A******n...Extremes on both sides..
Feb 9, 2023 09:20:17 #
proud republican wrote:
On the Right side.. Extreme is that there is no exception to a******n even in cases of rape, incest, or health if the mother..This is might be a reason why we lost midterms..
On the left.. A******n on demand, even if it's after second trimester when baby can feel the pain...
Both extremes are dangerous ...
On the left.. A******n on demand, even if it's after second trimester when baby can feel the pain...
Both extremes are dangerous ...
That was never true! There are always exceptions! That is not why we supposedly lost midterms! The c***ting was rampant! Cally lost 4 million b****ts! Arizona and Alaska a joke! Not to mention fetterman and that joker preacher! All because of manipulated b****ts! Polls showed a******n was not an issue !
Feb 9, 2023 09:21:55 #
pegw wrote:
I am all for any woman getting an a******n anytime up to the end of the second trimester for any reason. Also, any women can get an a******n for a non viable baby any time. No sense carring a dead baby like my mother did.
But you still survived!!!
Feb 9, 2023 09:23:49 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
The health of the mother is too broad. It can be interpreted to allow an a******n for any reason.
If a woman’s health would be in jeapardy because of child bearing , there are birth control methods that are very effective including sterilization
Feb 9, 2023 09:25:14 #
proud republican wrote:
There are times as in cancer when woman has to make choice between having a baby or having chemotherapy that can k**l baby, but save woman's life.... Especially if woman has child already at home..
Many women have chosen not to abort in this instance and given birth to healthy babies
Feb 9, 2023 09:25:58 #
American Vet wrote:
If you were to do a DNA test on an unborn child - at any stage of development, what would it show?
It would have the DNA of a distinct human being - an individual who is not 'part of the mother's body'.
Is that sufficient evidence?
It would have the DNA of a distinct human being - an individual who is not 'part of the mother's body'.
Is that sufficient evidence?
God knew us in the womb!
Feb 9, 2023 13:51:27 #
proud republican wrote:
On the Right side.. Extreme is that there is no exception to a******n even in cases of rape, incest, or health if the mother..This is might be a reason why we lost midterms..
On the left.. A******n on demand, even if it's after second trimester when baby can feel the pain...
Both extremes are dangerous ...
On the left.. A******n on demand, even if it's after second trimester when baby can feel the pain...
Both extremes are dangerous ...
You're talking about >less than 1%< of a******ns, hardly representative. (And, if you actually took the time to research this topic, you'd know that the vast majority of those late-terms were due to medical reasons.)
But the anti a******n movements target 100% of women. You're comparing apples to oranges here.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.