PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.

No oldroy, I didn't read (see) that link. However, I would be/am very curious as to who "those very people" are. As I stated previously,the preponderance of Silicon Valley are firmly in King Obama's camp. Would you mind pointing me to the link of which you speak? Thanks.

Not-a-RINO Loc: Michigan

Do you think there's a possibility the Senate's actions are similar in nature as the following statements?

"I'll be right there" when someone asks you to help them do something you have no intention of doing. It saves you the agony and arguments of declining;
"I met her. You'll love her. She has a great personality" when you are forced to find a blind date for a friend and the pickings are rather slim. Yes, you lined the guy up with a date, but chances are it will be the last time he trusts you to fix him up again.
"My check is in the mail" -or- "What d'yer mean my check wasn't signed?" Oh, sure, you contributed and looked like you made an effort, but in the end it was a big, fat nothing.

As for the Senate, "We'll forward the bill to the House tomorrow" -or- "I'm glad the political battle in this chamber is over. I hope the House comes up with a similar version of the bill so we can blend them someday" -or- "Say, you know that bill we passed earlier today? Do you know where the master copy is so we can forward it to the House? You haven't seen it, huh?"

In the end, their actions come down to the phrase, "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bulls__."

Most Americans want the laws that are on the books enforced. Instead, we get Obama suing the State of Arizona and Rubio generating a watered-down version of amnesty in the Senate. My policy is simple, "If you're here illegally, you get nothing - no welfare, no job, no education, no medical, no nothing. You may as well stay home because this is a country that doesn't reward lawbreakers. If you come here legally and want a better life for you and your family, we welcome you with open arms. The best of good fortune to you!"

Hoghunter

I am new to the post. Not in 87%. GOP changing to Republicanos. Wants to take illegal v**es back from Democrats instead of standing up for Constitution and conservative values. What are We the People supposed to do?

Hoghunter

Exactly. Our immigration isn't broken. Immigration enforcement is broken. If the Executive does not execute the laws passed by Congress, then it is in a state of disability. The President can be removed for disability.

ABBAsFernando Loc: Ohio

Ghost Loc: The 1st state to ever secede

This 87% is about as a big distortion (and disproportional) as that whole 99% and 1% BS from the Occupy Wallstreet drones.

As far as going by this as a poll number, liberal or otherwise can easily gear a poll towards a certian outcome. They can skew the poll questions at any degree to get the results they desire.

So is this 87% from their own political base or from a seriously mislead polling scheme? Who knows?

I got to the point that polls are irrelevant no matter from what political entities that be.

Not-a-RINO Loc: Michigan

You sound like the product of many years of statistical lies and obfuscations. I understand how easy that is today when everything you hear or read is more often than not twisted to fit someone's agenda. Perhaps this is by design so the average person doesn't know who to trust any more. It is also why when we do see statistics, we should also delve into the reporter's political agenda as to what would motivate this person to lie. Otherwise we would all be absolutely convinced g****l w*****g is real, the EPA only has the public's concern at heart and Obama is the epitome of t***h.

Harry Truman once said, "There are three kinds of lies: Big lies, little lies and statistics." I'll wager there's about a 9 in 10 chance you will agree with that statement! :)

Oldguy Loc: Deep east Texas Big Thicket country

Why, they get their numbers from the same wonderful folks who put out the unemployment numbers, inflation numbers and poll numbers. Those same wonderful government employees who change the rules on how they are figured each month to show "progress".

snowbear37 Loc: MA.

I don't think that the majority of v**ers in this country want i******s to be given "amnesty" because even the "low information" v**ers have some idea of the economic disaster this would be for them. Even that jerk Dirty Harry knows this. He is holding the bill until such time as he can figure out a good enough lie to tell people about how it will be paid for. He knows it will be a boon to dems/progs as far as v**es are concerned, but the v**ers need to know that they can pull this off without it costing them money (which is impossible). I am curious to see what lie they come up with to fool their v**ers into thinking that amnesty will either cost nothing or even make money for the country.

Loki Loc: Georgia

Any revenue generating bill, (like S.744) has to originate in the House. That is why we have the constitutionality of the bill questioned. As for the 87% figure, I personally think that came from the same place as the 90% who allegedly supported the outrageous gun control bill recently defeated in the Senate.

betty Loc: Arizona Mountains

Where..this valley? Its in california, and not a real valley.

timmh67 Loc: USA...West Coast

LOL, Maybe its one of those bills that needs to be signed so we will know whats in it ... You know, like the rest of the story. This is why Obama care is in so much disarey now, the republicans went along with it and look where we are now. It's one thing after another with this thug administration, more smoke screens for us who are trying to see through all of their nonsence.

bahmer

But its filled with fruits and nuts right.

snowbear37 Loc: MA.

Almost as many as there are in San Fransicko!

Tasine Loc: Southwest US

I suspect this is like the e*****rate in 2008 - many, many wanted a "change" - and they got the change. Unfortunately it wasn't the change they wanted.

I think the change the 87% want re immigration is that we once again start enforcing the existing laws re i*****l i*********n.

It's the only thing that makes sense, hence I doubt Congress will take that road.