gmanp135

You have not answered the question ,would a normal citizen get away with what she did in destroying the emails even though she says they were private,now we will never know,if there was nothing to hide why destroy them?And can you honestly say that her attorneys who decided what was and was not to be turned over were acting in the publics interest?No you cannot because bottom line is they are paid to look after HER interests,turning them over would have ended the controversy,just one more example of the most "t***sparent" administration in history.And I apologise for saying no emails when I should have said not ALL emails because now we will never know.If it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck....

jelun

I don't know what question you think I have not answered that I should be able to answer.
I am not Hillary Clinton. I cannot know any more than you can exactly what her motives were.
So I cannot answer for her, why would I?
It is unreasonable to expect that I would.
I believe that any emails she sent to US State Dept. staff would be captured on the state department system. That is a logical conclusion since that is the way email works.
You seem to deny that possibility.
I think you are wrong.

gmanp135

Exactly right, only she knows why and yes official government correspondence should be stored by their respective departments but her aides were occasionally using their personal emails also,Sec. of State Kerry is now trying to determine how to handle future department correspondence to avoid future complications,the wiping of her server was either a very serious error in judgement which I personally do not want in a President or a calculated attempt to hide fact.

ssgtgood

I don't hope that you're right at all, as a matter of fact I KNOW that I'm right. You'll find it out soon enough. Guess you're calling the Lord Jesus and the Holy Spirit liars. Wouldn't want to be in your situation. But who knows, maybe you'll yet come to your senses. The Lord loves you in spite of yourself. Its all in the Word of God, why don't you try reading it. I know you're too stupid to understand the King James Version but the NIV might suit you.

hnealc

Boy, you are an out and out i***t. Not only that, you're stupid!!!

boofhead

The law required her to use official government email while carrying out official government business. She did not do that. She should be charged and have to answer to that but the system is protecting her. I have a strong feeling that the system would not protect me if I broke the law.

To compound her offense she has wiped her own private emails. Now we have no evidence that can clear her or condemn her. This might not be illegal but shows a clear intent to show her contempt for the law and suggests that she had something to hide.

Let me show a parallel that could affect you directly, in the light of the Germanwings "accident". A pilot, who might be flying the very next airplane you choose to travel on, is required for various reasons to submit to a urine test with the intent of checking for illegal substances. If the pilot refuses to take that test the pilot is immediately subject to revocation of his/her pilot certificate. The pilot might be perfectly healthy and have no illegal substances in the urine but the avoidance of the test is enough to prove the offense. The avoidance of the test has a higher standard than failing the test and the penalties are higher as well.

If it is OK for Hillary to avoid the test on her emails, why should a pilot/engineer/Air Traffic Controller taxi driver etc not be able to do the same? If we follow the Hillary standard, would we personally be at risk as a result, or is using her stand that she is innocent of any wrong doing sufficient to keep us safe?

I doubt that the press and the useful i***ts would have the same opinion if the person under scrutiny was a Republican.

Liberty Tree

They would be screaming cover up as loudly as possible.

CarolSeer2016

It certainly wasn't because there was nothing there. I think things were being well-hidden.

Liberty Tree

Carol, you are right. There has been evidence withheld and witnesses who were there suppressed so there has never been a complete investigation.

CarolSeer2016

Why is it we can't seem to reach the people of the gullible party--the Dims?

CarolSeer2016

I thought that was green cheese.

Spankem Loc: NJ

The Fu****g b***h is guilty of not following the rules, regulations and laws that applied to that office, any of the rest of us low life's would certainly be prosecuted for even much lesser offenses.
She has clearly lied about so much, and deleting all her e mails has again clearly implied she is hiding information again, so what, what's the big deal ? well i***t you can trust and believe her but I sure as hell don't.

Liberty Tree

Because it is easier to be a liberal since the standards are so much lower.

CarolSeer2016

I like that!

Ricko Loc: Florida

Libertytree-exactly. The Gowdy Committee is the one with sufficient subpoena power to require that the documents requested be delivered. Hillary knew that they had the power to get her server so .as a devious liberal, she cleaned the server. A republican doing the same thing would already be in jail. But the law is different for democrats. When you have absolute corruption throughout an administration potential felons are protected. The Obama administration is the Poster Boy for corruption at the highest level. Yet the sheepies still support them. It makes as much sense as would the Italians in Sicily cheering on the Mafia. Good Luck America !!!