Why do Republican h**e Obamacare
Nov 30, 2013 00:30:03 #
You know that the republicans had the same idea. But because the democrats put it into effect, they are trying their hardest to derail it. However, it is a red-heron due to the fact that they could have made it more affordable to the citizens than what they have. They should have used Germany as their template instead of Canada. It has worked for them with fewer complaints. But, unfortunately, most of our health care is owned and run by lawyers. We need a leader that has the interest of the country first and foremost. Not looking to increase their coffers before being v**ed out of office.
Nov 30, 2013 00:31:30 #
bmac32 wrote:
Alternatives? $100,000 hospital bill (God forbid) for say a car accident.
I am as reluctant to go to the hospital as you probably would be to go to a witch doctor. It took my years to get to this place, but if I was going to wear a medical alert bracelet it would say "Do not hospitalize."
Nov 30, 2013 00:32:56 #
mongo wrote:
You know that the republicans had the same idea. B... (show quote)
I think it will take more than one leader.
Nov 30, 2013 00:34:01 #
What would either have to do with foreign affairs they have never been president but think Obama has gone well? The whole mid east is a mess, gives Iran just what they wanted and that's well???
octive9 wrote:
I think he has done better with foreign affairs than Romney or McCain would have. I think he avoided 2 or 3 was that the Republicans would have started. But that is a whole different topic and should probably be on a different thread.
Nov 30, 2013 00:37:50 #
Two broken legs, one broken arm and internal injuries and your going home? Son was sitting at a stop light 8 years ago and that was the outcome. If it was for our insurance I'd still be paying that off.
octive9 wrote:
I am as reluctant to go to the hospital as you probably would be to go to a witch doctor. It took my years to get to this place, but if I was going to wear a medical alert bracelet it would say "Do not hospitalize."
Nov 30, 2013 00:42:35 #
bmac32 wrote:
What would either have to do with foreign affairs they have never been president but think Obama has gone well? The whole mid east is a mess, gives Iran just what they wanted and that's well???
Key phrase is would have. If either of them had won we would probably be in more wars. As for Iran, it is a 6 month deal that allows us to watch them. It is just a first step in a long journey. That is just my opinion, and at this point opinions are all we have. Time will bring in some facts.
Nov 30, 2013 00:48:09 #
bmac32 wrote:
Two broken legs, one broken arm and internal injuries and your going home? Son was sitting at a stop light 8 years ago and that was the outcome. If it was for our insurance I'd still be paying that off.
That is why I am concerned with health care insurance. Not for me but for those that need it. Like I said, it took me years to get to where I am, and I don't expect anyone else to see it the way I do, but I just do not play in the orthodox medical game.
Nov 30, 2013 00:49:03 #
Watch them? You mean like the last 6 have.
octive9 wrote:
Key phrase is would have. If either of them had won we would probably be in more wars. As for Iran, it is a 6 month deal that allows us to watch them. It is just a first step in a long journey. That is just my opinion, and at this point opinions are all we have. Time will bring in some facts.
Nov 30, 2013 00:51:57 #
Because it is the dumbest idea they ever heard of on the federal level where the conservative ideal is to abolish laws and decrease taxes in order to increase market place competition and interstate commerce to solve domestic problems. It will work and that worries them that neoliberalism will be popular again resulting in more federal regulations of markets which leads to socialism. Unfortunately, there's no other solution and this frustrates them more to h**e it at every level rather than admit it is a good example for federal regulation to solve a problem that free enterprise capitalism cannot.
octive9 wrote:
I have been trying to figure out why the right see... (show quote)
Nov 30, 2013 00:52:32 #
oz89
Loc: California
larry wrote:
And you find that acceptable?? I want honest politicians, if they can't be honest, what good are they. It doesn't cost them anything to be honest, but to get caught in a lie will bankrupt their character.
It will cost them, in the political game. Big company money is needed to run the campaign which means not only do they have to agree to the terms of that company they have to get all of the people to agree as well. I mean would you v**e for a person if they told you the insurance company is paying for me to run but they want me to help pass laws that will benefit them and not you?
Nov 30, 2013 00:52:46 #
That's not orthodox that's stupid but that's why American go bankrupt.
octive9 wrote:
That is why I am concerned with health care insurance. Not for me but for those that need it. Like I said, it took me years to get to where I am, and I don't expect anyone else to see it the way I do, but I just do not play in the orthodox medical game.
Nov 30, 2013 00:52:52 #
bmac32 wrote:
Watch them? You mean like the last 6 have.
Which would you rather deal with words and inspections, or bombs and bullets?
Nov 30, 2013 00:54:51 #
Little late at this stage of the game but no matter who is in there it will come to war.
octive9 wrote:
Which would you rather deal with words and inspections, or bombs and bullets?
Nov 30, 2013 00:58:03 #
bmac32 wrote:
That's not orthodox that's stupid but that's why American go bankrupt.
Ever hear of the book "Death by Medicine?" You can check it out here:
http://www.octive9.com/deathbymedicine1.htm
Nov 30, 2013 00:59:07 #
bmac32 wrote:
Little late at this stage of the game but no matter who is in there it will come to war.
I hope you are wrong.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.