One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
This will end the Hillary e-mail story
Page 1 of 12 next> last>>
Feb 4, 2016 20:34:18   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
The NBC News investigation found that this was a case of more smoke than fire and quite a bit of wishful thinking on the part of conservatives. Here’s what they found instead (emphasis added):

But contrary to some published reports, three officials said there was no email on Clinton’s server that directly revealed the identity of an undercover intelligence operative. Rather, they said, State Department and other officials attempted to make veiled references to intelligence officers in the emails — references that were deemed classified when the messages were being reviewed years later for public release.

Catch the differences?

There were absolutely no direct references to the identities of undercover operatives. No “names” or distinguishing characteristics. No way to know who the emails were referring to. If a terrorist were to find these emails, they would be spectacularly unhelpful.

Making matters even stronger for Clinton’s case, the emails were only deemed classified years later. At the time she had them, they were considered mundane.

This falls in line with what Clinton has been saying all along. She admits that having the server at her house was a mistake, but it was never a criminal act, and it ultimately put zero CIA agents at risk of any danger. The Republican charges to the contrary are evaporating under scrutiny.

If this is all they have against her should she receive the Democratic nomination, they are – without doubt – utterly

Reply
Feb 4, 2016 20:49:02   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
No. That ends nothing.

Reply
Feb 4, 2016 21:02:44   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
Super Dave wrote:
No. That ends nothing.


NBC could not have seen any of the classified emails certainly not the ones that could not even be shown to the committee investigating the emails. And there were many that had been deleted. What NBC intentionally overlooked is that it was illegal for her to have a single email pertaining to government business on her personal server.

Reply
 
 
Feb 4, 2016 21:03:19   #
CowboyMilt
 
Super Dave wrote:
No. That ends nothing.


DUH! YEAH...SHE STILL COMMITTED CRIMES...

Reply
Feb 4, 2016 21:04:16   #
Worried for our children Loc: Massachusetts
 
permafrost wrote:
The NBC News investigation found that this was a case of more smoke than fire and quite a bit of wishful thinking on the part of conservatives. Here’s what they found instead (emphasis added):

But contrary to some published reports, three officials said there was no email on Clinton’s server that directly revealed the identity of an undercover intelligence operative. Rather, they said, State Department and other officials attempted to make veiled references to intelligence officers in the emails — references that were deemed classified when the messages were being reviewed years later for public release.

Catch the differences?

There were absolutely no direct references to the identities of undercover operatives. No “names” or distinguishing characteristics. No way to know who the emails were referring to. If a terrorist were to find these emails, they would be spectacularly unhelpful.

Making matters even stronger for Clinton’s case, the emails were only deemed classified years later. At the time she had them, they were considered mundane.

This falls in line with what Clinton has been saying all along. She admits that having the server at her house was a mistake, but it was never a criminal act, and it ultimately put zero CIA agents at risk of any danger. The Republican charges to the contrary are evaporating under scrutiny.

If this is all they have against her should she receive the Democratic nomination, they are – without doubt – utterly
The NBC News investigation found that this was a c... (show quote)



Nice fragmented post, how about giving the source so we can read the entire thing??????

Reply
Feb 4, 2016 21:07:06   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
Worried for our children wrote:
Nice fragmented post, how about giving the source so we can read the entire thing??????
Possibly from addictinginfo.com

It's a left wing bomb throwing h**e site.

Reply
Feb 4, 2016 21:15:46   #
Worried for our children Loc: Massachusetts
 
Super Dave wrote:
Possibly from addictinginfo.com

It's a left wing bomb throwing h**e site.




I was thinking that, or "Alternet" which does the same. I find it peculiar when these folks don't provide a link... 👍

Reply
 
 
Feb 4, 2016 21:28:01   #
AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State
 
Worried for our children wrote:
I was thinking that, or "Alternet" which does the same. I find it peculiar when these folks don't provide a link... 👍


As you are My WFOC, I will use your area to try, yet again, to explain one simple thing.

Mrs. Clinton had photographic images on her private, no secure, nongovernmental server from NGO. ALL NGO photographic images are rated as S/TSI and are required to be on a government approved secure server! As a fun fact, it was the radical, right wing conservative news organization, Washington Post, who reported the fact about the NGO images.

As another laughable fact, all of these Clinton worshippers fail to acknowledge the fact the hugely right wing, radically conservative NYT was the first media organization to report on the private server.

She is guilty of violating:

18 USC 793

(d) Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, t***smits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or t***smitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, t***smit or cause to be communicated, delivered or t***smitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it;


(f)Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

Reply
Feb 4, 2016 21:37:52   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
AuntiE wrote:
As you are My WFOC, I will use your area to try, yet again, to explain one simple thing.

Mrs. Clinton had photographic images on her private, no secure, nongovernmental server from NGO. ALL NGO photographic images are rated as S/TSI and are required to be on a government approved secure server! As a fun fact, it was the radical, right wing conservative news organization, Washington Post, who reported the fact about the NGO images.

As another laughable fact, all of these Clinton worshippers fail to acknowledge the fact the hugely right wing, radically conservative NYT was the first media organization to report on the private server.

She is guilty of violating:

18 USC 793

(d) Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, t***smits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or t***smitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, t***smit or cause to be communicated, delivered or t***smitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it;


(f)Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
As you are b My /b WFOC, I will use your area to... (show quote)


AuntiE,
No matter how many times you post the facts they have no intention of acklowledging them. You know what you are speaking about, but it makes no difference to those who choose only to speak the line presented by their masters. "Polly want a c*****r Hillary is wonderful, and god doesn't exist, polly wants a c*****r"

Reply
Feb 4, 2016 21:39:05   #
missinglink Loc: Tralfamadore
 
NBC ? Did you say NBC ? Ha!!!!!!

permafrost wrote:
The NBC News investigation found that this was a case of more smoke than fire and quite a bit of wishful thinking on the part of conservatives. Here’s what they found instead (emphasis added):

But contrary to some published reports, three officials said there was no email on Clinton’s server that directly revealed the identity of an undercover intelligence operative. Rather, they said, State Department and other officials attempted to make veiled references to intelligence officers in the emails — references that were deemed classified when the messages were being reviewed years later for public release.

Catch the differences?

There were absolutely no direct references to the identities of undercover operatives. No “names” or distinguishing characteristics. No way to know who the emails were referring to. If a terrorist were to find these emails, they would be spectacularly unhelpful.

Making matters even stronger for Clinton’s case, the emails were only deemed classified years later. At the time she had them, they were considered mundane.

This falls in line with what Clinton has been saying all along. She admits that having the server at her house was a mistake, but it was never a criminal act, and it ultimately put zero CIA agents at risk of any danger. The Republican charges to the contrary are evaporating under scrutiny.

If this is all they have against her should she receive the Democratic nomination, they are – without doubt – utterly
The NBC News investigation found that this was a c... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 4, 2016 21:44:46   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
permafrost wrote:
The NBC News investigation found that this was a case of more smoke than fire and quite a bit of wishful thinking on the part of conservatives. Here’s what they found instead (emphasis added):

But contrary to some published reports, three officials said there was no email on Clinton’s server that directly revealed the identity of an undercover intelligence operative. Rather, they said, State Department and other officials attempted to make veiled references to intelligence officers in the emails — references that were deemed classified when the messages were being reviewed years later for public release.

Catch the differences?

There were absolutely no direct references to the identities of undercover operatives. No “names” or distinguishing characteristics. No way to know who the emails were referring to. If a terrorist were to find these emails, they would be spectacularly unhelpful.

Making matters even stronger for Clinton’s case, the emails were only deemed classified years later. At the time she had them, they were considered mundane.

This falls in line with what Clinton has been saying all along. She admits that having the server at her house was a mistake, but it was never a criminal act, and it ultimately put zero CIA agents at risk of any danger. The Republican charges to the contrary are evaporating under scrutiny.

If this is all they have against her should she receive the Democratic nomination, they are – without doubt – utterly
The NBC News investigation found that this was a c... (show quote)


"She admits that having the server at her house was a mistake"

Besides the fact that it won't be over until that b***h is out of the picture...having that server at her house should put her in the JOINT much less PRESIDENT! Get a grip, Guido!

Reply
 
 
Feb 4, 2016 21:53:26   #
Worried for our children Loc: Massachusetts
 
AuntiE wrote:
As you are My WFOC, I will use your area to try, yet again, to explain one simple thing.

Mrs. Clinton had photographic images on her private, no secure, nongovernmental server from NGO. ALL NGO photographic images are rated as S/TSI and are required to be on a government approved secure server! As a fun fact, it was the radical, right wing conservative news organization, Washington Post, who reported the fact about the NGO images.

As another laughable fact, all of these Clinton worshippers fail to acknowledge the fact the hugely right wing, radically conservative NYT was the first media organization to report on the private server.

She is guilty of violating:

18 USC 793

(d) Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control over, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, t***smits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or t***smitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, t***smit or cause to be communicated, delivered or t***smitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it;


(f)Whoever, being entrusted with or having lawful possession or control of any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, note, or information, relating to the national defense (1) through gross negligence permits the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, or (2) having knowledge that the same has been illegally removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of its trust, or lost, or stolen, abstracted, or destroyed, and fails to make prompt report of such loss, theft, abstraction, or destruction to his superior officer—
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.
As you are b My /b WFOC, I will use your area to... (show quote)





You may use my area to post these facts any day of the week and twice on Sundays. Unfortunately, NPP is right, yet again...

Reply
Feb 4, 2016 21:55:14   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
Worried for our children wrote:
You may use my area to post these facts any day of the week and twice on Sundays. Unfortunately, NPP is right, yet again...


What is unfortunate about me being right once in a while?

Reply
Feb 4, 2016 22:04:32   #
Worried for our children Loc: Massachusetts
 
no propaganda please wrote:
What is unfortunate about me being right once in a while?





Lol, not the fact that you're right, just the facts that you're right about. 😁😁😜

Reply
Feb 4, 2016 22:04:54   #
peter11937 Loc: NYS
 
no propaganda please wrote:
NBC could not have seen any of the classified emails certainly not the ones that could not even be shown to the committee investigating the emails. And there were many that had been deleted. What NBC intentionally overlooked is that it was illegal for her to have a single email pertaining to government business on her personal server.


Very true.

Reply
Page 1 of 12 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.