192 in congress v**e against baby formula.
May 25, 2022 09:07:39 #
4430 wrote:
looks like you post stuff and then can't remember ... (show quote)
You have No rights over a woman’s body.
Wh**ever is inside a woman’s body is none of your concern .
You can’t check to see what’s in her pockets but you still believe you have a right to defend what’s in her womb.
This is ridiculous.
There are no babies in the womb.
May 25, 2022 09:10:45 #
Ferrous wrote:
The Infant Formula Supplemental Appropriations Act... (show quote)
Trump devastated The FDA before he left.
Anything going to the FDA is what already should have been there.
May 25, 2022 09:12:52 #
4430 wrote:
I don't have time right now to read the whole bill but a fast scan I didn't find anything to do with baby formulas .
You don’t have time ????
You seem to have enough time to complain about the article not being posted but now it looks like another empty rrpublican complaint.
May 25, 2022 09:16:27 #
Rose42 wrote:
Milosia posted the OP to troll. No other reason. She’s no different than those on the right who do the same thing
I posted it because 192 Rrpublicans v**ed against babies having formula.
Only 12 there with a shred a decency left in them .
The 192 are the monsters you should be composing about.
Greedy bunch o baby h**ers.
May 25, 2022 09:56:05 #
nwtk2007
Loc: Texas
Milosia2 wrote:
I posted it because 192 Rrpublicans v**ed against babies having formula.
Only 12 there with a shred a decency left in them .
The 192 are the monsters you should be composing about.
Greedy bunch o baby h**ers.
Only 12 there with a shred a decency left in them .
The 192 are the monsters you should be composing about.
Greedy bunch o baby h**ers.
What part of that bill gets babies formula? It's needed now. This was a known problem, exacerbated by the FDA and no action taken until too late. It's just typical of this admin and the typical dem response is to throw money at it.
May 25, 2022 10:43:03 #
JR-57 wrote:
Two thumbs up. 👍🏻👍🏻 He, she, it, they, them can barely explain their position on topics let alone why they support that position. Now you’re asking he, she, it, they, them to explain their actions?
She makes no effort to write clearly. I doubt she knows why she does it
May 25, 2022 10:48:06 #
Milosia2 wrote:
I posted it because 192 Rrpublicans v**ed against babies having formula.
Only 12 there with a shred a decency left in them .
The 192 are the monsters you should be composing about.
Greedy bunch o baby h**ers.
Only 12 there with a shred a decency left in them .
The 192 are the monsters you should be composing about.
Greedy bunch o baby h**ers.
You have a trouble with honesty. Why do you make such foolish statements?
May 25, 2022 11:03:28 #
Milosia2 wrote:
Why do they h**e babies ?????
Ask the Democrats they are the one's that fight hard to k**l babies and it's the Republican's that fight hard to stop murdering babies !
You don't seem capable of understanding that !
May 25, 2022 11:06:07 #
Milosia2 wrote:
I posted it because 192 Rrpublicans v**ed against babies having formula.
Only 12 there with a shred a decency left in them .
The 192 are the monsters you should be composing about.
Greedy bunch o baby h**ers.
Only 12 there with a shred a decency left in them .
The 192 are the monsters you should be composing about.
Greedy bunch o baby h**ers.
There is not any bill v**ed on that hasn't got some stupid stuff added to it !
Sometimes one can only v**e NO because of it !
May 25, 2022 11:08:11 #
Milosia2 wrote:
You don’t have time ????
You seem to have enough time to complain about the article not being posted but now it looks like another empty rrpublican complaint.
You seem to have enough time to complain about the article not being posted but now it looks like another empty rrpublican complaint.
The bill you posted had absolutely nothing to do with baby formula when I did a quick glance !
May 25, 2022 11:09:13 #
4430 wrote:
Ask the Democrats they are the one's that fight hard to k**l babies and it's the Republican's that fight hard to stop murdering babies !
You don't seem capable of understanding that !
You don't seem capable of understanding that !
Republicans just protect fetuses. They care less about infants.
Highest mortality rates are in red states.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/infant_mortality_rates/infant_mortality.htm
May 25, 2022 11:22:29 #
RascalRiley wrote:
Republicans just protect fetuses. They care less about infants.
Highest mortality rates are in red states.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/infant_mortality_rates/infant_mortality.htm
Highest mortality rates are in red states.
https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/pressroom/sosmap/infant_mortality_rates/infant_mortality.htm
O Hogwash
California has the highest number and it isn't red and your claim has no bearing that Republican's don't care about infants !
Lets face it you love the Dems that love k**l fully formed babies clear up to birth then have the audacity to blame Republican's for not caring that's a ridiculous insult !
Why didn't you post the reason for Causes of Infant Mortality
It's because you prefer to post part of the story and skip over the rest of the story !
Causes of Infant Mortality
Almost 21,000 infants died in the United States in 2018. The five leading causes of infant death in 2018 were:
Birth defects.
Preterm birth and low birth weight.
Injuries (e.g., suffocation).
Sudden infant death syndrome.
Maternal pregnancy complications.
May 25, 2022 11:29:59 #
4430 wrote:
O Hogwash br br California has the highest numbe... (show quote)
Since when is 3.69 high than 8.27?
May 25, 2022 12:47:34 #
Rose42 wrote:
Why do you troll?
Thank you, Rose42... you saved me the time to have to answer this fool.
The guy is so dense he couldn't see that the children were only getting 18% of the $28 million while the bureaucrats were getting 82% of the pie.
"The typical charity spends 75 percent of its budget on programs, according to CharityNavigator. Look for nonprofits that hit or come close to the benchmark. The rest of a typical charity's budget goes to administrative costs (15 percent) and fundraising (10 percent)."
May 25, 2022 12:49:38 #
RascalRiley wrote:
Since when is 3.69 high than 8.27?
I was looking at the total deaths
California 1,651 Deaths
Illinory 1214
Texas 1918
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.