Thoughts on the Recent Supreme Court Decisions (Page 10): Tell me Dashy, why do you labor under the misconception that it is pretense? You have mentioned this twice in the past couple...

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

DASHY wrote:

Looks like Murder by A******n will be recognized in red states and rejected in blue states. Crossing state lines and monitoring sale of a******n pills will be contested in courts. The United States of America will be less united. Policing the womb will become a new job for law enforcement personnel. All in the name of pretending to care about the life of the unborn.

Tell me Dashy, why do you labor under the misconception that it is pretense? You have mentioned this twice in the past couple of days.
And by the way, an accurate phrase would be, "All in the name of saving the lives of children."

Ricktloml

RandyBrian wrote:

Tell me Dashy, why do you labor under the misconception that it is pretense? You have mentioned this twice in the past couple of days.
And by the way, an accurate phrase would be, "All in the name of saving the lives of children."

That is the approved left-wing/pro-a******n rebuttal. L*****ts think Pro-life concerns can be dismissed if the "you don't care about the baby after it's born" narrative is constantly repeated...it doesn't matter that it's a lie.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

Ricktloml wrote:

That is the approved left-wing/pro-a******n rebuttal. L*****ts think Pro-life concerns can be dismissed if the "you don't care about the baby after it's born" narrative is constantly repeated...it doesn't matter that it's a lie.

I guess so. A brilliant rebuttal.....for a toddler. Lies are a waste of time and effort. I do not indulge in them, but some people can't tell the difference. Those types usually become democrats.

DASHY

RandyBrian wrote:

Tell me Dashy, why do you labor under the misconception that it is pretense? You have mentioned this twice in the past couple of days.
And by the way, an accurate phrase would be, "All in the name of saving the lives of children."

The pro-life argument is more about punishing women than it is about saving the lives of children.https://www.savethechildren.org/us/charity-stories/child-hunger-in-america

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

DASHY wrote:

The pro-life argument is more about punishing women than it is about saving the lives of children.https://www.savethechildren.org/us/charity-stories/child-hunger-in-america

How do you know?

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

DASHY wrote:

The pro-life argument is more about punishing women than it is about saving the lives of children.https://www.savethechildren.org/us/charity-stories/child-hunger-in-america

Really? Can you back up that first sentence? Cause I haven't seen that at all. EVERYthing about pro-life is about saving the children.
And what is the link supposed to mean? If you would do just a little research, instead of relying on DNC talking points, you would see that Christian organizations lead the way in helping, feeding, and caring for children.
Why, if I didn't know better, it would almost seem like you are implying that we should chop up babies and dispose of their torn bodies so that they would not ever be hungry during their unaborted life!
Yeah...I know....silly thought. Forget I even mentioned it.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

RandyBrian wrote:

Really? Can you back up that first sentence? Cau... (show quote)

Same mindset that says, gee your grandparents aren't functioning very well, so for convenience sake let's make them comfortable then k**l em.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

JFlorio wrote:

Same mindset that says, gee your grandparents aren't functioning very well, so for convenience sake let's make them comfortable then k**l em.

And some of those i***ts call Trump supporters a 'death' cult!
Like I earlier posted on another thread.....l*****t do not look for SOLUTIONS to problems....they look of ways to benefit politically from the problems.

DASHY

RandyBrian wrote:

Really? Can you back up that first sentence? Cau... (show quote)

The so-call pro-life argument should be pro-birth. Pro life would include giving as much consideration to the life of the woman as to the possibility that a zygote or embryo or fetus might someday become a human being, but only if the mother is willing to spend every hour of every day for nine months carrying it around inside her body. No woman wants to be in a position of having to choose a******n. However, there will always be a need for a******n. That's reality. Women cannot, and should not, be forced to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term.

DASHY

JFlorio wrote:

Same mindset that says, gee your grandparents aren't functioning very well, so for convenience sake let's make them comfortable then k**l em.

Stupid comparison. A woman does not carry a grandparent around inside her body for nine months.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

DASHY wrote:

Stupid comparison. A woman does not carry a grandparent around inside her body for nine months.

Both are human life. You’re for slaughtering the unborn. I’m not. Argument over. You’re just to cowardly to admit it.

DASHY

RandyBrian wrote:

And some of those i***ts call Trump supporters a 'death' cult!
Like I earlier posted on another thread.....l*****t do not look for SOLUTIONS to problems....they look of ways to benefit politically from the problems.

Lefties think the best way to reduce the number of a******ns is by making it less necessary rather than by making it less available or illegal. Democrats believe we should make a true commitment to: (1) Comprehensive sexuality education, (2) public funding for family planning, (3) Greater access to emergency contraception, (4) programs that curb domestic violence and sexual abuse.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

DASHY wrote:

The so-call pro-life argument should be pro-birth.... (show quote)

And I guess that is the bottom line, and where you and I will never agree. You do not murder a child in order to keep a Mom from having to deal with it, and then call that protecting the woman's rights. It is still murder.

Big Kahuna

DASHY wrote:

Lefties think the best way to reduce the number of a******ns is by making it less necessary rather than by making it less available or illegal. Democrats believe we should make a true commitment to: (1) Comprehensive sexuality education, (2) public funding for family planning, (3) Greater access to emergency contraception, (4) programs that curb domestic violence and sexual abuse.

You might want to watch a video of a 2nd trimester a******n. It is gruesome and beyond comprehension to see those little baby parts torn up and crushed. Anyone who is moral and ethical would object to this procedure but yet you endorse it, and this is only the 2nd trimester. Can you imagine a******n in the 3rd trimester? Like we say on OPP, you are immoral and unethical as well as being a supporter of infanticide.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

DASHY wrote:

Lefties think the best way to reduce the number of a******ns is by making it less necessary rather than by making it less available or illegal. Democrats believe we should make a true commitment to: (1) Comprehensive sexuality education, (2) public funding for family planning, (3) Greater access to emergency contraception, (4) programs that curb domestic violence and sexual abuse.

If the Democrats ideas worked, there already WOULD be almost no a******ns. Do you really believe there is a girl or boy over the age of 12 that does NOT know what the pill is? That does NOT know what a condom is? That does NOT know what an a******n is? IMO most kids over 10 already know all about those. And MOST of them know what a Crisis Pregnancy Center is. Is there a public school in the United States that will not hand a teenager birth control? If the Democrats plans worked HOW COME a******n rates continue at high levels in Democrat controlled states and cities???
I think Rush Limbaugh was right. He said liberals get angry every time an a******n is NOT performed. In spite of what you say and they say, I see every indication that he was right.