One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
The v****g bills. Who should be allowed to v**e? Age? Citizen? etc. #2
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
Jan 18, 2022 23:11:05   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
Suggested as a first point of a discussion about v****g laws.

My first point is absolutely Citizenship. You must be a citizen of America. Some places are now allowing non citizens to v**e in local e******ns. Well, hell no. Yes, I know they might live there, and some seem to want them to have a right to v**e in their locality. Why? Because it affects their lives too. But they could be v****g in people that make laws that might affect American citizens. No non citizen should ever have the right to create laws in any way that affect American citizens. You might live there, but this is our country. Now there are two types of people besides citizens who are residing in America. Those that are legally here and under a valid visa, like a tourist, student, business. And there are those that are here illegally. Neither should have any rights over citizens as to who are leaders are. Under no circumstances. Period.
Example. Small town. Many Muslins. Then the government dumps thousands of Afghanistan refugees there. They get a local option and v**e in all Muslims into Government and then they start changing laws to match Sharia laws and require head covering on women. So the non Muslim women in that town are now required to wear head scarves or wh**ever. It starts small. Would you put up with that, because of the v**es of non citizens. Hell no.

Now age limits. Personally I would like to see the age limit raised to 21, maybe even 25. At eighteen, most kids don't really know what these leaders will do to/for them. They would v**e in a rock star. V**e in free schooling and forgive student loans. Didn't we just do that? And look what we got. They did nothing to earn the right to v**e besides breathing. They have biased teachers brainwashing ideologies on them. They haven't been able to grow enough to really see and understand what these leaders will do to and for them in the future.

And yet, some want to give the v**e to 17 year olds and are already starting that with the right to v**e in primaries in some states and/or cities. And remember, they have even stopped teaching them Civics. They have never read the Constitution or even the Bill of Rights. And can't read the original version because it is in script. In other words, they are less intellectually qualified then newly sworn in citizens. Of course, if some have their way, blanket citizenship for i******s will even eliminate that.

Maybe a law that even citizens have to have a basic understanding of Civics, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights in order to v**e, isn't a bad idea. What say you?

One more thing about the age limit. And here is where I have a rough idea with changing to higher age limits. The military. If they will sign up to risk their lives in potential combat to defend our country, they should be able to v**e on who is creating or reacting to threats to our country and the preparedness for their ability to carry out the mission. I'm not sure on the age limits and would like to see your opinions.

Another question is criminals. Convicted felons doing time? No. Absolutely not. Out on probations? No, absolutely not. They are still serving time. Forever? No. There should be some time where they earn that right to v**e again. I'd rather see something like a time limit after they finished their sentence, in years or based on the length of the sentence and no trouble after they are set free. And maybe a one time limit on getting that right to v**e again.

People who are to incompetent to v**e? That gets tricky. There are some people who just don't know what the hell is happening. We already have that with those we can't refuse the right to v**e. I'm talking about things like low I. Q. I mean real low I. Q. Or senile. They might have enough reality to really like somone or h**e someone. But knowledge of a whole b****t. And who would be helping them fill in that b****t. Tricky, but worthy of consideration. But not at the forefront on the issues. Those previously stated.

Well, that is my piece. What say you. Strictly on who should have the right to v**e. Please stay on topic. More topics later. And remember. Keep this civil. We want to really hear from both sides on what and why. Sound reasons for your opinions. This is our country.

Logically Right

Reply
Jan 18, 2022 23:34:46   #
keepuphope Loc: Idaho
 
I actually agree with you there's not a country on earth that lets non-citizens v**e period.Agree on age limits. And mental illnesses of certain types also.AND A PICTURE ID. That's how I feel about it.

Reply
Jan 18, 2022 23:47:53   #
nonalien1 Loc: Mojave Desert
 
LogicallyRight wrote:
Suggested as a first point of a discussion about v****g laws.

My first point is absolutely Citizenship. You must be a citizen of America. Some places are now allowing non citizens to v**e in local e******ns. Well, hell no. Yes, I know they might live there, and some seem to want them to have a right to v**e in their locality. Why? Because it affects their lives too. But they could be v****g in people that make laws that might affect American citizens. No non citizen should ever have the right to create laws in any way that affect American citizens. You might live there, but this is our country. Now there are two types of people besides citizens who are residing in America. Those that are legally here and under a valid visa, like a tourist, student, business. And there are those that are here illegally. Neither should have any rights over citizens as to who are leaders are. Under no circumstances. Period.
Example. Small town. Many Muslins. Then the government dumps thousands of Afghanistan refugees there. They get a local option and v**e in all Muslims into Government and then they start changing laws to match Sharia laws and require head covering on women. So the non Muslim women in that town are now required to wear head scarves or wh**ever. It starts small. Would you put up with that, because of the v**es of non citizens. Hell no.

Now age limits. Personally I would like to see the age limit raised to 21, maybe even 25. At eighteen, most kids don't really know what these leaders will do to/for them. They would v**e in a rock star. V**e in free schooling and forgive student loans. Didn't we just do that? And look what we got. They did nothing to earn the right to v**e besides breathing. They have biased teachers brainwashing ideologies on them. They haven't been able to grow enough to really see and understand what these leaders will do to and for them in the future.

And yet, some want to give the v**e to 17 year olds and are already starting that with the right to v**e in primaries in some states and/or cities. And remember, they have even stopped teaching them Civics. They have never read the Constitution or even the Bill of Rights. And can't read the original version because it is in script. In other words, they are less intellectually qualified then newly sworn in citizens. Of course, if some have their way, blanket citizenship for i******s will even eliminate that.

Maybe a law that even citizens have to have a basic understanding of Civics, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights in order to v**e, isn't a bad idea. What say you?

One more thing about the age limit. And here is where I have a rough idea with changing to higher age limits. The military. If they will sign up to risk their lives in potential combat to defend our country, they should be able to v**e on who is creating or reacting to threats to our country and the preparedness for their ability to carry out the mission. I'm not sure on the age limits and would like to see your opinions.

Another question is criminals. Convicted felons doing time? No. Absolutely not. Out on probations? No, absolutely not. They are still serving time. Forever? No. There should be some time where they earn that right to v**e again. I'd rather see something like a time limit after they finished their sentence, in years or based on the length of the sentence and no trouble after they are set free. And maybe a one time limit on getting that right to v**e again.

People who are to incompetent to v**e? That gets tricky. There are some people who just don't know what the hell is happening. We already have that with those we can't refuse the right to v**e. I'm talking about things like low I. Q. I mean real low I. Q. Or senile. They might have enough reality to really like somone or h**e someone. But knowledge of a whole b****t. And who would be helping them fill in that b****t. Tricky, but worthy of consideration. But not at the forefront on the issues. Those previously stated.

Well, that is my piece. What say you. Strictly on who should have the right to v**e. Please stay on topic. More topics later. And remember. Keep this civil. We want to really hear from both sides on what and why. Sound reasons for your opinions. This is our country.

Logically Right
Suggested as a first point of a discussion about v... (show quote)


No on non citizens. 18 years old works for me . Maybe a high school diploma. When your off parole you should get your v****g privilege reinstated. Photo ID a must.

Reply
 
 
Jan 19, 2022 01:39:37   #
Ri-chard Loc: 23322
 
LogicallyRight wrote:
Suggested as a first point of a discussion about v****g laws.

My first point is absolutely Citizenship. You must be a citizen of America. Some places are now allowing non citizens to v**e in local e******ns. Well, hell no. Yes, I know they might live there, and some seem to want them to have a right to v**e in their locality. Why? Because it affects their lives too. But they could be v****g in people that make laws that might affect American citizens. No non citizen should ever have the right to create laws in any way that affect American citizens. You might live there, but this is our country. Now there are two types of people besides citizens who are residing in America. Those that are legally here and under a valid visa, like a tourist, student, business. And there are those that are here illegally. Neither should have any rights over citizens as to who are leaders are. Under no circumstances. Period.
Example. Small town. Many Muslins. Then the government dumps thousands of Afghanistan refugees there. They get a local option and v**e in all Muslims into Government and then they start changing laws to match Sharia laws and require head covering on women. So the non Muslim women in that town are now required to wear head scarves or wh**ever. It starts small. Would you put up with that, because of the v**es of non citizens. Hell no.

Now age limits. Personally I would like to see the age limit raised to 21, maybe even 25. At eighteen, most kids don't really know what these leaders will do to/for them. They would v**e in a rock star. V**e in free schooling and forgive student loans. Didn't we just do that? And look what we got. They did nothing to earn the right to v**e besides breathing. They have biased teachers brainwashing ideologies on them. They haven't been able to grow enough to really see and understand what these leaders will do to and for them in the future.

And yet, some want to give the v**e to 17 year olds and are already starting that with the right to v**e in primaries in some states and/or cities. And remember, they have even stopped teaching them Civics. They have never read the Constitution or even the Bill of Rights. And can't read the original version because it is in script. In other words, they are less intellectually qualified then newly sworn in citizens. Of course, if some have their way, blanket citizenship for i******s will even eliminate that.

Maybe a law that even citizens have to have a basic understanding of Civics, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights in order to v**e, isn't a bad idea. What say you?

One more thing about the age limit. And here is where I have a rough idea with changing to higher age limits. The military. If they will sign up to risk their lives in potential combat to defend our country, they should be able to v**e on who is creating or reacting to threats to our country and the preparedness for their ability to carry out the mission. I'm not sure on the age limits and would like to see your opinions.

Another question is criminals. Convicted felons doing time? No. Absolutely not. Out on probations? No, absolutely not. They are still serving time. Forever? No. There should be some time where they earn that right to v**e again. I'd rather see something like a time limit after they finished their sentence, in years or based on the length of the sentence and no trouble after they are set free. And maybe a one time limit on getting that right to v**e again.

People who are to incompetent to v**e? That gets tricky. There are some people who just don't know what the hell is happening. We already have that with those we can't refuse the right to v**e. I'm talking about things like low I. Q. I mean real low I. Q. Or senile. They might have enough reality to really like somone or h**e someone. But knowledge of a whole b****t. And who would be helping them fill in that b****t. Tricky, but worthy of consideration. But not at the forefront on the issues. Those previously stated.

Well, that is my piece. What say you. Strictly on who should have the right to v**e. Please stay on topic. More topics later. And remember. Keep this civil. We want to really hear from both sides on what and why. Sound reasons for your opinions. This is our country.

Logically Right
Suggested as a first point of a discussion about v... (show quote)


So you must be a Citizen Subject and Debt S***e to v**e. No sovereign men and women allowed, Right ?

Reply
Jan 19, 2022 02:09:33   #
LogicallyRight Loc: Chicago
 
Ri-chard wrote:
So you must be a Citizen Subject and Debt S***e to v**e. No sovereign men and women allowed, Right ?


I have no idea what the hell you are talking about. Do you? Debt s***e???????????? Please explain.

Reply
Jan 19, 2022 02:58:27   #
Ri-chard Loc: 23322
 
LogicallyRight wrote:
I have no idea what the hell you are talking about. Do you? Debt s***e???????????? Please explain.


Yes, you agreed to pay taxes on just about everything including your labor to NGOs. Why, because you agreed to be recognized as a citizen subject to their man-made laws. you are their Debt S***e.
Maybe, just maybe, if you knew your American history you would know of the frauds and deceits your Founding Father bestowed on you.

Reply
Jan 19, 2022 03:41:32   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
nonalien1 wrote:
No on non citizens. 18 years old works for me . Maybe a high school diploma. When your off parole you should get your v****g privilege reinstated. Photo ID a must.

Eighteen is too young. Most kids that age don't know s**t from shinola. When I was eighteen I v**ed Democrat. That was the last time. I went from high school to college and was properly impressed with how smart my professors were. I ran out of money and enlisted in the Army. After a hitch with Uncle Sam I went back to the same College and was appalled at how clueless these same professors were; not to mention the politicians I had once admired.
When I was a young man, college degrees were called sheepskins. Given a sample of some of the barely literate dickheads graduating today, perhaps they should start calling them foreskins.

Reply
 
 
Jan 19, 2022 07:03:30   #
PeterS
 
LogicallyRight wrote:
Suggested as a first point of a discussion about v****g laws.

My first point is absolutely Citizenship. You must be a citizen of America. Some places are now allowing non citizens to v**e in local e******ns. Well, hell no. Yes, I know they might live there, and some seem to want them to have a right to v**e in their locality. Why? Because it affects their lives too. But they could be v****g in people that make laws that might affect American citizens. No non citizen should ever have the right to create laws in any way that affect American citizens. You might live there, but this is our country. Now there are two types of people besides citizens who are residing in America. Those that are legally here and under a valid visa, like a tourist, student, business. And there are those that are here illegally. Neither should have any rights over citizens as to who are leaders are. Under no circumstances. Period.
Example. Small town. Many Muslins. Then the government dumps thousands of Afghanistan refugees there. They get a local option and v**e in all Muslims into Government and then they start changing laws to match Sharia laws and require head covering on women. So the non Muslim women in that town are now required to wear head scarves or wh**ever. It starts small. Would you put up with that, because of the v**es of non citizens. Hell no.

Now age limits. Personally I would like to see the age limit raised to 21, maybe even 25. At eighteen, most kids don't really know what these leaders will do to/for them. They would v**e in a rock star. V**e in free schooling and forgive student loans. Didn't we just do that? And look what we got. They did nothing to earn the right to v**e besides breathing. They have biased teachers brainwashing ideologies on them. They haven't been able to grow enough to really see and understand what these leaders will do to and for them in the future.

And yet, some want to give the v**e to 17 year olds and are already starting that with the right to v**e in primaries in some states and/or cities. And remember, they have even stopped teaching them Civics. They have never read the Constitution or even the Bill of Rights. And can't read the original version because it is in script. In other words, they are less intellectually qualified then newly sworn in citizens. Of course, if some have their way, blanket citizenship for i******s will even eliminate that.

Maybe a law that even citizens have to have a basic understanding of Civics, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights in order to v**e, isn't a bad idea. What say you?

One more thing about the age limit. And here is where I have a rough idea with changing to higher age limits. The military. If they will sign up to risk their lives in potential combat to defend our country, they should be able to v**e on who is creating or reacting to threats to our country and the preparedness for their ability to carry out the mission. I'm not sure on the age limits and would like to see your opinions.

Another question is criminals. Convicted felons doing time? No. Absolutely not. Out on probations? No, absolutely not. They are still serving time. Forever? No. There should be some time where they earn that right to v**e again. I'd rather see something like a time limit after they finished their sentence, in years or based on the length of the sentence and no trouble after they are set free. And maybe a one time limit on getting that right to v**e again.

People who are to incompetent to v**e? That gets tricky. There are some people who just don't know what the hell is happening. We already have that with those we can't refuse the right to v**e. I'm talking about things like low I. Q. I mean real low I. Q. Or senile. They might have enough reality to really like somone or h**e someone. But knowledge of a whole b****t. And who would be helping them fill in that b****t. Tricky, but worthy of consideration. But not at the forefront on the issues. Those previously stated.

Well, that is my piece. What say you. Strictly on who should have the right to v**e. Please stay on topic. More topics later. And remember. Keep this civil. We want to really hear from both sides on what and why. Sound reasons for your opinions. This is our country.

Logically Right
Suggested as a first point of a discussion about v... (show quote)

Who? No one who participated in an i**********n against this country? I would start there and move down.

Reply
Jan 19, 2022 07:31:28   #
River Reb Loc: MS Delta
 
PeterS wrote:
Who? No one who participated in an i**********n against this country? I would start there and move down.


I agree. Nobody in b*m or a****a should v**e.

Reply
Jan 19, 2022 07:37:51   #
guzzimaestro
 
...and no machines connected to the internet, no Soros owned machines

Reply
Jan 19, 2022 10:06:23   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
LogicallyRight wrote:
Suggested as a first point of a discussion about v****g laws.

My first point is absolutely Citizenship. You must be a citizen of America. Some places are now allowing non citizens to v**e in local e******ns. Well, hell no. Yes, I know they might live there, and some seem to want them to have a right to v**e in their locality. Why? Because it affects their lives too. But they could be v****g in people that make laws that might affect American citizens. No non citizen should ever have the right to create laws in any way that affect American citizens. You might live there, but this is our country. Now there are two types of people besides citizens who are residing in America. Those that are legally here and under a valid visa, like a tourist, student, business. And there are those that are here illegally. Neither should have any rights over citizens as to who are leaders are. Under no circumstances. Period.
Example. Small town. Many Muslins. Then the government dumps thousands of Afghanistan refugees there. They get a local option and v**e in all Muslims into Government and then they start changing laws to match Sharia laws and require head covering on women. So the non Muslim women in that town are now required to wear head scarves or wh**ever. It starts small. Would you put up with that, because of the v**es of non citizens. Hell no.

Now age limits. Personally I would like to see the age limit raised to 21, maybe even 25. At eighteen, most kids don't really know what these leaders will do to/for them. They would v**e in a rock star. V**e in free schooling and forgive student loans. Didn't we just do that? And look what we got. They did nothing to earn the right to v**e besides breathing. They have biased teachers brainwashing ideologies on them. They haven't been able to grow enough to really see and understand what these leaders will do to and for them in the future.

And yet, some want to give the v**e to 17 year olds and are already starting that with the right to v**e in primaries in some states and/or cities. And remember, they have even stopped teaching them Civics. They have never read the Constitution or even the Bill of Rights. And can't read the original version because it is in script. In other words, they are less intellectually qualified then newly sworn in citizens. Of course, if some have their way, blanket citizenship for i******s will even eliminate that.

Maybe a law that even citizens have to have a basic understanding of Civics, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights in order to v**e, isn't a bad idea. What say you?

One more thing about the age limit. And here is where I have a rough idea with changing to higher age limits. The military. If they will sign up to risk their lives in potential combat to defend our country, they should be able to v**e on who is creating or reacting to threats to our country and the preparedness for their ability to carry out the mission. I'm not sure on the age limits and would like to see your opinions.

Another question is criminals. Convicted felons doing time? No. Absolutely not. Out on probations? No, absolutely not. They are still serving time. Forever? No. There should be some time where they earn that right to v**e again. I'd rather see something like a time limit after they finished their sentence, in years or based on the length of the sentence and no trouble after they are set free. And maybe a one time limit on getting that right to v**e again.

People who are to incompetent to v**e? That gets tricky. There are some people who just don't know what the hell is happening. We already have that with those we can't refuse the right to v**e. I'm talking about things like low I. Q. I mean real low I. Q. Or senile. They might have enough reality to really like somone or h**e someone. But knowledge of a whole b****t. And who would be helping them fill in that b****t. Tricky, but worthy of consideration. But not at the forefront on the issues. Those previously stated.

Well, that is my piece. What say you. Strictly on who should have the right to v**e. Please stay on topic. More topics later. And remember. Keep this civil. We want to really hear from both sides on what and why. Sound reasons for your opinions. This is our country.

Logically Right
Suggested as a first point of a discussion about v... (show quote)


We are all in this together. Everyone should be allowed to v**e. We all pay taxes.
Which one person stands taller than the rest should decide who v**es. Nobody. This could be accomplished by consensus of the majority.
It’s called Democracy.
E Pluribus Unum.
Of Many One .

Reply
 
 
Jan 19, 2022 10:13:57   #
Milosia2 Loc: Cleveland Ohio
 
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
Eighteen is too young. Most kids that age don't know s**t from shinola. When I was eighteen I v**ed Democrat. That was the last time. I went from high school to college and was properly impressed with how smart my professors were. I ran out of money and enlisted in the Army. After a hitch with Uncle Sam I went back to the same College and was appalled at how clueless these same professors were; not to mention the politicians I had once admired.
When I was a young man, college degrees were called sheepskins. Given a sample of some of the barely literate dickheads graduating today, perhaps they should start calling them foreskins.
Eighteen is too young. Most kids that age don't k... (show quote)


So, your brainwashing to become an upstanding Authoritarian began at an early age ?

When I was Young I was embarrassed about how stupid my father was . After a stint in the Military , coming home again I was amazed at how much the old man had learned. - author undetermined-
Robert Frost maybe.

Reply
Jan 19, 2022 10:23:15   #
Ri-chard Loc: 23322
 
Milosia2 wrote:
We are all in this together. Everyone should be allowed to v**e. We all pay taxes.
Which one person stands taller than the rest should decide who v**es. Nobody. This could be accomplished by consensus of the majority.
It’s called Democracy.
E Pluribus Unum.
Of Many One .


You mean a Republic. Not a Democracy as a steppingstone to Socialism and C*******m. Read Article IV Section 4 of the Constitution.

Reply
Jan 19, 2022 10:28:23   #
keepuphope Loc: Idaho
 
Milosia2 wrote:
We are all in this together. Everyone should be allowed to v**e. We all pay taxes.
Which one person stands taller than the rest should decide who v**es. Nobody. This could be accomplished by consensus of the majority.
It’s called Democracy.
E Pluribus Unum.
Of Many One .


Civics 101: Anyone v****g in any e******n MUST be a United States citizen.Its in our constitution. They can't change v**er laws by passing a bill. It has to be ratified to the constitution requiring a two thirds majority v**e. What's to stop other countries from flooding our borders with people and v****g in people who disregard our laws and abuse our constitution? Minnesota is an example of that. Omar is a product of just that problem.

Reply
Jan 19, 2022 10:33:20   #
FallenOak Loc: St George Utah
 
LogicallyRight wrote:
Suggested as a first point of a discussion about v****g laws.

My first point is absolutely Citizenship. You must be a citizen of America. Some places are now allowing non citizens to v**e in local e******ns. Well, hell no. Yes, I know they might live there, and some seem to want them to have a right to v**e in their locality. Why? Because it affects their lives too. But they could be v****g in people that make laws that might affect American citizens. No non citizen should ever have the right to create laws in any way that affect American citizens. You might live there, but this is our country. Now there are two types of people besides citizens who are residing in America. Those that are legally here and under a valid visa, like a tourist, student, business. And there are those that are here illegally. Neither should have any rights over citizens as to who are leaders are. Under no circumstances. Period.
Example. Small town. Many Muslins. Then the government dumps thousands of Afghanistan refugees there. They get a local option and v**e in all Muslims into Government and then they start changing laws to match Sharia laws and require head covering on women. So the non Muslim women in that town are now required to wear head scarves or wh**ever. It starts small. Would you put up with that, because of the v**es of non citizens. Hell no.

Now age limits. Personally I would like to see the age limit raised to 21, maybe even 25. At eighteen, most kids don't really know what these leaders will do to/for them. They would v**e in a rock star. V**e in free schooling and forgive student loans. Didn't we just do that? And look what we got. They did nothing to earn the right to v**e besides breathing. They have biased teachers brainwashing ideologies on them. They haven't been able to grow enough to really see and understand what these leaders will do to and for them in the future.

And yet, some want to give the v**e to 17 year olds and are already starting that with the right to v**e in primaries in some states and/or cities. And remember, they have even stopped teaching them Civics. They have never read the Constitution or even the Bill of Rights. And can't read the original version because it is in script. In other words, they are less intellectually qualified then newly sworn in citizens. Of course, if some have their way, blanket citizenship for i******s will even eliminate that.

Maybe a law that even citizens have to have a basic understanding of Civics, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights in order to v**e, isn't a bad idea. What say you?

One more thing about the age limit. And here is where I have a rough idea with changing to higher age limits. The military. If they will sign up to risk their lives in potential combat to defend our country, they should be able to v**e on who is creating or reacting to threats to our country and the preparedness for their ability to carry out the mission. I'm not sure on the age limits and would like to see your opinions.

Another question is criminals. Convicted felons doing time? No. Absolutely not. Out on probations? No, absolutely not. They are still serving time. Forever? No. There should be some time where they earn that right to v**e again. I'd rather see something like a time limit after they finished their sentence, in years or based on the length of the sentence and no trouble after they are set free. And maybe a one time limit on getting that right to v**e again.

People who are to incompetent to v**e? That gets tricky. There are some people who just don't know what the hell is happening. We already have that with those we can't refuse the right to v**e. I'm talking about things like low I. Q. I mean real low I. Q. Or senile. They might have enough reality to really like somone or h**e someone. But knowledge of a whole b****t. And who would be helping them fill in that b****t. Tricky, but worthy of consideration. But not at the forefront on the issues. Those previously stated.

Well, that is my piece. What say you. Strictly on who should have the right to v**e. Please stay on topic. More topics later. And remember. Keep this civil. We want to really hear from both sides on what and why. Sound reasons for your opinions. This is our country.

Logically Right
Suggested as a first point of a discussion about v... (show quote)


Paragraph one. You are correct. I have a bumper sticker that states, "Indians had bad i*********n l*ws".
Perhaps another for today, "America has bad i*********n l*ws".

Reply
Page 1 of 5 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.