Hows that?
Jan 30, 2016 16:10:46 #
slatten49
Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
Loki wrote:
What does having one's habers dashered have to do with denuding a nuder that is nekkidfying the forest?
Lpnmajor/Doc was just presenting a bare facts, historical perspective. :mrgreen:
Jan 30, 2016 16:27:30 #
slatten49 wrote:
Lpnmajor/Doc was just presenting a bare facts, historical perspective. :mrgreen:
I don't care how hysterical the perspective was; answer the question.
Jan 30, 2016 17:42:34 #
lpnmajor
Loc: Arkansas
Loki wrote:
I don't care how hysterical the perspective was; answer the question.
The answer is: yes. Happy now? Or, would you prefer the hysterical perspective? Ok, here it is: YES!!, NO!!, Maybe both! I don't know!!
Jan 30, 2016 18:19:22 #
slatten49
Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
lpnmajor wrote:
The answer is: yes. Happy now? Or, would you prefer the hysterical perspective? Ok, here it is: YES!!, NO!!, Maybe both! I don't know!!
Is that your final answer :?: Sounds like a revisionist perspective. :roll:
Jan 30, 2016 18:34:30 #
slatten49 wrote:
Is that your final answer :?: Sounds like a revisionist perspective. :roll:
As long as we don't have any more nekkid denuders getting their habers dashered. That sounds pretty kinky.
Jan 30, 2016 18:53:36 #
Loki wrote:
As long as we don't have any more nekkid denuders getting their habers dashered. That sounds pretty kinky.
Does that infer there will be no chatting with chi chi's?
Jan 30, 2016 19:35:13 #
PoppaGringo wrote:
Does that infer there will be no chatting with chi chi's?
I suppose that's alright, but no habers dashering around.
Jan 30, 2016 19:36:30 #
slatten49
Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
Loki wrote:
I suppose that's alright, but no habers dashering around.
My hopes are dashed. :|
Jan 30, 2016 20:15:59 #
slatten49 wrote:
My hopes are dashed. :|
Better than your habers dashered, especially in a nekkidfied forest with denudes running around dashering their own.
Jan 30, 2016 20:22:32 #
Loki wrote:
Better than your habers dashered, especially in a nekkidfied forest with denudes running around dashering their own.
Well, I'll be dashed.
Jan 30, 2016 20:31:38 #
Jan 30, 2016 20:36:49 #
Loki wrote:
As long as you leave the habers out of it.
You betcha.
Jan 30, 2016 20:49:11 #
slatten49
Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
Loki wrote:
As long as you leave the habers out of it.
If leaving the habers out of it, what about the hab-nots :?:
Jan 30, 2016 20:55:35 #
slatten49 wrote:
If leaving the habers out of it, what about the bab-nots :?:
I think you meant the 'hab-nots'. Yes?
Jan 30, 2016 21:01:22 #
slatten49
Loc: Lake Whitney, Texas
PoppaGringo wrote:
I think you meant the 'hab-nots'. Yes?
Proof-reading without glasses has its down-side. :oops:
Thanks, Marine. It has been corrected. :thumbup:
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.