Another troll who cherry-picks legal decisions that support his premise, which is "Orange Man Bad." Hey OPP! In case you bothered to read his "cites," most of them seem to include the words "cert. denied." That means a Writ of Certiorari has been denied, and a higher court has declined to hear the case. You will note that most of them emanate from either the Ninth Circuit or what was then the DC Circuit. That should tell you something; along with the detachment of the partial statements from the rest of the proceedings. Partial statement like these, devoid of meaning when detached from their cases, are often used by trolls and amateur intimidators as "proof" of their expertise. They count on the fact that most people either won't bother or don't know how to look up the relevant material. L*****ts are quite good at this; case in point, how they belabor the "Well-Regulated M*****a" of the Second Amendment while omitting all mention of what "well regulated" and "m*****a" meant in the 1790s, and neglecting to mention that the phrase is a prefatory clause. You quote partial statements from cases that have nothing to do with the matter at hand and rely on the unwillingness or inability of others to prove you wrong.