Lou wrote:
No , I've been on Social Security for a year now . But when I was working (47years) I looked at my pay check and was aware of what I was paying in Income tax SS and Medicare . As did everyone I knew .
It is erroneous to think and then generalize that anyone working for a living would not be aware of the same .
Tax is a fact of life l and the notion mentioned that we should only be taxed for maintaining a military for our national Defense , is quite naïve if not purposefully ignorant . You drive on an Interstate Highway system with bridges and tunnels that has been paid for and maintained with tax , as well as Schools , Libraries , Coast Guard , Customs and all the regulatory Agencies in place to ensure a safe food supply etc.etc .
Indeed if one abhors the idea of tax then one should leave and go to a country where there is no tax , unfortunately there will be none of anything else there either .
No , I've been on Social Security for a year now .... (
show quote)
First, congratulations on your retirement! I, too, retired about a year ago after working 42 years. Still have a few months before I'm eligible for SS.
It's easy to win a debate against a strawman...I'm a libertarian, we're the champions of the smallest govt possible, and even we don't say the only purpose of govt is the national defense (military). Interestingly, you forgot to mention the 2nd most important function of govt - a criminal justice system which includes law enforcement. You mentioned roads, and while I don't agree they're technically a function of govt, I have no problem with letting the govt perform that function and use tax dollars for them.
Then you mention other agencies including food inspectors. Is there a federal agency that ensures the electrical appliances you purchase don't catch fire and burn your house down? No. Why? Because industry developed their own regulatory system and funds Underwriters Labs. They test products to make sure they're safe. There's no need to involve govt. If govt food inspectors were doing such a great job then we wouldn't hear about cases of salmonella and food recalls all the time.
Education is a valid function of govt, but most people would agree that the current public education system is broken. Here's my suggestion to fix it:
Since education (K-12) benefits all of society I think the government has an obligation to provide it, but they have proven they are incapable of actually administering it. Therefore I suggest that the government give vouchers to parents for private schooling for each K-12 age child. This will allow private schools to open throughout the country and parents will be able to choose which schools to send their children to. Private schools that wish to purchase what are currently public school buildings should be allowed to do so at a fair-value price.
The government should also mandate a minimum curriculum for these schools. This minimum curriculum should pertain to sk**ls in reading, writing, math, history, civics and science only. Schools providing only the minimum curriculum should not be allowed to charge more than the government vouchers, but should be free to charge less if desired. If they charge less then the parents can keep half the difference between the tuition and the voucher amount. Schools providing more than the minimum curriculum can charge more than the vouchers and the parents can make up the difference if they choose to send their children there.
With regard to higher education, the government should not be involved in any way.
Yes, taxes are a necessary evil. But they should only be used for purposes that benefit the entire population. National Defense, a criminal justice system, an education system and a system of roads all meet that criteria. There are others as well, but those are a few of the biggest.
Charity is not a valid purpose of govt. It does not meet the criteria of benefiting all. In fact, for the govt to help some, it must harm others.