One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Wisconsin homosexuals just screwed themselves
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
Jun 14, 2015 04:09:56   #
Chameleon12
 
As we all know, the state of Wisconsin and a homosexual couple sued a florist for refusing to provide flowers for a gay wedding due to religious objections. Apparently, Wisconsin wants to appear to be anti-discrimination at any cost. They thoughtlessly rolled over this elderly lady who stood up for her beliefs. But, time and time again, these laws come back to bite the people they were intended to protect in the ass. Here are some questioons they should have been asking themselves:

Should a Muslim baker be forced by government to bake a cake for a gay wedding?

Should a Muslim butcher be forced by government to sell pork?

Should a gay owner of a print shop be forced by government to create banners with anti-gay profanity on it?

Should a gay photographer be forced by government to photograph a rally where religious speakers are telling gays to go hell?

Should a Jewish owner of a security company in be forced by government to provide security for a N**i rally?

Should a churchgoing Christian mother be forced by government to cater an awards gala at a porn convention?

Should an Obama-loving liberal business owner be forced by government to rent the stage at his event center for a Tea Party rally?

Should a black family owned restaurant be forced by government to cater a meal for a KKK meeting?

This isn't anti-discrimnation. It's pro-offensive, and Wisconsonites will pay the price for it.

Reply
Jun 14, 2015 04:23:19   #
dwallace2015
 
It must be the fungus in all that cheese. Goes right to the position the brain should occupy, or in lieu of that straight to their ass.

Reply
Jun 14, 2015 04:30:00   #
Boo_Boo Loc: Jellystone
 
Interesting questions. I wonder if anyone will put it to the test.
Chameleon12 wrote:
As we all know, the state of Wisconsin and a homosexual couple sued a florist for refusing to provide flowers for a gay wedding due to religious objections. Apparently, Wisconsin wants to appear to be anti-discrimination at any cost. They thoughtlessly rolled over this elderly lady who stood up for her beliefs. But, time and time again, these laws come back to bite the people they were intended to protect in the ass. Here are some questioons they should have been asking themselves:

Should a Muslim baker be forced by government to bake a cake for a gay wedding?

Should a Muslim butcher be forced by government to sell pork?

Should a gay owner of a print shop be forced by government to create banners with anti-gay profanity on it?

Should a gay photographer be forced by government to photograph a rally where religious speakers are telling gays to go hell?

Should a Jewish owner of a security company in be forced by government to provide security for a N**i rally?

Should a churchgoing Christian mother be forced by government to cater an awards gala at a porn convention?

Should an Obama-loving liberal business owner be forced by government to rent the stage at his event center for a Tea Party rally?

Should a black family owned restaurant be forced by government to cater a meal for a KKK meeting?

This isn't anti-discrimnation. It's pro-offensive, and Wisconsonites will pay the price for it.
As we all know, the state of Wisconsin and a homos... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Jun 14, 2015 05:47:51   #
hprinze Loc: Central Florida
 
Chameleon12 wrote:
As we all know, the state of Wisconsin and a homosexual couple sued a florist for refusing to provide flowers for a gay wedding due to religious objections. Apparently, Wisconsin wants to appear to be anti-discrimination at any cost. They thoughtlessly rolled over this elderly lady who stood up for her beliefs. But, time and time again, these laws come back to bite the people they were intended to protect in the ass. Here are some questioons they should have been asking themselves:

Should a Muslim baker be forced by government to bake a cake for a gay wedding?

Should a Muslim butcher be forced by government to sell pork?

Should a gay owner of a print shop be forced by government to create banners with anti-gay profanity on it?

Should a gay photographer be forced by government to photograph a rally where religious speakers are telling gays to go hell?

Should a Jewish owner of a security company in be forced by government to provide security for a N**i rally?

Should a churchgoing Christian mother be forced by government to cater an awards gala at a porn convention?

Should an Obama-loving liberal business owner be forced by government to rent the stage at his event center for a Tea Party rally?

Should a black family owned restaurant be forced by government to cater a meal for a KKK meeting?

This isn't anti-discrimnation. It's pro-offensive, and Wisconsonites will pay the price for it.
As we all know, the state of Wisconsin and a homos... (show quote)


============================

To simplify - Should government simply stop meddling in private bisiness?

Reply
Jun 14, 2015 05:48:32   #
hprinze Loc: Central Florida
 
Chameleon12 wrote:
As we all know, the state of Wisconsin and a homosexual couple sued a florist for refusing to provide flowers for a gay wedding due to religious objections. Apparently, Wisconsin wants to appear to be anti-discrimination at any cost. They thoughtlessly rolled over this elderly lady who stood up for her beliefs. But, time and time again, these laws come back to bite the people they were intended to protect in the ass. Here are some questioons they should have been asking themselves:

Should a Muslim baker be forced by government to bake a cake for a gay wedding?

Should a Muslim butcher be forced by government to sell pork?

Should a gay owner of a print shop be forced by government to create banners with anti-gay profanity on it?

Should a gay photographer be forced by government to photograph a rally where religious speakers are telling gays to go hell?

Should a Jewish owner of a security company in be forced by government to provide security for a N**i rally?

Should a churchgoing Christian mother be forced by government to cater an awards gala at a porn convention?

Should an Obama-loving liberal business owner be forced by government to rent the stage at his event center for a Tea Party rally?

Should a black family owned restaurant be forced by government to cater a meal for a KKK meeting?

This isn't anti-discrimnation. It's pro-offensive, and Wisconsonites will pay the price for it.
As we all know, the state of Wisconsin and a homos... (show quote)


============================

To simplify - Should government simply stop meddling in private business?

Reply
Jun 14, 2015 07:19:30   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
hprinze wrote:
============================

To simplify - Should government simply stop meddling in private bisiness?


Like a******n, right. :thumbup: :thumbup:

Reply
Jun 14, 2015 07:19:41   #
jelun
 
Chameleon12 wrote:
As we all know, the state of Wisconsin and a homosexual couple sued a florist for refusing to provide flowers for a gay wedding due to religious objections. Apparently, Wisconsin wants to appear to be anti-discrimination at any cost. They thoughtlessly rolled over this elderly lady who stood up for her beliefs. But, time and time again, these laws come back to bite the people they were intended to protect in the ass. Here are some questioons they should have been asking themselves:

Should a Muslim baker be forced by government to bake a cake for a gay wedding?

Should a Muslim butcher be forced by government to sell pork?

Should a gay owner of a print shop be forced by government to create banners with anti-gay profanity on it?

Should a gay photographer be forced by government to photograph a rally where religious speakers are telling gays to go hell?

Should a Jewish owner of a security company in be forced by government to provide security for a N**i rally?

Should a churchgoing Christian mother be forced by government to cater an awards gala at a porn convention?

Should an Obama-loving liberal business owner be forced by government to rent the stage at his event center for a Tea Party rally?

Should a black family owned restaurant be forced by government to cater a meal for a KKK meeting?

This isn't anti-discrimnation. It's pro-offensive, and Wisconsonites will pay the price for it.
As we all know, the state of Wisconsin and a homos... (show quote)



Great Title...a wonderful hook you had there.
Sadly, your point drifts away as soon as you begin your list of fallacious propositions.
The whole point of discrimination is that a business refuses to provide a service to someone that the business offers to others.
As soon as you begin with ridiculous proposals for cases you lose.
Thanks for thinking about it, though.

BTW, it has been a while...I think that religious folk who believe this tell gays that they will end up in Hell not that they should Go To Hell.

Reply
 
 
Jun 14, 2015 07:46:16   #
Alicia Loc: NYC
 
jelun wrote:
Great Title...a wonderful hook you had there.
Sadly, your point drifts away as soon as you begin your list of fallacious propositions.
The whole point of discrimination is that a business refuses to provide a service to someone that the business offers to others.
As soon as you begin with ridiculous proposals for cases you lose.
Thanks for thinking about it, though.

******************
I'm with you. I believe the ridiculous circumstances presented would eventually be supposed after the Hobby Lobby fiasco. From that point, anything a business decided they disagreed to in the law, could be overcome for "religious reasons." All are free to practice their own religion but, when a business that is available to "the public" opens, those of any religion should not ever be allowed to choose whom they serve. I was immediately aware that the HL situation was a test case; especially as it attacked the ACA. Wh**ever happened to the "Land of the Free" where all the persecuted could come in order to live normal lives?

In my lifetime, Semitic food businesses were respected regarding the type of foods they carried. I was never upset that in going to a deli to eat, I was limited to cream soda rather than a glass of milk with my sandwich. But then, I am a Liberal.

Reply
Jun 14, 2015 07:52:13   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
Pennylynn wrote:
Interesting questions. I wonder if anyone will put it to the test.


I hope that they do put it to the test. It would be great if the political correctness concept was pushed to the limits so people might get a taste of what governmental speech control is really like. Realize that the ultimate goal is mind control, and it is working all to well.

Reply
Jun 14, 2015 08:36:37   #
rkevin Loc: florida
 
Chameleon12 wrote:
As we all know, the state of Wisconsin and a homosexual couple sued a florist for refusing to provide flowers for a gay wedding due to religious objections. Apparently, Wisconsin wants to appear to be anti-discrimination at any cost. They thoughtlessly rolled over this elderly lady who stood up for her beliefs. But, time and time again, these laws come back to bite the people they were intended to protect in the ass. Here are some questioons they should have been asking themselves:

Should a Muslim baker be forced by government to bake a cake for a gay wedding?

Should a Muslim butcher be forced by government to sell pork?

Should a gay owner of a print shop be forced by government to create banners with anti-gay profanity on it?

Should a gay photographer be forced by government to photograph a rally where religious speakers are telling gays to go hell?

Should a Jewish owner of a security company in be forced by government to provide security for a N**i rally?

Should a churchgoing Christian mother be forced by government to cater an awards gala at a porn convention?

Should an Obama-loving liberal business owner be forced by government to rent the stage at his event center for a Tea Party rally?

Should a black family owned restaurant be forced by government to cater a meal for a KKK meeting?

This isn't anti-discrimnation. It's pro-offensive, and Wisconsonites will pay the price for it.
As we all know, the state of Wisconsin and a homos... (show quote)










"WE" have to understand that "e******y" is a little more "equal" for the liberal progressive, 12.

Reply
Jun 14, 2015 08:46:25   #
bmac32 Loc: West Florida
 
Most, probably not yet but government sure needs to get out of this business.


Pennylynn wrote:
Interesting questions. I wonder if anyone will put it to the test.

Reply
 
 
Jun 14, 2015 08:48:07   #
jelun
 
Alicia wrote:
******************
I'm with you. I believe the ridiculous circumstances presented would eventually be supposed after the Hobby Lobby fiasco. From that point, anything a business decided they disagreed to in the law, could be overcome for "religious reasons." All are free to practice their own religion but, when a business that is available to "the public" opens, those of any religion should not ever be allowed to choose whom they serve. I was immediately aware that the HL situation was a test case; especially as it attacked the ACA. Wh**ever happened to the "Land of the Free" where all the persecuted could come in order to live normal lives?

In my lifetime, Semitic food businesses were respected regarding the type of foods they carried. I was never upset that in going to a deli to eat, I was limited to cream soda rather than a glass of milk with my sandwich. But then, I am a Liberal.
****************** br I'm with you. I believe the... (show quote)



Exactly, open minded.
The laws are not about making someone who builds sailboats provide a caboose.
KKK members are the ones who don't want contact with Jews and other minority groups not the other way around.
You know, kind of like the people here who believe that servers spit in their food on a regular basis.
I am reminded of that PSA about the woman complaining about sitting next to a black woman and looking for a 1st class seat...the seat is given to the minority person, a typical comeuppance story that is fun to see. Upworthy, I think.
At least those who object to equal rights admit that they are space cadets orbiting somewhere far from earth.
HAHAHA, it has been a long time since I said space cadet.

Reply
Jun 14, 2015 08:51:22   #
Ox
 
Jelun says:"I think that religious folk who believe this tell gays that they will end up in Hell not that they should Go To Hell."

I'm not quite sure that ALL religious folk say that.

The jury is still out on the question of whether homosexuals are born or created. Those I have known well enough to be certain they were homosexual were identified as children, well before puberty. If they were born homosexual they are blameless for their condition. If they were created by some act of nurture they are similarly blameless.

I despise the very thought of their acts, and I know that the most of them lead very unhappy lives--but I cannot bring myself to believe that they are condemned to hell for the very nature of their condition. We EARN hell, we are not born to it.

Reply
Jun 14, 2015 08:54:55   #
jelun
 
Ox wrote:
Jelun says:"I think that religious folk who believe this tell gays that they will end up in Hell not that they should Go To Hell."

I'm not quite sure that ALL religious folk say that.

The jury is still out on the question of whether homosexuals are born or created. Those I have known well enough to be certain they were homosexual were identified as children, well before puberty. If they were born homosexual they are blameless for their condition. If they were created by some act of nurture they are similarly blameless.

I despise the very thought of their acts, and I know that the most of them lead very unhappy lives--but I cannot bring myself to believe that they are condemned to hell for the very nature of their condition. We EARN hell, we are not born to it.
Jelun says:"I think that religious folk who b... (show quote)



Which is why, Ox, I said the religious folks who believe this...
There are plenty of religious people who have no interest in judging others or worry about where they may or may not go after this life.
Could you tell me this?
Do you despise those same acts when done by a heterosexual couple?
Is it abhorrent when a wife performs fellatio with her husband?
What convinces you that gay folk are leading very unhappy lives?

Reply
Jun 14, 2015 10:25:51   #
Unclet Loc: Amarillo, Tx
 
Bad Bob wrote:
Like a******n, right. :thumbup: :thumbup:


Meddling in anything - all they do is muck it up. What any American citizen chooses to do is their business and no one else's. Since A******n was mentioned, I am pro-life, but not all people agree with that, so what? A******n is something that woman has to live with the rest of her life. If she chooses to abort a child, she should be free to do so, her problem, her choice. I or We should not be required to fund it, again with the exception of Rape or Incest, those I would help fund.

Reply
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.