The NBC News investigation found that this was a case of more smoke than fire and quite a bit of wishful thinking on the part of conservatives. Here’s what they found instead (emphasis added):

But contrary to some published reports, three officials said there was no email on Clinton’s server that directly revealed the identity of an undercover intelligence operative. Rather, they said, State Department and other officials attempted to make veiled references to intelligence officers in the emails — references that were deemed classified when the messages were being reviewed years later for public release.

Catch the differences?

There were absolutely no direct references to the identities of undercover operatives. No “names” or distinguishing characteristics. No way to know who the emails were referring to. If a terrorist were to find these emails, they would be spectacularly unhelpful.

Making matters even stronger for Clinton’s case, the emails were only deemed classified years later. At the time she had them, they were considered mundane.

This falls in line with what Clinton has been saying all along. She admits that having the server at her house was a mistake, but it was never a criminal act, and it ultimately put zero CIA agents at risk of any danger. The Republican charges to the contrary are evaporating under scrutiny.

If this is all they have against her should she receive the Democratic nomination, they are – without doubt – utterly

HuffPo would have worked at least as good for this one or maybe alternate.

Do any of you remember Valerie Plame and how the left leaners squealed and howled when the woman who was once a minor spy was brought into the open? Oh those were wonderful days and Plame was not covered at that time. It is so laughable the way they behaved back them and how they tend to forget that one now.

When a law is broken, even by someone so important to the lefties, they just don't remember the Plame case.

The NBC News investigation found that this was a case of more smoke than fire and quite a bit of wishful thinking on the part of conservatives. Here’s what they found instead (emphasis added):

But contrary to some published reports, three officials said there was no email on Clinton’s server that directly revealed the identity of an undercover intelligence operative. Rather, they said, State Department and other officials attempted to make veiled references to intelligence officers in the emails — references that were deemed classified when the messages were being reviewed years later for public release.

Catch the differences?

There were absolutely no direct references to the identities of undercover operatives. No “names” or distinguishing characteristics. No way to know who the emails were referring to. If a terrorist were to find these emails, they would be spectacularly unhelpful.

Making matters even stronger for Clinton’s case, the emails were only deemed classified years later. At the time she had them, they were considered mundane.

This falls in line with what Clinton has been saying all along. She admits that having the server at her house was a mistake, but it was never a criminal act, and it ultimately put zero CIA agents at risk of any danger. The Republican charges to the contrary are evaporating under scrutiny.

If this is all they have against her should she receive the Democratic nomination, they are – without doubt – utterly

The NBC News investigation found that this was a case of more smoke than fire and quite a bit of wishful thinking on the part of conservatives. Here’s what they found instead (emphasis added):

But contrary to some published reports, three officials said there was no email on Clinton’s server that directly revealed the identity of an undercover intelligence operative. Rather, they said, State Department and other officials attempted to make veiled references to intelligence officers in the emails — references that were deemed classified when the messages were being reviewed years later for public release.

Catch the differences?

There were absolutely no direct references to the identities of undercover operatives. No “names” or distinguishing characteristics. No way to know who the emails were referring to. If a terrorist were to find these emails, they would be spectacularly unhelpful.

Making matters even stronger for Clinton’s case, the emails were only deemed classified years later. At the time she had them, they were considered mundane.

This falls in line with what Clinton has been saying all along. She admits that having the server at her house was a mistake, but it was never a criminal act, and it ultimately put zero CIA agents at risk of any danger. The Republican charges to the contrary are evaporating under scrutiny.

If this is all they have against her should she receive the Democratic nomination, they are – without doubt – utterly

The NBC News investigation found that this was a case of more smoke than fire and quite a bit of wishful thinking on the part of conservatives. Here’s what they found instead (emphasis added):

But contrary to some published reports, three officials said there was no email on Clinton’s server that directly revealed the identity of an undercover intelligence operative. Rather, they said, State Department and other officials attempted to make veiled references to intelligence officers in the emails — references that were deemed classified when the messages were being reviewed years later for public release.

Catch the differences?

There were absolutely no direct references to the identities of undercover operatives. No “names” or distinguishing characteristics. No way to know who the emails were referring to. If a terrorist were to find these emails, they would be spectacularly unhelpful.

Making matters even stronger for Clinton’s case, the emails were only deemed classified years later. At the time she had them, they were considered mundane.

This falls in line with what Clinton has been saying all along. She admits that having the server at her house was a mistake, but it was never a criminal act, and it ultimately put zero CIA agents at risk of any danger. The Republican charges to the contrary are evaporating under scrutiny.

If this is all they have against her should she receive the Democratic nomination, they are – without doubt – utterly

The NBC News investigation found that this was a case of more smoke than fire and quite a bit of wishful thinking on the part of conservatives. Here’s what they found instead (emphasis added):

But contrary to some published reports, three officials said there was no email on Clinton’s server that directly revealed the identity of an undercover intelligence operative. Rather, they said, State Department and other officials attempted to make veiled references to intelligence officers in the emails — references that were deemed classified when the messages were being reviewed years later for public release.

Catch the differences?

There were absolutely no direct references to the identities of undercover operatives. No “names” or distinguishing characteristics. No way to know who the emails were referring to. If a terrorist were to find these emails, they would be spectacularly unhelpful.

Making matters even stronger for Clinton’s case, the emails were only deemed classified years later. At the time she had them, they were considered mundane.

This falls in line with what Clinton has been saying all along. She admits that having the server at her house was a mistake, but it was never a criminal act, and it ultimately put zero CIA agents at risk of any danger. The Republican charges to the contrary are evaporating under scrutiny.

If this is all they have against her should she receive the Democratic nomination, they are – without doubt – utterly

The NBC News investigation found that this was a case of more smoke than fire and quite a bit of wishful thinking on the part of conservatives. Here’s what they found instead (emphasis added):

But contrary to some published reports, three officials said there was no email on Clinton’s server that directly revealed the identity of an undercover intelligence operative. Rather, they said, State Department and other officials attempted to make veiled references to intelligence officers in the emails — references that were deemed classified when the messages were being reviewed years later for public release.

Catch the differences?

There were absolutely no direct references to the identities of undercover operatives. No “names” or distinguishing characteristics. No way to know who the emails were referring to. If a terrorist were to find these emails, they would be spectacularly unhelpful.

Making matters even stronger for Clinton’s case, the emails were only deemed classified years later. At the time she had them, they were considered mundane.

This falls in line with what Clinton has been saying all along. She admits that having the server at her house was a mistake, but it was never a criminal act, and it ultimately put zero CIA agents at risk of any danger. The Republican charges to the contrary are evaporating under scrutiny.

If this is all they have against her should she receive the Democratic nomination, they are – without doubt – utterly