One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Yet half the supporters repeat this every day...
Page 1 of 31 next> last>>
Jun 20, 2022 14:13:33   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Isn’t the January 6th committee pursuing Trump because of what Pelosi would have to expose on her own behalf for what she failed or refused to do?
Isn’t the January 6th committee pursuing Trump because of what Pelosi would have to expose on her own behalf for what she failed or refused to do?

These little nuggets of insanity are the only things that keep me informed of what the bizarro alternate reality of Fox News and other right wingnut/Russian propaganda outlets are dispensing to their brainwashed masses.

It absolutely blows my mind that there are people dumb enough to believe this stuff when the truth is so accessible.

Insurrection Timeline: First the Coup and Then the Cover-Up
The trial is over, but the stain on our democracy remains.
https://billmoyers.com/story/insurrection-timeline-first-the-coup-and-then-the-cover-up-updated/?fbclid=IwAR3SPwSK7O9ViWOgdyoaSo4dWFaVgvNJyk8GuVvd-TOtAoxTAevVMb4fhlE
Pelosi had nothing to do with the insurrection or with getting the National Guard there. Trump had plotted, in advance, to make sure the National Guard would not be there, and could not be gotten there. Then he opens his fat, lying mouth, and says it was Peolsi’s fault that they were not there, and based on nothing but the lies of a proven lying liar, millions of idiots keep repeating this bullshit. It’s shameful.

Icon for Trump Is A Criminal
Trump Is A Criminal
"Not only did Donald Trump NOT “offer” 10,000 national guard troops for additional security around the Capitol, he fired his secretary of defense (Esper) in order to install a lackey (Miller) who (by his order) directed the Pentagon NOT to deploy..."

Reply
Jun 20, 2022 14:29:39   #
Weasel Loc: In the Great State Of Indiana!!
 
permafrost wrote:
Isn’t the January 6th committee pursuing Trump because of what Pelosi would have to expose on her own behalf for what she failed or refused to do?
Isn’t the January 6th committee pursuing Trump because of what Pelosi would have to expose on her own behalf for what she failed or refused to do?

These little nuggets of insanity are the only things that keep me informed of what the bizarro alternate reality of Fox News and other right wingnut/Russian propaganda outlets are dispensing to their brainwashed masses.

It absolutely blows my mind that there are people dumb enough to believe this stuff when the truth is so accessible.

Insurrection Timeline: First the Coup and Then the Cover-Up
The trial is over, but the stain on our democracy remains.
https://billmoyers.com/story/insurrection-timeline-first-the-coup-and-then-the-cover-up-updated/?fbclid=IwAR3SPwSK7O9ViWOgdyoaSo4dWFaVgvNJyk8GuVvd-TOtAoxTAevVMb4fhlE
Pelosi had nothing to do with the insurrection or with getting the National Guard there. Trump had plotted, in advance, to make sure the National Guard would not be there, and could not be gotten there. Then he opens his fat, lying mouth, and says it was Peolsi’s fault that they were not there, and based on nothing but the lies of a proven lying liar, millions of idiots keep repeating this bullshit. It’s shameful.

Icon for Trump Is A Criminal
Trump Is A Criminal
"Not only did Donald Trump NOT “offer” 10,000 national guard troops for additional security around the Capitol, he fired his secretary of defense (Esper) in order to install a lackey (Miller) who (by his order) directed the Pentagon NOT to deploy..."
Isn’t the January 6th committee pursuing Trump bec... (show quote)




https://youtu.be/RRNybpPVulU

Reply
Jun 20, 2022 14:30:05   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
permafrost wrote:
Isn’t the January 6th committee pursuing Trump because of what Pelosi would have to expose on her own behalf for what she failed or refused to do?
Isn’t the January 6th committee pursuing Trump because of what Pelosi would have to expose on her own behalf for what she failed or refused to do?

These little nuggets of insanity are the only things that keep me informed of what the bizarro alternate reality of Fox News and other right wingnut/Russian propaganda outlets are dispensing to their brainwashed masses.

It absolutely blows my mind that there are people dumb enough to believe this stuff when the truth is so accessible.

Insurrection Timeline: First the Coup and Then the Cover-Up
The trial is over, but the stain on our democracy remains.
https://billmoyers.com/story/insurrection-timeline-first-the-coup-and-then-the-cover-up-updated/?fbclid=IwAR3SPwSK7O9ViWOgdyoaSo4dWFaVgvNJyk8GuVvd-TOtAoxTAevVMb4fhlE
Pelosi had nothing to do with the insurrection or with getting the National Guard there. Trump had plotted, in advance, to make sure the National Guard would not be there, and could not be gotten there. Then he opens his fat, lying mouth, and says it was Peolsi’s fault that they were not there, and based on nothing but the lies of a proven lying liar, millions of idiots keep repeating this bullshit. It’s shameful.

Icon for Trump Is A Criminal
Trump Is A Criminal
"Not only did Donald Trump NOT “offer” 10,000 national guard troops for additional security around the Capitol, he fired his secretary of defense (Esper) in order to install a lackey (Miller) who (by his order) directed the Pentagon NOT to deploy..."
Isn’t the January 6th committee pursuing Trump bec... (show quote)


Don't you have boogers to pick? That would be a better use of your time.

Reply
 
 
Jun 20, 2022 14:59:09   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
permafrost wrote:
Isn’t the January 6th committee pursuing Trump because of what Pelosi would have to expose on her own behalf for what she failed or refused to do?
Isn’t the January 6th committee pursuing Trump because of what Pelosi would have to expose on her own behalf for what she failed or refused to do?

These little nuggets of insanity are the only things that keep me informed of what the bizarro alternate reality of Fox News and other right wingnut/Russian propaganda outlets are dispensing to their brainwashed masses.

It absolutely blows my mind that there are people dumb enough to believe this stuff when the truth is so accessible.

Insurrection Timeline: First the Coup and Then the Cover-Up
The trial is over, but the stain on our democracy remains.
https://billmoyers.com/story/insurrection-timeline-first-the-coup-and-then-the-cover-up-updated/?fbclid=IwAR3SPwSK7O9ViWOgdyoaSo4dWFaVgvNJyk8GuVvd-TOtAoxTAevVMb4fhlE
Pelosi had nothing to do with the insurrection or with getting the National Guard there. Trump had plotted, in advance, to make sure the National Guard would not be there, and could not be gotten there. Then he opens his fat, lying mouth, and says it was Peolsi’s fault that they were not there, and based on nothing but the lies of a proven lying liar, millions of idiots keep repeating this bullshit. It’s shameful.

Icon for Trump Is A Criminal
Trump Is A Criminal
"Not only did Donald Trump NOT “offer” 10,000 national guard troops for additional security around the Capitol, he fired his secretary of defense (Esper) in order to install a lackey (Miller) who (by his order) directed the Pentagon NOT to deploy..."
Isn’t the January 6th committee pursuing Trump bec... (show quote)
FACT: Congress has no power to conduct a criminal investigation, not to mention a criminal trial.

The Evidence Trump Requested 10,000 National Guard Troops on January 6th That “Fact Checkers” Are Ignoring

With the anniversary of January 6th having passed earlier this month, Donald Trump’s claim that he requested national guard troops ahead of that day has been scrutinized by the so-called “fact checkers” once again. While a number have been published in recent weeks, I’ll be addressing Politifact’s from last year, as I’ve made a habit of specifically going after their godawful “fact checks.”

Sports reporter turned pretend fact checker Tom Kertscher attempted to fact check Donald Trump’s claim that he “requested 10,000 national guard troops for January 6th, which Pelosi denied.” Trump first made the claim during a February 28, 2021 interview on Fox News. When asked if he thought there was anything he could’ve done differently by host Steve Hilton, Trump replied “We said to the Department of Defense, the top person, days before we had the rally … I requested … I definitely gave the number of 10,000 National Guardsmen, I think you should have 10,000 of the National Guard ready. They took that number. From what I understand, they gave it to the people at the Capitol, which is controlled by Pelosi. And I heard they rejected it because they didn’t think it would look good. So, you know, that was a big mistake.”

Sportsball’s rebuttal is as follows:

* He quotes an article in far-left Vanity Fair quoting then acting defense secretary Christopher Miller met with Trump on the night of January 5th, and Trump asked Miller how many troops the Pentagon planned to deploy to D.C. the next day, but “There is no clear evidence that Trump made a request for 10,000 National Guard troops.”
* He says “a Defense Department spokesman said the department ‘has no record of such an order being given’ by Trump. This quote is anonymous and unsourced, and I cannot find it in any publication besides the PolitiFact article quoting it.
* In a February 23, 2021 Senate hearing, former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund said he met with the former House sergeant-at-arms Paul Irving (who reports to Pelosi), and former Senate sergeant-at-arms Michael Stenger, and that he requested the National Guard deploy troops on January 6th. Irving testified that he didn’t “take the discussion as a request,” and that the three men agreed there was no need for troops.

Now unlike most of my fact checks of fact checks, this isn’t a case where there’s a clear verdict. In fact, whether or not you believe Trump’s claims boils down to which officials you happen to trust. Kertscher is only quoting those who contradict Trump, but there are others who seconded his claim.

Former Acting Director of National Intelligence Ric Grenell blasted the “fact check,” stating that Kertscher is focusing on the lack of a formal request, “But the leaders of the Pentagon then made clear they offered Pelosi and she said No.”

Kash Patel, who served as acting United States Secretary of Defense, also supported the “10,000 national guard” claim, explaining to Hannity earlier this month:

"I was in the Oval Office on that day, days prior to January 6, with the secretary of defense, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and others and President Trump.

And he authorized, as the law requires, 10,000 to 20,000 National Guardsmen and Women to be utilized around the country. But the second part of the law requires a federal agency or governor or mayor, such as the United States Capitol Police or Mayor Bowser to make a request, otherwise, the National Guard cannot be deployed legally."

…….

Biden’s DOD inspector general himself said the Trump administration DOD did not delay or obstruct their response to January 6th and Mayor Bowser and the Capitol police repeatedly in writing refused to request the National Guard. And that’s in the report and it’s in the DOD records, and I wonder why so many people aren’t asking for it.

Hannity asked “for the National Guard to have been called up, that had to be approved by Nancy Pelosi. Is that the correct chain of command?” and Patel clarified:

Well, Nancy Pelosi supervises the United States Capitol Police. That’s the federal agency and Mayor Bowser who would have requested the National Guard. So I can’t imagine the universe where the United States Capitol Police didn’t consult with their chain of command to make that request.

…..

It’s backed up by writing; Mayor Bowser’s written refusal, the communications between the leader of the Capitol police and their chain of command to the DOD refusing our request to allow National Guardsmen and Women to stage on January 4 and January 5, before January 6. That’s in the timeline.

So we have a case where it’s Patel and Grenell’s word against Miller’s and Sund’s. An honest “fact checker” would rate this sort of claim “disputed,” yet PolitiFact opted for a “false” rating because their goal is to silence the narrative, not actually discover if it’s true or not. Kertscher writes there’s “No proof Trump requested 10,000 Guard troops for Jan. 6 or that Pelosi denied it” – but there’s certainty evidence for it – evidence that was conveniently ignored.

Reply
Jun 20, 2022 15:06:45   #
Tiptop789 Loc: State of Denial
 
Blade_Runner wrote:
FACT: Congress has no power to conduct a criminal investigation, not to mention a criminal trial.

The Evidence Trump Requested 10,000 National Guard Troops on January 6th That “Fact Checkers” Are Ignoring

With the anniversary of January 6th having passed earlier this month, Donald Trump’s claim that he requested national guard troops ahead of that day has been scrutinized by the so-called “fact checkers” once again. While a number have been published in recent weeks, I’ll be addressing Politifact’s from last year, as I’ve made a habit of specifically going after their godawful “fact checks.”

Sports reporter turned pretend fact checker Tom Kertscher attempted to fact check Donald Trump’s claim that he “requested 10,000 national guard troops for January 6th, which Pelosi denied.” Trump first made the claim during a February 28, 2021 interview on Fox News. When asked if he thought there was anything he could’ve done differently by host Steve Hilton, Trump replied “We said to the Department of Defense, the top person, days before we had the rally … I requested … I definitely gave the number of 10,000 National Guardsmen, I think you should have 10,000 of the National Guard ready. They took that number. From what I understand, they gave it to the people at the Capitol, which is controlled by Pelosi. And I heard they rejected it because they didn’t think it would look good. So, you know, that was a big mistake.”

Sportsball’s rebuttal is as follows:

* He quotes an article in far-left Vanity Fair quoting then acting defense secretary Christopher Miller met with Trump on the night of January 5th, and Trump asked Miller how many troops the Pentagon planned to deploy to D.C. the next day, but “There is no clear evidence that Trump made a request for 10,000 National Guard troops.”
* He says “a Defense Department spokesman said the department ‘has no record of such an order being given’ by Trump. This quote is anonymous and unsourced, and I cannot find it in any publication besides the PolitiFact article quoting it.
* In a February 23, 2021 Senate hearing, former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund said he met with the former House sergeant-at-arms Paul Irving (who reports to Pelosi), and former Senate sergeant-at-arms Michael Stenger, and that he requested the National Guard deploy troops on January 6th. Irving testified that he didn’t “take the discussion as a request,” and that the three men agreed there was no need for troops.

Now unlike most of my fact checks of fact checks, this isn’t a case where there’s a clear verdict. In fact, whether or not you believe Trump’s claims boils down to which officials you happen to trust. Kertscher is only quoting those who contradict Trump, but there are others who seconded his claim.

Former Acting Director of National Intelligence Ric Grenell blasted the “fact check,” stating that Kertscher is focusing on the lack of a formal request, “But the leaders of the Pentagon then made clear they offered Pelosi and she said No.”

Kash Patel, who served as acting United States Secretary of Defense, also supported the “10,000 national guard” claim, explaining to Hannity earlier this month:

"I was in the Oval Office on that day, days prior to January 6, with the secretary of defense, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and others and President Trump.

And he authorized, as the law requires, 10,000 to 20,000 National Guardsmen and Women to be utilized around the country. But the second part of the law requires a federal agency or governor or mayor, such as the United States Capitol Police or Mayor Bowser to make a request, otherwise, the National Guard cannot be deployed legally."

…….

Biden’s DOD inspector general himself said the Trump administration DOD did not delay or obstruct their response to January 6th and Mayor Bowser and the Capitol police repeatedly in writing refused to request the National Guard. And that’s in the report and it’s in the DOD records, and I wonder why so many people aren’t asking for it.

Hannity asked “for the National Guard to have been called up, that had to be approved by Nancy Pelosi. Is that the correct chain of command?” and Patel clarified:

Well, Nancy Pelosi supervises the United States Capitol Police. That’s the federal agency and Mayor Bowser who would have requested the National Guard. So I can’t imagine the universe where the United States Capitol Police didn’t consult with their chain of command to make that request.

…..

It’s backed up by writing; Mayor Bowser’s written refusal, the communications between the leader of the Capitol police and their chain of command to the DOD refusing our request to allow National Guardsmen and Women to stage on January 4 and January 5, before January 6. That’s in the timeline.

So we have a case where it’s Patel and Grenell’s word against Miller’s and Sund’s. An honest “fact checker” would rate this sort of claim “disputed,” yet PolitiFact opted for a “false” rating because their goal is to silence the narrative, not actually discover if it’s true or not. Kertscher writes there’s “No proof Trump requested 10,000 Guard troops for Jan. 6 or that Pelosi denied it” – but there’s certainty evidence for it – evidence that was conveniently ignored.
FACT: Congress has no power to conduct a criminal ... (show quote)


DoJ and also the state of GA may convene grand juries

Reply
Jun 20, 2022 15:10:15   #
archie bunker Loc: Texas
 
Tiptop789 wrote:
DoJ and also the state of GA may convene grand juries


May?

Reply
Jun 20, 2022 15:55:52   #
pegw
 
Tiptop789 wrote:
DoJ and also the state of GA may convene grand juries


Georgia has a grand jury sitting now about Trump's attempt to change the outcome of the election. Apparently it is no longer just investigating Trump's call, but have windened their net.

Reply
 
 
Jun 20, 2022 16:01:02   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
permafrost wrote:
Isn’t the January 6th committee pursuing Trump because of what Pelosi would have to expose on her own behalf for what she failed or refused to do?
Isn’t the January 6th committee pursuing Trump because of what Pelosi would have to expose on her own behalf for what she failed or refused to do?

These little nuggets of insanity are the only things that keep me informed of what the bizarro alternate reality of Fox News and other right wingnut/Russian propaganda outlets are dispensing to their brainwashed masses.

It absolutely blows my mind that there are people dumb enough to believe this stuff when the truth is so accessible.

Insurrection Timeline: First the Coup and Then the Cover-Up
The trial is over, but the stain on our democracy remains.
https://billmoyers.com/story/insurrection-timeline-first-the-coup-and-then-the-cover-up-updated/?fbclid=IwAR3SPwSK7O9ViWOgdyoaSo4dWFaVgvNJyk8GuVvd-TOtAoxTAevVMb4fhlE
Pelosi had nothing to do with the insurrection or with getting the National Guard there. Trump had plotted, in advance, to make sure the National Guard would not be there, and could not be gotten there. Then he opens his fat, lying mouth, and says it was Peolsi’s fault that they were not there, and based on nothing but the lies of a proven lying liar, millions of idiots keep repeating this bullshit. It’s shameful.

Icon for Trump Is A Criminal
Trump Is A Criminal
"Not only did Donald Trump NOT “offer” 10,000 national guard troops for additional security around the Capitol, he fired his secretary of defense (Esper) in order to install a lackey (Miller) who (by his order) directed the Pentagon NOT to deploy..."
Isn’t the January 6th committee pursuing Trump bec... (show quote)


When you start with bull shit, there is no reason to read on.
***Insurrection Timeline: First the Coup and Then the Cover-Up
>>>There was no Insurrection or Timeline: There was no Coup and no Cover-Up. Or were you referring to the obama/biden sponsored insurrection and coup in Ukraine in 2014 that really started this current war?

Reply
Jun 20, 2022 16:02:53   #
Blade_Runner Loc: DARK SIDE OF THE MOON
 
pegw wrote:
Georgia has a grand jury sitting now about Trump's attempt to change the outcome of the election. Apparently it is no longer just investigating Trump's call, but have windened their net.
If Trump did, in fact, attempt to change the outcome of the election, it is a nothing burger in comparison to what the high priests of secular progressivism (democrats) actually did to change the outcome of the election.

Reply
Jun 20, 2022 16:38:10   #
dtucker300 Loc: Vista, CA
 
pegw wrote:
Georgia has a grand jury sitting now about Trump's attempt to change the outcome of the election. Apparently it is no longer just investigating Trump's call, but have windened their net.


And you continue to lie and spout misinformation. It is even more obvious you didn't read the Article from the Federalists, you lying sack of ****.

Quote:
In his widely misrepresented telephone call with the Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffenperger, Trump said, “All I want to do is this: I just want to find 11,780 votes.” Trump’s legal team had found the votes, but the Georgia courts refused to timely consider Trump’s challenges.

What Barr didn’t investigate—and indeed shouldn’t have investigated—were the many violations of state election law highlighted by Trump’s legal team in their lawsuits challenging the election results. For instance, in Georgia, the state election code requires residents to “vote in the county in which they reside, unless they changed their residence within 30 days of the election” and “outside of the 30-day grace period, if people vote in a county in which they no longer reside, ‘their vote in that county would be illegal.’”

Trump’s legal team obtained solid evidence that as many as 30,000 Georgia residents voted illegally in their prior county in 2020. Trump never had his day in court on this challenge, though, which theoretically could have resulted in Georgia’s election results tossed.

That’s not the business of the attorney general, however, so those Republicans seeing Barr as derelict misunderstand his role. Likewise, those Democrats championing Barr’s words, believing it establishes a coup attempt by Trump, ignore that his testimony focused solely on election fraud.
In his widely misrepresented telephone call with t... (show quote)

Reply
Jun 20, 2022 19:09:27   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
LogicallyRight wrote:
When you start with bull shit, there is no reason to read on.
***Insurrection Timeline: First the Coup and Then the Cover-Up
>>>There was no Insurrection or Timeline: There was no Coup and no Cover-Up. Or were you referring to the obama/biden sponsored insurrection and coup in Ukraine in 2014 that really started this current war?


The coup attempt was unsuccessful, but we still should hang them for the attempt to overturn our elected government, and we sure as heck need to wring the necks of all the leaders..

Reply
 
 
Jun 20, 2022 21:27:12   #
David L
 
permafrost wrote:
Isn’t the January 6th committee pursuing Trump because of what Pelosi would have to expose on her own behalf for what she failed or refused to do?
Isn’t the January 6th committee pursuing Trump because of what Pelosi would have to expose on her own behalf for what she failed or refused to do?

These little nuggets of insanity are the only things that keep me informed of what the bizarro alternate reality of Fox News and other right wingnut/Russian propaganda outlets are dispensing to their brainwashed masses.

It absolutely blows my mind that there are people dumb enough to believe this stuff when the truth is so accessible.

Insurrection Timeline: First the Coup and Then the Cover-Up
The trial is over, but the stain on our democracy remains.
https://billmoyers.com/story/insurrection-timeline-first-the-coup-and-then-the-cover-up-updated/?fbclid=IwAR3SPwSK7O9ViWOgdyoaSo4dWFaVgvNJyk8GuVvd-TOtAoxTAevVMb4fhlE
Pelosi had nothing to do with the insurrection or with getting the National Guard there. Trump had plotted, in advance, to make sure the National Guard would not be there, and could not be gotten there. Then he opens his fat, lying mouth, and says it was Peolsi’s fault that they were not there, and based on nothing but the lies of a proven lying liar, millions of idiots keep repeating this bullshit. It’s shameful.

Icon for Trump Is A Criminal
Trump Is A Criminal
"Not only did Donald Trump NOT “offer” 10,000 national guard troops for additional security around the Capitol, he fired his secretary of defense (Esper) in order to install a lackey (Miller) who (by his order) directed the Pentagon NOT to deploy..."
Isn’t the January 6th committee pursuing Trump bec... (show quote)


Frosty, where in the hell do you find such drivel?

Reply
Jun 20, 2022 21:42:57   #
Birdmam
 
permafrost wrote:
Isn’t the January 6th committee pursuing Trump because of what Pelosi would have to expose on her own behalf for what she failed or refused to do?
Isn’t the January 6th committee pursuing Trump because of what Pelosi would have to expose on her own behalf for what she failed or refused to do?

These little nuggets of insanity are the only things that keep me informed of what the bizarro alternate reality of Fox News and other right wingnut/Russian propaganda outlets are dispensing to their brainwashed masses.

It absolutely blows my mind that there are people dumb enough to believe this stuff when the truth is so accessible.

Insurrection Timeline: First the Coup and Then the Cover-Up
The trial is over, but the stain on our democracy remains.
https://billmoyers.com/story/insurrection-timeline-first-the-coup-and-then-the-cover-up-updated/?fbclid=IwAR3SPwSK7O9ViWOgdyoaSo4dWFaVgvNJyk8GuVvd-TOtAoxTAevVMb4fhlE
Pelosi had nothing to do with the insurrection or with getting the National Guard there. Trump had plotted, in advance, to make sure the National Guard would not be there, and could not be gotten there. Then he opens his fat, lying mouth, and says it was Peolsi’s fault that they were not there, and based on nothing but the lies of a proven lying liar, millions of idiots keep repeating this bullshit. It’s shameful.

Icon for Trump Is A Criminal
Trump Is A Criminal
"Not only did Donald Trump NOT “offer” 10,000 national guard troops for additional security around the Capitol, he fired his secretary of defense (Esper) in order to install a lackey (Miller) who (by his order) directed the Pentagon NOT to deploy..."
Isn’t the January 6th committee pursuing Trump bec... (show quote)


Trump plotted so the National Guard would not be there you have it backwards it was Pelosi

Reply
Jun 20, 2022 22:42:57   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
David L wrote:
Frosty, where in the hell do you find such drivel?


This is a very poor post, what I posted is quite short, but is mixed with the OP to which I responded..

Mine was not the drivel part...



Reply
Jun 20, 2022 22:47:41   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Birdmam wrote:
Trump plotted so the National Guard would not be there you have it backwards it was Pelosi


Pelosi is not in charge of the National Guard.. trump had calls made to keep the NG away...

Pelosi did not keep the NG away on Jan 6th



Reply
Page 1 of 31 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2022 IDF International Technologies, Inc.