One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Yet half the supporters repeat this every day...
Page <<first <prev 4 of 32 next> last>>
Jun 21, 2022 18:55:33   #
martsiva
 
permafrost wrote:
The c**p attempt was unsuccessful, but we still should hang them for the attempt to overturn our elected government, and we sure as heck need to wring the necks of all the leaders..


Are you really that stupid?? There was NO 'c**p attempt' nor was there any attempt to 'overturn' any 'elected' government!!! These are nothing but bold face lies from you and shows how easily you can be led around by your nose by your handlers and repeating like a parrot, what they tell you!! YOU show us all where the military was involved to accomplish all the things you stated because all these lies you told NEED military backing!!!

Reply
Jun 21, 2022 19:04:36   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
permafrost wrote:
Lies to support the liar in chief.. the orange god you made..

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/12/16/fact-check-no-trump-request-10000-guard-troops-j***6/8929215002/

Fact check: Trump repeats false claim that Pelosi rejected request for National Guard ahead of J*** 6

rump’s claim is one of many efforts by Republicans and supporters of the former president to shift blame and downplay the J*** 6 attack on the Capitol that resulted in four deaths and led to more than 600 arrests.
Lies to support the liar in chief.. the orange god... (show quote)


You keep repeating the false claim that J****** 6th
Quote:
resulted in four deaths


There was only one death the result of J****** 6th. That was an unarmed Air Force Veteran shot by a CP.

Reply
Jun 21, 2022 19:24:43   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
son of witless wrote:
Okay tell me exactly how a bunch of r****rs were going to over turn the government ? Splain in detail if things had gone their way just how they could have done it ? I double dog dare you.


The object of J** 6th was to overturn the e******n in which we fired the dumb ass former occupant of the oval..
Thanks to our VP, it was stopped. And then the "bunch of r****rs" searched the capital in order to hang him...



Reply
Jun 21, 2022 19:25:11   #
moldyoldy
 
martsiva wrote:
Are you really that stupid?? There was NO 'c**p attempt' nor was there any attempt to 'overturn' any 'elected' government!!! These are nothing but bold face lies from you and shows how easily you can be led around by your nose by your handlers and repeating like a parrot, what they tell you!! YOU show us all where the military was involved to accomplish all the things you stated because all these lies you told NEED military backing!!!



You would be funny if you were not so misinformed. It’s scary.

Reply
Jun 21, 2022 19:27:04   #
moldyoldy
 
permafrost wrote:
The object of J** 6th was to overturn the e******n in which we fired the dumb ass former occupant of the oval..
Thanks to our VP, it was stopped. And then the "bunch of r****rs" searched the capital in order to hang him...



Just one hour of trump testimony would be more than enough.

Reply
Jun 21, 2022 19:29:50   #
moldyoldy
 
dtucker300 wrote:
Facts can't lie, just the people who are spinning them.



After a year of lying Rudy finally has to stop.
Rudy Giuliani admitted 'we just don't have the evidence' of v***r f***d, according to testimony

https://www.businessinsider.com/rudy-giuliani-v**er-fraud-evidence-rusty-bowers-testimony-j**6-committee-2022-6?amp

Reply
Jun 21, 2022 19:30:20   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Justice101 wrote:
This is a professional one-sided production where they cut and edit to their liking. We don't see the other side that gets to ask these people questions regarding their statements. How do we know if they weren't coerced you dummass?


When the trump republicans refuse to take part in any kind of committee, what did any of them think would happen?

this committee was formed after several court cases.. the Rep did not want to participate in any form of it..

Now stop crying as we run it in an orderly and lawful fashion.

Give today, trump is still putting your money in his pocket.. he will not run, he will not overturn the election, but he will spend your money..
Give today, trump is still putting your money in h...

Reply
Jun 21, 2022 19:34:07   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
Wildlandfirefighter wrote:
Hey Mr. ignorant, the authority to approve a request for guard troops in DC sits with the president by law, not the DC Mayor, Pelosi or anyone else. The authority has been delegated to the Sec Def, who has delegated the authority to the Sec of the Army to make it happen. Trump was MIA, have you not figured that out yet? The Sec of Army was not available, neither the DC major nor Pelosi have the authority to call in the guard. Pence was the one that finally got them there. So all your post is just useless, mindless BS.

Bowser requested guard support early for that day and had 340 troops in town, but they were set up for traffic control and not in r**t gear.

Spend a little time educating yourself and you won’t look so foolish to those of us that are not so easily misled by Trumps big lie!
Hey Mr. ignorant, the authority to approve a reque... (show quote)
One DMF who h**es Trump with a passion is gonna lecture us on Capitol security for the J*** 6 e******n certification.
Taking his cues from CNN, no doubt.

25,000 Trump supporters attended that event, less than 1100 actually assaulted the Capitol building.
And, the assault began BEFORE president Trump had finished his speech 10 blocks away.

FYI: Article 1, Section 8, paragraph 15, US Constitution:
The Congress shall have power . . . . To provide for calling forth the M*****a to execute the Laws of the Union,
suppress i**********ns, and repel invasions.


Trump Pentagon first offered National Guard to Capitol four days before J*** 6, 2021

Official C*****l P****e timeline validates Trump administration's account, shows Democrats' fateful rejections of offers. "Seems absolutely illogical," one official wrote about security posture hours before r**t began.

The Pentagon first raised the possibility of sending National Guard troops to the U.S. Capitol four days before the J*** 6 r**ts, setting in motion a series of rejections by C*****l P****e and Democrats that left Congress vulnerable as threats of violence were rising, according to government memos that validate Trump administration officials' long-held claims.

An official timeline of the J*** 6 tragedy assembled by C*****l P****e shows that a Defense Department official reached out to a C*****l P****e deputy chief, Sean Gallagher, on Jan. 2, 2021 to see if a request for troops was forthcoming, but the offer was quickly rejected after a consultation with then-Chief Steve Sund.

"Carol Corbin (DOD) texts USCP Deputy Chief Sean Gallagher, Protective Service Bureau, to determine whether USCP is considering a request for National Guard soldiers for J****** 6, 2021 event," the timeline reads in the lone entry listed for Saturday, Jan. 2, 2021.

The following morning, the timeline states, "Gallagher replies to DOD via text that a request for National Guard support not forthcoming at this time after consultation with COP Sund."

You can read the full police timeline here:
File
USCPJan.6Timeline.pdf

The rejection came as the C*****l P****e department was beginning to change its assessment, recognizing that the massive Trump rally to protest the November 2020 e******n results planned for J*** 6, 2021 had the potential for violence.

Earlier analyses suggested such violence was unlikely and the J*** 6 event was likely to be “similar to the previous Million MAGA March rallies in November and December,” police records show

For instance, C*****l P****e had determined that as of Dec. 16, 2020 there was "no information regarding specific disruptions or acts of civil disobedience targeting this function."
File
december 16 intel report.pdf

But by late December, C*****l P****e internal emails and documents show, information began flowing in that some groups expected to attend were talking on social media or fringe websites about tactics like blocking tunnels leading to the Capitol.

On Sunday, Jan. 3, 2021, just hours after Gallagher rejected the Pentagon's initial offer, the C*****l P****e issued a new and darker security assessment to its commanders and executives and to the two political appointees in Congress responsible for security, the House and Senate sergeants at arms, the timeline shows.

"Due to the tense political environment following the 2020 e******n, the threat of disruptive actions or violence cannot be ruled out," the new assessment declared. "Supporters of the current president see J****** 6, 2021 as the last opportunity to overturn the results of the p**********l e******n. This sense of desperation and disappointment may lead to more of an incentive to become violent."

Within 24 hours, Sund had changed his mind and began seeking permission from the political powers surrounding House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer to deploy the National Guard as a preventive measure on Monday, Jan. 4, 2021.

The C*****l P****e official timeline provides the most succinct summary of a series of events around Sund's request, some of which have been disputed and at times misreported in the news media.

"COP Sund asks Senate Sergeant at Arms (SSAA) Michael Stenger and House Sergeant at Arms (HSAA) Paul Irving for authority to have National Guard to assist with security for the J****** 6, 2021 event based on briefing with law enforcement partner and revised intelligence Assessment," the timeline recorded. "COP Sund's request is denied. SSAA and HSAA tell COP Sund to contact General Walker at DC National Guard to discuss the guard's ability to support a request if needed."

Walker, according to the police timeline, told Sund that if the chief could change minds and eventually get the approval from Capitol officials his team could deploy 125 troops quickly.

While Sund's requests were being delayed and denied, the Pentagon was forging ahead on Jan. 4, 2021 to get Trump to formally sign authorizations to deploy in advance of J*** 6, 2021 as many as 20,000 National Guard troops if Congress asked[/b], according to interviews Just the News has done with then-acting Defense Secretary Christopher Miller and his chief of staff Kash Patel.

"We went to the C*****l P****e and the Secret Service and law enforcement agencies and Mayor Bowser days before J****** 6, and asked them, 'Do you want thousands of National Guardsmen and women for J****** 6?'" Patel said in a detailed interview earlier this year." They all said no. Why did we do that? The law requires them to request it before we can deploy them. And the DOD IG found we did not delay, we actually prepared in a preemptive fashion, which is what we do at DOD."

Patel told Just the News on Wednesday night that the police timeline validated the account he has given to Congress.

"The C*****l P****e timeline shows what we have been saying for the last year — that DOD support via the National Guard was refused by the House and Senate sergeant at arms, who report to the Speaker of the House and the Senate Majority Leader," Patel said. "Now we have it in their own writing, days before J*** 6. And despite the FBI warning of potential for serious disturbance, no perimeter was established, no agents put on the street, and no fence put up."

As word circulated around the nation's capital that Sund wanted National Guardsmen deployed, District of Columbia Mayor Muriel Bowser wrote a preemptive letter to Miller and other Pentagon and Justice Department officials asking that troops not be deployed unless the Metropolitan Police Department approved, citing an incident in summer 2020, when troops were deployed at Lafayette Park near the White House during civil disobedience,
File
BowserDODLetterJan52021.pdf

Bowser wrote in her Jan. 5, 2021 letter that the earlier episode "caused confusion" and could have become "a national security threat with no way for MPD and federal law enforcement to decipher armed groups."

"To be clear, the District of Columbia is not requesting other federal law enforcement personnel and discourages any additional deployment without immediate notification to and consultation with MPD, if such plans are underway," Bowser wrote, adding she believed her police department was "well trained and prepared to lead the way" to ensure J*** 6 unfolded safely.

In the end, that did not happen. Capitol and D.C. police were overrun by r****rs, and the Guard wasn't deployed until after violence spiraled out of control, causing a mad scramble to send troops that had been offered and rejected days earlier, the records show.

The evening before J*** 6, the FBI's Norfolk, Va., office sent an explicit warning to some high-ranking officials in the C*****l P****e that there was new intelligence that some planned attendees were thinking of storming the Capitol and targeting lawmakers for violence.

Remarkably, the C*****l P****e's own after-action report concluded, that FBI intelligence warning was not shared with Sund or incorporated into the operational plan sent to police commanders and officers preparing to man the frontlines.

File
USCP-J**6AfterActionReportandRecommendations6-4-21.pdf

But with the J*** 6 event mere hours away, C*****l P****e — aware they had no National Guard backup — asked the C*****l P****e Architect to make some last-minute changes and eliminate a bike rack that initially was going to be used as a perimeter barrier. The Architect obliged but viewed the police request as ill-advised, internal emails show.

"This seems absolutely illogical," CPB Architect Brett Blanton wrote a colleague just 15 hours before the violence began. "It removes a zone of defense. If you find out a logical impetus for the change, let me know ASAP. I'll make calls to the board if necessary."
File
BlantonzemailJan52021.pdf

Reply
Jun 21, 2022 19:34:22   #
BIRDMAN
 
permafrost wrote:
When the trump republicans refuse to take part in any kind of committee, what did any of them think would happen?

this committee was formed after several court cases.. the Rep did not want to participate in any form of it..

Now stop crying as we run it in an orderly and lawful fashion.


Put me down for 100

Reply
Jun 21, 2022 19:35:18   #
BIRDMAN
 
permafrost wrote:
The object of J** 6th was to overturn the e******n in which we fired the dumb ass former occupant of the oval..
Thanks to our VP, it was stopped. And then the "bunch of r****rs" searched the capital in order to hang him...


The best you could come up with is George

Reply
Jun 21, 2022 19:36:24   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
martsiva wrote:
Are you really that stupid?? There was NO 'c**p attempt' nor was there any attempt to 'overturn' any 'elected' government!!! These are nothing but bold face lies from you and shows how easily you can be led around by your nose by your handlers and repeating like a parrot, what they tell you!! YOU show us all where the military was involved to accomplish all the things you stated because all these lies you told NEED military backing!!!


Ahhh, You lying i***t... no wonder you made trump your orange god.. so stupid..



Reply
Jun 21, 2022 19:37:55   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
dtucker300 wrote:
There was only one death the result of J****** 6th. That was an unarmed Air Force Veteran shot by a CP.


they died as a result of the attack...

Reply
Jun 21, 2022 19:40:46   #
BIRDMAN
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Trump is being convicted by testimony from his own people and lawyers. You want to blame anyone else instead of trump.


How about raping 12 women are not doing a day in jail

Reply
Jun 21, 2022 19:41:08   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
moldyoldy wrote:
After a year of lying Rudy finally has to stop.
Rudy Giuliani admitted 'we just don't have the evidence' of v***r f***d, according to testimony

https://www.businessinsider.com/rudy-giuliani-v**er-fraud-evidence-rusty-bowers-testimony-j**6-committee-2022-6?amp


Giuliani may turn out to be the weak link.. trump is failing to keep all his people following his words and Rudy has been getting a lot of heat..

Reply
Jun 21, 2022 19:43:32   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Birdmam wrote:
The best you could come up with is George


George ? George who? you seem to be short of a great deal of information relating to wh**ever you wish to say..

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 32 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.