Thoughts on the Recent Supreme Court Decisions (Page 9): Looks like Murder by A******n will be recognized in red states and rejected in blue states. Crossing state lines and monitoring...

DASHY

microphor wrote:

Hopefully not the one that allows babies to be murdered in the womb all the way up to birth.

Looks like Murder by A******n will be recognized in red states and rejected in blue states. Crossing state lines and monitoring sale of a******n pills will be contested in courts. The United States of America will be less united. Policing the womb will become a new job for law enforcement personnel. All in the name of pretending to care about the life of the unborn.

DASHY

RocktheBenz wrote:

You people that are commenting above are missing two things. 1st is your not taking into consideration that the conservatives represent the Constitution. 2nd is that if the cave people believed in a******n most of you would not be here.

3rd is that if pigs could fly, the price of bacon would be sky high.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

DASHY wrote:

What do you call a woman who swallows a pill to stop a pregnancy after enjoying sex with a willing partner?

Swallower, not a spitter?

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

DASHY wrote:

Looks like Murder by A******n will be recognized in red states and rejected in blue states. Crossing state lines and monitoring sale of a******n pills will be contested in courts. The United States of America will be less united. Policing the womb will become a new job for law enforcement personnel. All in the name of pretending to care about the life of the unborn.

Kinda like some states have the death penalty and some don't.

DASHY

JFlorio wrote:

Kinda like some states have the death penalty and some don't.

Will red states demand that a woman be prosecuted for her own self induced a******n?

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

DASHY wrote:

Will red states demand that a woman be prosecuted for her own self induced a******n?

Don't know. Will end up in the hands of the individual states v**ers, as it should. Are people prosecuted for attempted suicide?

microphor Loc: Home is TN

RocktheBenz wrote:

Even "after" their birth!

yes, could have been better worded.

Ricktloml

JFlorio wrote:

Don't know. Will end up in the hands of the individual states v**ers, as it should. Are people prosecuted for attempted suicide?

Before the SC magically found a******n rights, and un-Constitutionally made k*****g the unborn legal, if anyone was ever prosecuted for a******n, it was usually the doctor who performed the a******n, not the woman seeking one. Euphemisms are always used by the pro-a******n crowd, because the t***h of what they actually doing is so ugly.

DASHY

RocktheBenz wrote:

Even "after" their birth!

After their birth, babies are no longer in the womb.

DASHY

Ricktloml wrote:

Before the SC magically found a******n rights, and un-Constitutionally made k*****g the unborn legal, if anyone was ever prosecuted for a******n, it was usually the doctor who performed the a******n, not the woman seeking one. Euphemisms are always used by the pro-a******n crowd, because the t***h of what they actually doing is so ugly.

Do you think "swallowing a pill to end a pregnancy" is a euphemism for murdering a baby? I wonder how women will be punished for having a safe, self-induced a******n?

microphor Loc: Home is TN

DASHY wrote:

Do you think "swallowing a pill to end a pregnancy" is a euphemism for murdering a baby? I wonder how women will be punished for having a safe, self-induced a******n?

I wonder why Dems say the most stupid $hit

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

DASHY wrote:

Do you think "swallowing a pill to end a pregnancy" is a euphemism for murdering a baby? I wonder how women will be punished for having a safe, self-induced a******n?

You do realize you can take a pill that's pretty damn affective so you don't get pregnant, right?

Strycker Loc: The middle of somewhere else.

RandyBrian wrote:

And what is your point? Murderers for hire have existed for all of history. They will continue no matter what we do. Should we therefore legalize them and put them under government regulation? "Doctor, my wife is getting older, and I kinda like the new coworker my boss hired. How much to 'abort' the missus?"

In the US a******n was legal for 100 years. Then it was illegal for the next 100 years. Then it was legal again for the last 50 and still is. Though the pendulum is swinging back to the illegal side, for now. Beginning to see a pattern here. It has been a contentious issue since the beginning and will be a contentious issue far into the future. There is no one size fits all and satisfies all solution with the competing rights of a shared body.

Ricktloml

JFlorio wrote:

You do realize you can take a pill that's pretty damn affective so you don't get pregnant, right?

Ah, you've hit upon something very dark there. There are indeed several methods of contraception. Many at no cost. The pro-a******n crowd would always rather k**l the baby than prevent a pregnancy. "My body, my choice", I choose to be irresponsible/I choose to murder the inconvenient baby that I took no effort to avoid conceiving.

RandyBrian Loc: Texas

DASHY wrote:

What do you call a woman who swallows a pill to stop a pregnancy after enjoying sex with a willing partner?

A murderer. But an understandable one, because at least she has the excuse that she has been told her whole life that it isn't REALLY a child. It just looks like one, has a functioning brain and heart and other organs. It was created from your ovaries and a sperm donor, but, you know, it's really just an unviable tissue mass that uses oxygen and food that your body provides. Yes, of course if nothing goes wrong, it will someday BECOME a human being, but that is irrelevant, because we are here to provide you with a doctor or a pill that will MAKE SURE something DOES go wrong.
Yes sir, I think a duped murderer is the perfect name.