One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
More Evidence Gone
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
Mar 28, 2015 09:12:29   #
Liberty Tree
 
Hillary has wiped her server clean and destroyed all the emails. She knew this was evidence that was going to be sought by Congress. Libs, please do not even say that she was just trying to protect private family information. She did it to hide the t***h on B******i and other incidents. The t***h has been hidden by her and Obama for years. It is interesting that this came out right after she had a meeting with Obama and they appeared all cozy with each other.

Reply
Mar 28, 2015 09:50:30   #
robmull Loc: florida
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Hillary has wiped her server clean and destroyed all the emails. She knew this was evidence that was going to be sought by Congress. Libs, please do not even say that she was just trying to protect private family information. She did it to hide the t***h on B******i and other incidents. The t***h has been hidden by her and Obama for years. It is interesting that this came out right after she had a meeting with Obama and they appeared all cozy with each other.













Our Founders made it very clear that for a Constitutional Republic to work, Liberty Tree, the government would have to have a moral compass; a deity of sorts that guided the occasionally diabolical hand of mankind. Well, government and education sure went the "Alinsky" route on THAT one, and seem to have, like Alinsky, dedicated [their] "agenda" to SATAN. What emails??? What F & F??? What B******i???

And the "Alinskyites" are now running for [their] very lives in politics; and "not looking back." The quiet deception of the Marxist/Alinsky c*******t "movement" in America and free-market Western civilization, in general, is now in a spiritual battle with a t***h that has been "exposed," because [they] went with the; "never let a good crisis go to waste" strategy [Emmanuel] of "liberalism," and are now standing on Wall Street, "naked in the sun;" and daylight doesn't become [them].

Never try to catch a falling sword, and "deception" is a funny [peculiar, not ha, ha] thing when reacting to a light being switched-on; much like vermin and other unwanted pesks; and "pens and phones" just can't quite seem to reach the light-switch!!! Scurry, scurry you little 7th century vermin, and "don't look back!!!"

Reply
Mar 28, 2015 09:53:10   #
jelun
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Hillary has wiped her server clean and destroyed all the emails. She knew this was evidence that was going to be sought by Congress. Libs, please do not even say that she was just trying to protect private family information. She did it to hide the t***h on B******i and other incidents. The t***h has been hidden by her and Obama for years. It is interesting that this came out right after she had a meeting with Obama and they appeared all cozy with each other.


How do you explain that the Congress has had years of discovery and investigation and reported no deception?

Reply
 
 
Mar 28, 2015 09:56:17   #
Liberty Tree
 
jelun wrote:
How do you explain that the Congress has had years of discovery and investigation and reported no deception?


Because of evidence suppressed, witnesses stopped from testifying and the fear of some Democrats and Republicans that the t***h will come out.

Reply
Mar 28, 2015 10:04:20   #
jelun
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Because of evidence suppressed, witnesses stopped from testifying and the fear of some Democrats and Republicans that the t***h will come out.


Uh huh, and you know about this evidence that Darrell Issa couldn't unearth how?

Reply
Mar 28, 2015 10:10:18   #
Liberty Tree
 
jelun wrote:
Uh huh, and you know about this evidence that Darrell Issa couldn't unearth how?


He and others have been unable to gather all the evidence because of things just like Hillary did. All witnesses were not called. Even GOP Congressman Mike Rogers did not want all the t***h out because his wife's company was supposed to provide security at B******i. But just be honest, you do not want t***h but cover for Obama, etal. If this was a GOP administration you would have a whole different view.

Reply
Mar 28, 2015 10:18:26   #
robmull Loc: florida
 
jelun wrote:
How do you explain that the Congress has had years of discovery and investigation and reported no deception?









There are currently hundreds of open law-suits, jelly, against "contemptible" people in government office; and [they] just keep stonewalling, lying, covering-up, scrubbing, deleting, losing and hiding the evidence of [their] stonewalling, lying, ..., and [their] taxpayer-funded legal teams seem to be able to stonewall, lie, cover-up..., for much longer than the actual taxpayers. Does THAT explain {IT} comrade???

Reply
 
 
Mar 28, 2015 11:08:52   #
eagleye13 Loc: Fl
 
jelun wrote:
How do you explain that the Congress has had years of discovery and investigation and reported no deception?


That is easy!

WE have the best government money can buy
The “TWO” Party S**m
Corruption in both parties runs so deep, that they cover for each other on the Big Nasties.

The video below shows it all: A compilation of footage that shows the tactics used by the media to have both tickets covered.
Everything from; ignoring, bias, and even Republican caucus fraud. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o_WBo4sfmi4&feature=player_profilepage

Reply
Mar 28, 2015 11:29:19   #
jelun
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
He and others have been unable to gather all the evidence because of things just like Hillary did. All witnesses were not called. Even GOP Congressman Mike Rogers did not want all the t***h out because his wife's company was supposed to provide security at B******i. But just be honest, you do not want t***h but cover for Obama, etal. If this was a GOP administration you would have a whole different view.



That was not my question, do you not have an answer?
How is it that you know that there is evidence that they couldn't turn up?
That makes no sense.
As to your question about the "different view" when there were administrations prior to this...(there is no GOP administration, once a person is president they are president of ALL AMERICANS) did you hear anyone screaming about these incidents?
http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-2-132602-US-diplomatic-missions-attacked-at--least-44-times-in-52-years

Reply
Mar 28, 2015 11:46:19   #
Liberty Tree
 
jelun wrote:
That was not my question, do you not have an answer?
How is it that you know that there is evidence that they couldn't turn up?
That makes no sense.
As to your question about the "different view" when there were administrations prior to this...(there is no GOP administration, once a person is president they are president of ALL AMERICANS) did you hear anyone screaming about these incidents?
http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-2-132602-US-diplomatic-missions-attacked-at--least-44-times-in-52-years
That was not my question, do you not have an answe... (show quote)


Typical liberal response is to dodge the issue and try to divert to something else. The issue is the suppression of evidence now taking place, but you cannot abide the possibility of t***h being revealed. It is a waste of time to try to reason with a mind closed to seeking t***h.

Reply
Mar 28, 2015 11:54:13   #
jelun
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Typical liberal response is to dodge the issue and try to divert to something else. The issue is the suppression of evidence now taking place, but you cannot abide the possibility of t***h being revealed. It is a waste of time to try to reason with a mind closed to seeking t***h.


I am not creating a diversion.
YOU said, with no basis for it, that there was evidence withheld.
There were so many hearings and so much information gathered that it cost the US taxpayer (you know, those folks who have been TaxedEnoughAlready) millions of dollars borrowed from foreign entitities.

It is straightforward, really.
How do you know that there is evidence that was not released?
Or do you not know that?

Reply
 
 
Mar 28, 2015 12:33:06   #
Liberty Tree
 
jelun wrote:
I am not creating a diversion.
YOU said, with no basis for it, that there was evidence withheld.
There were so many hearings and so much information gathered that it cost the US taxpayer (you know, those folks who have been TaxedEnoughAlready) millions of dollars borrowed from foreign entitities.

It is straightforward, really.
How do you know that there is evidence that was not released?
Or do you not know that?


When witnesses who were present at B******i are not allowed to testify that is evidence withheld. When emails are destroyed that is evidence withheld. Now go ahead anf spin it to say it is not so to coninue to blindly support Obama and Hillary. I am fone trying to reason with a closed mind who does not want t***h.

Reply
Mar 28, 2015 12:34:57   #
jelun
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
When witnesses who were present at B******i are not allowed to testify that is evidence withheld. When emails are destroyed that is evidence withheld. Now go ahead anf spin it to say it is not so to coninue to blindly support Obama and Hillary. I am fone trying to reason with a closed mind who does not want t***h.


Good, I am glad that you can admit that you have no idea of the facts.

Reply
Mar 28, 2015 13:01:59   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Hillary has wiped her server clean and destroyed all the emails. She knew this was evidence that was going to be sought by Congress. Libs, please do not even say that she was just trying to protect private family information. She did it to hide the t***h on B******i and other incidents. The t***h has been hidden by her and Obama for years. It is interesting that this came out right after she had a meeting with Obama and they appeared all cozy with each other.


Here we go again with the " lack of evidence is proof of wrongdoing " paradigm. Who cares what were on her e-mails? Don't you think, that if there HAD been something incriminating on there - that it would have been disappeared long ago?

How would you like to be accused of armed robbery, because no evidence was found that you committed the crime? How many of us would be convicted of crimes, BECAUSE no evidence of our guilt could be found - and that was proof that there WAS evidence - but we disappeared it.

Reply
Mar 28, 2015 13:10:25   #
jelun
 
lpnmajor wrote:
Here we go again with the " lack of evidence is proof of wrongdoing " paradigm. Who cares what were on her e-mails? Don't you think, that if there HAD been something incriminating on there - that it would have been disappeared long ago?

How would you like to be accused of armed robbery, because no evidence was found that you committed the crime? How many of us would be convicted of crimes, BECAUSE no evidence of our guilt could be found - and that was proof that there WAS evidence - but we disappeared it.
Here we go again with the " lack of evidence ... (show quote)




Trey Gowdy thinks that Hillary Clinton is going to fall for this silliness and provide proof that the server has not been wiped clean.
The Clintons have been hounded by the wackybats for over two decades, they know all of those conservative ugly tricks.
There is no reason why former Sec'y of State should release her personal information.
I think anyone who wants her to do that should release 15 years of their personal info.

Someone should look up what Trey Gowdy had to say when failed p**********l candidate Romney wouldn't release his tax returns.

Reply
Page 1 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.