One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
192 in congress v**e against baby formula.
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
May 24, 2022 18:59:53   #
4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory
 
Rose42 wrote:
You have no idea what you’re talking about or what my circle is.

You didn’t post a story either. Next time just post the story without your nonsense


Yep you're spot On when ever these posters type in something I pay little to no never mind to it no link or I'm not buying it !

Reply
May 24, 2022 22:24:55   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
JR-57 wrote:
$28 million. Nothing less than a bonus rewarding their incompetence.


I would make the corporations responsible for this shortage pay for it all.
I mean they all h**e Socialism , right !!!
It wouldn’t be fair for the government to pay what probably was already paid for 20 times over.
Stop the socialism and make the corporations pay for their screw ups.
Instead of poppa Uncle Sam bailing them out.
Stop the c*******m .
No more military flights for private enterprise.

Reply
May 24, 2022 22:28:26   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
liberalh****r wrote:
Just the babies your liberal Pregnant men give birth to....... we have a song to sing while those man bun birthers of the zero testosterone group are dilating...... there they sit with cheeks a flexin,, giving birth to a baby progressive..

Sorry you don't get to k**l them all.... make the ones you missed move to a nice East or West coast liberal city....... good chance your polices will get him k**led there...... win- win for ya.


Saying men can have babies doesn’t mean they will .
Another false premise report from the right.

Reply
 
 
May 24, 2022 23:49:25   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Milosia2 wrote:
Saying men can have babies doesn’t mean they will .
Another false premise report from the right.


The only falsehood would be the female, claiming to be a man, gets pregnant and has a baby. A man did not have a baby, except in the minds of the "woke."

Reply
May 25, 2022 05:38:20   #
Ferrous Loc: Pacific North Coast, CA
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
What else was in the bill?


The Infant Formula Supplemental Appropriations Act

"WASHINGTON – On a bipartisan 231 to 192 v**e, the House today passed H.R. 7790, a supplemental appropriations bill to provide $28 million in emergency funding to give the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the resources it needs to address the urgent infant formula shortage."

$28 million with $23 million going to “administrative costs and salaries.”

The House has 225 Democrats and 210 Republicans

192 Republican Reps v**ed "No" on this waste, 4 not v****g, and and 12 yes v**es

The other v**e alongside of it, the Access to Baby Formula Act passed 414-9 (overwhelming Bipartisan v**e

milosa writes these BS articles always leaving out information; this time as to why there was 192 Republican Reps (91.4%) v****g against a bill that would supply formula to children.

I applaud the 192 (R) Reps and question the 12 (R) Reps that v**ed for it... and why does it not surprise me that all 219 (D) Reps (one didn't v**e) follwed Party Line like good little Demibots

$23 million (82%) of the $28 million going to "grow the bureaucracy at the FDA" while the children get $5 million (18%)

.

Reply
May 25, 2022 06:21:33   #
JR-57 Loc: South Carolina
 
Milosia2 wrote:
I would make the corporations responsible for this shortage pay for it all.
I mean they all h**e Socialism , right !!!
It wouldn’t be fair for the government to pay what probably was already paid for 20 times over.
Stop the socialism and make the corporations pay for their screw ups.
Instead of poppa Uncle Sam bailing them out.
Stop the c*******m .
No more military flights for private enterprise.

The corporations AND private citizens DO pay for it all. In the form of tax dollars! Where do you think the government gets their money? The government can’t give something to someone without first taking it from another.

Reply
May 25, 2022 07:23:35   #
4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory
 
Milosia2 wrote:
Saying men can have babies doesn’t mean they will .
Another false premise report from the right.


Men CANNOT have Babies and this is not from the right for pete's sake it's just common sense something the progressive left doesn't have any of !

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2022 07:45:13   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Ferrous wrote:
The Infant Formula Supplemental Appropriations Act

"WASHINGTON – On a bipartisan 231 to 192 v**e, the House today passed H.R. 7790, a supplemental appropriations bill to provide $28 million in emergency funding to give the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the resources it needs to address the urgent infant formula shortage."

$28 million with $23 million going to “administrative costs and salaries.”

The House has 225 Democrats and 210 Republicans

192 Republican Reps v**ed "No" on this waste, 4 not v****g, and and 12 yes v**es

The other v**e alongside of it, the Access to Baby Formula Act passed 414-9 (overwhelming Bipartisan v**e

milosa writes these BS articles always leaving out information; this time as to why there was 192 Republican Reps (91.4%) v****g against a bill that would supply formula to children.

I applaud the 192 (R) Reps and question the 12 (R) Reps that v**ed for it... and why does it not surprise me that all 219 (D) Reps (one didn't v**e) follwed Party Line like good little Demibots

$23 million (82%) of the $28 million going to "grow the bureaucracy at the FDA" while the children get $5 million (18%)

.
The Infant Formula Supplemental Appropriations Act... (show quote)


And there you have it.

Reply
May 25, 2022 08:13:13   #
EmilyD
 
Milosia2 wrote:
Saying men can have babies doesn’t mean they will .
Another false premise report from the right.

Saying men can have babies is silly. How can anyone take you seriously after saying something so absurd?

Reply
May 25, 2022 08:42:41   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
Ferrous wrote:
The Infant Formula Supplemental Appropriations Act

"WASHINGTON – On a bipartisan 231 to 192 v**e, the House today passed H.R. 7790, a supplemental appropriations bill to provide $28 million in emergency funding to give the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) the resources it needs to address the urgent infant formula shortage."

$28 million with $23 million going to “administrative costs and salaries.”

The House has 225 Democrats and 210 Republicans

192 Republican Reps v**ed "No" on this waste, 4 not v****g, and and 12 yes v**es

The other v**e alongside of it, the Access to Baby Formula Act passed 414-9 (overwhelming Bipartisan v**e

milosa writes these BS articles always leaving out information; this time as to why there was 192 Republican Reps (91.4%) v****g against a bill that would supply formula to children.

I applaud the 192 (R) Reps and question the 12 (R) Reps that v**ed for it... and why does it not surprise me that all 219 (D) Reps (one didn't v**e) follwed Party Line like good little Demibots

$23 million (82%) of the $28 million going to "grow the bureaucracy at the FDA" while the children get $5 million (18%)

.
The Infant Formula Supplemental Appropriations Act... (show quote)


Why do they h**e babies ?????

Reply
May 25, 2022 08:46:52   #
Rose42
 
Milosia2 wrote:
Why do they h**e babies ?????


Why do you troll?

Reply
 
 
May 25, 2022 08:47:54   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
JR-57 wrote:
The corporations AND private citizens DO pay for it all. In the form of tax dollars! Where do you think the government gets their money? The government can’t give something to someone without first taking it from another.


Private enterprise has no right to use military airlifts.
Period.
Some private citizens and Zero corporations pay for it.
Whom pays for it is moot argument.
What you are condoning is called
Socialism !!!!!
S O C I A L I S M
It’s what’s for supper.
Typical for the right to try altering the zeitgeist to favor their own d********g Greed.
The thing about Dogchit analogies
Is that they Always wind up benefiting you.
Never the other way around.
Rick Scott has a plan .
To Tax the 47% of this country who pays no Taxes.
Can you believe it ??????
A Republican who wants to raise Taxes ????
That 47% would infants , old and infirm , students , single mothers , for Chrissakes
I was just starting to like that guy.
And the government doesn’t have any money.
It borrows it from the rich people whom we pay $3Trillion / year for loans already taken.
And of course the 3 Trillion that Trump gave those people we borrow this money from as a Tax Break!
Go figure.

Reply
May 25, 2022 08:51:48   #
JR-57 Loc: South Carolina
 
Rose42 wrote:
Why do you troll?

Two thumbs up. 👍🏻👍🏻 He, she, it, they, them can barely explain their position on topics let alone why they support that position. Now you’re asking he, she, it, they, them to explain their actions?

Reply
May 25, 2022 08:56:38   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
Rose42 wrote:
Why do you troll?


I offer an independent adjunct to to the opp nonsense.
But, really , why do they h**e babies ?
Simple question .
I think you have trolls on the brain.

Reply
May 25, 2022 09:03:14   #
JR-57 Loc: South Carolina
 
Milosia2 wrote:
Private enterprise has no right to use military airlifts.
Period.
Some private citizens and Zero corporations pay for it.
Whom pays for it is moot argument.
What you are condoning is called
Socialism !!!!!
S O C I A L I S M
It’s what’s for supper.
Typical for the right to try altering the zeitgeist to favor their own d********g Greed.
The thing about Dogchit analogies
Is that they Always wind up benefiting you.
Never the other way around.
Rick Scott has a plan .
To Tax the 47% of this country who pays no Taxes.
Can you believe it ??????
A Republican who wants to raise Taxes ????
That 47% would infants , old and infirm , students , single mothers , for Chrissakes
I was just starting to like that guy.
Private enterprise has no right to use military ai... (show quote)

I’m against private enterprise using anything U.S. military owned.

You’re hilarious. Thanks for the chuckle.

Your earlier comment: “I would make the corporations responsible for this shortage pay for it all.
I mean they all h**e Socialism , right !!! It wouldn’t be fair for the government to pay what probably was already paid for 20 times over. Stop the socialism and make the corporations pay for their screw ups.Instead of poppa Uncle Sam bailing them out.”

Your above comment: “Whom pays for it is moot argument.”

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.