A******n...Extremes on both sides. On the Right side.. Extreme is that there is no exception to a******n even in cases of rape, incest, or health if the mother..This is might be a...

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

On the Right side.. Extreme is that there is no exception to a******n even in cases of rape, incest, or health if the mother..This is might be a reason why we lost midterms..

On the left.. A******n on demand, even if it's after second trimester when baby can feel the pain...

Both extremes are dangerous ...

woodguru

proud republican wrote:

On the Right side.. Extreme is that there is no exception to a******n even in cases of rape, incest, or health if the mother..This is might be a reason why we lost midterms..

On the left.. A******n on demand, even if it's after second trimester when baby can feel the pain...

Both extremes are dangerous ...

And then there is the middle that has the support of the majority in this country...a******ns for anyone that wants them, reasonable standards like we have already had on time frames allowed, get rid of the BS delays, restrictions on women's healthcare clinics, such as hospital admittance as a way to block access, etc.

keepuphope Loc: Idaho

proud republican wrote:

On the Right side.. Extreme is that there is no exception to a******n even in cases of rape, incest, or health if the mother..This is might be a reason why we lost midterms..

On the left.. A******n on demand, even if it's after second trimester when baby can feel the pain...

Both extremes are dangerous ...

Your wrong about the left, they would have obortions up to the moment of birth and if they survive that then let them lay on a table until they die.

pegw

I am all for any woman getting an a******n anytime up to the end of the second trimester for any reason. Also, any women can get an a******n for a non viable baby any time. No sense carring a dead baby like my mother did.

TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA

woodguru wrote:

And then there is the middle that has the support of the majority in this country...a******ns for anyone that wants them, reasonable standards like we have already had on time frames allowed, get rid of the BS delays, restrictions on women's healthcare clinics, such as hospital admittance as a way to block access, etc.

Which of the unborn babies did you ask of their opinions on this?

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

woodguru wrote:

And then there is the middle that has the support of the majority in this country...a******ns for anyone that wants them, reasonable standards like we have already had on time frames allowed, get rid of the BS delays, restrictions on women's healthcare clinics, such as hospital admittance as a way to block access, etc.

I have never seen restrictions to the hospital...for anything

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

pegw wrote:

I am all for any woman getting an a******n anytime up to the end of the second trimester for any reason. Also, any women can get an a******n for a non viable baby any time. No sense carring a dead baby like my mother did.

Up to the end of second trimester??? When baby can feel pain???? That is very l*****t thing to do..Sick!!👎

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

keepuphope wrote:

Your wrong about the left, they would have obortions up to the moment of birth and if they survive that then let them lay on a table until they die.

True!..

Liberty Tree

proud republican wrote:

On the Right side.. Extreme is that there is no exception to a******n even in cases of rape, incest, or health if the mother..This is might be a reason why we lost midterms..

On the left.. A******n on demand, even if it's after second trimester when baby can feel the pain...

Both extremes are dangerous ...

The health of the mother is too broad. It can be interpreted to allow an a******n for any reason.

TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA

pegw wrote:

I am all for any woman getting an a******n anytime up to the end of the second trimester for any reason. Also, any women can get an a******n for a non viable baby any time. No sense carring a dead baby like my mother did.

When does a baby become a human being? Please provide scientific evidence in your answer.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

TommyRadd wrote:

When does a baby become a human being? Please provide scientific evidence in your answer.

After 2nd trimester, actually at the end of the first trimester baby can feel pain and move around...

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

Liberty Tree wrote:

The health of the mother is too broad. It can be interpreted to allow an a******n for any reason.

There are times as in cancer when woman has to make choice between having a baby or having chemotherapy that can k**l baby, but save woman's life.... Especially if woman has child already at home..

American Vet

TommyRadd wrote:

When does a baby become a human being? Please provide scientific evidence in your answer.

If you were to do a DNA test on an unborn child - at any stage of development, what would it show?

It would have the DNA of a distinct human being - an individual who is not 'part of the mother's body'.

Is that sufficient evidence?

LostAggie66 Loc: Corpus Christi, TX (Shire of Seawinds)

keepuphope wrote:

Your wrong about the left, they would have obortions up to the moment of birth and if they survive that then let them lay on a table until they die.

NOT Everyone on the left thinks like that. Where did you get that ridiculous idea?

Liberty Tree

LostAggie66 wrote:

NOT Everyone on the left thinks like that. Where did you get that ridiculous idea?

What are your restrictions on a******n?