One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Wisconsin homosexuals just screwed themselves
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
Sep 4, 2015 09:20:46   #
jelun
 
no propaganda please wrote:
And why would a L***Q activist couple seek out a religious Christian and demand that they participate in what the Christian believes is an immoral act of the highest order? Only to cause trouble, as has been the case in all the publicized cases where there were many other florists, bakeries, catering services or chapels who were happy to perform the services requested.


A L***Q activist couple seek out a religious Christian and demand that they participate in what the Christian believes is an immoral act, I think,
for the same reason that people who are of other minorities pushed the issue 50 and 60 years ago.
Civil law and civil rights are what this nation settled by people who falsely claimed to be interested in ending persecution of minorities was supposed to be based on.
Like citizens in your image, those settlers really only meant and end of persecution for themselves. The brave souls who are publicizing that hypocrisy make life better for all American citizens.

Reply
Sep 4, 2015 09:35:01   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
jelun wrote:
A L***Q activist couple seek out a religious Christian and demand that they participate in what the Christian believes is an immoral act, I think,
for the same reason that people who are of other minorities pushed the issue 50 and 60 years ago.
Civil law and civil rights are what this nation settled by people who falsely claimed to be interested in ending persecution of minorities was supposed to be based on.
Like citizens in your image, those settlers really only meant and end of persecution for themselves. The brave souls who are publicizing that hypocrisy make life better for all American citizens.
A L***Q activist couple seek out a religious Chris... (show quote)


:thumbup:

Reply
Sep 4, 2015 09:36:23   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
jelun wrote:
A L***Q activist couple seek out a religious Christian and demand that they participate in what the Christian believes is an immoral act, I think,
for the same reason that people who are of other minorities pushed the issue 50 and 60 years ago.
Civil law and civil rights are what this nation settled by people who falsely claimed to be interested in ending persecution of minorities was supposed to be based on.
Like citizens in your image, those settlers really only meant and end of persecution for themselves. The brave souls who are publicizing that hypocrisy make life better for all American citizens.
A L***Q activist couple seek out a religious Chris... (show quote)



A minority is some one or group who was born black, oriental, female or some other unchangeable condition. A large number of people go through periods in early adolescence when they are same sex attracted but at maturity are opposite sex attracted. Within the group od adults who have unwanted same sex attractions, with help they percentage who no longer have same sex attractions runs from twenty to forty percent. therefore the homosexual act is not unchangeable and those who are same sex attracted do not qualify as a true minority. Within the t*********r group, few are mosaics, even fewer have a******l brain activity and places like John Hopkins have stopped doing the surgery and are using therapy to help the people get past the depression that often is at the root of the problem, so they do not qualify as a true minority either. There is more evidence that alcoholism has a large genetic component toward the behavior than that there is ANY genetic component toward same sex attraction. so, should we not discriminate against alcoholics by not hiring them as pilots, or allowing them to drive a car? Many people with the genetics that makes them more prone to becoming alcoholics choose not to drink or use drugs. Some same sex attracted people (I personally know of four) choose to not ever act on their same sex attraction, they are not homosexual just same sex attracted and not acting on it.

Reply
 
 
Sep 18, 2015 00:29:51   #
Chameleon12
 
jelun wrote:
I repeat, you hypothetical makes no sense why would a group of w***e s*********ts go to a black, family owned business and give them commerce.
And even if they wanted, for some odd reason to force this situation, white people are not protected as a minority.
What is it that you do not understand about discrimination laws?
They have been put in place to protect the minority form the tyranny of the majority.


Actually, you're wrong. Under every law that you're referring to, white people are protected under the word race. There is such a thing as discrimination against a majority, and white people are a minority in several demographic areas. For someone who typically uses intellectual arguments, what you just said is VERY biased, not to mention nonsensical.

Reply
Sep 18, 2015 00:38:08   #
Chameleon12
 
jelun wrote:
A L***Q activist couple seek out a religious Christian and demand that they participate in what the Christian believes is an immoral act, I think,
for the same reason that people who are of other minorities pushed the issue 50 and 60 years ago.
Civil law and civil rights are what this nation settled by people who falsely claimed to be interested in ending persecution of minorities was supposed to be based on.
Like citizens in your image, those settlers really only meant and end of persecution for themselves. The brave souls who are publicizing that hypocrisy make life better for all American citizens.
A L***Q activist couple seek out a religious Chris... (show quote)


Holy s**t! It happened! This is what I was talking about Here is the night mare that such laws cause!!!!

http://washingtonweeklynews.com/unintended-consequences-black-bakery-owner-loses-lawsuit-forced-to-bake-r****t-kkk-cake/

Reply
Sep 18, 2015 00:42:10   #
Chameleon12
 
jelun wrote:
I can't imagine they would have to be forced.
Profit driven companies are most often very happy to provide their services to make money.
They don't "give a spit" where the money comes from.


Sorry, Jelun, just wanted to point it out to you again. Read thist news article:

http://washingtonweeklynews.com/unintended-consequences-black-bakery-owner-loses-lawsuit-forced-to-bake-r****t-kkk-cake/

Reply
Sep 18, 2015 04:13:05   #
jelun
 
Chameleon12 wrote:
Actually, you're wrong. Under every law that you're referring to, white people are protected under the word race. There is such a thing as discrimination against a majority, and white people are a minority in several demographic areas. For someone who typically uses intellectual arguments, what you just said is VERY biased, not to mention nonsensical.


I am not wrong. Look up protected groups of people. Caucasian is not there it doesn't need to be there.

Reply
 
 
Sep 18, 2015 04:47:05   #
reconreb Loc: America / Inglis Fla.
 
Chameleon12 wrote:
As we all know, the state of Wisconsin and a homosexual couple sued a florist for refusing to provide flowers for a gay wedding due to religious objections. Apparently, Wisconsin wants to appear to be anti-discrimination at any cost. They thoughtlessly rolled over this elderly lady who stood up for her beliefs. But, time and time again, these laws come back to bite the people they were intended to protect in the ass. Here are some questioons they should have been asking themselves:

Should a Muslim baker be forced by government to bake a cake for a gay wedding?

Should a Muslim butcher be forced by government to sell pork?

Should a gay owner of a print shop be forced by government to create banners with anti-gay profanity on it?

Should a gay photographer be forced by government to photograph a rally where religious speakers are telling gays to go hell?

Should a Jewish owner of a security company in be forced by government to provide security for a N**i rally?

Should a churchgoing Christian mother be forced by government to cater an awards gala at a porn convention?

Should an Obama-loving liberal business owner be forced by government to rent the stage at his event center for a Tea Party rally?

Should a black family owned restaurant be forced by government to cater a meal for a KKK meeting?

This isn't anti-discrimnation. It's pro-offensive, and Wisconsonites will pay the price for it.
As we all know, the state of Wisconsin and a homos... (show quote)


Simple logic would be for the fed. gov.to get the hell out of local or state standards .

Reply
Sep 18, 2015 04:52:49   #
jelun
 
Chameleon12 wrote:
Sorry, Jelun, just wanted to point it out to you again. Read thist news article:

http://washingtonweeklynews.com/unintended-consequences-black-bakery-owner-loses-lawsuit-forced-to-bake-r****t-kkk-cake/



Remember that old saying that goes something like: If it seems to good to be true it most likely isn't.?
That would be the case with this story that you wanted to find so badly to prove your point.
One good tip off is that if instead of having an actual publication date for a story the story is headed "Six Months Ago" there is some problem with your source.
The link takes you to http://tribuneherald.net/about/

Reply
Sep 18, 2015 05:04:56   #
jelun
 
reconreb wrote:
Simple logic would be for the fed. gov.to get the hell out of local or state standards .


Sorry to see that you continue to deny the legitimacy of the US Constitution.

Reply
Sep 18, 2015 07:31:26   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
Chameleon12 wrote:
Sorry, Jelun, just wanted to point it out to you again. Read thist news article:

http://washingtonweeklynews.com/unintended-consequences-black-bakery-owner-loses-lawsuit-forced-to-bake-r****t-kkk-cake/

Some people are just plain stupid.

KKK Wins Lawsuit Against Bakery for Discrimination - Snopes

www.snopes.com › Home › Media › Not Necessarily the News

Snopes.com

Apr 14, 2015 - Origins: On 23 August 2013, the satirical Tribune Herald web site published a f**e news article titled "KKK Wins Lawsuit Against Bakery for ...

Reply
 
 
Sep 18, 2015 10:18:47   #
jelun
 
Bad Bob wrote:
Some people are just plain stupid.

KKK Wins Lawsuit Against Bakery for Discrimination - Snopes

www.snopes.com › Home › Media › Not Necessarily the News

Snopes.com

Apr 14, 2015 - Origins: On 23 August 2013, the satirical Tribune Herald web site published a f**e news article titled "KKK Wins Lawsuit Against Bakery for ...


:thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Sep 18, 2015 10:31:56   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
jelun wrote:
:thumbup: :thumbup:


The new Reflublicans sure keep Snopes busy.

Reply
Sep 18, 2015 14:36:14   #
jelun
 
Bad Bob wrote:
The new Reflublicans sure keep Snopes busy.



Yes, if it feels good, post it.

Reply
Sep 18, 2015 17:44:36   #
reconreb Loc: America / Inglis Fla.
 
jelun wrote:
Sorry to see that you continue to deny the legitimacy of the US Constitution.


You can twist the Constatution , but the SCOTUS can not make law , thats what is unconstantutional !

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.