right or wrong, but instead wants to remain lukewarm and take both sides, so both sides will like you.



slatten49 wrote:
Thanks, Willy! I'll have one of several I keep in my 'go-to' cache of snacks.

Unbridled arrogance does not set well with me...especially if unwarranted.

Reply
Oct 12, 2017 16:38:43   #
Randy131 Loc: Florida
 
Again, two more liberal rags with articles from liberal propagandists, that are opinions, not authenticated facts.

As long as I can remember, the FBI refuses to answer whether they have an investigation going on or not for any particular person, the same reason why President Trump fired Comey, because Comey refused to make public what he had told the President three times, that the FBI was not investigating him.

So you want to believe 'News Week', that claims some anonymous source in the FBI told them off the record that there was no investigation into the Seth Rich's murder that is going on right now. If that were true, why are they still holding his personal laptop computer, not giving it back to his family, where his family could learn things about their son from his personal computer that might give them some joy, after this tragedy? What reason would the FBI have to keep it, unless they needed to use the information on it as evidence in an investigation.

Why are you trying so hard to prove someone innocent of Seth Rich's murder, or is it the lie about the Russian collusion that you're trying to protect, which will be blown up as soon as Mueller finishes his investigation, which you liberals, progressives, and Democrats still won't admit you lied by making false and unfounded accusations about President Trump, with absolutely no proof of, just because of your hatred for him, and love of a criminal women who has ripped off the American people to the tune of billions of dollars.

Has anyone ever found out what the $2 billion was used for that was t***sferred from the 'Clinton Foundation' in Pennsylvania, to a bank account in Qutar where the Clintons, as well as the Obama's, own mansions, supposedly in the personal names of the Clintons, which can't be checked out because we have no reciprocating banking information agreement with Qutar, just like Switzerland used to be, until the federal government put enough pressure on them to make them capitulate and give out information on American citizens that have banking accounts in Switzerland, which Qutar adamantly will not do or allow, and why most despots in the Middleeast all have huge banking accounts there, as does the Clintons now.



moldyoldy wrote:
Even though all the right wing sites claim the FBI has the laptop and DNC e mails, the FBI is not investigating this simple murder.
http://dailycaller.com/2017/05/17/fbi-not-investigating-seth-rich-murder/

http://www.newsweek.com/seth-rich-dnc-staffer-wikileaks-leaked-emails-fbi-610383

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.