Physical Conservative Independant (Page 3): 10-4 police code= copy...

Comment Loc: California

bahmer wrote:

I agree with you but everybody I talked to didn't like him for the exact reason you say. I happen to agree with you and I would have loved to see him go head to head with OIllegal in a debate.

10-4 police code= copy

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

Billhuggins wrote:

and look at the d********g we got , only, because Repubs didn't v**e. That's treason in the eyes of me.

I can present you something more treasonous. People who fail to r******r to v**e! :!: :!:

bahmer

AuntiE wrote:

I can present you something more treasonous. People who fail to r******r to v**e! :!: :!:

Amen, Amen, Amen. I presume you are referring to the Republicans as the Demoncrats don't have to r******r to v**e not only once but many times. They were even bused from Chicago to Wisconsin complete with their Bear paraphernalia on to v**e for OIllegal. They did have a hard time pronouncing the Polish names though.

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

bahmer wrote:

Amen, Amen, Amen. I presume you are referring to the Republicans as the Demoncrats don't have to r******r to v**e not only once but many times. They were even bused from Chicago to Wisconsin complete with their Bear paraphernalia on to v**e for OIllegal. They did have a hard time pronouncing the Polish names though.

There are issues currently occurring in my state. The people raising bonkerboos about them are the very people who are not registered, knew they were forthcoming and still did not register or v**e. If you did not register, did not v**e, then shut the perdition up! :!: :!: :!:

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

bahmer wrote:

Yes and I would lay it square at the feet of Karl Rove and his big government politics. He knows what the conservatives want and he refuses to give us a conservative because he is in bed with the big government crew.

I was having a very pleasant evening communicating on, as I call it, the Plaza. Then what should assail my eyes but the "architect" of perfidious and puerile pretentiousness. Why would you disrupt my pleasant time by issuing forth his name? :mrgreen: :hunf:

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

bahmer wrote:

I agree with you but everybody I talked to didn't like him for the exact reason you say. I happen to agree with you and I would have loved to see him go head to head with OIllegal in a debate.

Hoping not to be soundly berated, another issue would have been his marital issues. It is perfectly alright for Weiner and Spitzer to be morally bankrupt; however, not others. Mark Sanford, SC apparently was able to overcome. I am not so sure such would have been the case had his opposition been a stronger candidate. Republicans have to be as Caesar's was required to be.

Comment Loc: California

AuntiE wrote:

Hoping not to be soundly berated, another issue would have been his marital issues. It is perfectly alright for Weiner and Spitzer to be morally bankrupt; however, not others. Mark Sanford, SC apparently was able to overcome. I am not so sure such would have been the case had his opposition been a stronger candidate. Republicans have to be as Caesar's was required to be.

Thank you all for the laughs. "-)

Comment Loc: California

AuntiE wrote:

I have a very traditional welcome for our new members. Insert an airline pilot voice....NOW..

Welcome to our site. We hope you enjoy your sojourn with us. You may find times of great turbulence while with us. It is your responsibility to provide your own remedy for such times.

why do you say short stay. Is the site closing soon or am I to be disposed of soon? Just wondering.

Comment Loc: California

Billhuggins wrote:

why do you say short stay. Is the site closing soon or am I to be disposed of soon? Just wondering.

:-)

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

Billhuggins wrote:

why do you say short stay. Is the site closing soon or am I to be disposed of soon? Just wondering.

I did not say "short stay". I said "sojourn" as in a visit or stay.

As to being "disposed of soon", it would be a matter for your family to decide depending on their feeling toward you when you ask them about the matter. :roll: :-o

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

alex wrote:

welcome aboard kid i'm 73 for another three and a half months

Is our new member "bill" a baby goat, ie. "kid" or perhaps just a youngster? :) :)

alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa

AuntiE wrote:

Is our new member "bill" a baby goat, ie. "kid" or perhaps just a youngster? :) :)

I have welcomed so many aboard I CAN'T REMEMBER WHICH ONE WAS BILL BUT i THINK HE SAID HE WAS 46(sorry about that) so I called him a kid, is that permissible

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

alex wrote:

I have welcomed so many aboard I CAN'T REMEMBER WHICH ONE WAS BILL BUT i THINK HE SAID HE WAS 46(sorry about that) so I called him a kid, is that permissible

He said he was 71. I was picking on you. :D

alex Loc: michigan now imperial beach californa

AuntiE wrote:

He said he was 71. I was picking on you. :D

I was aware of that but since he is only 71 I would have still called him a kid, I meant that you were picking on me but I won't cry even if you are a meany

AuntiE Loc: 45th Least Free State

alex wrote:

I was aware of that but since he is only 71 I would have still called him a kid, I meant that you were picking on me but I won't cry even if you are a meany

My progeny has done nothing to deserve picking on this PM/AM, hence it is your turn. :mrgreen: