[quote=Randy131]You know, you haven't the slightest idea of what has been going on here, so I suggest you look up the original thread about the Charlottesville incident, and read all the comments between Slatten and me. There are a lot of them, and I caught him accusing the innocent of what the guilty did, and gave him two simple questions to answer to prove he was wrong in the side that he chose to defend as the innocent, who were actually the guilty, as the detestable parties turned out to be the innocent ones, which sometimes happens, and he refused to answer those two simple questions because he didn't want to prove himself wrong, and he knows the t***hful answers would have shown he chose the wrong side to say was innocent, as he then condemned the real innocent as the guilty parties.
I tried my best to get him to answer those two questions, which had very simple answers, but he refused, and the comments started getting into name calling by both sides, and then he had the audacity to tell others that he destroyed me as "road K**l", but a week later he then condemned the real guilty parties, as even more evidence came out of what they have done at every event they attend, but still hadn't the guts to admit he was wrong.
I know Slatten rubs your ego with nice comments so you'll like him, he does that to everyone, because he has an unusual psychotic need for everyone to like him, which I could give a damn about, but I want the t***h to be exposed, and he refused, because he feared people would think less of him if it was known that he could make a mistake, and he feared that he would lose the admiration that he seeks from everyone, always taking both sides of a discussion, and when he does try to make a point, he puts a disclaimer with it in case someone can prove his source false, and would still admire him when the source he provides is proven wrong.
I don't care if you like the guy, or that you don't like me, but the only thing that I've been trying to get to is the t***h that he denied, and the two questions I put to him would have proven that, so through his cowardice to answer thos simplee questions that would have proven he made a mistake, and would only have to a[ologize to anyone who may even care about it, he refused the t***h to keep from showing that he made a mistake and was wrong that one time. But he attacked me personally just as bad as I did him. But don't believe me, look up the threads and read them for yourself, all of them, not just the ones that Slatten would like you to see, then decide for yourself what is going on and who is right and who is wrong. But you'll see that everything that I have said is true, even the things that you don't like that I exposed about your friend, it happens, but pretty talk can hide a lot.
If I was controlling, I could have gotten him to answer those two simple questions, but he refused, because the answers would have proven him wrong, and he knew it. If I wanted to pick a fight, I would hunt him down and go at it, which may happen anyway if we ever meet face to face. I'm usuually very laid back, but I don't compromise my principles, and seek the t***h to expose it for all, and don't like cowards who refuse to speak the t***h, just so they can speak nicely and get everyone to like them.
Do you even know how s**mmers c***t people out of their money, by the same way Slatten tries to cultivate admiration and sympathy from all of you, and if you think that is not true, then I suggest you read all the comments from both of us to learn of everything that he told me, none of it asked of him by me, but wanted my sympathy to let the t***h to stay hidden for his poor sake.
Before you get into this matter, first learn what you're getting into. I know that everyone on this site loves Slatten, but that doesn't mean he is always t***hful, and that he doesn't make mistakes, all this just proves that he's scared to admit it when he does make a mistake, because he may lose some of the admiration and sympathy that he has spent so much time, kind words, and compliments to cultivate from all of you, and for some psychotic reason, he needs all that admiration and love from all of you, which I'm happy to see you give him, but don't tell me I'm wrong when I'm only trying to expose the t***h that he keeps hiding, because it will prove he was wrong, something that all of you don't believe that could ever happen with Slatten, but it can happen to anybody, and it usually does, even Slatten.[/quote]
All this semantic drivel to avoid what I put in front of you. I know I am wasting my time but try to examine your desperate need to be proven "right". Regardless of Mr Slattens lack of perfection he is one of the few civil and moderate voices on OPP.
You.... not so much. (Try looking up "psychosis" then read back through your post.) A little humility and a little less self serving bombast would help you find a little more peace brother.
Wh**ever. I have plenty of peace, many firends, but I constantly seek the t***h. Someone who canstantly kisses up to everyone and is civil only because he always takes both sides of the debate in order to cultivate admiration and sympathy from everyone, is a dishonest person and is duplicit, just what Jesus bragged that Nathaniel was not in John: Ch.1, Vs.45-51. For Jesus also told us that he prefers us to be either hot or cold, and if we're lukewarm, that he will spit us out, as Slatten is one who never takes a side in any debate so everybody will like him and show him admiration and sympathy, the only things that he seeks, so he always talks up both sides, and you think that is being civil. So you live your life as you see fit, and I'll do the same, and we shall depart being civil to each other, even though we don't agree, for my axe to grind is with the coward, until he can find it in himself to admit to the t***h, which he'll never do for fear of losing some of that admiration and sympathy.
eden wrote:
All this semantic drivel to avoid what I put in front of you. I know I am wasting my time but try to examine your desperate need to be proven "right". Regardless of Mr Slattens lack of perfection he is one of the few civil and moderate voices on OPP.
You.... not so much. (Try looking up "psychosis" then read back through your post.) A little humility and a little less self serving bombast would help you find a little more peace brother.
[quote=Randy131]You know, you haven't the slightest idea of what has been going on here, so I suggest you look up the original thread about the Charlottesville incident, and read all the comments between Slatten and me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Ya-da, ya-da, ya-da...ad nauseum. Your theory of me and comments fall within Goebbel's belief that if you tell a lie(s) big enough and keep repeating it, you hope people will eventually come to accept it. Myself, I will stick to the t***h and roll with that. I have already suggested that anyone who cares to do so, can read the totality of our exchanges on the threads mentioned...and, other's comments.
BTW, It is unknown as to whether Eden and/or others have read our previous exchanges.
To assume she wasn't aware of them follows your pattern of assuming facts not in evidence...besides being condescending in nature. Also, with regards to my capacity for admitting mistakes, ask both BigBass and LDSutton as to their catching me in errors fairly recently.
Randy131 wrote:
Wh**ever. I have plenty of peace, many firends, but I constantly seek the t***h. Someone who canstantly kisses up to everyone and is civil only because he always takes both sides of the debate in order to cultivate admiration and sympathy from everyone, is a dishonest person and is duplicit, just what Jesus bragged that Nathaniel was not in John: Ch.1, Vs.45-51. For Jesus also told us that he prefers us to be either hot or cold, and if we're lukewarm, that he will spit us out, as Slatten is one who never takes a side in any debate so everybody will like him and show him admiration and sympathy, the only things that he seeks, so he always talks up both sides, and you think that is being civil. So you live your life as you see fit, and I'll do the same, and we shall depart being civil to each other, even though we don't agree, for my axe to grind is with the coward, until he can find it in himself to admit to the t***h, which he'll never do for fear of losing some of that admiration and sympathy.
Wh**ever. I have plenty of peace, many firends, b... (
show quote)
If you seek the t***h talk to your Jesus about your abrasive attitude. You are right about one thing, we do disagree...have a nice day.
slatten49 wrote:
Interesting take you have there, Randy.
How could I have been a "kiss-a**" in handing you your a**, figuratively speaking, for all to see
I guess I should'a been nicer, so you'd think better of me.
that's it......sending you a pallet of king sized snicker bars
moldyoldy wrote:
No one posts more false stories than you do, you are like the trump of OPP.
Your opinions are NOT facts, moldy. BTW: calling someone the Trump of OPP is a compliment.
Weewillynobeerspilly wrote:
Welcomed, and thank you, Willy
However, I've gone from irritated to mildly amused with this particular antagonist.
eagleye13 wrote:
So who got kicked off?
None, that I know of for certain. I haven't noticed America Only for over ten days, but he may be on vacation or ill...don't know.
Anyone else, OPP'ers
Yeah, seek aid from whereever you can get it, even from those who are ignorant of the conflict, and of all that you said, because you said a lot, that showed just what type of person you really are, as you are also doing now. If she knows the facts of our discussions, as you imply, then she needn't go back and look at all our comments, but if she isn't knowledgable on what has been said, then she needs to go back and read them, to learn the t***h, but is this a ploy by you to get her not to back and look at what was said between us, the real t***h.
What I've said about you is no lie, big or small, because you prove what I said every time you make a post on these sites, and people will start figuring it out sooner or later, when it's put in front of them, and when they read all your's and my comments about the Charlottesville incident, those comments will confirm what I have said.
But don't worry so much about it Slatten, Jesus said everything will eventually be exposed, and I guess it is now your turn, so keep annoying me with your cowardice of refusing to answer two simple questions, for fear those answers prove you wrong. People will eventually become curious, and go back and see what all this is about, then they'll be able to see how you exposed your own true nature, just as I have been describing it, and wonder why you refused to answer those two simple questions, and then the light will come on, and they will then understand that everything I have said about you is true.
Just keep on keeping this thread alive, and the t***h will eventually come out.
[quote=slatten49]
Randy131 wrote:
You know, you haven't the slightest idea of what has been going on here, so I suggest you look up the original thread about the Charlottesville incident, and read all the comments between Slatten and me.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Ya-da, ya-da, ya-da...ad nauseum. Your theory of me and comments fall within Goebbel's belief that if you tell a lie(s) big enough and keep repeating it, you hope people will eventually come to accept it. Myself, I will stick to the t***h and roll with that. I have already suggested that anyone who cares to do so, can read the totality of our exchanges on the threads mentioned...and, other's comments.
BTW, It is unknown as to whether Eden and/or others have read our previous exchanges.
To assume she wasn't aware of them follows your pattern of assuming facts not in evidence...besides being condescending in nature. Also, with regards to my capacity for admitting mistakes, ask both BigBass and LDSutton as to their catching me in errors fairly recently.
You know, you haven't the slightest idea of what h... (
show quote)
Kevyn wrote:
Has anyone been keeping a tally of who had been kicked off OPP? I have noticed a couple of vulgar posters have fallen silent and don’t know if they were banned or are just incapable of expressing themselves without using profanity and insults.
kevyn: I'm surprised your still on!
slatten49 wrote:
None, that I know of for certain. I haven't noticed America Only for over ten days, but he may be on vacation or ill...don't know.
Anyone else, OPP'ers
have not seen bombastic for a week or 10 days....Hmmmmm
of course I have not been here in 2 weeks, my alter ego has been holding down my chair for me while I am gone
ldsuttonjr wrote:
kevyn: I'm surprised your still on!
he came back when school started...once the parks emptied out, he had no reason to be stalking in that zone.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.