One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Reid backpedals as predicted
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
Oct 3, 2013 22:58:59   #
carolyn
 
Harry Reid back pedaled as was predicted as soon as the comment he made concerning the child with cancer was aired. Now he is saying that he did not mean what he said because he has umpteen thousand children and umpteen million grandchildren, so that should prove to the world that he didn't mean what he said.

These worms are predictable as night and day, aren't they?

Reply
Oct 3, 2013 23:11:29   #
bahmer
 
carolyn wrote:
Harry Reid back pedaled as was predicted as soon as the comment he made concerning the child with cancer was aired. Now he is saying that he did not mean what he said because he has umpteen thousand children and umpteen million grandchildren, so that should prove to the world that he didn't mean what he said.

These worms are predictable as night and day, aren't they?


Especially the democrat worms. I doubt they even make good bait as the fish that I catch and eat all have better taste than that. Maybe they are good carp bait.

Reply
Oct 3, 2013 23:11:32   #
LurkingTom Loc: North Dakota
 
carolyn wrote:
Harry Reid back pedaled as was predicted as soon as the comment he made concerning the child with cancer was aired. Now he is saying that he did not mean what he said because he has umpteen thousand children and umpteen million grandchildren, so that should prove to the world that he didn't mean what he said.

These worms are predictable as night and day, aren't they?


:thumbup:

Reply
 
 
Oct 3, 2013 23:20:31   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
Poor Harry, he was all confused and actually found it easier to attack the reporter for even bring it up.


carolyn wrote:
Harry Reid back pedaled as was predicted as soon as the comment he made concerning the child with cancer was aired. Now he is saying that he did not mean what he said because he has umpteen thousand children and umpteen million grandchildren, so that should prove to the world that he didn't mean what he said.

These worms are predictable as night and day, aren't they?

Reply
Oct 4, 2013 06:34:42   #
runzwsissors Loc: Calhoun, GA
 
He certainly didn't mean what he said. His mind was probably processing what would happen if they allowed the republicans to fund the NIH, which would take bullets out of their guns, and said, "why would I want to do that?" Still it was funny to hear him get cornered and then choke. lol. What gets me is the liberal tendency to say that republicans wanted the children with cancer to not get better. Demagoguery. Disappointing.

Reply
Oct 4, 2013 07:46:21   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
No I'm sure they all do this after all they are human, but then the left jumped on wh**ever Bush said it's tit for tat.
Now I did hear something on the news about what he ment and it still made zero sense. I checked online about his statement and NSNBC, CNN, ABC nor CBS had that statement. Now I know they know as I sent that clip to each network.




runzwsissors wrote:
He certainly didn't mean what he said. His mind was probably processing what would happen if they allowed the republicans to fund the NIH, which would take bullets out of their guns, and said, "why would I want to do that?" Still it was funny to hear him get cornered and then choke. lol. What gets me is the liberal tendency to say that republicans wanted the children with cancer to not get better. Demagoguery. Disappointing.

Reply
Oct 4, 2013 09:45:41   #
Pogo Loc: New Mexico via Carolinas
 
carolyn wrote:
Harry Reid back pedaled as was predicted as soon as the comment he made concerning the child with cancer was aired. Now he is saying that he did not mean what he said because he has umpteen thousand children and umpteen million grandchildren, so that should prove to the world that he didn't mean what he said.

These worms are predictable as night and day, aren't they?


Harry Reid. What a despicable little man. Surely there's a better man or woman to lead the Senate majority.

Reply
 
 
Oct 4, 2013 10:21:16   #
John Deere
 
bahmer wrote:
Especially the democrat worms. I doubt they even make good bait as the fish that I catch and eat all have better taste than that. Maybe they are good carp bait.


Even the carp and suckers would spit them out.

Reply
Oct 4, 2013 10:54:35   #
bahmer
 
Pogo wrote:
Harry Reid. What a despicable little man. Surely there's a better man or woman to lead the Senate majority.


There are but he has all of the connections and pull to not only put him there but to keep him there. The only ways that he will be replaced are the following.

1. He could have a heart attack or stroke and drop over dead or die in route to the hospital.

2. He could be v**ed out but that seems unlikely at this time as someone in their party would have to run a c**p to get into that position.

3. He could resign and go home which with the power he has in Washington at this time seems unlikely.

4. The republicans could win the senate in 2014 and then replace Dingy Harry Reid with their own senate majority leader.

5. The next time that he is up for ree******n in Nevada someone from either the democrat party or a republican could challenge him and beat him.

Aside from the above I don't any other scenarios whereby he could be replaced.

Reply
Oct 4, 2013 10:59:11   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
Have noted Harry over the last 4 or 5 years is failing, just walking up steps is a chore. He plans on running in 2016 but I really think he'll change his mind, he's not good.



bahmer wrote:
There are but he has all of the connections and pull to not only put him there but to keep him there. The only ways that he will be replaced are the following.

1. He could have a heart attack or stroke and drop over dead or die in route to the hospital.

2. He could be v**ed out but that seems unlikely at this time as someone in their party would have to run a c**p to get into that position.

3. He could resign and go home which with the power he has in Washington at this time seems unlikely.

4. The republicans could win the senate in 2014 and then replace Dingy Harry Reid with their own senate majority leader.

5. The next time that he is up for ree******n in Nevada someone from either the democrat party or a republican could challenge him and beat him.

Aside from the above I don't any other scenarios whereby he could be replaced.
There are but he has all of the connections and pu... (show quote)

Reply
Oct 4, 2013 11:19:42   #
bahmer
 
bmac32 wrote:
Have noted Harry over the last 4 or 5 years is failing, just walking up steps is a chore. He plans on running in 2016 but I really think he'll change his mind, he's not good.


I have noticed that also, in fact he may not make it to ree******n time without some sort of medical emergency. Lucky for him that he has the premium health care package.

Reply
 
 
Oct 4, 2013 11:39:37   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
I do not wish bad health on anyone not even Harry. He is failing and with any luck his loved one will point this out to him.


bahmer wrote:
I have noticed that also, in fact he may not make it to ree******n time without some sort of medical emergency. Lucky for him that he has the premium health care package.

Reply
Oct 4, 2013 11:55:53   #
Constitutional libertarian Loc: St Croix National Scenic River Way
 
bahmer wrote:
I have noticed that also, in fact he may not make it to ree******n time without some sort of medical emergency. Lucky for him that he has the premium health care package.


Irony, our taxes pay for his health care and he has 100 times the money we will ever have.

Reply
Oct 4, 2013 12:02:18   #
carolyn
 
Pogo wrote:
Harry Reid. What a despicable little man. Surely there's a better man or woman to lead the Senate majority.


But the problem is, they do not want a better man. They want an insane someone who thinks as Hitler did to go long with their plan to abolish the Constitution. Let's face it! The Constitution has been a thorn in these crooks' hides for so long that they lose sleep and weight just having to abide by it. Why do you think a few world control freaks are so adamant about seeing it abolished? This is why I am so adamant about seeing this healthcare bill fail. There are simply too many ways that they can begin taking the greatest protection we have away from us. And they have suckered enough people in with the promise of something for nothing to finally see their way to take this great writ away from us. This is N**i tactics at work once again. Check history and see if this isn't right.

Reply
Oct 4, 2013 12:05:50   #
bahmer
 
Constitutional libertarian wrote:
Irony, our taxes pay for his health care and he has 100 times the money we will ever have.


Thats why they chose "public service" it pays very well. Also once you get in and established with the big boys your future is secure. I put the public service in quotes because this group of democrats and a good bunch of RINO republicans are the furthest from public servants than you can get. They are career politicians and that is all. Public servant went out the door as soon as each one of them started taking the thirty pieces of silver to deny their constituents their undivided devotion and instead started dealing in insider information to make themselves millionaires.

Reply
Page 1 of 3 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.