One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
97 Percent Of Republicans Use Government Social Programs: Survey
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Mar 9, 2013 17:27:15   #
Tasine Loc: Southwest US
 
Voice of Reason wrote:
Tasine wrote:

Actually we don't disagree at all. I agree with you 1000%. I merely meant to say that of all people, the feds have no business mucking around with welfare.

Actually, while I am registered Libertarian after half a century as a Republican, in actual fact with no window dressing, I am an anarchist. I happen to believe that societies can co-exist with neighbors without big brother telling everyone what size toilet tank they must have, what guns one may own, whether or not you must wear a helmet. Considering our nation is in free fall, we may have anarchy whether or not anyone wants it. Everyone thinks anarchy is mass chaos - that is only if people cannot converse and reason with those around us. I cannot believe how many conservatives cannot bring themselves to even talk about anarchy realistically.
br Actually we don't disagree at all. I agree wi... (show quote)


About the only thing I know (or think I know) about anarchy is that it is a complete lack of government. In any business dealings between two people or groups of people, at some point, there are bound to be disputes that arise where the parties cannot reach an equitable or a peaceful resolution. Under our current system that's when the dispute is settled by an arbiter or the courts. How would that work under anarchy?

I'm also under the impression that anarchy means no laws. Is that correct? How would what are now crimes like robbery, rape, murder be handled? What about burglary, theft?
quote=Tasine br Actually we don't disagree at al... (show quote)


How these issues COULD be handled is for small think-alike communites be formed and decisions made re the rules which should be kept as simple as possible. The best way would be for every community to follow common law, which amounts to common sense as we understand common sense. I see very little need for laws as long as the parties involved will step in and solve the problem between themselves - as it was ONCE done. Getting swatted a few times makes people more prone to solve problems the easy way instead of the expensive and non-just way.

Reply
Mar 9, 2013 17:40:10   #
memBrain Loc: North Carolina (No longer in hiding.)
 
Tasine wrote:
Voice of Reason wrote:
Tasine wrote:

Actually we don't disagree at all. I agree with you 1000%. I merely meant to say that of all people, the feds have no business mucking around with welfare.

Actually, while I am registered Libertarian after half a century as a Republican, in actual fact with no window dressing, I am an anarchist. I happen to believe that societies can co-exist with neighbors without big brother telling everyone what size toilet tank they must have, what guns one may own, whether or not you must wear a helmet. Considering our nation is in free fall, we may have anarchy whether or not anyone wants it. Everyone thinks anarchy is mass chaos - that is only if people cannot converse and reason with those around us. I cannot believe how many conservatives cannot bring themselves to even talk about anarchy realistically.
br Actually we don't disagree at all. I agree wi... (show quote)


About the only thing I know (or think I know) about anarchy is that it is a complete lack of government. In any business dealings between two people or groups of people, at some point, there are bound to be disputes that arise where the parties cannot reach an equitable or a peaceful resolution. Under our current system that's when the dispute is settled by an arbiter or the courts. How would that work under anarchy?

I'm also under the impression that anarchy means no laws. Is that correct? How would what are now crimes like robbery, rape, murder be handled? What about burglary, theft?
quote=Tasine br Actually we don't disagree at al... (show quote)


How these issues COULD be handled is for small think-alike communites be formed and decisions made re the rules which should be kept as simple as possible. The best way would be for every community to follow common law, which amounts to common sense as we understand common sense. I see very little need for laws as long as the parties involved will step in and solve the problem between themselves - as it was ONCE done. Getting swatted a few times makes people more prone to solve problems the easy way instead of the expensive and non-just way.
quote=Voice of Reason quote=Tasine br Actually ... (show quote)


It is because parties involved often don't resolve the problems between themselves civilly that we have law. It cannot be done away with. With respect to common sense, it is only common if the majority demonstrates their use of it. Often what is called common sense is one person's opinion, but not necessarily demonstrated by the majority. Therefore it is actually uncommon sense. However, it is only sense if it makes sense, and is not merely an opinion. In other words, it must be supportable by untampered available evidence.

Reply
Mar 9, 2013 17:56:57   #
Voice of Reason Loc: Earth
 
Tasine wrote:
How these issues COULD be handled is for small think-alike communites be formed and decisions made re the rules which should be kept as simple as possible. The best way would be for every community to follow common law, which amounts to common sense as we understand common sense. I see very little need for laws as long as the parties involved will step in and solve the problem between themselves - as it was ONCE done. Getting swatted a few times makes people more prone to solve problems the easy way instead of the expensive and non-just way.
How these issues COULD be handled is for small thi... (show quote)


Sounds to me like your talking about feudalism, not anarchy. Either way, no thanks!

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.