One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
This will end the Hillary e-mail story
Page <<first <prev 3 of 12 next> last>>
Feb 5, 2016 08:46:44   #
Vic
 
Thank you for the welcome :)
no propaganda please wrote:
I want to welcome you Vic. Glad you are aboard. Please use quote reply when you reply so we can follow the conversation by knowing to whom you are responding . Thank you.

Reply
Feb 5, 2016 08:53:10   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
Vic wrote:
Thank you for the welcome :)


You are welcome. Have fun here, but I do hope you have a thick skin because there are no safe spaces here, unlike colleges this is the real world..

Reply
Feb 5, 2016 09:17:05   #
Vic
 
Lol safe spaces are for wussies and democrats!

Reply
 
 
Feb 5, 2016 09:23:33   #
Ronald Hatt Loc: Lansing, Mich
 
Vic wrote:
Lol safe spaces are for wussies and democrats!


{ &.....under rocks,, old rotten boards, septic tanks, & sewers! }....all places one can find 'good Libtards"!............... :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Reply
Feb 5, 2016 09:41:17   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Vic wrote:
Lol safe spaces are for wussies and democrats!


Welcome as well..You appear to fit in already~~ :wink: :thumbup:

Reply
Feb 5, 2016 09:45:39   #
moldyoldy
 
GOP poison wrote:
i see now that Colin Powell and Condi both sent E-mails that were later classified. Bet you do not hear a word out of the republicans about that.



I will mention it for them, from right wing newsmax.

Former Secretary of State Colin Powell and aides to his successor Condoleezza Rice both received classified emails on personal email accounts, the top Democrat on a congressional oversight panel said on Thursday.
In a revelation following months of controversy over the emails of Democratic p**********l candidate Hillary Clinton while she was secretary of state, Representative Elijah Cummings said the disclosures about Powell's and Rice's aides' emails were made by the State Department's Inspector General.

That office is reviewing the email practices of five previous secretaries of state, said Cummings, who is the ranking Democrat on the House of Representatives Oversight Committee.



In a statement, Powell said the emails in question were not judged to contain confidential information at the time they were sent to him. A representative for Rice said the emails sent to her aide did not contain intelligence information.

Powell and Rice held Washington's top diplomatic post during the administration of Republican President George W. Bush. Clinton held the post under President Barack Obama before she launched a bid for the Democratic p**********l nomination.

Throughout her campaign, Clinton has struggled to put behind her questions about her use of a personal email server to conduct government business while serving as secretary from 2009 to early 2013

Cummings said that State Department Inspector General Steve Linick on Wednesday told the department's chief management officer, Patrick Kennedy, about the alleged email practices of Powell and Rice's staffers.

In a memo, Cummings said, Linick reported the State Department determined last month that 12 emails he reviewed contained classified information. Two went to the personal email account of Powell; 10 to personal accounts used by Rice's staff.

Cummings said that none of the information in the emails was marked as classified at the time they were sent. He said the inspector general raised concerns that more classified information may also be sitting unnoticed in other unclassified State Department archives dating to the Powell and Rice eras.

Powell said both messages to him, which originated with American ambassadors, were not classified.

"The Ambassadors did not believe the contents were Confidential at the time and they were sent as unclassified. That is a fact," he said in the statement.

On Rice's behalf, Georgia Godfrey, her chief of staff at Stanford University's Hoover Institution, said the former secretary of state "did not use email as secretary nor have a personal email account. My understanding is that the report is in reference to emails sent to her assistant reporting diplomatic conversations and they contained no intelligence information."


© 2016 Thomson/Reuters. All rights reserved.


Breaking News at Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/Colin-Powell-Condoleezza-Rice-personal-email/2016/02/04/id/712794/#ixzz3zIwaNVb0
Urgent: Rate Obama on His Job Performance. V**e Here Now!

Reply
Feb 5, 2016 09:46:35   #
Vic
 
lindajoy wrote:
Welcome as well..You appear to fit in already~~ :wink: :thumbup:


8-) !!

Reply
Feb 5, 2016 10:12:52   #
Randy131 Loc: Florida
 
Maybe because the numbers in comparison were so minor to what Hillary Clinton did, never once sending any US State Department information on a government secured e-mail server, but every last e-mail she ever sent or received in over four years was sent on her private unsecured e-mail server, just so she could control the things she did and said from getting to the public if she wanted them kept hidden, and receiving more private e-mails than US State Department e-mails during that time is a very long stretch of the t***h, which most commonsense people can easily reason is an out right lie. And while speaking about comparisons, lets look at a comparison of what our war hero General David Petraeus did in handling classified information, for which he was indicted, prosecuted, fined hundreds of thousands of dollars, put on two years probation, and given a felony record, to the thousand times more numerous and severe things that Hillary Clinton has done handling classifies information. And the only person who saw the classified material General David Petraeus had, was seen only by another Army officer who also had a 'Top Secret Clearance'. But General David Petraeus was indicted for the handling of that classified material, which he kept in a locked drawer of his desk in his locked office, which the FBI said was not secure enough, which is what he was actually indicted for. But the way Hillary Clinton handled the thousand times more numerous and much higher classified material on her private unsecured e-mail server, was available for any hacker around the world, while all our intelligence people say it is a surety that her unsecured private e-mail server did get hacked by our most dangerous enemies. You'd like to ignore those comparisons wouldn't you. Because of what she did, Hillary Clinton should be much more severely punished than the war hero General David Petraeus was, if there were truly equal justice under the law for all in the USA. But under Obama, only conservative Christian Republicans, like General David Petraeus, are held accountable and are punished, while all the other law breakers and scandal causers in his appointed Democratic administration, gets off 'Scott Free', with absolutely no accountability under our laws, because of Obama's Democratic 'IMMUNITY' for all liberals, progressives, and Democrats.

GOP poison wrote:
i see now that Colin Powell and Condi both sent E-mails that were later classified. Bet you do not hear a word out of the republicans about that.

Reply
Feb 5, 2016 10:30:06   #
Ricko Loc: Florida
 
Randy131 wrote:
Maybe because the numbers in comparison were so minor to what Hillary Clinton did, never once sending any US State Department information on a government secured e-mail server, but every last e-mail she ever sent or received in over four years was sent on her private unsecured e-mail server, just so she could control the things she did and said from getting to the public if she wanted them kept hidden, and receiving more private e-mails than US State Department e-mails during that time is a very long stretch of the t***h, which most commonsense people can easily reason is an out right lie. And while speaking about comparisons, lets look at a comparison of what our war hero General David Petraeus did in handling classified information, for which he was indicted, prosecuted, fined hundreds of thousands of dollars, put on two years probation, and given a felony record, to the thousand times more numerous and severe things that Hillary Clinton has done handling classifies information. And the only person who saw the classified material General David Petraeus had, was seen only by another Army officer who also had a 'Top Secret Clearance'. But General David Petraeus was indicted for the handling of that classified material, which he kept in a locked drawer of his desk in his locked office, which the FBI said was not secure enough, which is what he was actually indicted for. But the way Hillary Clinton handled the thousand times more numerous and much higher classified material on her private unsecured e-mail server, was available for any hacker around the world, while all our intelligence people say it is a surety that her unsecured private e-mail server did get hacked by our most dangerous enemies. You'd like to ignore those comparisons wouldn't you. Because of what she did, Hillary Clinton should be much more severely punished than the war hero General David Petraeus was, if there were truly equal justice under the law for all in the USA. But under Obama, only conservative Christian Republicans, like General David Petraeus, are held accountable and are punished, while all the other law breakers and scandal causers in his appointed Democratic administration, gets off 'Scott Free', with absolutely no accountability under our laws, because of Obama's Democratic 'IMMUNITY' for all liberals, progressives, and Democrats.
Maybe because the numbers in comparison were so mi... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: Its not about republicans but about the FBI . They will either exonerate Hillary or request that she be charged. The republicans do not have any say in the matter. The allegations that someone else may have also violated the law by doing something similar to what Hillary did is not much of an excuse. We shall see !!! Meanwhile, that does not change the perception that Hillary is incompetent, untrustworthy and a consummate liar. She lies when the t***h would serve her better. For example: she said that when she accepted 675K from Goldman Sachs she was not planning on running for president. LIE LIE LIE She has been planning a p**********l run since she occupied the White House as First Lady. She has to be a cong*****l liar who cannot help but to lie. Good Luck America !!!

Reply
Feb 5, 2016 10:45:38   #
DamnYANKEE
 
permafrost wrote:
The NBC News investigation found that this was a case of more smoke than fire and quite a bit of wishful thinking on the part of conservatives. Here’s what they found instead (emphasis added):

But contrary to some published reports, three officials said there was no email on Clinton’s server that directly revealed the identity of an undercover intelligence operative. Rather, they said, State Department and other officials attempted to make veiled references to intelligence officers in the emails — references that were deemed classified when the messages were being reviewed years later for public release.

Catch the differences?

There were absolutely no direct references to the identities of undercover operatives. No “names” or distinguishing characteristics. No way to know who the emails were referring to. If a terrorist were to find these emails, they would be spectacularly unhelpful.

Making matters even stronger for Clinton’s case, the emails were only deemed classified years later. At the time she had them, they were considered mundane.

This falls in line with what Clinton has been saying all along. She admits that having the server at her house was a mistake, but it was never a criminal act, and it ultimately put zero CIA agents at risk of any danger. The Republican charges to the contrary are evaporating under scrutiny.

If this is all they have against her should she receive the Democratic nomination, they are – without doubt – utterly
The NBC News investigation found that this was a c... (show quote)


PERMAI***T :roll: :roll: :roll: :roll:

Reply
Feb 5, 2016 10:50:14   #
Randy131 Loc: Florida
 
Obama controls the federal government agencies by the people he appoints and requires them to answer to him for everything they do. Some say FBI Director James Comey is a standup guy, possessing character traits of honesty, integrity, and honor, so we will see what he will do under Obama's demand for immunity for his Democratic appointees. But if he does recommend and ask for an indictment of Hillary Clinton, with a case put together by the FBI, it will be up to Attorney General Loretta Lynch, another Obama appointee, who runs the DOJ, to decide whether she'll indict or not, again under Obama's demand for Democratic 'IMMUNITY' for all his political appointees, except for his Republican appointees, like the war hero General David Petraeus. Under Obama, 'IMMUNITY' is meant only for Democrats, and not for Republicans, and out of all the law breaking and scandals that Obama's administration has been involved in, the only one ever to be held accountable and prosecuted was the Republican war hero General David Petraeus, and the Obama administration has broken all previous records for the number of law breaking and scandals in a federal government P**********l administration, in all of US history.

Ricko wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: Its not about republicans but about the FBI . They will either exonerate Hillary or request that she be charged. The republicans do not have any say in the matter. The allegations that someone else may have also violated the law by doing something similar to what Hillary did is not much of an excuse. We shall see !!! Meanwhile, that does not change the perception that Hillary is incompetent, untrustworthy and a consummate liar. She lies when the t***h would serve her better. For example: she said that when she accepted 675K from Goldman Sachs she was not planning on running for president. LIE LIE LIE She has been planning a p**********l run since she occupied the White House as First Lady. She has to be a cong*****l liar who cannot help but to lie. Good Luck America !!!
:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumb... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 5, 2016 11:03:34   #
jimahrens Loc: California
 
What is it you don't get She broke the law all the other bulls**t is just idle talk. She Broke the law period.
permafrost wrote:
The NBC News investigation found that this was a case of more smoke than fire and quite a bit of wishful thinking on the part of conservatives. Here’s what they found instead (emphasis added):

But contrary to some published reports, three officials said there was no email on Clinton’s server that directly revealed the identity of an undercover intelligence operative. Rather, they said, State Department and other officials attempted to make veiled references to intelligence officers in the emails — references that were deemed classified when the messages were being reviewed years later for public release.

Catch the differences?

There were absolutely no direct references to the identities of undercover operatives. No “names” or distinguishing characteristics. No way to know who the emails were referring to. If a terrorist were to find these emails, they would be spectacularly unhelpful.

Making matters even stronger for Clinton’s case, the emails were only deemed classified years later. At the time she had them, they were considered mundane.

This falls in line with what Clinton has been saying all along. She admits that having the server at her house was a mistake, but it was never a criminal act, and it ultimately put zero CIA agents at risk of any danger. The Republican charges to the contrary are evaporating under scrutiny.

If this is all they have against her should she receive the Democratic nomination, they are – without doubt – utterly
The NBC News investigation found that this was a c... (show quote)

Reply
Feb 5, 2016 11:12:05   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
Yes it is your fault. Facebook is a social media outlet like these pages and you present this as hard fact when in fact it's not even half the story.

I don't get mad, dogs get mad but I do get upset on how people can be so miss informed.



permafrost wrote:
This is my fault.. This was on a facebook page the came past. About what NBC published but not the article itself..

I nearly always save, at least bookmark this stuff but not this time.

All I can say is that I screwed it up.... I get mad when others do not post a link.... Have no excuse when I fail at the same task...

Reply
Feb 5, 2016 11:15:07   #
moldyoldy
 
Randy131 wrote:
Obama controls the federal government agencies by the people he appoints and requires to answer to him for everything they do. Some say FBI Director James Comey is a standup guy, possessing character traits of honesty, integrity, and honor, so we will see what he will do under Obama's demand for immunity for his Democratic appointees. But if he does recommend and ask for an indictment of Hillary Clinton, with a case put together by the FBI, it will be up to Attorney General Loretta Lynch, another Obama appointee, who runs the DOJ, to decide whether she'll indict or not, again under Obama's demand for Democratic 'IMMUNITY' for all his political appointees, except for his Republican appointees, like the war hero General David Petraeus. Under Obama, 'IMMUNITY' is meant only for Democrats, and not for Republicans, and out of all the law breaking and scandals that Obama's administration has been involved in, the only one ever to be held accountable and prosecuted was the Republican war hero General David Petraeus, and the Obama administration has broken all previous records for the number of law breaking and scandals in a federal government P**********l administration, in all of US history.
Obama controls the federal government agencies by ... (show quote)


The presidency of Ronald Reagan in the United States was marked by multiple scandals, resulting in the investigation, indictment, or conviction of over 138 administration officials, the largest number for any US president.[1]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reagan_administration_scandals

Reply
Feb 5, 2016 11:16:40   #
moldyoldy
 
jimahrens wrote:
What is it you don't get She broke the law all the other bulls**t is just idle talk. She Broke the law period.


What law was that?

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 12 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.