Ri-chard Loc: 23322

Wasn't my words, not my documents, the opinion is theirs not mine, they said what they said and signed the documents. I do not consent to their frauds and deceits. I note you have no factual rebuttal, and that means it hurt your little mind.
Therefore, I will ease it for you. It would be best for you to stick with, George chopped down a cherry tree and could not tell a lie. And the other Mason flew a kite in an electrical storm with a key on the string and said we have a Republic, if we can keep it. Now get your coloring book out and color the pages as you see fit.

guzzimaestro

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

sorry about that, start answering an existing post and lose the subject..

Age for v****g.. I would like it back as 21.. that makes for more adult style thinking and covers most of the "if old enough for this, they should be able to do that" objections. but a great deal to considr.

Must be a citizen, released felons.. that part is more complicated, many who have done the time should get back the v**e.. but easy to find examples in which I never want them to v**e or even exist for that matter..

sorry I did not follow your instructions.. should have done so. I helped ruin a good thread..

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Mr. chard, you post is so silly that no one is going to take the time for rebuttal.. simply look at history, any time frame. then show me how England and the pope ruled the events.. foreign or domestic..

Ri-chard Loc: 23322

Did read and understand the introduction to the King's 1783 Treaty? He clearly claims his Vatican title bestowed on him by the Holy Roman Empire. he told all what his authority was a Arch-treasurer $$$$ and Prince E*****r = Vatican v**es.
There was no word magic in this document that was signed by the King's men as his Esquires.

BTW Do you think it was possible King George kept passing on his authorities and capacities to the next in command and they all did the same pertaining to being the Arch-Treasurer of the United States of America?

Is it OK with you that Queen Elizabeth controls over and has amended U.S. Social Security Program?
Again, not my words or claims.

S.I. 1997 NO.1778 The Social Security ( United States of America)
Order 1997 Made 22nd of July 1997 coming into force 1st September 1997. At the Court at Buckingham Palace the 22nd day of July 1997. Now, therefore Her Majesty an pursuance of section 179 (1) (a) and (2) of the Social Security Administration Act of 1992 and all other powers enabling Her in that behalf, is please, by and with advise of Her privy Council, to order, and it is hereby ordered as follows:

"This Order may be cited as the Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997 and shall come into force on 1st September 1997."


Does this give a new meaning to Federal Judge William Wayne Justice
stating in court that he takes his orders from England? This order goes on to redefine words in the Social Security Act and makes some changes in United States Law.

Remember, King George was the "Arch-Treasurer and Prince E*****r of the Holy Roman Empire and c, and of the United States of America." See: Treaty of Peace (1783) 8 U.S. Statutes at Large. Great Britain which is the agent for the Pope, is in charge of the USA 'plantation.'

What people do not know is that the so called Founding Fathers
and King George were working hand-n-hand to bring the people of America to their knees, to install a Central Government over them and to bind them to a debt that could not be paid. First off you have to understand that the UNITED STATES is a corporation and that it existed before the Revolutionary war. See Respublica v. Sweers 1 Dallas 43. 28 U.S.C. 3002 (15)

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

Thanks for that turn around. Some good comments.

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

I think Di-ckead deserves the NWR treatment.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

You must know that you posting these comments is so dumb that no one, at least not this some one, will bother to reply to your silly unspecific and dreaming comments..

to dumb to comment about..

Find some other subject to rant about.. some thing that is real and in line with event of history or current time frame..

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

Ri-chard Loc: 23322

Again, you have no intelligent rebuttal because you can't handle the facts within your government documentation.
Go back to sleep unless you want to acquire some knowledge.

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

I see nothing in your posts that can pass as facts..

and now I see nothing in your post the rates any reply at all..

good night... try again tomorrow..

Ri-chard Loc: 23322

Can we discuss one event at a time? Who created the 1783 Treaty of Peace aka Treaty of Paris?

permafrost Loc: Minnesota

discrib what it is and post a link,, maybe we can..

Ri-chard Loc: 23322

https://911nwo.com/?p=7775
http://newensign.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/Legions-of-Satan-Banning.pdf
After this event Washington did not create a Doctrine of Conquest. This conquest document should have documented that a victorious nation (America) in war acquired sovereignty over the conquered nation (British Crown) and could exert its own legal and political jurisdiction chosen by its sovereign residents.
Note: The practice for creating a doctrine of conquest dates back at least to Roman law.

Also, excerpt from a 1956 speech, “GEORGE WASHINGTON’S SURRENDER” by Senator Joseph McCarthy (1908-1957.) on the Senate Record.
And many of the people of the land became Jews.” Esther 9:17.
“The confession of General Cornwallis to General Washington at Yorktown (Oct. 17, 1781) has been well hidden by historians. History books and text books have taught for years that when Cornwallis surrendered his army to General Washington that American independence came, and we lived happily ever after until the tribulations of the twentieth century.”

King's Trilateral Treaty
https://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/paris.asp
https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Franklin/01-40-02-0356
It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent Prince George the Third, by the grace of God, king of Great Britain, France, and Ireland, defender of the faith, duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, arch-treasurer and prince e*****r of the Holy Roman Empire etc., and of the United States of America etc.

King Georges capacities
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arch-Treasurer
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince-e*****r

LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago

Well, I tried. I closed my eyes. Counted to ten and opened them again. And your off topic post and crap is still there.