More Evidence Gone (Page 2): They were able to cover up the shooting of JFK, what else do you expect to happen? Hang the little guy who does not know any thing about his big boss's...

dfpole56

They were able to cover up the shooting of JFK, what else do you expect to happen? Hang the little guy who does not know any thing about his big boss's actions. Her and Bill seems to do as they please and no one, and I mean no one, will try to stop them.
Sad but true. Mel Havener

jelun

Mel Havener wrote:

They were able to cover up the shooting of JFK, what else do you expect to happen? Hang the little guy who does not know any thing about his big boss's actions. Her and Bill seems to do as they please and no one, and I mean no one, will try to stop them.
Sad but true. Mel Havener

It seems that right wing extremists are trying to stop "them" at every turn. You tried two decades ago and you try now.
Why don't you make all of your personal emails public?
I know that conspiracy theories are intriguing, that does not make them real.

Liberty Tree

jelun wrote:

It seems that right wing extremists are trying to stop "them" at every turn. You tried two decades ago and you try now.
Why don't you make all of your personal emails public?
I know that conspiracy theories are intriguing, that does not make them real.

Do not you ever get it? She mixed personal emails and government emails together on the same server on purpose so she could wipe them all out under cover of personal privacy. The plan was to have an independent source separate the two so only government ones would be mafe public. She deleted them all to protect herself and Obama.

jelun

Liberty Tree wrote:

Do not you ever get it? She mixed personal emails and government emails together on the same server on purpose so she could wipe them all out under cover of personal privacy. The plan was to have an independent source separate the two so only government ones would be mafe public. She deleted them all to protect herself and Obama.

Yeah, what I do get is that there is nothing that would satisfy you short of some piece of paper that does not exist saying that there is responsibility that lies with the president and the former Sec'y of State in those deaths.
You have absolutely NO PROOF as evidenced by you refusal to answer a direct question about a source for that info.
Mrs. Clinton (she) turned over 55K pages of emails, that is not 55,000 emails that is 55K pages, created during four years of service.
I am sorry that you will never be satisfied. Two years of investigations delivered to you by the party members you are most closely aligned with came up with no evidence of wrong doing despite the copies of emails given to the hearings through the US Dept. of State.
I know that you are smart enough to realize that when you send an email at work it is saved by the work system.
I haven't been in a work place yet that didn't CC half the staff with each send pressed. There are adequate records, the committee received adequate records or Representative Issa would have been squealing like crazy. Do you think that his staff would not have noticed and reported that there were a lack of continuity in the communications?

Liberty Tree

jelun wrote:

Yeah, what I do get is that there is nothing that ... (show quote)

Keep on drinking the koolaid, you are the kind of person Gruber was talking about. There is no proof you would accept. If this was a Republican you would be screaming coverup.

jelun

Liberty Tree wrote:

Keep on drinking the koolaid, you are the kind of person Gruber was talking about. There is no proof you would accept. If this was a Republican you would be screaming coverup.

You are repeating yourself.
Let me try one more time. Who did you hear screaming about any of these?

http://www.thenews.com.pk/Todays-News-2-132602-US-diplomatic-missions-attacked-at--least-44-times-in-52-years

ssgtgood

jelun wrote:

I am not creating a diversion.
YOU said, with no basis for it, that there was evidence withheld.
There were so many hearings and so much information gathered that it cost the US taxpayer (you know, those folks who have been TaxedEnoughAlready) millions of dollars borrowed from foreign entitities.

It is straightforward, really.
How do you know that there is evidence that was not released?
Or do you not know that?

And how do YOU know that God has no religion. Ever heard of the Lord Jesus Christ? Do you believe in Him? Have you ever read the Bible? Do you believe the Bible is the Word of God?

jelun

ssgtgood wrote:

And how do YOU know that God has no religion. Ever heard of the Lord Jesus Christ? Do you believe in Him? Have you ever read the Bible? Do you believe the Bible is the Word of God?

I have answer those questions ad nauseum.
Quite frankly, none of the responses are any of your business.
Do you even know the definition of religion?

Spankem Loc: NJ

jelun wrote:

Trey Gowdy thinks that Hillary Clinton is going to... (show quote)

The fact is she broke the rules and the law by using her private server, when she was supposed to be using the secured government servers.

jelun

Spankem wrote:

The fact is she broke the rules and the law by using her private server, when she was supposed to be using the secured government servers.

She may, and probably did, have breached policy and or procedures at least technically.
She definitely did not break a law by doing that, that has never been alleged.

Have you seen the regs? I haven't bothered to look it up.
The concerns that I have seen expressed have been about "recording and tracking" her communications.
Maybe you could direct me to the regs that say she was supposed to be using a secured server, one that is more secure than that used by past POTUS Bill Clinton.

ssgtgood

jelun wrote:

I have answer those questions ad nauseum.
Quite frankly, none of the responses are any of your business.
Do you even know the definition of religion?

I KNOW that I'll get to see you answer Him on judgment day. You probably don't believe in that either do you. Time will tell jelun, time will tell. I'd rather not answer any more of your questions, you make my PTSD go through the roof.

jelun

ssgtgood wrote:

I KNOW that I'll get to see you answer Him on judgment day. You probably don't believe in that either do you. Time will tell jelun, time will tell. I'd rather not answer any more of your questions, you make my PTSD go through the roof.

Yes, I could see that. You and your buddies don't do much for mine either.
Difference is, I don't whigne about it.
And no, I don't believe in a Judgement Day, you should hope that I am right.

hnealc

Liberty Tree wrote:

Hillary has wiped her server clean and destroyed all the emails. She knew this was evidence that was going to be sought by Congress. Libs, please do not even say that she was just trying to protect private family information. She did it to hide the t***h on B******i and other incidents. The t***h has been hidden by her and Obama for years. It is interesting that this came out right after she had a meeting with Obama and they appeared all cozy with each other.

:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:

gmanp135

You just don't get it do you,she broke the law,obstruction of justice at the very least,if any citizen would have done what she has done they would be behind bars,her attorney asked for two week continuance and she used that time to wipe clean her server,if she had nothing to hide then why,and since when does the subject of any type of investigation get to decide what is and isn't relevant,and don't you find it curious that there are no emails relating to the time immediately before ,during and after the incident,remember we are talking about a woman who was once fired for being an unethical liar.

jelun

gmanp135 wrote:

You just don't get it do you,she broke the law,obs... (show quote)

The moon is made of bleu cheese.
That has as much validity as any of your statements.
Where do you get this foolishness about no emails? Read the report from the Committee.