Reid backpedals as predicted
Oct 4, 2013 18:04:25 #
permafrost wrote:
I think you got that right. Probably been this way since the idea of "public service" was first thought of. I would apply it to 95% of all politicians both parties...Term limits would be great, but none of them will ever v**e for that..As said in a good book I read, Money is the root of all evil.
Love of money is the root of all evil. Money itself is an inanimate object like a gun, a hoe, a garden rake, or a knife, or any tool around the house. Its the love of the money and the fleshly desire that turn men evil to obtain ill gotten riches. Any tool can be used either for good or evil it is the owners choice.
Oct 4, 2013 18:09:23 #
carolyn wrote:
I believe every politician should be elected on the platform of honesty, intelligence and common sense. If, after checking their political background, they lack any one of these requirements, they should be overlooked as a candidate. If everyone would v**e using these requirements, we could eventually weed the crooks out and once again have an American government.
Who are you going to have do the reporting? Are you going to ask the state run media to all of sudden get a conscience. Are they going to step up to the plate when all we really have to go on is these last two e******ns and we all know their honesty and integrity there.
Oct 4, 2013 18:16:27 #
carolyn wrote:
Harry Reid back pedaled as was predicted as soon as the comment he made concerning the child with cancer was aired. Now he is saying that he did not mean what he said because he has umpteen thousand children and umpteen million grandchildren, so that should prove to the world that he didn't mean what he said.
These worms are predictable as night and day, aren't they?
These worms are predictable as night and day, aren't they?
They DO seem to be running scared, don't they? To the point that they're showing their true colors! He's a mean-little man.
Oct 4, 2013 18:18:59 #
Pogo wrote:
Harry Reid. What a despicable little man. Surely there's a better man or woman to lead the Senate majority.
Yes, but not a more heartless, crooked man or woman!
Oct 4, 2013 18:24:10 #
carolyn wrote:
I believe every politician should be elected on the platform of honesty, intelligence and common sense. If, after checking their political background, they lack any one of these requirements, they should be overlooked as a candidate. If everyone would v**e using these requirements, we could eventually weed the crooks out and once again have an American government.
And that phony would NOT be in the White House!
Oct 5, 2013 01:36:16 #
Pogo wrote:
Harry Reid. What a despicable little man. Surely there's a better man or woman to lead the Senate majority.
Freddie Kruger? He'd be an improvement.
Oct 5, 2013 07:33:44 #
Oct 5, 2013 22:59:45 #
bahmer wrote:
Who are you going to have do the reporting? Are you going to ask the state run media to all of sudden get a conscience. Are they going to step up to the plate when all we really have to go on is these last two e******ns and we all know their honesty and integrity there.
There are websites that are neutral in their reporting, and almost everyone with a computer and want to find out everything a politician believes in and has v**ed on can find it. I checked Obama's record as state senator and even how he had attended Rev. Wright's church for 20 years, and how Rev. Wright was the biggest un-American and r****t someone in our history. I found out how Obama had attended the same university as Bill Ayers, the CONVICTED first World Trade Center bomber, and had even worked on a project with Ayers, although he said he did not personally know Ayers. I found where Ayers had had Obama's state senatorial acceptance party in his home. That was pretty good out of Ayers since Obama said he did not know Ayers at all.
I showed all this to my niece to prove that Obama wasn't nothing but a liar but she said that since she and "her girlfriends did not like the looks of Bush," they decided to go ahead and v**e for Obama.
It wasn't long before she was admitting their mistake, but as usual, it was too late.
Oct 5, 2013 23:05:27 #
V**e by LOOKS and they v**e!
All that about Wright, Ayers and it was a NY police station not the WTC. The media knew all about it and they declaired it was no big deal.
All that about Wright, Ayers and it was a NY police station not the WTC. The media knew all about it and they declaired it was no big deal.
carolyn wrote:
There are websites that are neutral in their repor... (show quote)
Oct 5, 2013 23:46:42 #
carolyn wrote:
There are websites that are neutral in their repor... (show quote)
Um...I'd sure like to know the address of a neutral reporting website! :shock:
Oct 6, 2013 00:11:46 #
bmac32 wrote:
V**e by LOOKS and they v**e!
All that about Wright, Ayers and it was a NY police station not the WTC. The media knew all about it and they declaired it was no big deal.
All that about Wright, Ayers and it was a NY police station not the WTC. The media knew all about it and they declaired it was no big deal.
They also were involved in the FIRST World Trade Center bombing. I agree that they did bomb a New York City police station, but they also bombed the WTC THE FIRST TIME. Also, they searched for Ayers' girlfriend for several years because she was also involved. Then when they finally caught up with her, I believe they smacked her hand, fined her a few dollars and put her on probation. So neither one of these felons were penalized any more than a minor misdemeanor would have gotten.
Oct 6, 2013 00:14:33 #
BigMike wrote:
Um...I'd sure like to know the address of a neutral reporting website! :shock:
LOL! I agree you might have to look some but there are those that are not politically motivated. I usually look for the things that are posted "documented."
Oct 6, 2013 00:59:08 #
Oct 6, 2013 09:38:27 #
No mention of Ayers at Wiki. As much as I dislike Ayers I find no tie in between Ayers and first WTC bombing.
carolyn wrote:
They also were involved in the FIRST World Trade Center bombing. I agree that they did bomb a New York City police station, but they also bombed the WTC THE FIRST TIME. Also, they searched for Ayers' girlfriend for several years because she was also involved. Then when they finally caught up with her, I believe they smacked her hand, fined her a few dollars and put her on probation. So neither one of these felons were penalized any more than a minor misdemeanor would have gotten.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.